Clopidogrel Monotherapy After 1-Month Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients With Diabetes Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Current status of percutaneous coronary interventions in diabetics with multivessel disease - is it time to challenge FREEDOM?

Diabetes mellitus (DM) and coronary artery disease (CAD) are the leading causes of death in the world. Over the last two decades, clinical trials have indicated that DM patients with CAD have poorer cardiac outcomes than non-diabetic patients with CAD. The pivotal findings of the FREEDOM trial greatly impacted the way clinicians approached revascularisation in diabetic patients with multivessel disease (MVD). However, since the publication of the FREEDOM trial, much has changed both in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) technology, as well as in the management of diabetes. This review provides insights into advancements in stent technology, enhanced patient management strategies, improved clinical outcomes with newer hypoglycaemic agents, current approaches to antiplatelet therapy, and advances in lipid management in diabetic patients. The influence of patient-specific factors such as comorbidities and anatomical complexities on treatment decisions in diabetic patients with MVD is also discussed. The ongoing TUXEDO-2 India trial was designed to primarily compare the clinical outcomes of PCI with the new-generation ultrathin-strut Supraflex Cruz stent, compared to the second-generation XIENCE stent in the setting of contemporary optimal medical therapy in Indian diabetic patients with MVD. The secondary objective of this study is to compare clinical outcomes in the combined group from both study arms against a performance goal derived from the coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) arm of the FREEDOM trial (historical cohort). The tertiary objective is to compare the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor versus prasugrel in diabetic patients with MVD. In view of recent advances in PCI and medical therapy since the FREEDOM trial, now is an appropriate time to revisit the results of CABG versus PCI in diabetic patients with MVD.

Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Treatment After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

ABSTRACT

Aim of our systematic review and meta-analysis is to compare shortened (≤3 months) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with longer DAPT in diabetic patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions.We systematically screened 3 major databases (MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Scopus) searching for randomized-controlled trials or subanalyses of them, which compared shortened DAPT (S-DAPT) with longer DAPT regimens of DAPT. Primary end point of systematic review and meta-analysis is the net adverse clinical events (NACE), and secondary are major adverse cardiac events (MACE), mortality, bleedings, myocardial infarction, and stent thrombosis. Subgroup analyses included studies using only ticagrelor-based regimens and 3-month duration of DAPT.A total of 8 studies and 12,665 patients were included in our analysis. Our meta-analysis met its primary end point because S-DAPT was associated significantly with a reduced risk ratio (RR) by 17% [RR: 0.83, 95% confidence intervals (CI), 0.72-0.96]. Nonsignificant difference among the rest end points was detected between the 2 groups. Subgroup analyses showed that ticagrelor-based regimens were associated with a significant reduction of mortality (RR: 0.67, 95% CI, 0.48-0.93) and 3-month DAPT reduced furtherly NACE by 27% (RR: 0.73, 95% CI, 0.60-0.89).In conclusion, our systematic review and meta-analysis showed that (i) S-DAPT was significantly associated with a lower incidence of NACE, (ii) ticagrelor-based S-DAPT was associated with decreased mortality rates, and (iii) the benefit of 3-month duration of DAPT achieved an even greater NACE reduction. Thus, S-DAPT could be considered as a safe and feasible option in diabetic patients.

CYP2C19 Loss-of-Function Variants Associated With Long-Term Ischemic Stroke Events During Clopidogrel Treatment in the Chinese Population

This study aims to determine whether CYP2C19 loss-of-function (LoF) variants were associated with long-term ischemic stroke risk in Chinese primary care patients treated with clopidogrel. Patients treated with clopidogrel were ascertained from Chinese electronic medical records linked with a biobank for a retrospective cohort study. Their medical information was examined for the period from January 2018 to December 2021. Two CYP2C19 major loss of function variants (*2:rs4244285 and *3: rs4986893) were genotyped. The clinical outcome was ischemic stroke event. Cox regression analysis was used to evaluate the association between the occurrence of ischemic stroke events and CYP2C19 LoF variants. Covariates included age, gender, body mass index, prior ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipoidemia, smoke status, aspirin use, proton-pump inhibitor use, and statin use. Of the 1,141 patients included in the clopidogrel therapy cohort, 61.9% carried at least one CYP2C19 LoF variant. During a median follow-up period of 12 months, 103 patients (9.0%) had an ischemic stroke. After adjusting for other risk factors, carriers of CYP2C19 LoF variants had significantly higher risk of ischemic stroke compared with non-carriers (hazard ratio: 1.64, 95% confidence interval: 1.06-2.53, P = 0.025). This pharmacogenetic study of clopidogrel provides novel insights into the association between the CYP2C19 LoF variant and long-term stroke risk. We established that there is still a need for CYP2C19 genotype-guided personalized antiplatelet therapy in those who have returned to the primary care setting for clopidogrel prescription.

Association Between MIND Diet Adherence and Mortality: Insights from Diabetic and Non-Diabetic Cohorts

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

To date, evidence regarding the protective roles of the Mediterranean-Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension Intervention for Neurodegenerative Delay (MIND) diet in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is scarce. This study aims to estimate the impact of adhering to the MIND diet on the mortality in patients with and without T2DM.

SUBJECTS/METHODS

In this cohort study, 6887 participants (1021 patients with T2DM) from the NHANES dataset were analyzed. The exposure is the MIND diet adherence. The primary outcomes are all-cause and cardiovascular (CV) deaths.

RESULTS

We documented 1087 all-cause deaths consisting of 377 CV deaths during the follow-up (median time of 10 years). Among participants with T2DM, those with a high MIND score (> 8.0, range of MIND score: 4.5-13) had a significantly lower risk of all-cause death (hazard ratio [HR] 0.75, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.59, 0.96, P = 0.021) and CV death (HR 0.50, 95% CI: 0.29, 0.87, P = 0.014) compared to those with a low MIND score (≤ 8.0). In participants without T2DM, a high MIND score was associated with a significant decrease in the risk of all-cause death (HR = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.70, 0.99, P < 0.001), but the association with CV death risk was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

This study uncovered significant associations between the MIND diet and decreased risk of all-cause and CV death in patients with T2DM. The findings highlight the potential benefits of following the MIND diet in managing and enhancing the outcomes of individuals with T2DM.