Al-Hafidh NN, Al-Khatib AR, Al-Hafidh NN. Assessment of the cortical bone thickness by CT-scan and its association with orthodontic implant position in a young adult Eastern Mediterranean population: A cross sectional study.
Int Orthod 2020;
18:246-257. [PMID:
32147328 DOI:
10.1016/j.ortho.2020.02.001]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2019] [Revised: 01/31/2020] [Accepted: 02/04/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
This study was conducted to assess cortical bone thickness in the alveolar process of maxilla and mandible and to investigate its association with different orthodontic implant positions in Eastern Mediterranean young adults.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Computed tomography images of 50 patients aged between 18-35 years were included. Buccal, palatal and lingual cortical bone thicknesses were measured at 2, 4, 6, and 8mm from cemento-enamel junction starting from the mesial side of the second molar to the contralateral side. Pearson correlation was used to assess the association between cortical bone thickness and proposed orthodontic implant positions at all inter-radicular sites (p<0.05).
RESULTS
The highest value of buccal cortical bone thickness was found mesial to the second molar in the maxilla and mandible for both genders. The value of palatal cortical bone thickness was found to be at the highest rate mesial to canine and first premolar in males and females respectively. On the other hand, the highest value of lingual cortical bone thickness was recorded to be mesial to the first molar in both genders. In addition to that, the buccal cortical bone thickness was significantly higher than palatal at the area mesial to the second molar at all four levels from the cemento-enamel junction. A significant correlation was found between cortical bone thickness and 2, 4, 6, and 8mm orthodontic implant levels in all inter-radicular sites. The values of correlation coefficients ranged from 0.280 to 0.674 in the maxillary arch and from 0.266 to 0.605 in the mandibular arch.
CONCLUSIONS
From this study, we can conclude that as the position of the orthodontic implant moved more posteriorly and apically more cortical bone thickness was expected to be found in both jaws. A significant correlation was found between cortical bone thickness and the site of the orthodontic implant. Cortical bone thickness and its relationship with implant position should be taken into consideration when attempts are made to insert the orthodontic implant.
Collapse