Insulin adsorption on coated silica based supports grafted with N-acetylglucosamine by liquid affinity chromatography

Comparative pharmacoscintigraphic and pharmacokinetic evaluation of two new formulations of inhaled insulin in type 1 diabetic patients

In this open, single-dose study, we compared the lung deposition and bioavailability of two newly developed insulin formulations for pulmonary delivery. Twelve type 1 diabetic patients were administered the two insulin products (2 U/kg b.w.), which had been radiolabelled with (99m)Tc. The formulations were either microparticles of insulin without excipients (F1) or lipid-coated insulin microparticles (F2). Lung deposition was assessed by γ-scintigraphy imaging performed immediately after administration. Bioavailability was evaluated by quantifying serum insulin levels over a period of 6 h. Lung deposition was found to be 50 ± 9% and 24 ± 8% for the F1 and F2 formulations, respectively. The insulin AUC₀₋₃₆₀ ratio of F1/F2 was 188%, which was consistent with scintigraphic imaging. The concordance between imaging and biological results suggests that the lower bioavailability of F2 is due to its lower lung deposition and not to a reduced absorption into the blood stream. Additional in vitro experiments indicated that the lower performance of F2 was most probably related to a lower disaggregation efficiency of the powder when administered at a sub-optimal flow rate. The two formulations showed interesting pharmacokinetic profiles (T(max) of 26 and 16 min for F1 and F2, respectively) that mimic the physiological insulin secretion pattern. The bioavailability of the developed formulations was within the range of other DPI insulin formulations that have reached the final stages of clinical development.

Monosize microbeads for pseudo-affinity adsorption of human insulin

Affinity adsorption technique is increasingly used for protein purification, separation and other biochemical applications. Therapeutic molecules such as antibodies, cytokines, therapeutic DNA and plasma proteins must be purified before characterization and utilization. The aim of this study was to prepare micronsized spherical polymeric beads and to investigate the extent of their human insulin adsorption capability. Monosize poly(ethylene glycol dimethacrylate-N-methacryloyl-(L)-histidine) [poly(EDMA-MAH)] beads were prepared by modified suspension copolymerization. Functional monomer (MAH) was synthesized using methacryloyl chloride and L-histidine. The beads were characterized using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, swelling test and elemental analysis. MAH incorporation into monosize polymeric beads, having an average size around 2-3 μm, was estimated as 55.3 μmol MAH/g bead. Equilibrium swelling ratios of poly(EDMA-MAH) and poly(EDMA) beads were 65% and 55%, respectively. Adsorption experiments were performed under different conditions (i.e., pH, temperature, protein concentration and ionic strength). It was found that adsorption characteristics are strongly depend on these conditions. Maximum insulin adsorption capacity was achieved as 24.7 mg insulin/g poly(EDMA-MAH) beads. Results were well fitted to the Langmuir isotherm model. Compared with poly(EDMA-MAH), nonspecific insulin adsorption onto poly(EDMA) beads was very low (0.61 mg insulin/g bead) and can be negligible. It was observed that insulin could be repeatedly adsorbed and desorbed (at least 10 times) without significant loss in adsorption capacity.

Adsorption of human insulin and AspB28 insulin on a PTFE-like surface

The interactions of human insulin, Zn-free human insulin, and AspB28 insulin with a hydrophobic surface were studied by ellipsometry. All three insulin types investigated adsorbed with high affinity onto the hydrophobic surface, as the plateau of the adsorption isotherm, represented by the irreversible bound fraction, was reached at concentrations >10(-3) mg/ml. The plateau values for human insulin and Zn-free human insulin could not be distinguished with statistical significance, whereas the plateau value for AspB28 insulin was lower than those for the two others, with an adsorbed amount corresponding to a monolayer of insulin monomers. The results observed may be explained by differences in self-association patterns of the insulin types or by enhanced charge repulsion between the AspB28 analog and the negatively charged surface.