Adsorption energies for a nanoporous carbon from gas–solid chromatography and molecular mechanics

Binding energies for alkane molecules on a carbon surface from gas-solid chromatography and molecular mechanics

Gas-solid chromatography was used to determine B(2s) (gas-solid virial coefficient) values for 12 alkanes (10 branched and 2 cyclic) interacting with a carbon powder (Carbopack B, Supelco). B(2s) values were determined by multiple size variant injections within the temperature range of 393 to 623 K with each alkane measured at 5 or 6 different temperatures. The temperature variations of the gas-solid virial coefficients were used to find the experimental adsorption energy or binding energy values (E( *)) for each alkane. A molecular mechanics based, rough-surface model was used to calculate the molecule-surface binding energy (E(cal)( *)) using augmented MM2 parameters. The surface model consisted of three parallel graphene layers with each layer containing 127 interconnected benzene rings and two separated nanostructures each containing 17 benzene rings arranged in a linear strip. As the parallel nanostructures are moved closer together, the surface roughness increases and molecule-surface interactions are enhanced. A comparison of the experimental and calculated binding energies showed excellent agreement with an average difference of 3.8%. Linear regressions of E( *) versus E(cal)( *) for the current data set and a combined current and prior alkane data set both gave excellent correlations. For the combined data set with 18 linear, branched and cyclic alkanes; a linear regression of E( *)=0.9848E(cal)( *) and r(2)=0.976 was obtained. The results indicate that alkane-surface binding energies may be calculated from MM2 parameters for some gas-solid systems.

Evaluation of molecular mechanics calculated binding energies for isolated and monolayer organic molecules on graphite

The calculated molecule-surface binding energy, E(cal)( *), for physical adsorption was determined using molecular mechanics MM2 parameters for a model graphite surface and various organic molecules. The results for E(cal)( *) were compared to published experimental binding energy values, E( *), from gas chromatography (GC) or thermal desorption (TD). The binding energies from GC were for isolated molecules in the Henry's law region of adsorption, and the binding energies from TD were for molecules in monolayer coverage on a highly oriented pyrolytic graphite (HOPG). A simple desorption model was used to allow the calculation of monolayer coverage to include both molecule-surface and molecule-molecule interactions and then the results were compared to experimental values. For the 14 TD organic adsorbates (polyaromatic hydrocarbons, alcohols, benzene, substituted benzenes, methane, chloroalkanes, N,N-dimethylformamide, and C(60) Buckyball), the experimental versus calculated binding energies were E( *)=1.1193E(cal)( *) and r(2)=0.967. The GC E( *) values were also well correlated by calculated E(cal)( *) values for a set of 11 benzene and methyl substituted benzenes and for another set of 10 alkanes and haloalkanes. The TD E(cal)( *) mechanics computation provides a useful comparison to the one for GC data since adsorbate-adsorbate interactions as well as adsorbate-surface must be considered.

Determining molecule–carbon surface adsorption energies using molecular mechanics and graphene nanostructures

Five model surfaces were developed using molecular mechanics with MM2 parameters. A smooth, flat model surface was constructed of three parallel graphene layers where each graphene layer contained 127 interconnected benzene rings. Four rough surfaces were constructed by varying the separation between a pair of graphene nanostructures placed on the topmost layer of graphene. Each nanostructure contained 17 benzene rings arranged in a linear strip. The parallel nanostructures were moved closer together to increase the surface roughness and to enhance the molecule-surface interaction. Experimental adsorption energy values from the temperature variation of second gas-solid virial coefficients values were available for 16 different alkanes, haloalkanes, and ether molecules adsorbed on Carbopack B (Supelco, 100 m(2)/g). For each of the five different surface models, sets of 16 calculated adsorption energies, E(cal)( *), were determined and compared to the available experimental adsorption energies, E( *). The best linear regression correlation between E( *) and E(cal)( *) was found for a 1.20 nm internuclei separation of the surface nanostructures, and for this surface model the calculated gas-solid interaction energies closely matched the experimental values (E( *)=1.018E(cal)( *), r(2)=0.964).