Incidence, Causes, and Predictors of Early (≤30 Days) and Late Unplanned Hospital Readmissions After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Impact of Intensified Outpatient Follow-Up on Rehospitalization After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Results From the HOSPITAVI Trial

Patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) are at increased risk of rehospitalization in the early period after discharge from TAVI. The HOSPITAVI study aimed to compare the impact of a standard versus intensified outpatient follow-up on rehospitalization rates within 90 days after TAVI discharge. Patients were 1:1 randomized to either a standard or intensified outpatient follow-up after TAVI discharge. The primary endpoint was the 90-day hospital rehospitalization rate. In total, 300 patients were included: 150 patients were randomized to standard follow-up and 150 patients to intensified outpatient follow-up. The study population had a median age of 79 years, a median EuroSCORE II of 2.9%, and 72% were discharged the day after TAVI. Within 90 days after discharge, the mean number of all-cause hospital readmissions per patient was 0.44 versus 0.35 (HR 0.8 [95% CI, 0.6-1.2], p = 0.23) in the standard versus intensified group, respectively. The mean number of cardiovascular (CV) readmissions per patient was 0.27 versus 0.15 (HR 0.6 [95% CI, 0.4-1.0], p = 0.04) in the standard versus intensified group, respectively. This resulted in a mean number of CV readmission days per patient of 1.52 days versus 0.49 days within the first 90 days in the standard versus intensified group, respectively (p < 0.05). Following TAVI discharge, there was no significant difference in all-cause rehospitalization rates using a standard versus intensified outpatient follow-up approach. However, an intensified outpatient follow-up reduces the burden of early CV rehospitalization after TAVI discharge. (Rehospitalization after transcatheter aortic valve implantation [HOSPITAVI]; NCT05670041).

Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors in Aortic Stenosis: Toward a Comprehensive Cardiometabolic Approach

Aortic stenosis (AS), the most prevalent valvular heart disease, is increasingly recognized as an active disease process driven by a convergence of hemodynamic stress, inflammation, oxidative injury, and metabolic remodeling. While transcatheter and surgical valve replacement remain the standard interventions for severe AS, they fail to reverse the chronic myocardial remodeling that underlies adverse outcomes in many patients. Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have emerged as promising cardioprotective agents, with effects extending well beyond glycemic control. Recent mechanistic studies reveal that SGLT2 is expressed in the myocardium of patients with AS and is linked to pathways of fibrosis, inflammation, and energetic dysfunction. Experimental models and translational data demonstrate that SGLT2 inhibition attenuates maladaptive remodeling through modulation of TGF-β, NF-κB, NLRP3 inflammasome, and oxidative stress signaling while enhancing mitochondrial energetics and endothelial function. Importantly, clinical evidence from randomized and real-world studies suggests that SGLT2 inhibitors improve heart failure outcomes following valve replacement and may slow AS progression. This review integrates current pathophysiological insights with emerging molecular and clinical data to delineate the therapeutic rationale for SGLT2 inhibition in AS. By targeting both myocardial and valvular components of the disease, SGLT2 inhibitors may offer a novel disease-modifying strategy with potential implications across the AS continuum-from asymptomatic stages to the post-interventional setting. Ongoing and future trials are warranted to define optimal patient selection, timing, and biomarkers for response to SGLT2 inhibitor therapy in this increasingly high-risk population.

Dapagliflozin in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Implantation

BACKGROUND

Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors reduce the risk of heart-failure admission among high-risk patients. However, most patients with valvular heart disease, including those undergoing transcatheter aortic-valve implantation (TAVI), have been excluded from randomized trials.

METHODS

We conducted this randomized, controlled trial in Spain to evaluate the efficacy of dapagliflozin (at a dose of 10 mg once daily) as compared with standard care alone in patients with aortic stenosis who were undergoing TAVI. All the patients had a history of heart failure plus at least one of the following: renal insufficiency, diabetes, or left ventricular systolic dysfunction. The primary outcome was a composite of death from any cause or worsening of heart failure, defined as hospitalization or an urgent visit, at 1 year of follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 620 patients were randomly assigned to receive dapagliflozin and 637 to receive standard care alone after TAVI; after exclusions, a total of 1222 patients were included in the primary analysis. A primary-outcome event occurred in 91 patients (15.0%) in the dapagliflozin group and in 124 patients (20.1%) in the standard-care group (hazard ratio, 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.55 to 0.95; P = 0.02). Death from any cause occurred in 47 patients (7.8%) in the dapagliflozin group and in 55 (8.9%) in the standard-care group (hazard ratio, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.59 to 1.28). Worsening of heart failure occurred in 9.4% and 14.4% of the patients, respectively (subhazard ratio, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.45 to 0.88). Genital infection and hypotension were significantly more common in the dapagliflozin group.

CONCLUSIONS

Among older adults with aortic stenosis undergoing TAVI who were at high risk for heart-failure events, dapagliflozin resulted in a significantly lower incidence of death from any cause or worsening of heart failure than standard care alone. (Funded by Instituto de Salud Carlos III and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04696185.).

Early and late hospital readmissions after percutaneous left atrial appendage closure

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) has emerged as a nonpharmacological alternative for the prevention of thromboembolic events in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. However, there are few data on readmissions after LACC. The aim of this study was to determine the rate of early (≤ 30 days) and late (31-365 days) readmission after LAAC, and to assess the predictors and clinical impact of rehospitalization.

METHODS

This multicenter study included 1419 consecutive patients who underwent LAAC. The median follow-up was 33 [17-55] months, and follow-up was complete in all but 54 (3.8%) patients. The primary endpoint was readmissions for any cause. Logistic regression and Cox regression analysis were performed to determine the predictors of readmission and its clinical impact.

RESULTS

A total of 257 (18.1%) patients were readmitted within the first year after LAAC (3.2% early, 14.9% late). The most common causes of readmission were bleeding (24.5%) and heart failure (20.6%). A previous gastrointestinal bleeding event was associated with a higher risk of early readmission (OR, 2.65; 95%CI, 1.23-5.71). The factors associated with a higher risk of late readmission were a lower body mass index (HR, 0.96-95%CI, 0.93-0.99), diabetes (HR, 1.38-95%CI, 1.02-1.86), chronic kidney disease (HR, 1.60; 95%CI, 1.21-2.13), and previous heart failure (HR, 1.69; 95%CI, 1.26-2.27). Both early (HR, 2.12-95%CI, 1.22-3.70) and late (HR, 1.75; 95%CI, 1.41-2.17) readmissions were associated with a higher risk of 2-year mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Readmissions within the first year after LAAC were common, mainly related to bleeding and heart failure events, and associated with patients' comorbidity burden. Readmission after LAAC confered a higher risk of mortality during the first 2 years after the procedure.

Readmission Mortality After TAVR: The Combined Effect of Teaching Hospital Status and Cause of Readmission

Background

Variability in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) readmission rates highlights the importance of assessing post-discharge outcomes. Understanding how teaching hospital status and causes of readmission influence mortality could optimise post-TAVR care.

Methods

Using the National Readmissions Database, we identified 155,298 TAVR admissions from 2012 to 2020. We evaluated the interaction effect between teaching status and cause of readmission on readmission-related mortality through adjusted mixed-effects models.

Results

Overall, 18.9% of patients (n = 29,479) had a nonelective readmission within 90 days, with no significant difference between teaching and nonteaching hospitals (19.3% vs 18.9%; P > 0.05). Cardiac-related readmissions accounted for 42.7% of cases, while noncardiac readmissions made up 57.3%, with no differences observed in their distribution between teaching and nonteaching hospitals. The unadjusted 90-day readmission mortality rate was 3.8%, without significant differences between teaching and nonteaching hospitals (3.8% vs 4.1%; P = 0.38). A downward trend in nonelective readmission and readmission-related mortality rates was observed, regardless of teaching status. An interaction effect between teaching status and the cause of readmission was identified: Noncardiac readmissions to teaching hospitals were associated with increased odds of death (odds ratio [OR] 1.82, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.59-2.07; P < 0.001) compared with nonteaching hospitals, whereas cardiac readmissions to teaching hospitals were associated with decreased odds of in-hospital mortality (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.48-0.62; P < 0.001).

Conclusion

Our findings indicate a differential association between teaching hospital status and 90-day readmission mortality, contingent on the cause of readmission. Further research, including the use of metrics such as failure to rescue, is needed to better understand the relationship between patient-level variables and teaching hospital status.

Management of Acute Coronary Syndrome in Patients With Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Review

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has become a viable treatment option for patients with severe aortic stenosis among all risk subsets. As TAVR use becomes more prevalent and patients live longer with their transcatheter valve, an increasing number of these patients can be expected to present with ACS. Overall, there is a paucity of high-quality data detailing incidence, pathophysiology, and management of ACS in this subset. While most ACS cases post-TAVR are Type II myocardial infarctions (MI), the incidence of Type I MI and ST-elevation myocardial infarction is not negligible. Additionally, ACS in TAVR patients is associated with poor outcomes. While medical management is similar in this cohort to non-TAVR patients, procedural issues pose a unique challenge, especially as related to coronary access in the presence of valve prosthesis. Despite the proven benefit of invasive therapies in the management of ACS in non-TAVR patients, administrative databases suggest a lower utilization of invasive therapies in this cohort, which may highlight a disparity in care and potential for improvement. In this review, we summarize available data regarding the incidence, pathophysiology, and management of ACS in TAVR patients as well as strategies for coronary access post-TAVR.

Common Risk Factors for Atrial Fibrillation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: A Systematic Review from 2009 to 2024

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) is an effective treatment for severe aortic stenosis in high-risk patients; however, atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common complication associated with the procedure. New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation (NOAF) after TAVI is linked to increased mortality and additional complications. This study aimed to evaluate the incidence of NOAF following TAVI and identify risk factors associated with mortality and the development of thromboembolic events. A systematic review of 18 studies was conducted using databases such as MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, Wiley Online Library, SciELO, and Redalyc. No language restrictions were applied, and the search covered studies from 2009 to 2024. The follow-up period ranged from 48 h to 730 days, with a mean of 180 days. Early monitoring and management of AF are essential in patients undergoing TAVI. The incidence of NOAF ranged up to 29.04%, meaning about 29 out of every 100 patients were affected. AF rates varied between 7.2% and 37%, with an average of around 20. Standardizing anticoagulation strategies is important to reduce complications. Randomized studies are needed to evaluate the relationship between AF and post-TAVI mortality and to determine whether AF is a marker of higher risk or an independent factor in these patients.

Association of Cardiac Damage and Computed Tomography-Derived Extracellular Volume in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

BACKGROUND

Extravalvular cardiac damage (EVCD) and extracellular volume (ECV) are key determinants of poor outcomes in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). We aimed to assess the association of ECV derived by means of cardiac computed tomography (CT) with EVCD before and after TAVI, its impact on left ventricular reverse remodelling, and functional improvements at 3-month follow-up in patients with severe AS undergoing TAVI.

METHODS

This was a prospective study of 73 consecutive patients undergoing TAVI, with CT-derived ECV assessment and baseline and follow-up echocardiographic evaluation of EVCD. After identifying the best ECV cutoff for predicting EVCD progression and advanced EVCD (stages 3-4) at follow-up according to the Youden index, patients were divided into low (n = 39) and high (n = 34) ECV groups. Predictors of EVCD progression, advanced EVCD, and functional improvements at follow-up were identified by means of logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

At 3-month follow-up, 34.2% of patients showed EVCD progression. ECV ≥ 32% accurately predicted EVCD progression and stages 3-4 (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.66, P < 0.001). At follow-up, patients with high ECV were more frequently in stages 3-4 (P = 0.011) and had a 50% progression rate (P = 0.012). Conversely, patients with low ECV exhibited greater LV reverse remodelling (P = 0.004) and improvement in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class at both 3-month (P = 0.020) and 6-month (P = 0.001) follow-ups compared with patients with high ECV. High ECV emerged as an independent predictor of EVCD progression (odds ratio [OR] 4.34, 95% CI 1.36-13.78, P = 0.013), stages 3-4 (OR 5.71, 95% CI 1.77-18.42, P = 0.004) and lack of improvement in NYHA functional class (OR 3.22, 95% CI 1.14-9.09, P = 0.027) at 3-month follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Elevated CT-derived ECV was associated with EVCD progression and reduced functional improvement after TAVI.

Multiparametric Outcome Assessment After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation-A Systematic Review

Backround/Objectives: Aortic stenosis (AS) is the most commonly acquired valvular disorder. Patient risk stratification and the development of an accurate and reliable tool are crucial in identifying suitable candidates for TAVI. The present review summarized the current state of knowledge on the influence of selected factors on the outcomes and course of patients with AS undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Methods: The inclusion criteria for the present systematic review were as follows: (1) studies indexed in the medical databases PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Scopus; (2) full-text articles available in English; (3) papers published between 2013 and 2023; and (4) addressing the topic of assessing the impact of factors on the outcomes of patients with aortic stenosis undergoing TAVI. This review used PRISMA 2020 reporting guidelines for systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Results: One hundred and thirty-two studies were eligible for this review. The available studies showed an association of psychosocial and socioeconomic factors, valve parameters, comorbidities, clinical factors, treatment-related factors, biomarkers, and treatment methods with the outcomes of patients with AS undergoing TAVI. Conclusions: Given the conflicting results obtained regarding the impact of right ventricular dysfunction, paravalvular leaks, and treatment method on the mortality of patients undergoing aortic valve implantation, further research in these areas is needed. In view of the researchers' differing views on some of the factors affecting patient outcomes after TAVI, further analysis is needed to develop a new tool for assessing predictive outcomes in AS patients. This study is registered at PROSPERO (CRD42024612752).

Sex disparities in outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve implantation- a multi-year propensity-matched nationwide study

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) has revolutionized the management of severe aortic stenosis (AS), but the impact of sex on TAVI outcomes remains unclear. In this study, we examined differences between men and women in the post-procedural outcomes of TAVI, including healthcare burden and readmission rates. The Nationwide Readmissions Database (2016-2020) was utilized to identify hospitalizations for TAVI. A propensity score matching (PSM) model was used to match males and females. Outcomes were examined using Pearson's chi-squared test. Among 320,324 hospitalizations for TAVI, 142,054 (44.3 %) procedures were performed in women. After propensity matching (N = 165,894 with 82,947 hospitalizations in each group), women had higher in-hospital mortality (2.48 % vs 2.11 %, p: 0.001), stroke (2.14 % vs 1.49 %, p < 0.001), post-procedural bleeding (2.34 % vs 1.72 %, p < 0.001), vascular complications (1.2 % vs 0.7 %, p < 0.001), pericardial complications (1.13 % vs 0.60 %, p < 0.001), acute respiratory failure (ARF) (5.10 % vs 4.63 %, p < 0.001), need for transfusion (7 % vs 5.56 %, p < 0.001), need for vasopressors (2.48 % vs 2.11 %, p < 0.001) and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) (7.53 % vs 6.85 %, p < 0.001). Meanwhile, women had modestly lower incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) (10.17 % vs 11.88 %, p < 0.001), sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) (0.96 % vs 1.06 %, p: 0.042), cardiogenic shock (1.69 % vs 2.05 %, p < 0.001) and mechanical circulatory support (MCS) requirement (0.69 % vs 0.84 %, p < 0.001). With regard to readmissions, men had higher readmission rates at 30 days (16.07 % vs 14.75 %, p < 0.001) and 90 days (23.8 % vs 21.9 %, p < 0.001). No significant difference was observed in 180-day readmission rates between men and women after TAVI. Notably, procedure-related mortality decreased for both sexes from 2016 to 2020, accompanied by faster recovery times and reduced hospitalization costs (p-trend <0.001). In conclusion, women had higher mortality and post-procedural complication rates, while men had higher readmission rates, cardiogenic shock, AKI and need for mechanical circulatory support. While procedure-related mortality and resource utilization for TAVI have improved over time from 2016 to 2020, irrespective of sex, our findings highlight that significant disparities exist in TAVI outcomes.

Association of neighborhood socioeconomic status with echocardiographic parameters and re-admission following transcatheter aortic valve replacement

BACKGROUND

Data on predictors of poor hemodynamic presentation and rehospitalizations following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are limited. We evaluate the association between neighborhood socioeconomic status (NSES) on echocardiographic presentation and post-TAVR readmission at a high-volume institution.

METHODS

All patients undergoing TAVR at a single institution between 2012 and 2022 were included. Patient addresses, baseline variables including Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) preoperative risk of mortality and frailty, and post-procedural outcomes were extracted from electronic health records. Using a validated US Census Bureau Index, the NSES of each patient (1-100) was tabulated, with lower values correlating to increased social deprivation. Patients were separated into four ranked groups based on NSES (rank 1: 1-25, rank 4: 76-100). Multivariable regression was performed to determine variables associated with number of days hospitalized in one-year following index TAVR procedure.

RESULTS

A total of 2031 patients were included. The median NSES was 68 (IQR: 53-80). There was a total of 232 (11.4%) readmissions. The median number of days hospitalized in one year following TAVR was 4 (interquartile range [IQR]: 2-7) After adjusting for baseline variables including STS risk score and patient frailty, compared to patients in the lowest ranked socioeconomic group, patients of higher NSES were associated with lower aortic valve gradients at baselines (Exp[β]=0.997, 95% CI: 0.993-0.999, P=0.049). Additionally, compared to patients in the lowest ranked socioeconomic group, patients of NSES were associated with shorter duration of readmission after risk-factor adjustments (Exp[β]=0.996, 95% CI: 0.992-0.999, P=0.032).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients of lower socioeconomic status are associated with higher aortic valve gradient at baseline and more days hospitalized in the first year after their index TAVR procedure after adjusting for other risk factors. As TAVR volume continues to expand, physicians and health systems must consider this independent factor when determining patient prognosis and readmission policies.

SGLT2-inhibitors in diabetic patients with severe aortic stenosis and cardiac damage undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)

BACKGROUND

A substantial number of patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) experience adverse events after TAVI, with health care expenditure. We aimed to investigate cardiac remodeling and long-term outcomes in diabetic patients with severe AS, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 50%, and extra-valvular cardiac damage (EVCD) undergoing TAVI treated with sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) versus other glucose-lowering strategies (no-SGLT2i users).

METHODS

Multicenter international registry of consecutive diabetic patients with severe AS, LVEF < 50%, and EVCD undergoing TAVI. Based on glucose-lowering therapy at hospital discharge, patients were stratified in SGLT2i versus no-SGLT2i users. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause death and heart failure (HF)-hospitalization (major adverse cardiovascular events, MACE) at 2-year follow-up. Secondary outcomes included all-cause death, cardiovascular death, and HF hospitalization.

RESULTS

The study population included 311 patients, among which 24% were SGLT2i users. Within 1-year after TAVI, SGLT2i users experienced a higher rate of LV recovery (p = 0.032), especially those with baseline LVEF ≤ 30% (p = 0.026), despite the lower baseline LVEF. Patients not treated with SGLT2i were more likely to progress to a worse EVCD stage over time (p = 0.018). At 2-year follow-up, SGLT2i use was associated with a lower rate of MACE, all-cause death, and HF hospitalization (p < 0.01 for all). After adjusting for confounding factors, the use of SGLT2i emerged as an independent predictor of reduced MACE (HR = 0.45; 95% CI 0.17-0.75; p = 0.007), all-cause death (HR = 0.51; 95% CI 0.25-0.98; p = 0.042) and HF-hospitalization (HR = 0.40; 95% CI 0.27-0.62; p = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

In diabetic patients with severe AS, LVEF < 50%, and EVCD undergoing TAVI, the use of SGLT2i was associated with a more favorable cardiac remodeling and a reduced risk of MACE at 2-year follow-up.

The perspectives of older adults related to transcatheter aortic valve replacement: An integrative review

BACKGROUND

Aortic Stenosis (AS) is a common syndrome in older adults wherein the narrowing of the aortic valve impedes blood flow, resulting in advanced heart failure.1 AS is associated with a high mortality rate (50 % at 6 months if left untreated), substantial symptom burden, and reduced quality of life.1-3 Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) was approved in 2012 as a less invasive alternative to surgical valve repair, offering a treatment for older frail patients. Although objective outcomes have been widely reported,4 the perspectives of older adults undergoing the TAVR process have never been synthesized.

OBJECTIVES

To contextualize the perspectives and experiences of older adults undergoing TAVR.

METHODS

An integrative review was conducted using Whittemore and Knafl's five-stage methodology.5 Four electronic databases were searched in April 2023. Articles were included if a qualitative methodology was used to assess the perceptions of older adults (>65 years old) undergoing or recovering from TAVR.

RESULTS

Out of 4619 articles screened, 12 articles met the criteria, representing 353 individuals from 10 countries. Relevant themes included the need for an individualized care plan, caregiver and family support, communication and education, persistent psychosocial and physical symptoms, and the unique recovery journey.

CONCLUSION

Older adults with AS undergoing TAVR generally perceive their procedure positively. Improved interdisciplinary and holistic management, open communication, symptom assessment, support, and education is needed.

Clinical implications of Sokolow-Lyon voltage less than 3.5 mV in patients who have undergone transcatheter aortic valve replacement

BACKGROUND

Degenerative severe aortic valve stenosis (AS) is increasingly prevalent in the aging population, leading to the adoption of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) as a less invasive alternative. While TAVR indications have expanded, the procedure is associated with a substantial incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE). The study aims to establish a preoperative risk-stratification system for TAVR candidates based on Sokolow-Lyon voltage (SLV) and other relevant factors.

METHODS

A total of 181 consecutive patients who underwent TAVR were retrospectively reviewed. Baseline characteristics, preoperative electrocardiogram (ECG) and echocardiography findings, and TAVR procedures were assessed. Low SLV (<3.5 mV) was defined based on ECG measurements.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics revealed a mean age of 84 years, with 71.8% females. The two-year incidence of MACE defined as a composite of cardiac death and hospitalization due to heart failure, was 11.6%, significantly higher in the low SLV group. Low SLV emerged as an independent prognostic factor. The Tokyo Bay Risk (TBR) Score, including low SLV, Body Mass Index <18.5 kg/m2, and previous coronary artery disease, effectively stratified MACE risk. Higher TBR scores (2 or 3) correlated with increased MACE risk.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with low SLV in pre-procedural ECG demonstrated a heightened risk of two-year MACE. The TBR score, incorporating low SLV, proved valuable for preoperative risk assessment. Careful consideration of TAVR indications, along with TBR score integration, is crucial for optimizing outcomes.

Burden of hospitalization during the first year following transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement

BACKGROUND

Hospitalizations are a major burden for both patients and society but are potentially preventable. We examined the one-year hospitalization burden in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and compared hospitalization rates and patterns with those undergoing isolated surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR).

METHODS

Using Danish nationwide registries, we identified patients who underwent first-time TAVR and isolated SAVR (2008-2019), respectively. Subsequent hospitalizations were classified as cardiovascular or noncardiovascular according to discharge diagnosis codes.

RESULTS

Patients undergoing TAVR (N = 4,921) were older and had more comorbidities than those undergoing SAVR (N = 5,220). There were 5,725 and 4,426 hospitalizations within the first year after discharge in the TAVR and SAVR group, respectively. During the one-year follow-up period post-TAVR, 46.6% were not admitted, 25.4% were admitted once, 12.6% twice, and 15.4% 3 times or more. The corresponding proportions in patients undergoing SAVR were 55.3%, 25.1%, 10.0%, and 9.5%, respectively. Among patients with ≥1 hospitalization following TAVR, 50.3% had a total length of all hospital stays between 1 and 7days, 19.0% 8-14days, 18.0% 15-30days, 9.9% 31-60days, and 2.8% ≥61days. The corresponding proportions for patients undergoing SAVR were 58.6%, 17.2%, 13.1%, 7.4%, and 3.7%, respectively. Compared with patients undergoing SAVR, those undergoing TAVR had a lower early (day0-30: HR 0.89 [95% CI, 0.80-0.98]), but a higher late hospitalization rate (day 31-365: 1.46 [1.32-1.60]).

CONCLUSIONS

The 1-year hospitalization burden following TAVR is substantial. Compared with patients undergoing isolated SAVR, those undergoing TAVR had a lower early, but a higher late hospitalization rate - a difference that likely reflects unmeasured differences in the patient cohorts.

Ramipril After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Patients Without Reduced Ejection Fraction: The RASTAVI Randomized Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

Patients with aortic stenosis may continue to have an increased risk of heart failure, arrhythmias, and death after successful transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Renin-angiotensin system inhibitors may be beneficial in this setting. We aimed to explore whether ramipril improves the outcomes of patients with aortic stenosis after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

PROBE (Prospective Randomized Open, Blinded Endpoint) was a multicenter trial comparing ramipril with standard care (control) following successful transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction >40%. The primary end point was the composite of cardiac mortality, heart failure readmission, and stroke at 1-year follow-up. Secondary end points included left ventricular remodeling and fibrosis. A total of 186 patients with median age 83 years (range 79-86), 58.1% women, and EuroSCORE-II 3.75% (range 3.08-4.97) were randomized to receive either ramipril (n=94) or standard treatment (n=92). There were no significant baseline, procedural, or in-hospital differences. The primary end point occurred in 10.6% in the ramipril group versus 12% in the control group (P=0.776), with no differences in cardiac mortality (ramipril 1.1% versus control group 2.2%, P=0.619) but lower rate of heart failure readmissions in the ramipril group (3.2% versus 10.9%, P=0.040). Cardiac magnetic resonance analysis demonstrated better remodeling in the ramipril compared with the control group, with greater reduction in end-systolic and end-diastolic left ventricular volumes, but nonsignificant differences were found in the percentage of myocardial fibrosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Ramipril administration after transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with preserved left ventricular function did not meet the primary end point but was associated with a reduction in heart failure re-admissions at 1-year follow-up.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique Identifier: NCT03201185.

Evaluation of Hematological Parameters After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Although transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is safe and effective, mortality and bleeding events post procedure are important. The present study investigated the changes in hematologic parameters to evaluate whether they predict mortality or major bleeding. We enrolled 248 consecutive patients (44.8% male; mean age 79.0 ± 6.4 years) undergoing TAVR. In addition to demographic and clinical examination, blood parameters were recorded before TAVR, at discharge, 1 month and 1 year. Hemoglobin levels before TAVR 12.1 ± 1.8 g/dL, 10.8 ± 1.7 g/dL at discharge, 11.7 ± 1.7 g/dL at first month, 11.8 ± 1.4 g/dL at first year (Hemoglobin values compared with pre-TAVR, P < .001, P = .019, P = .047, respectively). Mean platelet volume (MPV) before TAVR 8.72 ± 1.71 fL, 8.16 ± 1.46 fL at discharge, 8.09 ± 1.44 fL at first month, 7.94 ± 1.18 fL at first year (MPV values compared with pre-TAVR, P < .001, P < .001, P < .001, respectively). Other hematologic parameters were also evaluated. Hemoglobin, platelet count, MPV, and red cell distribution width before the procedure, at discharge, and at the first year did not predict mortality and major bleeding in receiver operating characteristic analysis. After multivariate Cox regression analysis, hematologic parameters were not independent predictors of in-hospital mortality, major bleeding, and death at 1 year after TAVR.

Incidence, predictors, and prognostic impact of rehospitalization after transcatheter aortic valve implantation

AIMS

Despite rehospitalization being common after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), an in-depth analysis on this topic is missing. This study sought to report on the incidence, predictors, and prognostic impact of rehospitalization within 1 year following TAVI.

METHODS AND RESULTS

All consecutive patients treated with TAVI between 2016 and 2020 in East Denmark were included. Medical records of all patients were reviewed to validate rehospitalizations up to 1 year after discharge from the index admission. The study population consisted of 1397 patients, of whom 615 (44%) had an unplanned rehospitalization within the first year post-TAVI. The rehospitalization incidence rate was three-fold higher in the early period (within 30 days) compared with the late period (30 days to 1 year; 2.5 vs. 0.8 per patient-year, respectively; P < 0.001). Predictors of early unplanned rehospitalization were procedure-related complications and prior stroke, whereas late unplanned rehospitalization was associated with preexisting comorbidities. Predictors of heart failure (HF) rehospitalization included ischaemic heart disease, the extent of cardiac damage, atrial fibrillation, and New York Heart Association class at baseline. HF rehospitalization within 30 days and 1 year post-TAVI was associated with a markedly increased 1- and 5-year mortality risk [hazard ratio (HR) of 4.3 and 3.2 for 1-year mortality and HR of 3.2 and 2.9 for 5-year mortality, respectively; P< 0.001].

CONCLUSIONS

Rehospitalization after TAVI is frequent in real-world practice. Early rehospitalization is mostly procedure related, whereas late rehospitalization is related to preexisting comorbidities. HF rehospitalization is associated with poor long-term survival and could be validated as a prognostically relevant endpoint for TAVI trials.

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation with and without mitral stenosis - A National Readmission Database study

INTRODUCTION

Mitral valve stenosis (MS) can be concomitantly present in patients undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI). Some studies have reported up to one-fifth of patients who underwent TAVI also have MS. The relationship between mitral stenosis and TAVI has led to concerns regarding increased adverse cardiac outcomes during and after the procedure.

METHODS

The Nationwide Readmission Database (NRD 2016-2019) was utilized to identify TAVI patients with MS with ICD-10-CM codes. The primary outcome was a 30-day readmission rate. Secondary outcomes included predictors of all-cause readmissions, length of stay, and total hospitalization cost. We assessed readmission frequency with a national sample weighed at 30 days following the index TAVI procedure. Unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios were analyzed for in-hospital outcomes using univariate and multivariate logistic regression for study cohorts.

RESULTS

A total of 217,147 patients underwent TAVI procedures during the queried time period of the study. Of these patients, 2140 (0.98 %) had MS. The overall 30-day all-cause readmission rate for the study cohort was 12.4 %. TAVI patients with MS had higher rates of 30-day readmissions (15.8 % vs 12.3 %, aOR 1.22, CI: 1.03-1.45, P < 0.01). Additionally, TAVI patients with MS had longer lengths of hospital stay during index admissions (5.7 vs. 4.3 days), along with higher total hospitalization costs ($55,157 vs. $50,239). In contrast, in-hospital mortality during index TAVI admission did not differ significantly between the two groups, although there was a trend toward higher mortality in the MS group (2.1 % vs. 1.5 %). Among the TAVI MS cohort, patients admitted on weekends (aOR: 1.11, 95 % CI: 1.02-1.22, P = 0.01), admitted to non-metropolitan hospitals (aOR: 1.29, 95 % CI: 1.11-1.66, P = 0.04) and presence of co-morbidities such as atrial fibrillation (AF)/flutter (aOR: 1.24, 95 % CI: 1.16-1.32, P < 0.01), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (aOR: 1.16, 95 % CI: 1.11-1.22, P < 0.01), prior stroke (aOR: 1.09, 95 % CI: 1.03-1.14, P < 0.01), chronic kidney disease (CKD) ≥3 (aOR: 1.16, 95 % CI: 1.11-1.22, P < 0.01), end-stage renal disease (ESRD) (aOR: 1.75, 95 % CI: 1.61-1.90, P < 0.01), and anemia (aOR: 1.23, 95 % CI: 1.18-1.28, P < 0.01) were associated with increased odds of readmission.

CONCLUSION

Concomitant MS in patients undergoing TAVI is associated with higher readmission rates and total hospital costs. This can contribute significantly to healthcare-related burdens. Further studies are required to evaluate in-hospital outcomes and predictors of readmission in patients undergoing TAVI with the presence of concomitant MS.

Long-term prognostic value of the H2FPEF score in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation

AIMS

A considerable proportion of candidates for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) have underlying heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), which can be challenging for diagnosis because significant valvular heart disease should be excluded before diagnosing HFpEF. This study investigated the long-term prognostic value of the pre-procedural H2FPEF score in patients with preserved ejection fraction (EF) undergoing TAVI.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients who underwent TAVI between October 2013 and May 2017 were enrolled from the Optimized CathEter vAlvular iNtervention-Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Japanese multicentre registry. After excluding 914 patients, 1674 patients with preserved EF ≥ 50% (median age: 85 years, 72% female) were selected for calculation of the H2FPEF score and were dichotomized into two groups: the low H2FPEF score [0-5 points; n = 1399 (83.6%)] group and the high H2FPEF score [6-9 points; n = 275 (16.4%)] group. Patients with high H2FPEF scores were associated with a higher prevalence of New York Heart Association Functional Class III/IV (59.3% vs. 43.7%, P < 0.001), diabetes (24.4% vs. 18.5%, P = 0.03), and paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis (15.9% vs. 6.2%, P < 0.001). These patients showed worse prognoses than those with low H2FPEF scores regarding the cumulative 2 year all-cause mortality (26.3% vs. 15.5%, log-rank P < 0.001), cardiovascular mortality (10.5% vs. 5.4%, log-rank P < 0.001), HF hospitalization (16.2% vs. 6.7%, log-rank P < 0.001), and the composite endpoint of cardiovascular mortality and HF hospitalization (23.8% vs. 10.8%, log-rank P < 0.001). After adjustment for several confounders, the high H2FPEF scores were independently associated with increased risk for all-cause mortality [adjusted hazard ratio (HR), 1.48; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.09-2.00; P = 0.011] and for the composite endpoint of cardiovascular mortality and HF hospitalization (adjusted HR, 1.95; 95% CI, 1.38-2.74; P < 0.001). Subgroup analysis confirmed the excess risk of high H2FPEF scores relative to low H2FPEF scores for the composite endpoint of cardiovascular mortality and HF hospitalization increased with a lower Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) score (STS score <8%: adjusted HR, 2.40; 95% CI, 1.50-3.85; P < 0.001; STS score ≥8%: adjusted HR, 1.34; 95% CI, 0.79-2.28; P = 0.28; Pinteraction = 0.030).

CONCLUSIONS

The H2FPEF score is useful for predicting long-term adverse outcomes after TAVI, including all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and HF hospitalization for patients with preserved EF. More aggressive interventions targeting HFpEF in addition to the TAVI procedure might be relevant in patients with high H2FPEF scores, particularly in those with a lower surgical risk.

Cardiac power output is associated with adverse outcomes in patients with preserved ejection fraction after transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Aims

Cardiac power output (CPO) measures cardiac performance, and its prognostic significance in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (EF) has been previously reported. However, the effectiveness of CPO in risk stratification of patients with valvular heart disease and post-operative valvular disease has not been reported. We aimed to determine the association between CPO and clinical outcomes in patients with preserved left ventricular (LV) EF after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI).

Methods and results

This retrospective observational study included 1047 consecutive patients with severe aortic stenosis after TAVI. All patients were followed up for all-cause mortality and hospitalization for HF. CPO was calculated as 0.222 × cardiac output × mean blood pressure (BP)/LV mass, where 0.222 was the conversion constant to W/100 g of the LV myocardium. CPO was assessed using transthoracic echocardiography at discharge after TAVI. Of the 1047 patients, 253 were excluded following the exclusion criteria, including those with low LVEF, and 794 patients (84.0 [80.0-88.0] years; 35.8% male) were included in this study. During a median follow-up period of 684 (237-1114) days, the composite endpoint occurred in 196 patients. A dose-dependent association was observed between the CPO levels and all-cause mortality. Patients in the lowest CPO tertile had significantly lower event-free survival rates (log-rank test, P = 0.043). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that CPO was independently associated with adverse outcomes (hazard ratio = 0.561, P = 0.020). CPO provided an incremental prognostic effect in the model based on clinical and echocardiographic markers (P = 0.034).

Conclusion

CPO is independently and incrementally associated with adverse outcomes in patients with preserved LVEF following TAVI.

Female showed favorable left ventricle hypertrophy regression during post-TAVR follow-up

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a well-established procedure using a catheter-introduced valve prosthesis for patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS). This retrospective study investigated sex-related differences in pre- and post-TAVR clinical and hemodynamic outcomes and analyzed data of the first 100 cases at Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital (KMUH) between December 2013 and December 2021. Baseline characteristics, procedural outcomes, mortality rates, and echocardiographic parameters were analyzed and compared between sexes. Among the 100 patients, male (46%) and female (54%) were of similar age (mean age, male 86.0 years vs. female 84.5 years) and of the same severity of AS (mean pressure gradient, male 47.5 mmHg vs. female 45.7 mmHg) at the time receiving the TAVR procedure. Women had smaller aortic valve areas calculated by continuity equation (0.8 ± 0.3 cm2 vs. 0.7 ± 0.2 cm2, p < 0.001). In addition, women had better left ventricle ejection fraction (59.6 ± 14.0% vs. men 54.7 ± 17.2%, p < 0.01). In the post-TAVR follow-up, regression of left ventricle mass and dimension was better in women than in men. None of the patient died within 30 days after the procedure, and women tended to have a more favorable survival than men (2-year mortality and overall mortality rate in 8.3 year, women 9.1% and 22.2% vs. men 22.2% and 34.8%; p = 0.6385 and 0.1277, respectively). In conclusion, the sex-based difference in post-TAVR regression of LV remodeling suggests a need for sex-based evaluation for patients with severe AS and their post TAVR follow-up.

Development and Validation of a Machine Learning Risk-Prediction Model for 30-Day Readmission for Heart Failure Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR-HF Score)

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is the treatment of choice for patients with severe aortic stenosis across the spectrum of surgical risk. About one-third of 30-day readmissions following TAVR are related to heart failure (HF). Hence, we aim to develop an easy-to-use clinical predictive model to identify patients at risk for HF readmission. We used data from the National Readmission Database (2015-2018) utilizing ICD-10 codes to identify TAVR procedures. Readmission was defined as the first unplanned HF readmission within 30-day of discharge. A machine learning framework was used to develop a 30-day TAVR-HF readmission score. The receiver operator characteristic curve was used to evaluate the predictive power of the model. A total of 92,363 cases of TAVR were included in the analysis. Of the included patients, 3299 (3.6%) were readmitted within 30 days of discharge with HF. Individuals who got readmitted, vs those without readmission, had more emergent admissions during index procedure (33.4% vs 19.8%), electrolyte abnormalities (38% vs 16.7%), chronic kidney disease (34.8% vs 21.2%), and atrial fibrillation (60.1% vs 40.7%). Candidate variables were ranked by importance using a parsimony plot. A total of 7 variables were selected based on predictive ability as well as clinical relevance: HF with reduced ejection fraction (25 points), HF preserved EF (20 points), electrolyte abnormalities (17 points), atrial fibrillation (12 points), Charlson comorbidity index (<6 = 0, 6-8 = 9, 9-10 = 13, >10 = 14 points), chronic kidney disease (7 points), and emergent index admission (5 points). On performance evaluation using the testing dataset, an area under the curve of 0.761 (95% CI 0.744-0.778) was achieved. Thirty-day TAVR-HF readmission score is an easy-to-use risk prediction tool. The score can be incorporated into electronic health record systems to identify at-risk individuals for readmissions with HF following TAVR. However, further external validation studies are needed.

Myocardial sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 expression and cardiac remodelling in patients with severe aortic stenosis: The BIO-AS study

AIM

Cardiac remodelling plays a major role in the prognosis of patients with aortic stenosis (AS) and could impact the benefits of aortic valve replacement. Our study aimed to evaluate the expression of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) gene and protein in patients with severe AS stratified in high gradient (HG) and low flow-low gradient (LF-LG) AS and its association with cardiac functional impairments.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Gene expression and protein levels of main biomarkers of cardiac fibrosis (galectin-3, sST2, serpin-4, procollagen type I amino-terminal peptide, procollagen type I carboxy-terminal propeptide, collagen, transforming growth factor [TGF]-β), inflammation (growth differentiation factor-15, interleukin-6, nuclear factor-κB [NF-κB]), oxidative stress (superoxide dismutase 1 [SOD1] and 2 [SOD2]), and cardiac metabolism (sodium-hydrogen exchanger, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor [PPAR]-α, PPAR-γ, glucose transporter 1 [GLUT1] and 4 [GLUT4]) were evaluated in blood samples and heart biopsies of 45 patients with AS. Our study showed SGLT2 gene and protein hyper-expression in patients with LF-LG AS, compared to controls and HG AS (p < 0.05). These differences remained significant even after adjusting for age, gender, body mass index, history of diabetes mellitus, arterial hypertension, and coronary artery disease. SGLT2 gene expression was positively correlated with: (i) TGF-β (r = 0.72, p < 0.001) and collagen (r = 0.73, p < 0.001) as markers of fibrosis; (ii) NF-κB (r = 0.36, p < 0.01) and myocardial interleukin-6 (r = 0.68, p < 0.001) as markers of inflammation: (iii) SOD2 (r = -0.38, p < 0.006) as a marker of oxidative stress; (iv) GLUT4 (r = 0.33, p < 0.02) and PPAR-α (r = 0.36, p < 0.01) as markers of cardiac metabolism.

CONCLUSION

In patients with LF-LG AS, SGLT2 gene and protein were hyper-expressed in cardiomyocytes and associated with myocardial fibrosis, inflammation, and oxidative stress.

Fully independent external validation of the Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement 30-day (TAVR-30) hospital readmission model

BACKGROUND

Early and late readmissions after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) are common and associated with worse outcome. A risk prediction model (TAVR-30) was recently developed using readily available clinical variables to identify patients at risk for hospital readmission within 30 days after TAVR. We performed an independent external validation of the TAVR-30 model.

METHODS

The Swedish TAVR-registry, linked together with other mandatory national registries was used to identify all TAVR procedures, variables from the original model, hospitalizations and deaths between the years 2008 to 2021.

RESULTS

A total of 8459 patients underwent TAVR, 7693 patients had complete data and were included in the analysis. Out of these, 928 patients experienced a readmission within 30 days. Using the estimates from the original model, a concordance (c)-index of 0.51, a calibration slope of 0.07 and intercept of -0.62 were obtained respectively, overall implying poor model performance.

CONCLUSIONS

This independent external validation indicates poor performance of the TAVR-30 model in a Swedish setting. Further research is needed to develop more reliable tools for predicting the risk of early hospital readmission after TAVR, as well as, for providing a deeper understanding of how to develop risk models that performs well in patients with multiple underlying comorbidities.

Impact of Baseline Anemia in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Prognostic Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is currently the treatment of choice for patients aged ≥75 years with severe aortic stenosis. Preoperative anemia is present in a large proportion of patients and may increase the risk of post-procedural complications. The purpose of this prognostic systematic review was to analyze the impact of baseline anemia on short- and mid-term outcomes following TAVR. A computerized search was performed on PubMed and Web of Science databases for studies published between January 2013 and December 2022. Primary outcomes were 30-day need for transfusion, acute renal failure, 30-day and mid-term mortality, and readmission during the first year post-TAVR. Data were analyzed via random effects model using inverse variance method with 95% confidence intervals. Eleven observational studies met our eligibility criteria and included a total of 12,588 patients. The prevalence of baseline anemia ranged between 39% and 72%, with no relevant sex differences. Patients with preprocedural anemia received more blood transfusions [OR: 2.95 (2.13-4.09)]), and exhibited increased rates of acute kidney injury [OR:1.74 (1.45-2.10)], short-term mortality [OR: 1.47 (1.07-2.01], and mid-term [OR: 1.89 (1.58-2.25)] mortality following TAVR compared with those without anemia. Baseline anemia determined an increased risk for blood transfusion, acute kidney injury, and short/mid-term mortality among TAVR recipients.

Aortic Valve Disease, Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement, and the Heart Failure Patient: A State-of-the-Art Review

Concomitant aortic stenosis (AS) in heart failure (HF) is associated with high rates of mortality and morbidity. Current guidelines recommend aortic valve replacement in patients with severe symptomatic AS and asymptomatic AS with left ventricular ejection fraction <50% and during other cardiac surgeries. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has now allowed for the treatment of severe AS in previously inoperable or high-surgical-risk patients. Leveraging multimodality imaging techniques is increasingly recognized for reinforcing the rationale for intervening early, thus mitigating the risk of ongoing progression to advanced HF. There are increasing data in favor of TAVR in diverse clinical scenarios, particularly asymptomatic AS and moderate AS. Limited information is, however, available regarding the advantages of HF medical therapy before and after intervention. This review aims to comprehensively examine the phenotypes of AS in the context of HF progression, while exploring the evolving role of TAVR in specific populations.

The impact of a statewide payment reform on transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) utilization and readmissions

BACKGROUND

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is an increasingly used but relatively expensive procedure with substantial associated readmission rates. It is unknown how cost-constrictive payment reform measures, such as Maryland's All Payer Model, impact TAVR utilization given its relative expense. This study investigated the impact of Maryland's All Payer Model on TAVR utilization and readmissions among Maryland Medicare beneficiaries.

METHODS

This was a quasi-experimental investigation of Maryland Medicare patients undergoing TAVR between 2012 and 2018. New Jersey data were used for comparison. Longitudinal interrupted time series analyses were used to study TAVR utilization and difference-in-differences analyses were used to investigate post-TAVR readmissions.

RESULTS

During the first year of payment reform (2014), TAVR utilization among Maryland Medicare beneficiaries dropped by 8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: -9.2% to -7.1%; p < 0.001), with no concomitant change in TAVR utilization in New Jersey (0.2%, 95% CI: 0%-1%, p = 0.09). Longitudinally, however, the All Payer Model did not impact TAVR utilization in Maryland compared to New Jersey. Difference-in-differences analyses demonstrated that implementation of the All Payer Model was not associated with significantly greater declines in 30-day post-TAVR readmissions in Maryland versus New Jersey (-2.1%; 95% CI: -5.2% to 0.9%; p =0.1).

CONCLUSIONS

Maryland's All Payer Model resulted in an immediate decline in TAVR utilization, likely a result of hospitals adjusting to global budgeting. However, beyond this transition period, this cost-constrictive reform measure did not limit Maryland TAVR utilization. In addition, the All Payer Model did not reduce post-TAVR 30-day readmissions. These findings may help inform expansion of globally budgeted healthcare payment structures.

Incidence and clinical impact of tachyarrhythmic events following transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A review

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is well established for treating severe symptomatic aortic stenosis. Whereas broad information on the epidemiology, clinical implications, and management of bradyarrhythmias after TAVR is available, data about tachyarrhythmic events remain scarce. Despite the progressively lower risk profile of TAVR patients and the improvement in device characteristics and operator skills, approximately 10% of patients develop new-onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) after TAVR. The proportion of patients in whom NOAF actually corresponds to previously undiagnosed silent atrial fibrillation (AF) has not been properly determined. The transapical approach, the need for pre- or post- balloon dilation, and the presence of periprocedural complications have been associated with a higher risk of NOAF. Older age, left atrial volume, or worse functional class are patient-derived risk factors shared with preprocedural AF. NOAF after TAVR has been associated with poorer survival and a higher incidence of cerebrovascular events. However, patient management differs markedly among different centers, especially with regard to anticoagulation in patients with short-duration AF episodes detected in the periprocedural setting and in cases of silent NOAF detected during continuous electrocardiographic (ECG) monitoring. Evidence about ventricular arrhythmias is even more scarce than for AF. Some case reports of sudden cardiac death after TAVR in patients with a pacemaker have identified ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation in device interrogation. TAVR has been shown to reduce the arrhythmic burden, but a significant proportion of patients (16%) present with complex premature ventricular complex arrhythmias within the year after TAVR. Whether these events are related to poorer outcomes is unknown. Continuous ECG monitoring after TAVR may help describe the frequency, risk factors, and prognostic implications of tachyarrhythmias in this population.

Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with morbid obesity: a multicentre propensity score-matched analysis

BACKGROUND

Morbidly obese (MO) patients are increasingly undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) for severe aortic stenosis (AS). However, the best therapeutic strategy for these patients remains a matter for debate.

AIMS

Our aim was to compare the periprocedural and mid-term outcomes in MO patients undergoing TAVR versus SAVR.

METHODS

A multicentre retrospective study including consecutive MO patients (body mass index ≥40 kg/m², or ≥35 kg/m² with obesity-related comorbidities) from 18 centres undergoing either TAVR (n=860) or biological SAVR (n=696) for severe AS was performed. Propensity score matching resulted in 362 pairs.

RESULTS

After matching, periprocedural complications, including blood transfusion (14.1% versus 48.1%; p<0.001), stage 2-3 acute kidney injury (3.99% versus 10.1%; p=0.002), hospital-acquired pneumonia (1.7% versus 5.8%; p=0.005) and access site infection (1.5% versus 5.5%; p=0.013), were more common in the SAVR group, as was moderate to severe patient-prosthesis mismatch (PPM; 9.9% versus 39.4%; p<0.001). TAVR patients more frequently required permanent pacemaker implantation (14.4% versus 5.6%; p<0.001) and had higher rates of ≥moderate residual aortic regurgitation (3.3% versus 0%; p=0.001). SAVR was an independent predictor of moderate to severe PPM (hazard ratio [HR] 1.80, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.25-2.59; p=0.002), while TAVR was not. In-hospital mortality was not different between groups (3.9% for TAVR versus 6.1% for SAVR; p=0.171). Two-year outcomes (including all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, and readmissions) were similar in both groups (log-rank p>0.05 for all comparisons). Predictors of all-cause 2-year mortality differed between the groups; moderate to severe PPM was a predictor following SAVR (HR 1.78, 95% CI: 1.10-2.88; p=0.018) but not following TAVR (p=0.737).

CONCLUSIONS

SAVR and TAVR offer similar mid-term outcomes in MO patients with severe AS, however, TAVR offers some advantages in terms of periprocedural morbidity.

Trends, Predictors, and Outcomes of 30-Day Readmission With Heart Failure After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Insights From the US Nationwide Readmission Database

BACKGROUND

Data on trends, predictors, and outcomes of heart failure (HF) readmissions after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) remain limited. Moreover, the relationship between hospital TAVR discharge volume and HF readmission outcomes has not been established.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The Nationwide Readmission Database was used to identify 30‐day readmissions for HF after TAVR from October 1, 2015, to November 30, 2018, using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD‐10‐CM) codes. A total of 167 345 weighted discharges following TAVR were identified. The all‐cause readmission rate within 30 days of discharge was 11.4% (19 016). Of all the causes of 30‐day rehospitalizations, HF comprised 31.4% (5962) of all causes. The 30‐day readmission rate for HF did not show a significant decline during the study period (P_trend=0.06); however, all‐cause readmission rates decreased significantly (P_trend=0.03). HF readmissions were comparable between high‐ and low‐volume TAVR centers. Charlson Comorbidity Index >8, length of stay >4 days during the index hospitalization, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, atrial fibrillation, chronic HF, preexisting pacemaker, complete heart block during index hospitalization, paravalvular regurgitation, chronic kidney disease, and end‐stage renal disease were independent predictors of 30‐day HF readmission after TAVR. HF readmissions were associated with higher mortality rates when compared with non‐HF readmissions (4.9% versus 3.3%; P<0.01). Each HF readmission within 30 days was associated with an average increased cost of $13 000 more than for each non‐HF readmission.

CONCLUSIONS

During the study period from 2015 to 2018, 30‐day HF readmissions after TAVR remained steady despite all‐cause readmissions decreasing significantly. All‐cause readmission mortality and HF readmission mortality also showed a nonsignificant downtrend. HF readmissions were comparable across low‐, medium‐, and high‐volume TAVR centers. HF readmission was associated with increased mortality and resource use attributed to the increased costs of care compared with non‐HF readmission. Further studies are needed to identify strategies to decrease the burden of HF readmissions and related mortality after TAVR.

Development and Validation of a Machine Learning Score for Readmissions After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

Background

Identifying predictors of readmissions after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is an important unmet need.

Objectives

We sought to explore the role of machine learning (ML) in predicting readmissions after TAVI.

Methods

We included patients who underwent TAVI between 2016 and 2019 in the Nationwide Readmission Database. A total of 917 candidate predictors representing all International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, diagnosis and procedure codes were included. First, we used lasso regression to remove noninformative variables and rank informative ones. Next, we used an unsupervised ML model (K-means) to identify patterns/clusters in the data. Furthermore, we used Light Gradient Boosting Machine and Shapley Additive exPlanations to specify the impact of individual predictors. Finally, we built a parsimonious model to predict 30-day readmission.

Results

A total of 117,398 and 93,800 index TAVI hospitalizations were included in the 30- and 90-day analyses, respectively. Lasso regression identified 138 and 199 informative predictors for the 30- and 90-day readmission, respectively. Next, K-means recognized 2 distinct clusters: low risk and high risk. In the 30-day cohort, the readmission rate was 10.1% in the low risk group and 23.3% in the high risk group. In the 90-day cohort, the rates were 17.4% and 35.3%, respectively. The top predictors were the length of stay, frailty score, total discharge diagnoses, acute kidney injury, and Elixhauser score. These predictors were incorporated into a risk score (TAVI readmission score), which exhibited good performance in an external validation cohort (area under the curve 0.74 [0.7-0.78]).

Conclusions

ML methods can leverage widely available administrative databases to identify patients at risk for readmission after TAVI, which could inform and improve post-TAVI care.

Risk Factors for Hospital Readmission Post-Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in the Contemporary Era: A Systematic Review

Background

Despite transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) becoming a widely accepted therapeutic option for the management of aortic stenosis, post-procedure readmission rates remain high. Rehospitalization is associated with negative patient outcomes, as well as increased healthcare costs, and has therefore been identified as an important target for quality improvement. Strategies to reduce the post-TAVI readmission rate are needed but require the identification of patients at high risk for rehospitalization. Our systematic review aims to identify predictors of post-procedure readmission in patients eligible for TAVI.

Methods

We conducted a comprehensive search of the MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases for the time period from 2015 to the present for articles evaluating risk factors for rehospitalization post-TAVI with a follow-up period of at least 30 days in adults age ≥ 70 years with aortic stenosis. The quality of included studies was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. We present the results as a qualitative narrative review.

Results

We identified 49 studies involving 828,528 patients. Post-TAVI readmission is frequent, and rates vary (14.9% to 54.3% at 1 year). The most-frequent predictors identified for both 30-day and 1-year post-TAVI readmission are atrial fibrillation, lung disease, renal disease, diabetes mellitus, in-hospital life-threatening bleeding, and non-femoral access.

Conclusions

This systematic review identifies the most-common predictors for 30-day and 1-year readmission post-TAVI, including comorbidities and potentially modifiable procedural approaches and complications. These predictors can be used to identify patients at high-risk for readmission who are most likely to benefit from increased support and follow-up post-TAVI.

Same-Day Discharge After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Insights from the Nationwide Readmission Database 2015 to 2019

Background There is a paucity of data on the feasibility of same-day discharge (SDD) following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) at a national level. Methods and Results This study used data from the Nationwide Readmission Database from the fourth quarter of 2015 through 2019 and identified patients undergoing TAVI using the claim code 02RF3. A total of 158 591 weighted hospitalizations for TAVI were included in the analysis. Of the patients undergoing TAVI, 961 (0.6%) experienced SDD. Non-SDDs included 65 814 (41.5%) patients who underwent TAVI who were discharged the next day, and 91 816 (57.9%) discharged on the second or third day. The 30-day readmission rate for SDD after TAVI was similar to non-SDD TAVI (9.8% versus 8.9%, P=0.31). The cumulative incidence of 30-day readmissions for SDD was higher compared with next-day discharge (log-rank P=0.01) but comparable to second- or third-day discharge (log-rank P=0.66). At 30 days, no differences were observed in major or minor vascular complications, heart failure, or ischemic stroke for SDD compared with non-SDD. Acute kidney injury, pacemaker implantation, and bleeding complications were lower with SDD. Predictors associated with SDD included age <85 years, male sex, and prior pacemaker placement, whereas left bundle-branch block, right bundle-branch block, second-degree heart block, heart failure, prior percutaneous coronary intervention, and atrial fibrillation were negatively associated with SDD. Conclusions SDD following TAVI is associated with similar 30-day readmission and complication rates compared with non-SDD. Further prospective studies are needed to assess the safety and feasibility of SDD after TAVI.

Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus repeat surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with a failed aortic bioprosthesis

BACKGROUND

Limited data are available regarding clinical outcomes of valve-in-valve (ViV) transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) following the United States Food and Drug Administration approval of ViV TAVI in 2015.

AIMS

The aim of this study was to evaluate in-hospital, 30-day, and 6-month outcomes of ViV TAVI versus repeat surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in patients with a failed aortic bioprosthetic valve.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study identified patients who underwent ViV TAVI or repeat SAVR utilising the Nationwide Readmission Database from 2016 to 2018. Primary outcomes were all-cause readmission (at 30 days and 6 months) and in-hospital death. Secondary outcomes were in-hospital stroke, pacemaker implantation, 30-day/6-month major adverse cardiac events (MACE), and mortality during readmission. Propensity score-matching (inverse probability of treatment weighting) analyses were implemented.

RESULTS

Out of 6,769 procedures performed, 3,724 (55%) patients underwent ViV TAVI, and 3,045 (45%) underwent repeat SAVR. ViV TAVI was associated with lower in-hospital all-cause mortality (odds ratio [OR] 0.42, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.20-0.90, p=0.026) and a higher rate of 30-day (hazard ratio [HR] 1.46, 95% CI: 1.13-1.90, p=0.004) and 6-month all-cause readmission (HR 1.54, 95% CI: 1.14-2.10, p=0.006) compared with repeat SAVR. All secondary outcomes were comparable between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

ViV TAVI was associated with lower in-hospital mortality but higher 30-day and 6-month all-cause readmission. However, there was no difference in risk of in-hospital stroke, post-procedure pacemaker implantation, MACE, and mortality during 30-day and 6-month readmission compared with repeat SAVR, suggesting that ViV TAVI can be performed safely in carefully selected patients.

Understanding repeat hospitalizations in intermediate-to-high risk aortic stenosis patients following transcatheter aortic valve replacement

OBJECTIVES

We describe the causes, timing and predictors of readmissions and analyze its impact on clinical outcomes in intermediate-to-high-risk patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis (AS) who underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).

BACKGROUND

Intermediate-high risk TAVR patients with severe AS have an increased risk for hospital readmissions due to the high burden of comorbidities.

METHODS

Patients who underwent TAVR from 2012 to 2018 at a single tertiary cardiac center were included and followed for 1 year. Readmissions were categorized as noncardiovascular (non-CV) and CV.

RESULTS

A total of 611 patients (410 with no readmissions, 201 with ≥1 readmissions) were included. There was a total of 317 readmissions (mean: 1.58 ± 1.09 per readmitted patient) with 65 patients having ≥2 readmissions. 64.0% were non-CV and 36.0% were CV. The top three CV causes were pacemaker/implantable cardioverter-defibrillator placement, bleeding, and stroke. About 23% occurred at 1 m, the majority were CV; 45% occurred between 7 and 12 m, the majority were non-CV. Those with ≥1 readmissions had a higher burden of comorbidities including peripheral arterial disease, diabetes, immunosuppression, prior percutaneous coronary interventions, and dialysis. Readmissions were associated with higher 1-year mortality (adjusted hazard ratio: 2.53, 95% confidence interval: 1.40-4.59; p = 0.002). High-risk patients had higher non-CV readmissions (0.37 ± 0.79 vs. 0.25 ± 0.62; p = 0.044) compared to intermediate-risk patients but similar CV readmissions (p = 0.645).

CONCLUSIONS

Understanding readmissions post-TAVR will promote the early identification of at-risk groups and the implementation of preventative measures to improve outcomes and reduce the burden and costs of readmissions.

Anemia and risk of periprocedural cerebral injury detected by diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement

BACKGROUND

Anemia is prevalent in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and has been linked to impaired outcomes after the procedure. Few studies have evaluated the impact of anemia and new ischemic lesions post TAVR.

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled 158 patients who received TAVR in our center. Anemia was defined according to the World Health Organization criteria as hemoglobin <12 g/dL in women and <13 g/dL in men. All patients underwent diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) procedure before and within 4-7 days after TAVR.

RESULTS

Anemia was present in 85 (53.8%) patients who underwent TAVR, and 126 (79.7%) patients had 718 new DW-MRI positive lesions with a mean of 4.54±5.26 lesions per patient. The incidence of new ischemic lesions was 81.2% in patients with anemia versus 78.1% in patients without anemia (P=0.629). Moreover, anemic patients had bigger total volume/lesions in the anterior cerebral artery/middle cerebral artery (ACA/MCA) and MCA regions compared to the non-anemic patients (31.89±55.78 mm3 vs. 17.08±37.39 mm3, P=0.049; and 54.54±74.72 mm3 vs. 33.75±46.03 mm3, P=0.034). Anemia was independently associated with the volume/lesion in the ACA/MCA (β=16.796, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 2.001 to 31.591, P=0.026) and in the MCA zone (β=0.020, 95% CI 0.001 to 0.040, P=0.041).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with pre-procedural anemia may have bigger total volume/lesions in the ACA/MCA and MCA regions compared to the non-anemic patients. Whether the consequences of bigger total volume/lesions impact neurological and cognitive outcomes remains to be investigated.

30-day readmission following urgent and elective transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A Nationwide Readmission Database analysis

BACKGROUND

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is being increasingly used for decompensated severe symptomatic aortic stenosis. Data on urgent and elective TAVR readmission is scarce in the literature. Here, we have performed a retrospective cohort study with the Nationwide Readmission Database of 2016 to identify the rate of 30-day all-cause readmission, common causes of readmission, and distribution of morbidity in index admission and readmission after urgent and elective TAVR.

METHODS

We used International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes (02R.F38H, 02R.F38Z, 02R.F48Z) for identification of all TAVR procedures done in 2016 in patients >18 years old. We found 8379 patients who underwent urgent TAVR and 32,006 patients who underwent elective TAVR in 2016.

RESULT

The mean age of patients undergoing urgent TAVR was 79 ± 9.97 years with 44.6% women. The mean age of patients undergoing elective TAVR was 80.7 ± 8.25 years with 46.2% women. We found the 30-day all-cause readmission rate of 15.5% and 9.5% in patients undergoing urgent and elective TAVR, respectively (p < 0.001). The cardiac cause was the predominant cause of readmission in both groups (43.77% vs. 42.11%, p = 0.57), followed by pulmonary cause, gastrointestinal (GI) cause, and renal cause. Among cardiac causes, congestive heart failure (CHF) was predominant cause of readmission and was similar in both groups (18.73 in urgent TAVR vs. 15.73 in elective TAVR, p = 0.12).

CONCLUSION

We found that the all-cause 30-day readmission rate was higher in patients who had undergone urgent TAVR. Further studies are needed to better understand this difference.

All-cause readmission after transcatheter aortic valve replacement in a community hospital - Long term follow-up: Readmissions after aortic valve replacement

BACKGROUND

Post-procedure readmissions are associated with lower quality of life and increased economic burden. The study aimed to identify predictors for long-term all-cause readmissions in patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in a community hospital.

METHODS

A Historical cohort study of all adults who underwent TAVR at Cape-Cod hospital between June 2015 and December 2017 was performed and data on readmissions was collected up-to May 2020 (median follow up of 3.3 years). Pre-procedure, procedure and in-hospital post-procedure parameters were collected. Readmission rate was evaluated, and univariate and multivariable analyses were applied to identify predictors for readmission.

RESULTS

The study included 262 patients (mean age 83.7±7.9 years, 59.9% males). The median Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) probability of mortality (PROM) score was 4.9 (IQR, 3.1-7.9). Overall, 120 patients were readmitted. Ten percent were readmitted within 1-month, 20.8% within 3-months, 32.0% within 6-months and 44.5% within 1-year. New readmissions after 1-year were rare. STS PROM 5% or above (HR 1.50, p=0.039), pre-procedure anemia (HR 1.63, p=0.034), severely decreased pre-procedure renal function (HR 1.93, p=0.040) and procedural complication (HR 1.65, p=0.013) were independent predictors for all-cause readmission.

CONCLUSIONS

Elevated procedural risk, anemia, renal dysfunction and procedural complication are important predictors for readmission. Pre-procedure and ongoing treatment of the patient's background diseases and completion of treatment for complications prior to discharge may contribute to a reduction in the rate of readmissions.

Rationale and design of the Dapagliflozin after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (DapaTAVI) randomized trial

AIMS

Despite aortic stenosis (AS) relief, patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) are at increased risk of developing heart failure (HF) within first months of intervention. Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors have been shown to reduce the risk of HF hospitalization in individuals with diabetes mellitus, reduced left ventricular ejection fraction and chronic kidney disease. However, the effect of SGLT-2 inhibitors on outcomes after TAVI is unknown. The Dapagliflozin after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (DapaTAVI) trial is designed to assess the clinical benefit and safety of the SGLT-2 inhibitor dapagliflozin in patients undergoing TAVI.

METHODS

DapaTAVI is an independent pragmatic, controlled, prospective, randomized, open-label blinded endpoint, multicentre trial conducted in Spain, evaluating the effect of dapagliflozin 10 mg/day on the risk of death and worsening HF in patients with severe AS undergoing TAVI. Candidate patients should have prior history of HF admission plus ≥1 of the following criteria: (i) diabetes mellitus, (ii) left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40%, or (iii) estimated glomerular filtration rate between 25 and 75 ml/min/1.73 m² . A total of 1020 patients will be randomized (1:1) to dapagliflozin vs. no dapagliflozin. Key secondary outcomes include: (i) incidence rate of individual components of the primary outcome; (ii) cardiovascular mortality; (iii) the composite of HF hospitalization or cardiovascular death; and (iv) total number of HF rehospitalizations.

CONCLUSION

DapaTAVI will determine the efficacy and safety of dapagliflozin in a broad spectrum of frail patients after AS relief by TAVI.

Midterm Outcomes Following Sutureless and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients With Aortic Stenosis

BACKGROUND

Sutureless-surgical aortic valve replacement (SU-SAVR) has been proposed as a surgical alternative for treating aortic stenosis, which facilitates a minimally invasive approach. While some studies have compared the early outcomes of SU-SAVR versus transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), most data were obtained in high-risk patients and/or limited to in-hospital outcomes. This study aimed to compare in-hospital and midterm clinical outcomes following SU-SAVR and TAVR in low-risk patients with aortic stenosis.

METHODS

A total of 806 consecutive low-risk (EuroSCORE II <4%) patients underwent TAVR or SU-SAVR between 2011 and 2020 in 2 centers. A 1:1 propensity score matching was performed and identified 171 pairs with similar characteristics that were included in the analysis. Baseline characteristics, in-hospital and follow-up events (defined according to Valve Academic Research Consortium-2) were collected.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics were well balanced between groups, with a median EuroSCORE II of 1.9% (1.3%-2.5%) in both SU-SAVR and TAVR groups (P=0.85). There were no statistically significant differences regarding in-hospital mortality (SU-SAVR: 4.1%, TAVR: 1.8%, P=0.199) and stroke (SU-SAVR: 2.3%, TAVR: 2.9%, P=0.736), but SU-SAVR recipients exhibited higher rates of bleeding and new-onset atrial fibrillation, higher residual transvalvular gradients (P<0.001), and a lower rate of pacemaker implantation (P=0.011). After a median follow-up of 2 (1-3) years, there were no differences between groups in all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 0.97 [95% CI, 0.52-1.82], P=0.936) and stroke (hazard ratio, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.32-2.15], P=0.708), but SU-SAVR was associated with a higher risk of heart failure hospitalization (hazard ratio, 5.38 [95% CI, 1.88-15.38], P=0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

In low-risk patients with aortic stenosis, TAVR was associated with improved in-hospital outcomes (except for conduction disturbances) and valve hemodynamics, compared with SU-SAVR. Although similar mortality and stroke rates were observed at 2-year follow-up, the risk of heart failure hospitalization was higher among SU-SAVR patients. These results may contribute to reinforce TAVR over SU-SAVR for the majority of such patients. Graphic Abstract: A graphic abstract is available for this article.

Long term mortality and readmissions after transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Background

Readmissions following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are common but detailed analysis of cardiac and non-cardiac inpatient readmissions beyond thirty days to different levels of care are limited.

Methods

Our study population was 1,037 consecutive patients who underwent TAVR between 2011-2017 within a multi-hospital quaternary health system. A retrospective chart review was performed and readmissions were adjudicated and classified based on primary readmission diagnosis (cardiac versus noncardiac) and level of care [intensive care unit (ICU) admission vs. non-ICU admission]. Incidence, causes, and outcomes of readmissions to up to three years post procedure were evaluated.

Results

Of the 1,017 patients who survived their index hospitalization, there were readmissions due to noncardiac causes in 350 (34.4%) and cardiac causes in 208 (20.5%) during a mean 1.96 years of follow-up. The most common non-cardiac causes of readmission were sepsis/infection (14.3%), gastrointestinal (8.3%), and respiratory (4.8%), whereas heart failure (14.0%) and arrhythmias (4.6%) were the most common cardiac causes of readmission. A total of 191 (18.8%) patients were readmitted to the ICU and 372 patients (36.6%) were non-ICU readmissions. The risk of a noncardiac readmission was highest in the period immediately following TAVR (~4.5% per month) with an early high hazard phase that gradually declined over months. However, the risk of cardiac readmission remained stable at ~1% per month throughout. TAVR patients that were readmitted for any cause had markedly increased mortality; this was especially true for patients readmitted to an ICU.

Conclusions

In TAVR patients who survived their index hospitalization, non-cardiac readmissions were more prevalent than cardiac. The risk of readmission and subsequent mortality was highest immediately post-procedure and declined thereafter. Readmission to ICU portends the highest risk of subsequent death in this cohort. Patient baseline co-morbidities are an important consideration for TAVR patients and play a significant role in readmissions and outcomes.

Real-life outcomes and readmissions after a TAVI procedure in a Glasgow population

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a routine procedure for patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis who are deemed inoperable or high-risk surgical candidates. The aim of this study was to examine real-world data on death and readmission rates in patients following the procedure. Electronic health records for patients who underwent TAVI between April 2015 and November 2018 were reviewed. Details of the procedure, complications, length of initial hospital stay and outcomes of interest (subsequent admissions and mortality) were recorded. In our cohort of 124 patients, the mean age was 80.8 years and 43% were male. Cardiac comorbidities were common, more than 30% had myocardial infarction (MI) and 15% had a previous coronary artery bypass graft (CABG). One in five suffered from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), with similar prevalence of diabetes mellitus and cerebrovascular accident (CVA). In-hospital mortality was low at 3.3%, however, 30-day readmission rates were high at 14.6%; 44.4% were readmitted to hospital within one year. TAVI is a successful procedure in Scotland with good outcome data. The potential benefit of the procedure in many patients is limited by comorbidities, which shorten life-expectancy and lead to hospital readmission. These data highlight the importance of effective multi-disciplinary discussion in a time of realistic medicine.

Heart failure following transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Introduction: Over the past decade, the number of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) procedures has increased exponentially. Despite major improvements in both device and successes, the rate of hospital readmission after TAVR remains high, with heart failure (HF) decompensation being one of the most important causes.Areas covered: This review provides an overview of the current status of HF following TAVR, including details about its incidence, clinical impact, contributing factors, and current and future treatment perspectives.Expert opinion: HF decompensation has been identified as the most common cause of rehospitalization following TAVR, and it has been associated with a negative prognosis. Multiple preexisting factors including low flow status, cardiac amyloidosis, myocardial fibrosis, multivalvular disease, pulmonary hypertension, coronary artery disease, and atrial fibrillation have been associated with an increased risk of HF events. Also, multiple post-procedural factors like the occurrence of significant paravalvular leaks, severe prosthesis-patient mismatch, and conduction disturbances have also contributed to increase this risk . Thus, reducing HF events in TAVR recipients would require a multifactorial and multidisciplinary effort including the optimization of the medical treatment and close follow-up and treatment of residual or concomitant valvular disease and conduction disturbance issues. Future studies in this challenging group of patients are warranted.

Modeling the Impact of Delaying TAVR for the Treatment of Aortic Stenosis in the Era of COVID-19

Objective

The aim of this study was to model the short term and 2-year overall survival for intermediate- and low-risk patients with severe symptomatic AS undergoing timely or delayed transcatheter aortic valve replacement during the 2019 novel coronavirus pandemic.

Methods

We developed a decision analysis model to evaluate two treatment strategies for both low-risk and intermediate-risk patients with aortic stenosis during the 2019 novel coronavirus pandemic.

Results

Prompt transcatheter aortic valve replacement resulted in improved 2-year overall survival when compared to delayed intervention for intermediate-risk patients (0.81 versus 0.67) and low-risk patients (0.95 vs 0.85), due to the risk of death or the need for urgent/emergent transcatheter aortic valve replacement in the waiting period. However, if the probability of acquiring the 2019 novel coronavirus is greater than 55% (intermediate risk patients) or 47% (low risk patients), delayed transcatheter aortic valve replacement is favorable to prompt intervention (0.66 vs 0.67, intermediate risk; 0.84 vs 0.85, low risk).

Conclusions and Relevance

Prompt transcatheter aortic valve replacement for both intermediate-risk and low-risk patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis results in improved 2-year survival when local healthcare system resources are not significantly constrained by the 2019 novel coronavirus.

Causes and predictors of readmission after transcatheter aortic valve implantation : A meta-analysis and systematic review

BACKGROUND

Since readmission rate is an important clinical index to determine the quality of inpatient care and hospital performance, the aim of this study was to explain the causes and predictors of readmission following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) at short-term and mid-term follow-up.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A systematic review and meta-analysis of all published articles from Embase, Pubmed/MEDLINE, and Ovid was carried out. In all, 10 studies including 52,702 patients were identified. The pooled estimate for the overall event rate was 0.15, and cardiovascular causes were the main reason for 30-day readmission (0.42, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.39-0.45). In addition, the pooled incidence of 1‑year readmission was 0.31, and cardiovascular events were still the main cause (0.41, 95% CI: 0.33-0.48). Patients with major and life-threatening bleeding, new permanent pacemaker implantation, and clinical heart failure were associated with a high risk for early readmission after TAVI. Moreover, an advanced (≥3) New York Heart Association classification, acute kidney injury, paravalvular leak, mitral regurgitation (≥ moderate), and major bleeding predicted unfavorable outcome to 1‑year readmission. Female gender and transfemoral TAVI was associated with a lower risk for unplanned rehospitalization.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis found cardiovascular factors to be the main causes for both 30-day and 1‑year rehospitalization. Heart failure represented the most common cardiovascular event at both short-term and mid-term follow-up. Several baseline characteristics and procedure-related factors were deemed unfavorable predictors of readmission. Importantly, transfemoral access and female gender were associated with a lower risk of readmission.