Enantioseparation of lomefloxacin hydrochloride by high-speed counter-current chromatography using sulfated-β-cyclodextrin as a chiral selector

Enantioseparation of three constitutional isomeric 2-(methylphenyl)propanoic acids by countercurrent chromatography

2-(3-Methylphenyl)propanic acid and 2-(4-methylphenyl)propanoic acid were successfully enantioseparated by countercurrent chromatography using hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin (HP-β-CD) as a chiral selector. 2-(2-Methylphenyl)propanoic acid was also studied to compare the enantioseparation ability of three isomeric 2-(methylphenyl)propanoic acids. Totally 20 mg of 2-(3-methylphenyl)propanic acid and 20mg of 2-(4-methylphenyl)propanic acid were enantioseparated individually by countercurrent chromatography. Recovery for the (±)-2-(3-methylphenyl)propanic acid enantiomer was in the range of 85%-90% with 98.0%-98.8% purity and recovery for the (±)-2-(4-methylphenyl)propanic acid enantiomer was in the range of 80%-83% with 97.0%-98.0% purity. The enantioseparation factor in countercurrent chromatography for 2-(4-methylphenyl)propanic acid and 2-(3-methylphenyl)propanic acid were 1.31 and 1.26, and the peak resolution in HPLC reached 2.2 and 1.4. However, no enantioseparation could be found for 2-(2-methylphenyl)propanic acid. In addition, the inclusion complexes were investigated by UV spectrophotometer. The inclusion formation constant of inclusion complex between 2-(4-methylphenyl)propanic acid, 2-(3-methylphenyl)propanic acid, 2-(2-methylphenyl)propanic acid and HP-β-CD were determined as 121.73 mol/L, 78.12 mol/L and 53.18 mol/L, respectively. The present results showed that enantiorecognition was greatly affected by substituted positions of methyl group on the benzene ring. Combined with our previous results, the steric hindrance had a significant effect on inclusion interaction between HP-β-CD and racemic 2-(substitutedphenyl)propanoic acids. No enantiorecognition could be achieved for 2-(substitutedphenyl)propanoic acids with ortho-substituent group on benzene, while the influence of meta- and para- group on enantiorecognition varies with different substituent groups on benzene ring.

Enantioseparation of ondansetron by countercurrent chromatography using sulfobutyl ether-β-cyclodextrin as chiral selector

Ondansetron, a highly selective 5-hydroxytryptamine 3 receptor antagonist, was successfully enantioseparated by recycling countercurrent chromatography using sulfobutyl ether-β-cyclodextrin as chiral selector. Important factors for the enantioseparation were optimized, including different organic solvent, type of substituted β-cyclodextrin, pH of aqueous phase, concentration of chiral selector, and separation temperature. A biphasic solvent system composed of n-hexane: n-butyl acetate: 0.1 mol/L phosphate buffer solution pH 9.2 with 50 mmol/L of sulfobutyl ether-β-cyclodextrin (2.5:7.5:10, v/v/v) was selected. Under optimized separation conditions, 5 mg of ondansetron was enantioseparated using recycling countercurrent chromatography, yielding 1.2 and 1.5 mg of ondansetron enantiomers with 97.5 and 95.8% purity and the recovery reached 48-60%.

Chiral counter-current chromatography: A survey of its instrument, mechanism, procedure, and applications

The chiral separation by counter-current chromatography has made great progress in the past three decades. It has become increasingly popular in the field of chiral separation, and many applications have been introduced during the last years. This review mainly focuses on the current topics, applications, and trends in chiral separation by counter-current chromatography. It contains the development of modern counter-current chromatography apparatus, theory of counter-current chromatography, overview of applications of chiral counter-current chromatography enantioseparation, its current situation, and challenges. At last, some conclusions and perspectives also have been discussed in this review.

An overview of recent progress in solvent systems, additives and modifiers of counter current chromatography

Solvent systems are critical to counter current chromatography (CCC). Appropriate additives and modifiers can be used to improve the separation efficiency of CCC.

Application and comparison of high-speed countercurrent chromatography and high performance liquid chromatography in preparative enantioseparation of α-substitution mandelic acids

Preparative enantioseparations of α-cyclopentylmandelic acid and α-methylmandelic acid by high-speed countercurrent chromatography (HSCCC) and high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) were compared using hydroxypropy-β-cyclodextrin (HP-β-CD) and sulfobutyl ether-β-cyclodextrin (SBE-β-CD) as the chiral mobile phase additives. In preparative HPLC the enantioseparation was achieved on the ODS C₁₈ reverse phase column with the mobile phase composed of a mixture of acetonitrile and 0.10 mol L^-1 phosphate buffer at pH 2.68 containing 20 mmol L^-1 HP-β-CD for α-cyclopentylmandelic acid and 20 mmol L^-1 SBE-β-CD for α-methylmandelic acid. The maximum sample size for α-cyclopentylmandelic acid and α-methylmandelic acid was only about 10 mg and 5 mg, respectively. In preparative HSCCC the enantioseparations of these two racemates were performed with the two-phase solvent system composed of n-hexane-methyl tert.-butyl ether-0.1 molL^-1 phosphate buffer solution at pH 2.67 containing 0.1 mol L^-1 HP-β-CD for α-cyclopentylmandelic acid (8.5:1.5:10, v/v/v) and 0.1 mol L^-1 SBE-β-CD for α-methylmandelic acid (3:7:10, v/v/v). Under the optimum separation conditions, total 250 mg of racemic α-cyclopentylmandelic acid could be completely enantioseparated by HSCCC with HP-β-CD as a chiral mobile phase additive in a single run, yielding 105-110 mg of enantiomers with 95-98% purity and 85-90% recovery. But, no complete enantioseparation of α-methylmandelic acid was achieved by preparative HSCCC with either of the chiral selectors due to their limited enantioselectivity. In this paper preparative enantioseparation by HSCCC and HPLC was compared from various aspects.

Chiral High-Speed Counter-Current Chromatography: Future Strategies for Chiral Selector Development

In conventional high-performance liquid chromatography, chiral separations are performed by chiral column with a chiral selector (CS) chemically boned to the solid support. In contrast, high-speed counter-current chromatography (HSCCC) performs chiral separations by dissolving CS in the liquid stationary phase. During the past two decades, several CSs were developed to successfully carry out chiral HSCCC which include N-dodecanoyl-L-proline-3,5-dimethylanilide, β-cyclodextrin derivatives, vancomycin, cinchona alkaloid derivatives, cellulose and amylose derivatives, tartaric acid derivatives, etc. Compared to HPLC which uses over hundred different kinds of CSs, the number of CSs effectively used in HSCCC is limited to several compounds. This may be due to the violent molecular movement of CS dissolved in the liquid stationary phase which reduces chiral selectivity based on steric affinity. Future development strategy of CS for HSCC proposed here is to suppress the molecular movement of the CS in the liquid stationary phase by the following three ways: 1) using viscous stationary phase such as aqueous-aqueous polymer phase system; 2) attaching a long hydrophobic chain to the asymmetric carbon, or 3) chemically bonding CS onto hydrophobic small particles such as carbon nanotubes, gold colloidal particles, and submicron silica particles.

Preparative isolation and purification of three sesquiterpenoid lactones from Eupatorium lindleyanum DC. by high-speed counter-current chromatography

A high-speed counter-current chromatography (HSCCC) method was established for the preparative separation of three sesquiterpenoid lactones from Eupatorium lindleyanum DC. The two-phase solvent system composed of n-hexane–ethyl acetate–methanol–water (1:4:2:3, v/v/v/v) was selected. From 540 mg of the n-butanol fraction of Eupatorium lindleyanum DC., 10.8 mg of 3β-hydroxy-8β-[4'-hydroxy-tigloyloxy]-costunolide, 17.9 mg of eupalinolide A and 19.3 mg of eupalinolide B were obtained in a one-step HSCCC separation, with purities of 91.8%, 97.9% and 97.1%, respectively, as determined by HPLC. Their structures were further identified by ESI-MS and ¹H-NMR.