Acute Heart Failure Caused by Dislocation of a WATCHMAN Left Atrial Appendage Occluder

Surgical Removal of a Migrated WATCHMAN Device

The WATCHMAN™ atrial appendage closure device is designed to reduce the risk of stroke in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation who are not suitable candidates for long-term oral anticoagulation therapy. However, the device also carries small risks, including procedural complications such as device migration, embolization, or pericardial effusion. We describe a case of WATCHMAN device migration requiring surgical retrieval.

Emergent surgical retrieval of a left atrial appendage occluder migrated into the left ventricular outflow tract with secondary massive mitral regurgitation: A case report and literature review

Thrombotic complications of atrial fibrillation continue to pose a significant challenge in clinical practice today. Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) has emerged as a promising alternative to oral anticoagulation for high-risk patients with atrial fibrillation. However, despite the potential benefits, there is still the possibility of life-threatening complications such as device dislocation. In this case study, we present a patient who experienced severe hemodynamic disturbances due to the embolization of LAAO device into the left ventricular outflow tract, resulting in a torn mitral valve and secondary massive mitral regurgitation, just 3 hours after the procedure. As a result, emergent surgical intervention was required to remove the device and repair the mitral valve. We also conducted a review of previous studies on the retrieval of dislodged left atrial appendage occluders through surgical procedures. It is crucial to maintain vigilance, foster interdisciplinary collaboration, and respond promptly to ensure the safety and efficacy of LAAO procedures.

A Simple Percutaneous Retrieval Technique for an Embolized Watchman Left Atrial Appendage Closure Device in the Thoracic Aorta Using a Homemade Snare

A 60-year old male with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation underwent a combined procedure of left atrial appendage occlusion and pulmonary vein isolation. However, an acute intraprocedural 24-mm Watchman device dislodgement occurred, and thus a decision for urgent surgery was made. However, it was noted during the surgery that the device had migrated further to the descending aorta, just distal to the left subclavian artery. Since a right sternotomy access for retrieval was not feasible, a percutaneous approach was justified. A homemade snare was created using a combination of a long sheath, J-wire, and a regular snare, and the device was successfully retrieved without significant difficulty.

Atrial Thrombosis Caused by a Dislocated Left Atrial Appendage Closure Device After Mitral Valve Replacement

A patient with a left atrial appendage occlusion device underwent mitral valve replacement. Later, the patient developed a left atrial thrombosis with thromboembolic myocardial infarction caused by a dislocation of the occlusion device. Exclusion of the device and non-device-based appendage occlusion may have prevented the patient from experiencing postoperative complications (Level of Difficulty: Intermediate.).

Late discovery of left atrial appendage occluder device embolization: a case report

BACKGROUND

Left atrial appendage (LAA) closure has been well evaluated in the prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation. Device embolization remains one of the most common complications. To the best of our knowledge, there have been no reports of late discovery of LAA occluder device embolization at 1.5 years after implantation.

CASE PRESENTATION

We describe the case of a 77-year-old man who underwent uneventful LAA closure. Echocardiography performed the next day showed the device in place. The patient was discharged but was then lost to follow-up. 1.5 years later, he was admitted for ischemic stroke. Transesophageal echocardiography showed the absence of the occluder device in the LAA. Computed tomography scan of the abdomen showed the device in the abdominal aorta. Due to the high cardiovascular risk, the device was kept in place and the patient was treated medically.

CONCLUSIONS

Per-procedural and late device embolization are not uncommon. Review of the literature however showed no report of late discovery of device embolization at 1.5 years. Follow-up echocardiography is mandatory for the detection of endothelialization or embolization.

Percutaneous retrieval of a dislocated LAmbre left atrial appendage occluder in a canine model

BACKGROUND

Dislocated left atrial appendage (LAA) occluders can be retrieved by percutaneous intervention when performing device embolization into the left atrium (LA), aorta (AO), or left ventricle (LV). However, few reports exist regarding LAmbre LAA occluder dislocation.

OBJECTIVE

The study was aimed to explore the outcome of retrieving dislocated LAmbre LAA occluder.

METHODS

Sixteen healthy dogs received LAmbre implants. After implantation of an occlusion device (not released), the occlusion device was completely retrieved. Subsequently, the device was released in the LA, resulting in the dislocation of the device. Angiography and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) were performed to check the occluders position. Disposable grasping rat-tooth forceps were used to percutaneously retrieve the LAA occluder.

RESULTS

All the 16 dogs were successfully implanted with the LAmbre LAA occluder and the success rate was 100%. After the occluder was released, TEE and angiography confirmed that the device was located in the LA in eight cases (50%), in the AO in five cases (31%), and in the LV in three cases (19%). One subject died due to cardiogenic shock before the retrieval procedure was complete as the device fell into the LV. Two cases of device-related aortic valve injury occurred during the retrieval procedure when the device was located in the LV. No complications were observed when the device was located in the LA or AO.

CONCLUSIONS

Device retrieval is feasible in most cases. However, potentially lethal complications may occur once the device is dislocated into the LV/AO.

Reoccurrence of Stroke in a Patient With Peri-Device Leak of WATCHMAN Device

Atrial fibrillation is the leading cause of cardioembolic stroke, with emboli most commonly originating from the left atrial appendage. We report the case of a 71-year-old male with left atrial appendage closure via implantation of the WATCHMAN device, due to possible anticoagulation therapy failure and increased bleeding risk, following a stroke. Following a new stroke over a year later, a 1.8-mm peri-device leak was observed. Surgical records noted a minimal (<5 mm jet flow) peri-device leak after the installation, which was considered successful WATCHMAN implantation per protocol. This case highlights the persistent risk of cardioembolic stroke in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation despite device implantation and questions the significance of peri-device leak and further management with anticoagulation for recurrent stroke.