Do cystic fibrosis centres with the lowest FEV1 still use the least amount of intravenous antibiotics? A registry-based comparison of intravenous antibiotic use among adult CF centres in the UK

Association of Pseudomonas aeruginosa incident infections with adherence to cystic fibrosis foundation care guidelines

BACKGROUND

Care guidelines for cystic fibrosis (CF) have been developed to enhance consistent care and to improve health outcomes. We determined if adherence to CF care guidelines predicted P. aeruginosa incidence rates (Pa-IR) at U.S. CF centers in 2018.

METHODS

This cross-sectional CF Foundation Patient Registry study included 82 adult and 132 pediatric centers. Adherence to 12 guidelines was defined categorically (guideline met) or as a continuous measure (proportion of patients being treated/evaluated per guideline). Association of adherence to individual guidelines with Pa-IR, accounted for center and patient characteristics relevant to Pa-IR and were modeled using random forests and weighted-least-squares (WLS) analyses.

RESULTS

The mean Pa-IR was 0.2 cases/patient-years at risk (SE 0.0074) for all centers combined. Guideline adherence was lowest for ≥4 bacterial cultures/year (54% of centers) and annual oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) (48% of centers), and highest for annual non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) sputum culture (98%). The mean number of guidelines met was 6.7 and higher for pediatric (7.3) than adult (5.6) centers, (p<0.001). The number of guidelines met correlated negatively with Pa-IR (β=-0.007, p = 0.043). Macrolide prescription and annual OGTT per guideline were associated with lower and higher Pa-IR, respectively. Centers with lower center-wide lung function, higher proportion of pwCF with low body-mass index, and location in the Southwest had higher Pa-IR.

CONCLUSION

Overall adherence to guidelines was high except for performing ≥4 bacterial cultures/year and OGTT. Higher Pa-IR was associated with center characteristics and lower guideline adherence. The lower Pa-IR with greater adherence to guidelines suggests that focusing on quality care can positively impact Pa-IR.

Assessing the health risk of living near composting facilities on lung health, fungal and bacterial disease in cystic fibrosis: a UK CF Registry study

AIM

To explore the health risk of living near permitted composting sites (PCSs) on disease severity in children and adults with cystic fibrosis (CF) across the UK.  METHODS: A semi-individual cross-sectional study was used to examine the risk of disease severity in people with CF (pwCF) within and beyond 4 km of PCSs in the UK in 2016. All pwCF registered in the UK CF Registry were eligible for this study. Linear and Poisson regressions, adjusted for age, gender, genotype, BMI, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and deprivation, were used to quantify associations between distance to a PCS and percent predicted forced expiratory volume in one second (ppFEV₁), pulmonary exacerbations (#IVdays), and fungal and bacterial infections.

RESULTS

The mean age of the 9,361 pwCF (3,931 children and 5,430 adults) studied was 20.1 (SD = 14.1) years; 53.3% were male; and 49.2% were homozygous F508del. Over 10% of pwCF (n = 1,015) lived within 4 km of a PCS. We found no statistically significant difference in ppFEV₁ and #IVdays/year in children. However, in adults, ppFEV₁ was -1.07% lower (95% confidence interval (CI): -2.29%, 0.16%) and #IVdays/year were 1.02 day higher (95%CI: 1.01, 1.04) within 4 km of a PCS. Furthermore, there were statistically significant differences in mean ppFEV₁ in CF adults with Aspergillus fumigatus (58.2.% vs 62.0%, p = 0.005) and Candida spp. (56.9% vs 59.9%, p = 0.029) residing within 4 km of a PCS. No associations were identified for allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis, P. aeruginosa or Staphylococcus aureus.

CONCLUSIONS

This novel national study provides evidence that adults with CF living near a PCS may experience small reductions in lung function, an increased risk of pulmonary exacerbations, and more frequent fungal infections. If confirmed by studies using refined exposure assessment methods accounting for bioaerosol dispersion, these results could have important implications for the living environment of pwCF.

Implementing the use of objective medication adherence data in routine clinical practice via the digital CFHealthHub platform: situation analysis and strategy development using the theoretical domains framework

Background

Preventative inhaled treatments preserve lung function and reduce exacerbations in cystic fibrosis (CF). Self-reported adherence to these treatments is over-estimated. An online platform (CFHealthHub) has been developed with patients and clinicians to display real-time objective adherence data from dose-counting nebulisers, so that clinical teams can offer informed treatment support.

Methods

In this paper, we identify pre-implementation barriers to healthcare practitioners performing two key behaviours: accessing objective adherence data through the website CFHealthHub and discussing medication adherence with patients. We aimed to understand barriers during the pre-implementation phase, so that appropriate strategy could be developed for the scale up of implementing objective adherence data in 19 CF centres.

Thirteen semi-structured interviews were conducted with healthcare practitioners working in three UK CF centres. Qualitative data were coded using the theoretical domains framework (TDF), which describes 14 validated domains to implementation behaviour change.

Results

Analysis indicated that an implementation strategy should address all 14 domains of the TDF to successfully support implementation. Participants did not report routines or habits for using objective adherence data in clinical care. Examples of salient barriers included skills, beliefs in consequences, and social influence and professional roles. The results also affirmed a requirement to address organisational barriers. Relevant behaviour change techniques were selected to develop implementation strategy modules using the behaviour change wheel approach to intervention development.

Conclusions

This paper demonstrates the value of applying the TDF at pre-implementation, to understand context and to support the development of a situationally relevant implementation strategy.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s43058-022-00263-9.

An Animated Functional Data Analysis Interface to Cluster Rapid Lung Function Decline and Enhance Center-Level Care in Cystic Fibrosis

Identifying disease progression through enhanced decision support tools is key to chronic management in cystic fibrosis at both the patient and care center level. Rapid decline in lung function relative to patient level and center norms is an important predictor of outcomes. Our objectives were to construct and utilize center-level classification of rapid decliners to develop an animated dashboard for comparisons within patients over time, multiple patients within centers, or between centers. A functional data analysis technique known as functional principal components analysis was applied to lung function trajectories from 18,387 patients across 247 accredited centers followed through the United States Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry, in order to cluster patients into rapid decline phenotypes. Smaller centers (<30 patients) had older patients with lower baseline lung function and less severe rates of decline and had maximal decline later, compared to medium (30-150 patients) or large (>150 patients) centers. Small centers also had the lowest prevalence of early rapid decliners (17.7%, versus 24% and 25.7% for medium and large centers, resp.). The animated functional data analysis dashboard illustrated clustering and center-specific summaries of the rapid decline phenotypes. Clinical scenarios and utility of the center-level functional principal components analysis (FPCA) approach are considered and discussed.

Longitudinal effects of ivacaftor and medicine possession ratio in people with the Gly551Asp mutation: a 5-year study

INTRODUCTION

Ivacaftor was the first therapy licensed to address the underlying defect in cystic fibrosis (CF). The improvements in lung function, nutritional status and pulmonary exacerbations in patients carrying a Gly551Asp mutation were greater than previously seen in clinical trials for other therapies. Limited data are available regarding long-term outcomes and adherence to ivacaftor outside clinical trials.

METHODS

We conducted a 5-year single-centre retrospective study of people with CF carrying the Gly551Asp mutation who received ivacaftor. Clinical outcome data were extracted from medical notes and databases. Drug delivery data were used to assess medicine possession ratio (MPR).

RESULTS

35 people were included. After commencing ivacaftor, FEV₁ improved by 9.6% (SE±1.59%) predicted by 6 months. Thereafter, FEV₁ declined, and at 5 years had returned to pre-ivacaftor baseline. Ivacaftor did not alter annual rate of FEV₁ decline (1.57% pre vs 1.82% post, p=0.74). Body mass index (BMI) increased for 4 years. There was a significant reduction in inpatient and total intravenous antibiotic days sustained over 5 years. MPR remained high but declined over time (-2.5±0.9% per year, p=0.007). FEV₁ was better maintained in patients with higher MPRs.

CONCLUSION

The addition of ivacaftor provides acute benefits for people with the Gly551Asp mutation and established lung disease. We report a sustained reduction in intravenous antibiotic use but following acute improvement in lung function, decline continues, and patients will continue to require medical observation and optimisation. Strategies to maintain high adherence should be a priority to prolong the benefits of ivacaftor.

Understanding FEV1 for the purpose of cystic fibrosis registry comparisons: Does bias in annual review FEV1 affect between-centre comparison within the UK? An analysis of registry data

RATIONALE, AIMS, AND OBJECTIVE

We previously demonstrated that annual review %FEV₁ underestimates lung health of adults with CF compared with %FEV₁ captured during periods of clinical stability. This has implications in the comparisons against registries with encounter-based FEV₁ , such as the United States. It is uncertain whether this bias affects between-centre comparison within the United Kingdom. Previous funnel plot analyses have identified variation in annual review %FEV₁ according to centre size; hence, we investigated whether paired differences between annual review and best %FEV₁ also vary according to centre size.

METHODS

This registry analysis included 18 adult CF centres in the United Kingdom with ≥80% completeness for best FEV₁ data in 2014. Mean discrepancy between annual review and best %FEV₁ is a surrogate for the extent by which annual review %FEV₁ underestimates lung health, and was plotted against centre size. A local polynomial regression (LOESS) curve was used to explore the relationship between the two variables. An appropriate model is fitted based on the LOESS curve to determine the strength of relationship between discrepancies in %FEV₁ and centre size.

RESULTS

There is an inverted U-shaped relationship between mean discrepancies in %FEV₁ and centre size. A regression of the paired mean difference in %FEV₁ against centre size showed a significant improvement in the goodness of fit for a quadratic model (R²  = 23.8% for a quadratic model compared with 0.4% for a linear one; P = 0.048 for the quadratic term).

CONCLUSIONS

Annual review %FEV₁ underestimated lung health of adults from small and large centres in the United Kingdom to a greater extent compared with medium-sized centres. A plot of %FEV₁ against centre size (eg, funnel plot comparison) would be affected by systematic bias in annual review %FEV₁ . Therefore, annual review %FEV₁ is an unreliable metric to compare health outcomes of adult CF centres within the United Kingdom.

Cystic fibrosis year in review 2018, part 2

Cystic fibrosis (CF) research and case reports were robust in the year 2018. This report summarizes publications related the multisystem effects of CF, pulmonary exacerbations, new and expanded therapies other than cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator modulator studies, and patient-reported priorities and outcomes.

Intravenous antibiotic use and exacerbation events in an adult cystic fibrosis centre: A prospective observational study

INTRODUCTION

In CF, people with higher FEV₁ are less aggressively treated with intravenous (IV) antibiotics, with resultant negative impact on their health outcomes. This could be entirely clinician-driven, but patient choice may also influence IV use. In this prospective observational study, we explored IV recommendations by clinicians and IV acceptance by adults with CF to understand how clinical presentations consistent with exacerbations resulted in IV use.

METHODS

Clinical presentations consistent with exacerbations, IV recommendation by clinicians and IV acceptance by patients were prospectively identified for every adult with CF in Sheffield throughout 2016, excluding those who had lung transplantation (n = 7) or on ivacaftor (n = 13). Relevant demographic data, e.g. %FEV₁, were extracted from medical records. Multi-level mixed-effects logistic regression models were used to compare IV recommendations vs non-recommendations for all clinical encounters, and IV acceptance vs non-acceptance for all IV recommendations.

RESULTS

Among 186 adults (median age 27 years, median FEV₁ 78.5%), there were 434 exacerbation events and 318 IV use episodes following 1010 clinical encounters. Only 254 (58.5%) of exacerbations were IV treated. A diagnosis of exacerbation, higher number of symptoms and lower %FEV₁ were independent predictors for IV recommendation by clinicians. Higher number of symptoms and lower %FEV₁ were also independent predictors for IV acceptance by adults with CF.

CONCLUSIONS

Lower IV use among adults with higher %FEV₁ was influenced by both clinicians' and patients' decisions. Using IV antibiotics as an exacerbation surrogate could under-estimate exacerbation rates and conceal differential treatment decisions according to varying clinical characteristics.

Identifying exceptional cystic fibrosis care services: combining statistical process control with focus groups

Background

The Cystic Fibrosis (CF) Registry collects clinical data on all patients attending specialist CF centres in the UK. These data have been used to make comparisons between centres on key outcomes such as forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) using simple rankings, which promote the assumption that those with the highest measures provide ‘better’ care.

Objectives

To explore whether or not using statistical ‘process control’ charts that move away from league tables and adjusting for case mix (age, where appropriate; sex; CF genotype; pancreatic sufficiency; and socioeconomic status) could identify exceptional CF care services in terms of clinically meaningful outcomes. Then, using insight from patients and clinicians on what structures, processes and policies are necessary for delivering good CF care, to explore whether or not care is associated with observed differences in outcomes.

Design

Cross-sectional analyses.

Setting

Specialist CF centres in the UK.

Participants

Patients aged ≥ 6 years attending specialist CF centres and clinicians at these centres.

Main outcome measures

FEV1% predicted.

Data sources

Annual reviews taken from the UK CF Registry (2007–15).

Results

We studied FEV1 in many different ways and in different periods. In our analyses of both adult and paediatric centres, we observed that some centres showed repeated evidence of ‘special-cause variation’, with mean FEV1 being greater than the mean in some cases and lower than the mean in others. Some of these differences were explained by statistical adjustment for different measures of case mix, such as age, socioeconomic status, genotype and pancreatic sufficiency. After adjustment, there was some remaining evidence of special-cause variation for some centres. Our data at these centres suggest that there may be an association with the use of intravenous antibiotics. Workshops and focus groups with clinicians at paediatric and adult centres identified a number of structures, processes and policies that were felt to be associated with good care. From these, questionnaires for CF centre directors were developed and disseminated. However, the response rate was low, limiting the questionnaires’ use. Focus groups with patients to gain their insights into what is necessary for the delivery of good care identified themes similar to those identified by clinicians, and a patient questionnaire was developed based on these insights.

Limitations

Our data analyses suggest that differences in intravenous antibiotic usage may be associated with centre-level outcomes; this needs to be explored further in partnership with the centres. Our survey of centre directors yielded a low response, making it difficult to gain useful knowledge to inform further discussions with sites.

Conclusions

Our findings confirm that the CF Registry can be used to identify differences in clinical outcomes between centres and that case mix might explain some of these differences. As such, adjustment for case mix is essential when trying to understand how and why centres differ from the mean.

Future work

Future work will involve exploring with clinicians how care is delivered so that we can understand associations between care and outcomes. Patients will also be asked for their perspectives on the care they receive.

Funding

The National Institute for Health Research Health Services and Delivery Research programme.

Reevaluating approaches to cystic fibrosis pulmonary exacerbations

Cystic Fibrosis (CF) lung disease is characterized by intermittent acute episodes of worsening signs, symptoms, and pulmonary function; these so-called pulmonary exacerbations (PEx) appear to be important drivers of long-term declines in lung function, quality of life, and life expectancy. Surveillance for development of PEx and their treatment is a fundamental component of chronic CF management, and the merits of novel CF therapies are often judged based on their ability to reduce the frequency of PEx. Given the central role that they play, it is surprising how poorly PEx are understood, how thin is the evidence base for their treatment and how often they are left unrecognized and untreated in clinical practice. This paper reviews what is known and what is unknown regarding the nature of PEx, and discusses the impact of missed recognition and treatment of these episodes as well as the apparent variation in practice across CF care centers. The arguments supporting a liberal, highly sensitive approach to the diagnosis of PEx are presented, as well as recommendation for how care programs can achieve consistency in their early recognition and treatment. A stepwise approach to personalized treatment supported by close follow-up to ensure the successful resolution of all signs and symptoms will lead to the stabilization of patients' lung function and quality of life. Recommendations are made regarding important priorities for research into evidence-based approaches to improving the care of PEx.

The importance of data issues when comparing cystic fibrosis registry outcomes between countries: Are annual review FEV1 in the UK only collected when subjects are well?

RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVE

Cross-country comparisons of cystic fibrosis (CF) outcomes can potentially identify variation in care but are dependent on data quality. An important assumption is that the UK annual review FEV₁ is only collected during periods of clinical stability. If this assumption does not hold, results of FEV₁ comparisons may be biased in favour of registries with encounter-based FEV₁ . We aimed to test the assumption that CF annual reviews in the UK are only performed during periods of clinical stability.

METHOD

Prospective encounter-based data collected in Sheffield (n = 174) was used to establish whether annual review FEV₁ were always collected during periods of clinical stability and to determine the group-level discrepancy between annual review vs best FEV₁ . We then went on to quantify the group-level discrepancy between annual review and best annual FEV₁ readings within the UK registry (n = 2995) to determine if the differences observed in Sheffield also apply to the wider UK data.

RESULTS

Sheffield results showed a group-level discrepancy between best and annual review FEV₁ of -2.5% (95% CI -3.95% to -1.2%) for annual reviews performed during periods of clinical stability (n = 50). The group-level discrepancy is larger at -8.0% (95% CI -11.2% to -4.9%) among annual reviews performed during periods of clinical instability (n = 13). Therefore, the magnitude of this group-level discrepancy is a surrogate for the proportion of clinically stable annual reviews-smaller discrepancy indicates a higher proportion of clinically stable annual reviews and vice versa. The overall group-level discrepancy in the UK registry (-5.6%, 95% CI -5.9 to -5.4%) was similar to Sheffield (-6.1%, 95% CI -7.1 to -5.1%). Around 20% of the clinician reviewed, annual reviews in Sheffield were performed during periods of clinically instability.

CONCLUSIONS

Annual review FEV₁ underestimates lung health of adults with CF in the UK and may bias cross-country comparisons.

Recent advances in the understanding and management of cystic fibrosis pulmonary exacerbations

Pulmonary exacerbations are common events in cystic fibrosis and have a profound impact on quality of life, morbidity, and mortality. Pulmonary exacerbation outcomes remain poor and a significant proportion of patients fail to recover their baseline lung function despite receiving aggressive treatment with intravenous antibiotics. This focused review provides an update on some of the recent advances that have taken place in our understanding of the epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of pulmonary exacerbations in cystic fibrosis as well as direction for future study.