1
|
Harik L, Gaudino M. Coronary angiography and bypass surgery: born together and now going separate ways? Eur Heart J 2024; 45:1816-1818. [PMID: 38583087 DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae223] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2024] [Accepted: 03/26/2024] [Indexed: 04/08/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Lamia Harik
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, 525 E 68th St, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Mario Gaudino
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, 525 E 68th St, New York, NY 10065, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Shamkhani W, Moledina S, Rashid M, Mamas MA. Complex high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention types, trends, and outcomes according to vascular access site. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2023; 102:803-813. [PMID: 37750228 DOI: 10.1002/ccd.30846] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2022] [Revised: 05/15/2023] [Accepted: 09/13/2023] [Indexed: 09/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radial access is associated with improved outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI); however, its role in complex, high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (CHiP) remains poorly studied. METHODS We studied retrospectively all registered patients's records from the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society dataset and compared the baseline characteristics, trends and outcomes of CHiP procedures performed electively between January 2006 and December 2017 according to the access site. RESULTS Out of 137,785 CHiP procedures, 61,825 (44.9%) were undertaken via transradial access (TRA). TRA use increased over time (14.6% in 2006 to 67% in 2017). The TRA patients were older, with a greater prevalence of previous stroke, hypertension, peripheral vascular disease, and smokers. TRA was used more frequently in most CHiP procedures (elderly (51.6%), chronic renal failure (52.6%), poor left ventricular (LV) function (47.6%), left main PCI (48.0%), treatment for severe vascular calcification (50.3%); although transfemoral access (TFA) was used more commonly in those with prior history of coronary artery bypass graft surgery, and PCI to a chronic total occlusion and LV support patients. Following adjustment for differences in clinical and procedural characteristics, TFA was independently associated with higher odds for mortality [adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 1.3 (1.1-1.7)], major bleeding [aOR: 2.9 (2.3-3.4)], and MACCE (following propensity score matching) [aOR: 1.2 (1.1-1.4)]. The same was found with multiple accesses: mortality [aOR: 2.1 (1.5-2.8)], major bleeding [aOR: 5.5 (4.3-6.9)], and MACCE [aOR: 1.4 (1.2-1.7)]. CONCLUSION TRA has become the predominant access site for CHiP procedures and is associated with significantly lower mortality, major bleeding and MACCE odds than TFA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Warkaa Shamkhani
- Department of Cardiology, Keele Cardiovascular Research Group, Centre for Prognosis Research, Keele University, Keele, UK
- Department of Cardiology, Royal Stoke University Hospital, Stoke-on-Trent, UK
| | - Saadiq Moledina
- Department of Cardiology, Keele Cardiovascular Research Group, Centre for Prognosis Research, Keele University, Keele, UK
- Department of Cardiology, Royal Stoke University Hospital, Stoke-on-Trent, UK
| | - Muhammad Rashid
- Department of Cardiology, Keele Cardiovascular Research Group, Centre for Prognosis Research, Keele University, Keele, UK
- Department of Cardiology, Royal Stoke University Hospital, Stoke-on-Trent, UK
| | - Mamas A Mamas
- Department of Cardiology, Keele Cardiovascular Research Group, Centre for Prognosis Research, Keele University, Keele, UK
- Department of Cardiology, Royal Stoke University Hospital, Stoke-on-Trent, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Blankenship JC, Patel K. High Rates of Ad Hoc PCI May Mandate a Modified Heart Team Approach. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2023; 16:1743-1745. [PMID: 37495349 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2023.06.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2023] [Revised: 06/15/2023] [Accepted: 06/20/2023] [Indexed: 07/28/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- James C Blankenship
- Division of Cardiology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA.
| | - Krishna Patel
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mahtta D, Manandhar P, Wegermann ZK, Wojdyla D, Megaly M, Kochar A, Virani SS, Rao SV, Elgendy IY. Outcomes and Institutional Variation in Arterial Access Among Patients With AMI and Cardiogenic Shock Undergoing PCI. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2023; 16:1517-1528. [PMID: 37380235 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2023.03.043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2023] [Revised: 03/22/2023] [Accepted: 03/24/2023] [Indexed: 06/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Contemporary data comparing the outcomes of transradial access (TRA) vs transfemoral access (TFA) among patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock (AMI-CS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are limited. OBJECTIVES This study examines in-hospital outcomes and institutional variation among patients with AMI-CS undergoing TRA-PCI vs TFA-PCI. METHODS Patients admitted with AMI-CS from the NCDR CathPCI registry between April 2018 and June 2021 were included. Multivariable logistic regression and inverse probability weighting models were used to assess the association between access site and in-hospital outcomes. A falsification analysis using non-access site-related bleeding was performed. RESULTS Among 35,944 patients with AMI-CS undergoing PCI, 25.6% were performed with TRA. The proportion of TRA-PCI increased over the study period (22.0% in the second quarter of 2018 vs 29.1% in the second quarter of 2021; P-trend <0.001). Significant institutional-level variability in the use of TRA-PCI was also observed: 20.9% of all sites using TRA in <2% of PCIs (low utilization) vs 1.9% of all sites using TRA in >80% of PCIs (high utilization). Patients undergoing TRA-PCI had a significantly lower adjusted incidence of major bleeding (odds ratio [OR]: 0.71; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.67-0.76), mortality (OR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.69-0.78), vascular complications (OR: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.54-0.84), and new dialysis (OR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.77-0.97). There was no difference in non-access site related bleeding (OR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.84-1.03). Sensitivity analyses revealed similar benefit with TRA-PCI among patients without arterial cross-over. There were no significant interactions observed between TRA-PCI with mechanical circulatory support and in-hospital outcomes. CONCLUSIONS In this large nationwide contemporary analysis of patients with AMI-CS, about quarter of PCIs were performed via TRA with wide variability across US institutions. TRA-PCI was associated with significantly lower incidence of in-hospital major bleeding, mortality, vascular complications, and new dialysis. This benefit was observed irrespective of mechanical circulatory support use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dhruv Mahtta
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | | - Zachary K Wegermann
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA; Division of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Daniel Wojdyla
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA; Division of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Michael Megaly
- Willis Knighton Heart Institute, Shreveport, Louisiana, USA
| | - Ajar Kochar
- Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Richard and Susan Smith Center for Outcomes Research in Cardiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Salim S Virani
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Sunil V Rao
- NYU Langone Health System, New York, New York, USA
| | - Islam Y Elgendy
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Gill Heart and Vascular Institute, University of Kentucky HealthCare, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kinnaird T, Gallagher S, Farooq V, Protty M, Back L, Devlin P, Anderson R, Sharp A, Ludman P, Copt S, Mamas MA, Curzen N. Temporal Trends in In-Hospital Outcomes Following Unprotected Left-Main Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: An Analysis of 14 522 Cases From British Cardiovascular Intervention Society Database 2009 to 2017. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2023; 16:e012350. [PMID: 36649390 DOI: 10.1161/circinterventions.122.012350] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is increasingly used as a treatment option for unprotected left main stem artery (unprotected left main stem percutaneous intervention) disease. However, whether patient outcomes have improved over time is uncertain. METHODS Using the United Kingdom national PCI database, we studied all patients undergoing unprotected left main stem percutaneous intervention between 2009 and 2017. We excluded patients who presented with ST-segment-elevation, cardiogenic shock, and with an emergency indication for PCI. RESULTS Between 2009 and 2017, in the study-indicated population, 14 522 unprotected left main stem percutaneous intervention procedures were performed. Significant temporal changes in baseline demographics were observed with increasing patient age and comorbid burden. Procedural complexity increased over time, with the number of vessels treated, bifurcation PCI, number of stents used, and use of intravascular imaging and rotational atherectomy increased significantly through the study period. After adjustment for baseline differences, there were significant temporal reductions in the occurrence of peri-procedural myocardial infarction (P<0.001 for trend), in-hospital major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events (P<0.001 for trend), and acute procedural complications (P<0.001 for trend). In multivariable analysis examining the associates of in-hospital major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events, while age per year (odds ratio, 1.02 [95% CIs, 1.01-1.03]), female sex (odds ratio, 1.47 [1.19-1.82]), 3 or more stents (odds ratio, 1.67 [05% [1.02-2.67]), and patient comorbidity were associated with higher rates of in-hospital major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events, by contrast use of intravascular imaging (odds ratio, 0.56 [0.45-0.70]), and year of PCI (odds ratio, 0.63 [0.46-0.87]) were associated with lower rates of in-hospital major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events. CONCLUSIONS Despite trends for increased patient and procedural complexity, in-hospital patient outcomes have improved after unprotected left main stem percutaneous intervention over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tim Kinnaird
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, United Kingdom (T.K., S.G., V.F., M.P., L.B., P.D., R.A., A.S.).,Keele Cardiovascular Research Group, Institute of Applied Clinical Sciences, University of Keele, Stoke-on-Trent, United Kingdom (T.K., M.A.M.)
| | - Sean Gallagher
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, United Kingdom (T.K., S.G., V.F., M.P., L.B., P.D., R.A., A.S.)
| | - Vasim Farooq
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, United Kingdom (T.K., S.G., V.F., M.P., L.B., P.D., R.A., A.S.)
| | - Majd Protty
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, United Kingdom (T.K., S.G., V.F., M.P., L.B., P.D., R.A., A.S.)
| | - Liam Back
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, United Kingdom (T.K., S.G., V.F., M.P., L.B., P.D., R.A., A.S.)
| | - Peadar Devlin
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, United Kingdom (T.K., S.G., V.F., M.P., L.B., P.D., R.A., A.S.)
| | - Richard Anderson
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, United Kingdom (T.K., S.G., V.F., M.P., L.B., P.D., R.A., A.S.)
| | - Andrew Sharp
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, United Kingdom (T.K., S.G., V.F., M.P., L.B., P.D., R.A., A.S.)
| | - Peter Ludman
- Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, Birmingham University, United Kingdom (P.L.)
| | - Samuel Copt
- Division of Statistics, Biosensors SA, Morges, Switzerland (S.C.)
| | - Mamas A Mamas
- Department of Cardiology, Royal Stoke Hospital, UHNM, Stoke-on-Trent, United Kingdom (M.A.M.).,Keele Cardiovascular Research Group, Institute of Applied Clinical Sciences, University of Keele, Stoke-on-Trent, United Kingdom (T.K., M.A.M.)
| | - Nick Curzen
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospital NHS Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom (N.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Defining Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Complexity and Risk: An Analysis of the United Kingdom BCIS Database 2006-2016. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2022; 15:39-49. [PMID: 34991822 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.09.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2021] [Revised: 08/11/2021] [Accepted: 09/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The authors used the BCIS (British Cardiovascular Intervention Society) database to define the factors associated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) procedural complexity. BACKGROUND Complex high-risk indicated percutaneous coronary intervention (CHIP-PCI) is an emerging concept that is poorly defined. METHODS The BCIS (British Cardiovascular Intervention Society) database was used to study all PCI procedures in the United Kingdom 2006-2016. A multiple logistic regression model was developed to identify variables associated with in-hospital major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events (MACCE) and to construct a CHIP score. The cumulative effect of this score on patient outcomes was examined. RESULTS A total of 313,054 patients were included. Seven patient factors (age ≥80 years, female sex, previous stroke, previous myocardial infarction, peripheral vascular disease, ejection fraction <30%, and chronic renal disease) and 6 procedural factors (rotational atherectomy, left main PCI, 3-vessel PCI, dual arterial access, left ventricular mechanical support, and total lesion length >60 mm) were associated with increased in-hospital MACCE and defined as CHIP factors. The mean CHIP score/case for all PCIs increased significantly from 1.06 ± 1.32 in 2006 to 1.49 ± 1.58 in 2016 (P < 0.001 for trend). A CHIP score of 5 or more was present in 2.5% of procedures in 2006 increasing to 5.3% in 2016 (P < 0.001 for trend). Overall in-hospital MACCE was 0.6% when the CHIP score was 0 compared with 1.2% with any CHIP factor present (P < 0.001). As the CHIP score increased, an exponential increase in-hospital MACCE was observed. The cumulative MACCE for procedures associated with a CHIP score 4+ or above was 3.2%, and for a CHIP score 5+ was 4.4%. All other adverse clinical outcomes were more likely as the CHIP score increased. CONCLUSIONS Seven patient factors and 6 procedural factors were associated with adverse in-hospital MACCE and defined as CHIP factors. Use of a CHIP score might be a future target for risk modification.
Collapse
|
7
|
Taxiarchi P, Kontopantelis E, Kinnaird T, Curzen N, Banning A, Ludman P, Shoaib A, Rashid M, Martin GP, Mamas MA. Adoption of same day discharge following elective left main stem percutaneous coronary intervention. Int J Cardiol 2020; 321:38-47. [PMID: 32739446 PMCID: PMC7392050 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.07.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2020] [Revised: 06/04/2020] [Accepted: 07/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study sought to investigate the safety and feasibility of same day discharge (SDD) practice and compare clinical outcomes to patients admitted for overnight stay (ON) undergoing elective left main stem (LMS) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). ON observation is still widely practiced in highly complex PCI as the standard of care, with no previous data comparing clinical outcomes in patients undergoing LMS PCI. METHODS We analysed 6452 patients undergoing elective LMS PCI between 2007 and 2014 in England and Wales. Multiple logistic regressions and the BCIS risk model were used to study association between SDD and 30 day mortality. RESULTS SDD rates almost doubled from 19.9% in 2007 to 39.8% in 2014 for all LMS procedures and increased from 20.7% to 41.4% for unprotected LMS cases during the same study period. There was a significant increase in procedural complexity with higher use of rotational atherectomy, longer stents and multivessel PCI. SDD was not associated with increased 30 day mortality (OR 0.70 95%CI 0.30-1.65) in the overall LMS PCI cohort and the results were similar in unprotected LMS (OR 0.48 95%CI 0.17-1.41) and those requiring ON stay (OR 0.58 95%CI 0.25-1.34). CONCLUSIONS We did not find evidence that SDD is not safe or feasible in highly complex LMS PCI procedures despite increasing procedural complexity with no significant increase in 30 day mortality rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paraskevi Taxiarchi
- Centre for Biostatistics, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Evangelos Kontopantelis
- Centre for Biostatistics, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Nick Curzen
- Coronary Research Group, University Hospital Southampton, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, UK
| | | | - Peter Ludman
- Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Ahmad Shoaib
- Keele Cardiovascular Research Group, Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, University of Keele and Academic Department of Cardiology, Royal Stoke Hospital, Stoke-on-Trent, UK
| | - Muhammad Rashid
- Keele Cardiovascular Research Group, Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, University of Keele and Academic Department of Cardiology, Royal Stoke Hospital, Stoke-on-Trent, UK
| | - Glen P Martin
- Centre for Biostatistics, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Mamas A Mamas
- Centre for Biostatistics, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; Keele Cardiovascular Research Group, Institute of Primary Care and Health Sciences, University of Keele and Academic Department of Cardiology, Royal Stoke Hospital, Stoke-on-Trent, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Meijers TA, Aminian A, Teeuwen K, van Wely M, Schmitz T, Dirksen MT, van der Schaaf RJ, Iglesias JF, Agostoni P, Dens J, Knaapen P, Rathore S, Ottervanger JP, Dambrink JHE, Roolvink V, Gosselink ATM, Hermanides RS, van Royen N, van Leeuwen MAH. Complex Large-Bore Radial percutaneous coronary intervention: rationale of the COLOR trial study protocol. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e038042. [PMID: 32690749 PMCID: PMC7375502 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The radial artery has become the standard access site for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in stable coronary artery disease and acute coronary syndrome, because of less access site related bleeding complications. Patients with complex coronary lesions are under-represented in randomised trials comparing radial with femoral access with regard to safety and efficacy. The femoral artery is currently the most applied access site in patients with complex coronary lesions, especially when large bore guiding catheters are required. With slender technology, transradial PCI may be increasingly applied in patients with complex coronary lesions when large bore guiding catheters are mandatory and might be a safer alternative as compared with the transfemoral approach. METHODS AND ANALYSIS A total of 388 patients undergoing complex PCI will be randomised to radial 7 French access with Terumo Glidesheath Slender (Terumo, Japan) or femoral 7 French access as comparator. The primary outcome is the incidence of the composite end point of clinically relevant access site related bleeding and/or vascular complications requiring intervention. Procedural success and major adverse cardiovascular events up to 1 month will also be compared between both groups. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethical approval for the study was granted by the local Ethics Committee at each recruiting center ('Medisch Ethische Toetsing Commissie Isala Zwolle', 'Commissie voor medische ethiek ZNA', 'Comité Medische Ethiek Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg', 'Comité d'éthique CHU-Charleroi-ISPPC', 'Commission cantonale d'éthique de la recherche CCER-Republique et Canton de Geneve', 'Ethik Kommission de Ärztekammer Nordrhein' and 'Riverside Research Ethics Committee'). The trial outcomes will be published in peer-reviewed journals of the concerned literature. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT03846752.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Adel Aminian
- Cardiology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Charleroi, Charleroi, Wallonie, Belgium
| | - Koen Teeuwen
- Cardiology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, Noord Brabant, The Netherlands
| | | | - Thomas Schmitz
- Cardiology, Elisabeth-Krankenhaus-Essen GmbH, Essen, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
| | - Maurits T Dirksen
- Cardiology, Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep, Alkmaar, Noord-Holland, The Netherlands
| | | | - Juan F Iglesias
- Cardiology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneve, Genève, Switzerland
| | | | - Joseph Dens
- Cardiology, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Genk, Limburg, Belgium
| | - Paul Knaapen
- Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC - Locatie VUMC, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Sudhir Rathore
- Cardiology, Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust, Frimley, Surrey, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Niels van Royen
- Cardiology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, Gelderland, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Guedeney P, Thiele H, Kerneis M, Barthélémy O, Baumann S, Sandri M, de Waha-Thiele S, Fuernau G, Rouanet S, Piek JJ, Landmesser U, Hauguel-Moreau M, Zeitouni M, Silvain J, Lattuca B, Windecker S, Collet JP, Desch S, Zeymer U, Montalescot G, Akin I. Radial versus femoral artery access for percutaneous coronary artery intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction and multivessel disease complicated by cardiogenic shock: Subanalysis from the CULPRIT-SHOCK trial. Am Heart J 2020; 225:60-68. [PMID: 32497906 DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2020.04.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2020] [Accepted: 04/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use and impact of transradial artery access (TRA) compared to transfemoral artery access (TFA) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute myocardial infarction (MI) complicated by cardiogenic shock (CS) remain unclear. METHODS This is a post hoc analysis of the CULPRIT-SHOCK trial where patients presenting with MI and multivessel disease complicated by CS were randomized to a strategy of culprit-lesion-only or immediate multivessel PCI. Arterial access was left at operator's discretion. Adjudicated outcomes of interest were the composite of death or renal replacement therapy (RRT) at 30 days and 1 year. Multivariate logistic models were used to assess the association between the arterial access and outcomes. RESULTS Among the 673 analyzed patients, TRA and TFA were successfully performed in 118 (17.5%) and 555 (82.5%) patients, respectively. Compared to TFA, TRA was associated with a lower 30-day rate of death or RRT (37.3% vs 53.2%, adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.57; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.34-0.96), a lower 30-day rate of death (34.7% vs 49.7%; aOR: 0.56; 95% CI 0.33-0.96), and a lower 30-day rate of RRT (5.9% vs 15.9%; aOR: 0.40; 95% CI 0.16-0.97). No significant differences were observed regarding the 30-day risks of type 3 or 5 Bleeding Academic Research Consortium bleeding and stroke. The observed reduction of death or RRT and death with TRA was no longer significant at 1 year (44.9% vs 57.8%; aOR: 0.85; 95% CI 0.50-1.45 and 42.4% vs 55.5%, aOR: 0.78; 95% CI 0.46-1.32, respectively). CONCLUSIONS In patients undergoing PCI for acute MI complicated by CS, TRA may be associated with improved early outcomes, although the reason for this finding needs further research.
Collapse
|
10
|
Sherwood MW, Piccini JP, Holmes DN, Pieper KS, Steinberg BA, Fonarow GC, Allen LA, Naccarelli GV, Kowey PR, Gersh BJ, Mahaffey KW, Singer DE, Ansell JE, Freeman JV, Chan PS, Reiffel JA, Blanco R, Peterson ED, Rao SV. Outcomes of Cardiac Catheterization in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation on Anticoagulation in Contemporary in Practice: An Analysis of the ORBIT II Registry. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2020; 13:e008274. [PMID: 32408815 DOI: 10.1161/circinterventions.119.008274] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with atrial fibrillation on oral anticoagulation (OAC) undergoing cardiac catheterization face risks for embolic and bleeding events, yet information on strategies to mitigate these risks in contemporary practice is lacking. METHODS We aimed to describe the clinical/procedural characteristics of a contemporary cohort of patients with atrial fibrillation on OAC who underwent cardiac catheterization. Use of bleeding avoidance strategies and bridging therapy were described and outcomes including death, stroke, and major bleeding at 30 days and 1 year were compared by OAC type. RESULTS Of 13 404 patients in the Outcomes Registry for Better Informed Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation II Registry from 2013 to 2016, 741 underwent cardiac catheterization (139 with percutaneous coronary intervention) in the setting of OAC. The patients' median age was 71, 61.8% were male, white (87.2%), had hypertension (83.7%), hyperlipidemia (72.1%), diabetes mellitus (31.6%), and chronic kidney disease (28.2%); 20.2% received warfarin while 79.8% received direct acting oral anticoagulant. One third of patients underwent radial artery access, and bivalirudin was used in 4.6%. Bridging therapy was used more often in patients on warfarin versus direct acting oral anticoagulant (16.7% versus10.0%). OAC was interrupted in 93.8% of patients. Patients on warfarin versus direct acting oral anticoagulant were equally likely to restart OAC (58.0% versus 60.7%), had similar use of antiplatelet therapy (44.0% versus 41.3%) after catheterization, and had similar rates of myocardial infarction and death at 1 year, but higher rates of major bleeding (43.3 versus 12.9 events/100 patient years) and stroke (4.9 versus 1.9 events/100 patient years). CONCLUSIONS In a real-world registry of patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing cardiac catheterization, most cases are elective, performed by femoral access, with interruption of OAC. Bleeding avoidance strategies such as radial artery access and bivalirudin were used infrequently and use of bridging therapy was uncommon. Nearly 40% of patients did not restart OAC postprocedure, exposing patients to risk for stroke. Further research is necessary to optimize the management of patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing cardiac catheterization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jonathan P Piccini
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC (J.P.P., D.N.H., R.B., E.D.P., S.V.R.)
| | - DaJuanicia N Holmes
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC (J.P.P., D.N.H., R.B., E.D.P., S.V.R.)
| | - Karen S Pieper
- Thrombosis Research Institute, London, United Kingdom (K.S.P.)
| | | | - Gregg C Fonarow
- University of California Los Angeles Medical Center (G.C.F.)
| | - Larry A Allen
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora (L.A.A.)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Jack E Ansell
- Hofstra North Shore-LIJ School of Medicine, Hempstead, NY (J.E.A.)
| | | | - Paul S Chan
- Saint Luke's Hospital, Kansas City, MO (P.S.C.)
| | | | - Rosalia Blanco
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC (J.P.P., D.N.H., R.B., E.D.P., S.V.R.)
| | - Eric D Peterson
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC (J.P.P., D.N.H., R.B., E.D.P., S.V.R.)
| | - Sunil V Rao
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC (J.P.P., D.N.H., R.B., E.D.P., S.V.R.)
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Goel S, Pasam RT, Raheja H, Gotesman J, Gidwani U, Ahuja KR, Reed G, Puri R, Khatri JK, Kapadia SR. Left main percutaneous coronary intervention—Radial versus femoral access: A systematic analysis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2019; 95:E201-E213. [DOI: 10.1002/ccd.28451] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2019] [Revised: 07/22/2019] [Accepted: 08/01/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Sunny Goel
- Department of CardiologyMaimonides Medical Center Brooklyn New York
| | - Ravi T. Pasam
- Department of CardiologyMaimonides Medical Center Brooklyn New York
| | - Hitesh Raheja
- Department of CardiologyMaimonides Medical Center Brooklyn New York
| | - Joseph Gotesman
- Department of CardiologyMaimonides Medical Center Brooklyn New York
| | - Umesh Gidwani
- Department of CardiologyIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai New York New York
| | - Keerat R. Ahuja
- Department of CardiologyHeart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic Cleveland Ohio
| | - Grant Reed
- Department of CardiologyHeart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic Cleveland Ohio
| | - Rishi Puri
- Department of CardiologyHeart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic Cleveland Ohio
| | - Jai K. Khatri
- Department of CardiologyHeart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic Cleveland Ohio
| | - Samir R. Kapadia
- Department of CardiologyHeart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic Cleveland Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Gurm HS. Left Main Stenting: Joining the Mainstream. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2018; 11:2492-2494. [PMID: 30573060 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.10.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2018] [Accepted: 10/23/2018] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Hitinder S Gurm
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
| |
Collapse
|