[The strategy "wait and watch" in patients with a cancer of bottom stocking rectum with a complete clinical answer after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy]

17-Week Delay Surgery after Chemoradiation in Rectal Cancer with Complete Pathological Response

Neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CRT) followed by curative surgery still remains the standard of care for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). The main purpose of this multimodal treatment is to achieve a complete pathological tumor response (ypCR), with better survival. The surgery delay after CRT completion seems to increase tumor response and ypCR rate. Usually, time intervals range from 8 to 12 weeks, but the maximum tumor regression may not be seen in rectal adenocarcinomas until several months after CRT. About this issue, we report a case of a 52-year-old man with LARC treated with neoadjuvant CRT who developed, one month after RT completion, an acute myocardial infarction. The need to increase the interval between CRT and surgery for 17 weeks allowed a curative surgery without morbidity and an unexpected complete tumor response in the resected specimen (given the parameters presented in pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) performed 11 weeks after radiotherapy completion).

Tailored rectal cancer treatment--a time for implementing contemporary prognostic factors?

AIM

To report data supporting the development of tailored treatment strategies for rectal cancer.

METHOD

A comprehensive review of the literature on the impact of prognostic factors cur-rently not included in international guidelines in rectal cancer management.

RESULTS

There is considerable variation in treatment guidelines for rectal cancer worldwide, especially for Stage II and Stage III disease. Long-term side effects of chemoradiotherapy are not considered in any guideline. Detailed knowledge, and the prognostic impact, of the circumferential resection margin, tumour grade and venous invasion should be factored into the development of a treatment strategy.

CONCLUSION

Factors additional to the TNM system should improve decision making for contemporary rectal cancer treatment. Optimized radiological and pathological evaluations, and a focus on detailed clinical factors, should be the basis for treatment decisions. International guidelines should consider all known prognostic factors for long-term oncological and functional outcomes.

Tumor regression grades: can they influence rectal cancer therapy decision tree?

Background. Evaluating impact of tumor regression grade in prognosis of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Materials and Methods. We identified from our colorectal cancer database 168 patients with LARC who received neoadjuvant therapy followed by complete mesorectum excision surgery between 2003 and 2011: 157 received 5-FU-based chemoradiation (CRT) and 11 short course RT. We excluded 29 patients, the remaining 139 were reassessed for disease recurrence and survival; the slides of surgical specimens were reviewed and classified according to Mandard tumor regression grades (TRG). We compared patients with good response (Mandard TRG1 or TRG2) versus patients with bad response (Mandard TRG3, TRG4, or TRG5). Outcomes evaluated were 5-year overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), local, distant and mixed recurrence. Results. Mean age was 64.2 years, and median followup was 56 months. No statistically significant survival difference was found when comparing patients with Mandard TRG1 versus Mandard TRG2 (p = .77). Mandard good responders (TRG1 + 2) have significantly better OS and DFS than Mandard bad responders (TRG3 + 4 + 5) (OS p = .013; DFS p = .007). Conclusions. Mandard good responders had a favorable prognosis. Tumor response (TRG) to neoadjuvant chemoradiation should be taken into account when defining the optimal adjuvant chemotherapy regimen for patients with LARC.

Oncologic outcome after preoperative chemoradiotherapy in patients with pathologic T0 (ypT0) rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the oncologic outcomes of patients with ypT0 rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiotherapy.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinicopathologic characteristics and oncologic outcomes of patients with ypT0 rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiotherapy and curative radical surgery.

DESIGN AND SETTINGS

This was a retrospective review of factors influencing outcome of patients treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer at a tertiary care university medical center in Seoul, Korea between 2000 and 2008.

PATIENTS

A total of 830 rectal cancer patients underwent surgery after preoperative chemoradiotherapy. Patients were included in the study if they had a pretreatment clinical classification of T3-4 or N+ (or T2N0 and preoperative chemoradiotherapy for sphincter preservation) and if they were classified on pathologic examination as ypT0 after preoperative CRT and curative radical surgery. Patients were classified as.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Overall survival and disease-free survival were evaluated in relation to ypT0N0 or ypT0N1-2 status and other factors that might influence outcome.

RESULTS

Of 91 patients included in the study, 54 (59.3%) were men; the mean patient age was 55 (SD, 11) years, and mean follow-up duration was 44 (SD, 23) months. Surgical procedures included low anterior resection in 68 patients, abdominoperineal resection in 21, and intersphincteric resection in 2. Mean tumor distance from the anal verge was 4.7 (SD, 1.8) cm. Of the 91 patients, 85 were classified as ypT0N0 and 6 as ypT0N1-2. No patient experienced local recurrence. A total of 11 patients (12.1%) had distant metastases, after a mean 11.1 months, including 7 (8.2%) with ypT0N0 and 4 (66.7%) with ypT0N1-2 tumors. One patient with ypT0N0 and 2 patients with ypT0N1-2 tumors died of metastasis. In patients classified as ypT0N0, the 5-year disease free survival and overall survival rates were 82.3% and 89.2%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that ypN1-2 status (p = 0.001) was a significant independent risk factor for recurrence (decreased 5-year disease-free survival), but no factor was associated with 5-year overall survival.

LIMITATIONS

The study is limited by its retrospective nature.

CONCLUSION

Oncologic outcomes in patients with ypT0N0 rectal cancer were excellent. The presence of residual cancer cells in mesorectal lymph nodes represents a risk factor for distant metastasis.

[Locally advanced rectal cancer management: which role for the pathologist in 2011?]

Locally advanced rectal cancers mainly correspond to lieberkünhien adenocarcinomas and are defined by T3-T4 lesions with or without regional metastatic lymph nodes. Such tumors benefit from neoadjuvant treatment combining chemotherapy and radiotherapy, followed by surgery with total mesorectum excision. Such a strategy can decrease the rate of local relapse and lead to an easier complementary surgery. The pathologist plays an important role in the management of locally advanced rectal cancer. Indeed, he is involved in the gross examination of the mesorectum excision quality and in the exhaustive sampling of the most informative areas. He also has to perform a precise histopathological analysis, including the determination of the circumferential margin or clearance and the evaluation of tumor regression. All these parameters are major prognostic factors which have to be clearly included in the pathology report. Moreover, the next challenge for the pathologist will be to determine and validate new prognostic and predictive markers, notably by using pre-therapeutic biopsies. The goal of this mini-review is to emphasize the pathologist's role in the different steps of the management of locally advanced rectal cancers and to underline its implication in the determination of potential biomarkers of aggressiveness and response.