Training, competency, and certification in cardiac CT: a summary statement from the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography

Level 1 of Entrustable Professional Activities in adult echocardiography: a position statement from the EACVI regarding the training and competence requirements for selecting and interpreting echocardiographic examinations

The goal of Level 1 training in echocardiography is to enable the trainee to select echocardiography appropriately for the evaluation of a specific clinical question, and then to interpret the report. It is not the goal of Level 1 training to teach how to perform the examination itself-that is the goal of higher levels of training. However, understanding the principles, indications, and findings of this crucial technique is valuable to many medical professionals including outside cardiology. This should be seen as part of a general understanding of cardiac imaging modalities. The purpose of this position statement is to define the scope and outline the general requirements for Level 1 training and competence in echocardiography. Moreover, the document aims to make a clear distinction between Level 1 competence in echocardiography and focus cardiac ultrasound (FoCUS).

Are Training Programs Ready for the Rapid Adoption of CCTA?: CBME in CCTA

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to assess training volumes and its relationship to learning and identify potential new thresholds for determining expertise.

BACKGROUND

Competency-based medical education (CBME) is being rapidly adopted and therefore training programs will need to adapt and identify new and novel methods of defining, measuring, and assessing clinical skills.

METHODS

Consecutive cardiac computed tomography (CT) studies were interpreted independently by trainees and expert readers, and their interpretations (Agatston score, coronary artery disease severity, and Coronary Artery Disease Reporting and Data System) were collected. Kappa agreements were measured between trainees and experts for every 50 consecutive cases. Agreements between trainees and experts were tracked and compared with the agreement between expert readers.

RESULTS

A total of 36 trainees interpreted 14,432 cardiac CT studies. Agreement between trainees and experts increased with CT case volumes, but trainees learned at different rates. Using a threshold for expertise, skill of measuring coronary calcification was achieved within 50 cases, but expertise for coronary CT angiography appeared to require a mean case volume of 750, comprising 400 abnormal cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Current volume-based training guidelines may be insufficient and higher case volumes may be required. We demonstrate that tracking cardiac CT learners is feasible and that CBME could be incorporated into CT training programs.

Trends in Cardiovascular MRI and CT in the U.S. Medicare Population from 2012 to 2017

Purpose

To assess the characteristics and trends of cardiovascular MRI and CT practitioners and practice in the United States.

Materials and Methods

A retrospective cross-sectional analysis of 2012-2017 Medicare Part B physician payments from the Provider Utilization and Payment Data Physician and Other Supplier Public Use Files (POSPUF) was performed. Characteristics of cardiovascular MRI and CT, including the number of providers and examinations, provider sex and location, and physician reimbursement were analyzed. Variable means, standard deviations, and changes per year were reported and compared.

Results

In 2017, 582 physicians provided cardiovascular MRI services in 45 states, a 16.6% increase from 2016 and an 84.8% increase from 2012. A total of 1645 physicians provided cardiovascular CT services in 49 states, a 14.2% increase from 2016 and a 77.3% increase from 2012. Of the providers, 18.0% and 13.3% of cardiovascular MRI and CT providers were women, respectively, similar to providers' respective medical specialties. Only 1.0% of radiologists and 0.2% of cardiologists provided cardiovascular MRI services. A total of 3.2% of radiologists and 0.5% of cardiologists provided cardiovascular CT services. Both cardiovascular MRI use (+75.5%) and cardiovascular CT use (+97.4%) increased markedly over the 6-year study period.

Conclusion

Although the availability of cardiovascular MRI and CT is increasing, both are used less frequently in comparison with other cardiovascular imaging modalities.See also the commentary by Bierhals in this issue.Supplemental material is available for this article.© RSNA, 2021.

Evaluation of Myocardial Perfusion by Computed Tomography - Principles, Technical Background and Recommendations

Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) has gained a prominent role in the evaluation of coronary artery disease. However, its anatomical nature does not allow the evaluation of the functional repercussion of coronary obstructions. It has been made possible to evaluate Myocardial computed tomography perfusion (Myocardial CTP) recently, based on myocardial contrast changes related to coronary stenoses. Several studies have validated this technique against the anatomical reference method (cardiac catheterization) and other functional methods, including myocardial perfusion scintigraphy and fractional flow reserve. The Myocardial CTP is performed in conjunction with the CCTA, a combined analysis of anatomy and function. The stress phase (with assessment of myocardial perfusion) can be performed before or after the resting phase (assessment of resting perfusion and coronary arteries), and different acquisition parameters are proposed according to the protocol and type of equipment used. Stressors used are based on coronary vasodilation (e.g. dipyridamole, adenosine). Image interpretation, similar to other perfusion assessment methods, is based on the identification and quantification of myocardial perfusion defects. The integration of both perfusion and anatomical findings is fundamental for the examination interpretation algorithm, allowing to define if the stenoses identified are hemodynamically significant and may be related to myocardial ischemia.

Central Core Laboratory versus Site Interpretation of Coronary CT Angiography: Agreement and Association with Cardiovascular Events in the PROMISE Trial

Purpose To assess concordance and relative prognostic utility between central core laboratory and local site interpretation for significant coronary artery disease (CAD) and cardiovascular events. Materials and Methods In the Prospective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain (PROMISE) trial, readers at 193 North American sites interpreted coronary computed tomographic (CT) angiography as part of the clinical evaluation of stable chest pain. Readers at a central core laboratory also interpreted CT angiography blinded to clinical data, site interpretation, and outcomes. Significant CAD was defined as stenosis greater than or equal to 50%; cardiovascular events were defined as a composite of cardiovascular death or myocardial infarction. Results In 4347 patients (51.8% women; mean age ± standard deviation, 60.4 years ± 8.2), core laboratory and site interpretations were discordant in 16% (683 of 4347), most commonly because of a finding of significant CAD by site but not by core laboratory interpretation (80%, 544 of 683). Overall, core laboratory interpretation resulted in 41% fewer patients being reported as having significant CAD (14%, 595 of 4347 vs 23%, 1000 of 4347; P < .001). Over a median follow-up period of 25 months, 1.3% (57 of 4347) sustained myocardial infarction or cardiovascular death. The C statistic for future myocardial infarction or cardiovascular death was 0.61 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.54, 0.68) for the core laboratory and 0.63 (95% CI: 0.56, 0.70) for the sites. Conclusion Compared with interpretation by readers at 193 North American sites, standardized core laboratory interpretation classified 41% fewer patients as having significant CAD. ^© RSNA, 2017 Online supplemental material is available for this article. Clinical trial registration no. NCT01174550.

Current utilization of cardiac computed tomography in mainland China: A national survey

BACKGROUND

Surveys that describe the utilization of cardiac CT are available for the United States, Germany, and Taiwan, but not mainland China.

OBJECTIVES

To analyze the clinical utilization of cardiac CT in mainland China.

METHODS

A 25-item questionnaire was created and 240 tertiary hospitals were randomly selected to participate. Survey data were collected and confirmed by email as well as phone interviews.

RESULTS

In total, 237 (99%) hospitals consented to this survey, but 85 were excluded because of lack of cardiac CT patient volume or advanced technology. Finally, 152 (64%) questionnaires were available for analysis. Median patient volume was 1,037 patients (range: 150-8,072) annually. The most common clinical indications for coronary CT angiography were exclusion of coronary artery disease in patients with low to intermediate pretest likelihood, asymptomatic individuals with cardiovascular risk factors, and follow-up after coronary bypass grafting. The median heart rate threshold for beta blocker administration was >70 beats/min; most centers (86%) used sublingual nitroglycerin. Prospectively ECG triggered acquisition was the predominant technique in 44% of hospitals. Most (59%) providers adjusted the tube current to the body mass, but few (16%) adjusted the contrast injection rate. Per case, the mean examination duration was 14.2 min; post-processing time 13.6 min; and reporting time 18.0 min.

CONCLUSIONS

Cardiac CT is widely established in clinical practice in mainland China but there is a need for more uniform standards regarding performance and clinical utilization.

Monochromatic image reconstruction by dual energy imaging allows half iodine load computed tomography coronary angiography

PURPOSE

To compare image interpretability and diagnostic performance of dual-energy CT coronary angiography (DE-CTCA) performed with 50% iodine load reduction versus single energy acquisitions (SE-CTCA) with full iodine load.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The present prospective study involved patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) clinically referred for CTCA. DE-CTCA with 50% iodine volume load was performed first, and after heart rate returned to baseline SE-CTCA was performed using full iodine volume load. The primary endpoint was to compare image interpretability between groups. DE-CTCA was performed by rapid switching between low and high tube potentials (80-140 kV) from a single source, allowing the generation of monochromatic image reconstructions ranging from 40 to 140 keV. Image quality assessment was performed using a 5-point Likert scale.

RESULTS

Thirty-six patients constituted the study population. The mean heart rate before the CT scan (DE-CTCA 57.3 ± 10.7 bpm vs. SE-CTCA 58.5 ± 11.2 bpm, p=0.29) and the mean effective radiation dose (3.5 ± 1.9 mSv vs. 3.8 ± 0.9 mSv, p=0.48) did not differ between groups. Likert image quality scores were similar between groups (DE-CTCA 4.42 ± 0.98 vs. SE-CTCA 4.43 ± 0.84, p=0.67). Signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratios were significantly lower with DE-CTCA, driven by lower signal density levels at 60 keV compared to SE-CTCA. The sensitivity and specificity for the detection of stenosis >50% was indistinguishable between groups (DE-CTCA 84.4% (69.9-93.0%), 87.1% (81.6-91.2%); SE-CTCA 84.4% (69.9-93.0%), 87.1% (81.6-91.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

In this pilot, prospective study, dual energy CTCA imaging with half iodine load achieved comparable interpretability than full iodine load with single energy CTCA.

Cardiothoracic imaging guidelines in quality improvement

The goal of this review article is to highlight the appropriateness criteria programs available to clinicians, to review the current state of decision-support systems for imaging, and to briefly review the accreditation requirements currently in place in cardiothoracic imaging.