Local Versus General Anesthesia for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Postprocedural Troponin Elevation and Mortality After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

Background

This study sought to investigate the role of postprocedural troponin elevations in mortality prediction after transcatheter aortic valve implantation and to define the threshold at which clinically relevant postprocedure myocardial injury determines mortality.

Methods and Results

A total of 1333 consecutive patients with transcatheter aortic valve implantation with available postprocedural high‐sensitivity cardiac troponin T measurements were included in the analysis. The threshold at which postprocedure myocardial injury determines long‐term mortality was identified using restricted cubic spline analysis. A >18.3‐fold increase of troponin above the upper reference limit was identified as threshold for relevant postprocedure myocardial injury. Associations remained significant in a landmark analysis between 30 days and 2 years (hazard ratio [HR], 1.61, [95% CI, 1.13–2.28]; P=0.01), after adjusting for known confounders (adjusted HR, 1.90 [95% CI, 1.40–2.57]; P<0001), and in subgroups of patients with coronary artery disease (adjusted HR, 2.17 [95% CI, 1.44–3.29]; P<0.001), renal dysfunction (adjusted HR, 1.88 [95% CI, 1.35–2.62]; P<0.001), and intermediate/high surgical risk (adjusted HR, 2.70 [95% CI, 1.40–5.22]; P=0.003).

Conclusions

This study determined a troponin threshold for the identification of patients at increased mortality risk after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. The proposed definition of postprocedure myocardial injury advances risk stratification in patients with transcatheter aortic valve implantation and may assist in postprocedural patient management.

Anaesthesia for minimally invasive cardiac procedures in the catheterization lab

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The share of cardiac procedures performed in settings involving nonoperating room anaesthesia (NORA) continues to grow rapidly, and the number of publications related to anaesthetic techniques in cardiac catheterization laboratories is substantial. We aim to summarize the most recent evidence about outcomes related to type of anaesthetic in minimally invasive cardiac procedures.

RECENT FINDINGS

The latest studies, primarily focused on transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and transcatheter mitral valve repair (TMVr), demonstrate the need for reliable monitoring and appropriate training of the interdisciplinary teams involved in this high-risk NORA setting.

SUMMARY

Inappropriate sedation and concurrent inadequate oxygenation are main risk factors for claims involving NORA care. Current evidence deriving from TAVR shows that monitored anaesthesia care (MAC) is associated with shorter length of stay and lower mortality.

Transcervical approach versus transfemoral approach for transcatheter aortic valve replacement

OBJECTIVES

The transfemoral (TF) approach is the gold-standard access route for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Alternative approaches, among which the transcervical (TC) approach, are needed in some patients. We aimed to compare TC-TAVR with TF-TAVR.

METHODS

All patients who underwent TAVR in our institution between 2016 and 2020, using Edwards SAPIEN family balloon-expandable transcatheter heart valves, were retrospectively included. Endpoints included 30-day all-cause mortality, procedural complications (according to the VARC-2 criteria), procedure duration, hospital length of stay (LOS) and echocardiographic outcomes. For 30-day all-cause mortality, we furthermore used a Cox proportional-hazards model to adjust for significant between-group differences in baseline characteristics as well as anesthesia modality.

RESULTS

TAVR was performed in 306 patients, using a TF approach (n = 255) or a TC approach (n = 51). TC-TAVR was associated with significantly higher STS scores (4.06 [IQR (interquartile range), 2.05, 5.56] vs. 2.97 [IQR, 2.08, 4.88], p < 0.001) and higher prevalence of peripheral artery disease, history of stroke, previous cardiovascular surgery. 30-day mortality (hazard ratio, 0.87 [0.77, 9.77], p = 0.909) and stroke rates (2.0% vs. 1.6%, p = 0.840) were similar, as well as procedural duration (74.0 [53.0, 99.5] vs. 77.0 [58.0, 98.0] minutes, p = 0.370), LOS (6.0 [IQR, 3.0, 8.0] vs. 6.0 [IQR, 4.0, 9.0] days, p = 0.175) and postprocedural mean transvalvular gradient (10.00 [IQR, 8.00, 13.00] vs. 10.00 [IQR, 8.00, 12.00] mmHg, p = 0.724).

CONCLUSION

Despite a higher cardiovascular disease burden in TC patients, TC-TAVR and TF-TAVR yielded similar outcomes. TC-TAVR may be a safe alternative when TF-TAVR is contraindicated.