Correlates of Adverse Events During Saphenous Vein Graft Intervention With Distal Embolic Protection

Association of CHA2DS2-VASc score with thrombus burden in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing SVG-PCI

BACKGROUND

The rate of saphenous vein graft (SVG) occlusion within the first year of bypass graft surgery is 15%. The CHA₂DS₂-VASc score is used to predict the risk of thromboembolic events in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. We aimed to evaluate the predictive role of the CHA₂DS₂-VASc score in the estimation of intracoronary thrombus burden in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) who underwent SVG-PCI.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 221 patients who were admitted with AMI and underwent PCI of SVGs at the Department of Cardiology in the Turkiye Yuksek Ihtisas Education and Research Hospital between 2012 and 2018. The study population was divided into two groups according to their Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) thrombus grade: low thrombus burden (LTB; TIMI 0-3) and high thrombus burden (HTB; TIMI 4 and 5).

RESULTS

The study included 221 patients with a mean age of 63.3 ± 6.7 years. The patients with HTB had significantly higher CHA₂DS₂-VASc scores (p < 0.001) compared with LTB patients. Univariate and multivariate regression analysis demonstrated that both CHA₂DS₂-VASc score (OR: 1.573, 95% CI: 1.153-2.147, p = 0.004) as a continuous variable and a binary cut-off level of the CHA₂DS₂-VASc score > 3 (OR: 3.876, 95% CI: 1.705-8.808, p = 0.001) were significantly associated with HTB. The ability of the CHA₂DS₂-VASc score to predict HTB burden was evaluated by receiver-operating characteristics analysis curve analysis. The optimum cut-off value of the CHA₂DS₂-VASc score for predicting HTB was 3 (with a sensitivity of 67.9% and a specificity of 69.3%) according to the Youden index.

CONCLUSION

The CHA₂DS₂-VASc score can be used as an easy practical tool to predict HTB in AMI patients undergoing SVG-PCI.

Advances in the Post-coronary Artery Bypass Graft Management of Occlusive Coronary Artery Disease

Revascularisation of chronic total occlusion (CTO) represents one of the most challenging aspects of percutaneous coronary intervention, but advances in equipment and an understanding of CTO revascularisation techniques have resulted in considerable improvements in success rates. In patients with prior coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery, additional challenges are encountered. This article specifically explores these challenges, as well as antegrade methods of CTO crossing. Techniques, equipment that can be used and reference texts are highlighted with the aim of providing potential CTO operators adequate information to tackle additional complexities likely to be encountered in this cohort of patients. This review forms part of a wider series where additional aspects of patients with prior CABG should be factored into decisions and methods of revascularisation.

Current State of the Art in Approaches to Saphenous Vein Graft Interventions

Saphenous vein grafts (SVGs), used during coronary artery bypass graft surgery for severe coronary artery disease, are prone to degeneration and occlusion, leading to poor long-term patency compared with arterial grafts. Interventions used to treat SVG disease are susceptible to high rates of periprocedural MI and no-reflow. To minimise complications seen with these interventions, proper stents, embolic protection devices (EPDs) and pharmacological selection are crucial. Regarding stent selection, evidence has demonstrated superiority of drug-eluting stents over bare-metal stents in SVG intervention. The ACCF/AHA/SCA American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions guidelines recommend the use of EPDs during SVG intervention to decrease the risk of periprocedural MI, distal embolisation and no-reflow. The optimal pharmacological treatment for slow or no-reflow remains unclear, but various vasodilators show promise.

Three-Year Outcomes Associated With Embolic Protection in Saphenous Vein Graft Intervention

Background—

Information is limited on contemporary use and outcomes of embolic protection devices (EPDs) in saphenous vein graft interventions.

Methods and Results—

We formed a longitudinal cohort (2005–2009; n=49 325) by linking National Cardiovascular Data Registry CathPCI Registry to Medicare claims to examine the association between EPD use and both procedural and long-term outcomes among seniors (65+ years), adjusting for clinical factors using propensity and instrumental variable methodologies. Prespecified high-risk subgroups included acute coronary syndrome and de novo or graft body lesions. EPDs were used in 21.2% of saphenous vein grafts (median age, 75; 23% women) and were more common in acute coronary syndrome (versus non–acute coronary syndrome; 22% versus 19%), de novo (versus restenotic; 22% versus 14%), and graft body lesions (versus aortic and distal anastomosis; 24% versus 20% versus 8%, respectively). EPDs were associated with a slightly higher incidence of procedural complications, including no reflow (3.9% versus 2.8%; P <0.001), vessel dissection (1.3% versus 1.1%; P =0.05), perforation (0.7% versus 0.4%; P =0.001), and periprocedural myocardial infarction (2.8% versus 1.8%; P <0.001). By 3 years, death, myocardial infarction, and repeat revascularization occurred in 25%, 15%, and 30% of cases, respectively. EPD use was associated with a similar adjusted risk of death (propensity score–matched hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% confidence interval, 0.91–1.02), myocardial infarction (propensity score–matched hazard ratio, 1.00; 95% confidence interval, 0.93–1.09), and repeat revascularization (propensity score–matched hazard ratio, 1.02; 95% confidence interval, 0.96–1.08) in the overall cohort and high-risk subgroups.

Conclusions—

In this contemporary cohort, EPDs were used more commonly among patients with high-risk clinical indications, yet there was no evidence of improved acute- or long-term outcomes. Further prospective studies are needed to support routine EPD use.

Early and midterm major adverse cardiac events in patient with saphenous vein graft using direct stenting or embolic protection device stenting

Background:

The treatment of an occluded saphenous vein graft (SVG) with percutaneous coronary intervention may encounter major adverse cardiac events (MACE). MACE rates have been reduced significantly by using the embolic protection device (EPD).

Objectives:

The aim of this study was to clarify the risks and the benefits of embolic protection devices.

Patients and Methods:

In a prospective, non-randomized observational study, patients aged 33 to 85 years old who underwent elective percutaneous coronary intervention due to SVG stenosis at our tertiary care center were enrolled between 2009 and 2011. The incidence rates of adverse events, including MACE, were obtained during the patients’ hospitalization and at 30-day and 6-month follow-up. MACE included death, Q-wave and non-Q-wave myocardial infarction, in-stent thrombosis, target lesion revascularization, and target vessel revascularization.

Results:

From 150 patients enrolled to the study, 128 (85.3%) patients underwent direct stenting and the rest underwent the EPD procedure. In-hospital MACE occurred in 17.2% of the patients in the direct stenting group versus only 9.1% in the EPD group (P = 0.530). MACE incidence was gradually increased at one and 6-month follow-up periods in the direct stenting group (19.5% and 21.9%, respectively), and remained unchanged in the EPD group (9.1% at six-month follow-up). Multivariate logistic regression model showed that the stenting procedure type could not predict early and midterm MACE with the presence of baseline characteristics as cofounders.

Conclusions:

Despite the considerable lower early and midterm MACE rates, numerically following the EPD procedure compared to direct stenting, the difference in the MACE rates between the two groups was not significant.

Saphenous vein graft intervention

Saphenous vein grafts are commonly used conduits for surgical revascularization of coronary arteries but are associated with poor long-term patency rates. Percutaneous revascularization of saphenous vein grafts is associated with worse clinical outcomes including higher rates of in-stent restenosis, target vessel revascularization, myocardial infarction, and death compared with percutaneous coronary intervention of native coronary arteries. Use of embolic protection devices is a Class I indication according to the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines to decrease the risk of distal embolization, no-reflow, and periprocedural myocardial infarction. Nonetheless, these devices are underused in clinical practice. Various pharmacological agents are available that may also reduce the risk of or mitigate the consequences of no-reflow. Covered stents do not decrease the rates of periprocedural myocardial infarction and restenosis. Most available evidence supports treatment with drug-eluting stents in this high-risk lesion subset to reduce angiographic and clinical restenosis, although large, randomized trials comparing drug-eluting stents and bare-metal stents are needed.

Manual aspiration prior to stenting does not reduce the incidence of filter no reflow in saphenous vein graft lesions protected by FilterWire EX/EZ

BACKGROUND

The beneficial role of manual thrombus aspiration in thrombus-containing lesions has been proven in acute myocardial infarction but data is lacking in saphenous vein graft lesions.

METHODS

From January 2004 to December 2008, 74 consecutive post-bypass patients underwent percutaneous coronary interventions to 76 saphenous vein graft lesions under the protection of FilterWire EX/EZ. Among them, the latest 25 consecutive patients with 25 lesions were treated with manual aspiration before stenting. The incidence of filter no reflow was compared between patients with and without manual aspiration pretreatment.

RESULTS

No major difference in demography, clinical, lesion, and procedure characteristics, and in-hospital outcome has been observed between the two patient groups. Most importantly, the incidence of filter no reflow has not been reduced (32.0% versus 19.6%, P = 0.26) by manual aspiration, even among thrombus-containing lesions (63.2% versus 64.7%, P = 1.00). The absence of diabetes mellitus is found to be the independent predictor for the occurrence of filter no reflow.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjunctive manual thrombus aspiration fails to reduce the filter no reflow, and probably has no additional benefit in saphenous vein graft lesions already protected by FilterWire EX/EZ.

Proximal protection in recanalization of totally occluded saphenous vein grafts in acute coronary syndrome

Percutaneous treatment of old, degenerated saphenous vein grafts (SVG) is associated with a high likelihood of major adverse cardiac events. When an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) develops in a patient with old SVG, fresh thrombus may superimpose on an old, degenerative atheroma: a sudden increase in the athero-thrombotic burden ensues with consequent, frequent total occlusion of the lumen. In this scenario, transluminal recanalization of the graft is usually associated with the highest chance of distal embolization and no-reflow and positioning of an embolic protection device (EPD) is almost mandatory. However, distal EPD are difficult to place when the vessel is totally occluded and do not completely avoid distal embolization. We report two cases of totally occluded SVG in patients admitted for ACS that were recanalized with the aid of a proximal EPD system with angiographic and clinical success.

Contemporary incidence and predictors of major adverse cardiac events after saphenous vein graft intervention with embolic protection (an AMEthyst trial substudy)

The incidence and predictors of major adverse cardiac events after percutaneous coronary intervention of saphenous vein grafts have not been evaluated in the era of routine embolic protection device (EPD) use and the current standards of antiplatelet therapy. The Assessment of the Medtronic AVE Interceptor Saphenous Vein Graft Filter System (AMEthyst) is the largest randomized trial of vein graft intervention comparing the Interceptor EPD and either the GuardWire or FilterWire EPD as the control. The baseline demographic, procedural, and clinical characteristics and the 30-day major adverse cardiac events ([MACE] death, myocardial infarction, and repeat revascularization [either surgery or percutaneous coronary intervention] of the target vessel) were recorded for 748 patients who had undergone vein graft intervention with distal embolic protection. At 30 days, MACE had occurred in 58 patients (7.8%). The univariate predictors of MACE at 30 days included plaque volume (odds ratio 1.005/mm(3), p <0.0001), target lesion length (odds ratio 1.046/mm, p <0.001), vein graft degeneration score (odds ratio 1.631, p = 0.001), coronary narrowing classification (odds ratio 1.697, p = 0.004), reference vessel diameter (odds ratio 1.689, p = 0.004), and male gender (odds ratio 2.406, p = 0.046) and was independent of device type (p = 0.74). The plaque volume was the most important and only multivariate predictor of MACE. The highest quartile of plaque volume defined a subset at particular risk, despite EPD use (MACE 15.8% vs 5.0%, p <0.001). In conclusion, in a patient population in which EPD and preprocedure thienopyridine therapy were uniformly implemented, MACE occurred with an incidence of 7.8% at 30 days. An increasing plaque volume was the most important determinant of MACE and defined a population at particular risk.