A year in review: Real world evidence, functional monitoring and emerging therapeutics in 2021

Telemedicine and home spirometry in cystic fibrosis: A prospective multicenter study

OBJECTIVES

Telehealth and home spirometry feasibility for children has been established, but their impact on cystic fibrosis (CF) disease progression remains unassessed. We aimed to evaluate the effects of telehealth and home spirometry on CF disease progression and care.

METHODS

Children with CF aged 5-17 years from all Swedish CF centers were provided with home spirometers. A minimum of two in-person visits were replaced with telemedicine visits and participants were instructed to conduct home spirometry before visits. Linear mixed-effects models were used to compare annual CF disease trajectories during the intervention period and prepandemic period (1 January 2019 to 28 February 2020). Participants and caregivers completed study questionnaires.

RESULTS

A total of 59 individuals completed the study over a mean (SD) period of 6.8 (1.4) months, made 3.1 (1.0) physical visits and 2.2 (0.6) telehealth visits per patient year during the study period. The mean difference (95% CI) between the intervention and prepandemic period progression rate for FEV1%, lung clearance index and BMI were -0.4 (-1.3 to 0.5, p = 0.39), 0.11 (-0.07 to 0.28, p = 0.25) and -0.02 (-0.13 to 0.08, p = 0.70), respectively. There were no major shifts in the incidence of airway pathogens, sputum cultures, or antibiotics use between the periods (p > 0.05). The intervention did not increase stress. Almost all participants and caregivers expressed a desire to continue with home spirometry and telemedicine.

CONCLUSION

Combining telehealth and physical visits with access to home spirometry demonstrated comparable effectiveness as exclusively in-person care with enhanced flexibility and personalization of CF care.

How Does the Corrected Exhalyzer Software Change the Predictive Value of LCI in Pulmonary Exacerbations in Children with Cystic Fibrosis?

Aim: Recently, the most commonly used for multiple breath washout device, the Exhalyzer D, has been shown to overestimate lung clearance index (LCI) results due to a software error. Our study aimed to compare the predictive values of LCI in the CF pulmonary exacerbations (PE) calculated with the updated (3.3.1) and the previous (3.2.1) version of the Spiroware software. Materials and Methods: The measurements were performed during 259 visits in CF pediatric patients. We used 39ΔPE pairs (PE preceded by stable visit) and 138ΔS pairs (stable visit preceded by stable visit) to compare the LCI changes during PE. The areas under the receiver operating curves (AUC^ROC) and odds ratios were calculated based on the differences between ΔPEs and ΔSs. The exacerbation risk was estimated using a logistic regression model with generalized estimating equations (GEE). Results: There were statistically significant differences in LCI 2.5% median values measured using the two versions of the software in the stable condition but not during PE. The AUC^ROC for changes between the two consecutive visits for LCI did not change significantly using the updated Spiroware software. Conclusions: Despite the lower median values, using the recalculated LCI values does not influence the diagnostic accuracy of this parameter in CF PE.

Respiratory Viruses and Cystic Fibrosis

The threat of respiratory virus infection to human health and well-being has been clearly highlighted by the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. For people with cystic fibrosis (CF), the clinical significance of viral infections long predated the emergence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. This article reviews the epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment of respiratory virus infection in the context of CF as well as the current understanding of interactions between viruses and other microorganisms in the CF lung. The incidence of respiratory virus infection in CF varies by age with young children typically experiencing more frequent episodes than adolescents and adults. At all ages, respiratory viruses are very common in CF and are associated with pulmonary exacerbations. Respiratory viruses are identified at up to 69% of exacerbations, while viruses are also frequently detected during clinical stability. The full impact of COVID-19 in CF is yet to be established. Early studies found that rates of COVID-19 were lower in CF cohorts than in the general population. The reasons for this are unclear but may be related to the effects of shielding, infection control practices, maintenance CF therapies, or the inflammatory milieu in the CF lung. Observational studies have consistently identified that prior solid organ transplantation is a key risk factor for poor outcomes from COVID-19 in CF. Several key priorities for future research are highlighted. First, the impact of highly effective CFTR modulator therapy on the epidemiology and pathophysiology of viral infections in CF requires investigation. Second, the impact of respiratory viruses on the development and dynamics of the CF lung microbiota is poorly understood and viral infection may have important interactions with bacteria and fungi in the airway. Finally, bacteriophages represent a key focus of future investigation both for their role in transmission of antimicrobial resistance and as a promising treatment modality for multiresistant pathogens.