Dual-Layered Stents: The New Standard for Carotid Stenting?

Comparing the Impact of Stenting vs. Medical Therapy for Intracranial Arterial Stenosis : A Systematic Review and One-stage and Two-stage Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

PURPOSE

In the treatment of intracranial arterial stenosis (ICAS), controversies remain regarding the optimal treatment strategy. Our study aims to conduct an individual patient-level data meta-analysis of existing RCTs comparing PTAS versus best medical therapy and to identify differences in outcomes such as incidence of ischemic stroke or death.

METHODS

Randomised controlled trials comparing the outcomes of stenting versus best medical therapy for patients who had symptomatic ICAS of >50%. Excluded studies included case reports, case series, reviews, observational studies,  letters or studies evaluating isolated angioplasty techniques without stenting. Data was extracted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines.

RESULTS

7 studies involving 1425 participants were included. There was an increased risk in the incidence of stroke and death within the first 30 days post-procedure for patients treated with PTAS over best medical therapy (RR = 2.22 [1.28-3.86], I² = 0%). Patients who underwent stenting also had a significantly higher risk of intracranial haemorrhage (RR = 12.66 [2.41-66.45], I² = 0%) and death (RR = 5.41 [1.20-24.28], I² = 0%).Under the shared frailty model, stenting when compared to medical therapy has a HR of 1.81 (95% CI:1.25-2.6) of stroke or death across 1 year. Under the parametric Royston-Parmar model, stenting has a significant decrease in the RMST(-0.83 months; 95% CI: -1.30-0.37). Stenting continued to show worse outcomes up to the 3 year mark with a HR of 1.60 (95% CI: 1.11-2.32).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

There is an increased risk of peri- and post-procedural stroke and death over best medical therapy in patients with symptomatic ICAS who undergo PTAS. Further work is required to refine patient selection and mitigate peri-procedural risks.

“Real-World Study of a Dual-Layer Micromesh Stent in Elective Treatment of Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis (ROADSAVER)”

Purpose

Endovascular carotid artery stenosis treatment is associated with a higher peri- and early post-procedural stroke risk relative to surgery. Dual-layer micromesh carotid stents were specifically designed for improved plaque coverage to reduce the cerebral embolization risk and related ischemic events. ROADSAVER study aims to further confirm the safety and efficacy of the Roadsaver™ dual-layer micromesh stent for the treatment of elective patients with carotid artery stenosis.

Materials and Methods

ROADSAVER is a prospective, multi-center, observational study. Between January 2018 and February 2021, a total of 1967 patients featuring asymptomatic or symptomatic, non-occlusive and non-thrombotic carotid stenosis eligible for an elective stenting procedure were enrolled across 13 European countries (52 centers). Follow-up visits are scheduled at 30 days and at 12 months. The primary outcome measure is the major adverse event rate, i.e., cumulative incidence of any death or stroke up to 30 days post-procedure. All deaths, strokes and carotid revascularizations are adjudicated by an independent Clinical Events Committee. Sub-analyses are prespecified and focused on baseline patient characteristics (e.g., age, neurologic status), procedural features (e.g., access route, embolic protection use), advanced imaging, and treatment efficacy up to 12 months.

Conclusion

The present study evaluates the Roadsaver™ dual-layer micromesh carotid stent in the real-world clinical practice aiming to provide valuable insights into the contemporary European treatment trends and outcomes of elective carotid artery stenting. The large study population and predefined sub-analyses should help identify the best practices and patient subsets to benefit most from the treatment.

Trial Registration

Clinicaltrial.gov identifier: NCT03504228.