WIRION Embolic Protection System in Lower Extremity Arterial Interventions

Peripheral Artery Disease: A comprehensive updated review

Peripheral arterial disease is estimated to affect more than 200 million people worldwide. Although more than 50% of those affected are asymptomatic, it accounts for 3-4% of amputations and a crude five-year death rate of 82.4 deaths per 1000 patient-years when adjusted for duration of follow-up. Additionally, peripheral artery disease is often an indicator of obstructive atherosclerotic disease involvement of cerebral and coronary vessels, consequently increasing the risk of stroke, cardiovascular death, and myocardial infarction in these patient populations. The management of peripheral arterial disease includes conservative therapies, pharmacological treatments, interventional and surgical revascularization of blood vessels. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty with balloons and stents has improved clinical outcomes compared to medical treatment alone. Despite these advances, the prevalence of peripheral arterial disease remains high. This review article aims to provide focused, up-to-date information on the clinical course, diagnosis, medical and interventional approach of the management of peripheral artery disease.

Critical Appraisal of the Contemporary Use of Atherectomy to Treat Femoral-Popliteal Atherosclerotic Disease

OBJECTIVE

Atherectomy has become increasingly used as an endovascular treatment of lower extremity atherosclerotic disease in the United States. Concerns and controversies about its indication and outcomes exist. The goal of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate the outcomes and complications related to atherectomy to treat femoropopliteal atherosclerotic disease.

METHODS

A systematic review following the recommendations of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement was performed. Four major scientific repositories, MEDLINE, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, and Thompson Web of Sciences were queried from their inception to April 5, 2020. Data was reviewed and entered in a dedicated dataset by the investigators. Outcomes included patency rates, clinical and hemodynamic improvement, and morbidity and mortality associated with atherectomy interventions.

RESULTS

Twenty-four studies encompassing 1900 patients met inclusion criteria for this study. 74.3% of patients presented with Rutherford class (RC) 1-3 and 25.7% presented with RC class 4-6. 1445 patients underwent atherectomy, and 455 patients were treated without atherectomy. Atherectomy patients underwent directional atherectomy (DA, n = 851), rotational atherectomy (RA, n = 851), laser atherectomy (LA, n = 201), and orbital atherectomy (OA, n = 78). The majority of patients additionally received adjunct treatments which were variable across studies and included a combination of stenting, balloon angioplasty (BA), or drug coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty. Technical success was achieved in 92.3% of cases. Distal embolization, vessel perforation, and dissection occurred in 3.4%, 1.9%, and 4% of cases respectively. Initial patency was 95.4% and at 12-month median follow up primary patency was 72.6%. ABI improved from pre-operative mean of 0.6 to post-operative mean of 0.84. Incidence of major amputation and mortality over the follow up period was 2.2% and 3.4% respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This review of the published data suggests that femoropopliteal atherectomy can be completed safely while modestly improving ABIs and maintaining one-year patency in nearly three out of four patients; however, this is based on heterogeneous studies that skew generalizable conclusions about atherectomy's efficacy. Atherectomy places a high cost burden on the healthcare system and is utilized in the United States at a higher rate than in other countries. Our review of the literature does not demonstrate clear atherectomy superiority to alternatives that would warrant pervasive and increasing use of this costly technology. Future work should focus on developing high quality randomized controlled trials to determine specific patient and lesion characteristics in which atherectomy can add value.

Embolic Protection in Complex Femoropopliteal Interventions: Safety, Efficacy and Predictors of Filter Macroembolization

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of a filter embolic protection device (FEPD) in endovascular interventions of the femoropopliteal arteries.

METHODS

Patients who underwent endovascular interventions of the femoropopliteal arteries between 2008 and 2016 and in whom the SpiderFX^TM FEPD was applied were included in this retrospective study. Clinical and angiographic characteristics, filter macroembolization (FME), device-related complications, distal embolization, as well as the early clinical and hemodynamic outcome, were assessed. Potential risk factors for FME were evaluated by multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 244 cases were identified (203 patients, claudication 60.4%, critical limb ischaemia 39.6%, mean lesion length 13.2 ± 12.9 cm, complete occlusions in 72.7%). Balloon angioplasty ± stenting (BAP), directional atherectomy ± balloon angioplasty ± stenting (DA) and rotational thrombectomy ± balloon angioplasty ± stenting (RT) were performed in 141, 61 and 42 cases, respectively. FEPD placement and retrieval were successful in all but one case each. Permanent filter-related vessel damage was not observed. The rate of FME was 37.3% (BAP 36.2%, DA 32.8%, RT 47.7%). Risk factors for FME in the BAP- and DA-group were total occlusion, lesion length > 19 cm, visible thrombus and diabetes mellitus. The distal embolization rate despite filter protection was 4.1 % (BAP 4.9%, DA 1.6%, RT 4.8%) and was higher in cases with FME compared with those without FME (8.7% vs. 1.5%, p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

The Spider FX^TM device is safe and effective in capturing embolic debris during femoropopliteal interventions. A residual risk of peripheral embolization remains.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, Cohort study.

JetStream Atherectomy for the Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis of the Femoropopliteal Segment: One-Year Results of the JET-ISR Study

PURPOSE

To report the results of a study evaluating JetStream atherectomy for the treatment of in-stent restenosis (ISR).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The JetStream XC atherectomy device, a rotational cutter with aspiration capacity, was evaluated in a prospective, multicenter study (JET-ISR) of 60 patients (mean age 70.2±10.8 years; 40 men) with femoropopliteal ISR (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02730234). Lesion length was 19.9±13.5 cm; 33 (55%) were chronic total occlusions and 26 (45%) were TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus class D. No drug-bearing device was allowed, and stenting was performed only for bailout. Lesion characteristics and stent integrity were evaluated by an independent core laboratory. The primary endpoint was target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 6 months with bailout stenting considered as TLR. Secondary endpoints included TLR (without bailout stenting) and clinical patency (no restenosis or TLR) at 1 year. The Kaplan-Meier method was employed to evaluate time-to-event endpoints; estimates are given with 95% confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

Bailout stenting was required in 6 of 60 limbs (10%). There were no stent fractures or deformities after atherectomy + adjunctive angioplasty reported by the core laboratory. Kaplan-Meier estimates of freedom from TLR at 6 months and 1 year were 79.3% (95% CI 68.9% to 89.8%) and 60.7% (95% CI 47.8% to 73.6%), respectively. When bailout stenting at the index procedure was not considered a TLR event, freedom from TLR estimates at 6 months and 1 year were 89.3% (95% CI 81.2% to 97.4%) and 66.8% (95% CI 54.3% to 74.2%), respectively. Clinical patency rates at 6 months and 1 year were 77.5% (31/40) and 51.7% (15/29), respectively.

CONCLUSION

JetStream atherectomy using the XC device and no drug-eluting devices is feasible, with good clinical patency and 1-year freedom from TLR.

WIRION™ embolic protection system for carotid artery stenting and lower extremity endovascular intervention

Aim: To summarize all available literature regarding the Wirion™ embolic protection system (EPS) and present examples from our center. Materials & methods: A review of literture was performed about the utilization of Wirion EPS. Results: One study was identified investigating the outcomes of Wirion during carotid artery stenting. The study demonstrated 98.3% procedural success with stroke occurring in only 2.5%. Two single arm studies were identified investigating the efficacy of the Wirion filter during lower extremity endovascular interventions. The reported device success ranged from 95.1 to 97.3%. Conclusion: While carotid artery stenting should always be performed with adjunctive EPS in order to decrease the risk of cerebrovascular accidents, the routine use of EPS in femorpopliteal interventions remains an active area of investigation.

WIRION EPS Filter with Jetstream Atherectomy of Femoropopliteal Arterial Disease: A Single Center Experience

BACKGROUND

The WIRION EPS filter was recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to be used in conjunction with all atherectomy devices when treating infrainguinal peripheral arterial disease. The safety of this filter with Jetstream atherectomy (JA) in a real world setting remains unclear.

METHODS

Consecutive patients from the practice of one operator who underwent JA under WIRION EPS when treating femoropopliteal arteries were enrolled in this retrospective analysis. The primary safety endpoint was the ability of the filter to capture macrodebris with no dissection or thrombosis at the filter site and no filter-related major adverse events. Descriptive analysis on demographics, clinical, procedural and angiographic variables was done using mean ± SD for continuous variables and percentages for categorical variables.

RESULTS

37 patients were enrolled in this study between June 2016 and September of 2018 (64.9% males, age 68.7 ± 9.0, BMI 27.7 ± 5.4). TASC II classification of the treated lesions were 51.4% B, 24.3% A, 21.6% C, and 2.7% D. At the filter site, spasm occurred in 1/37 (2.7%), while dissection did not occur (0%). Embolization within the filter was found in 51.4% of patients: 14/37 (37.8%) macro debris and 5/35 (13.5%) micro debris. Clinically significant embolization distal to the filter that required treatment with more than a simple aspiration was 1/37 (2.7%).

CONCLUSION

WIRION EPS filter use with Jetstream atherectomy was safe and was associated with a low rate of significant distal embolization that required more than a simple aspiration to treat.