Multisite Examination of Depression Screening Scores and Correlates Among Adolescents and Young Adults With Type 2 Diabetes

5. Facilitating Positive Health Behaviors and Well-being to Improve Health Outcomes: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2024

The American Diabetes Association (ADA) "Standards of Care in Diabetes" includes the ADA's current clinical practice recommendations and is intended to provide the components of diabetes care, general treatment goals and guidelines, and tools to evaluate quality of care. Members of the ADA Professional Practice Committee, an interprofessional expert committee, are responsible for updating the Standards of Care annually, or more frequently as warranted. For a detailed description of ADA standards, statements, and reports, as well as the evidence-grading system for ADA's clinical practice recommendations and a full list of Professional Practice Committee members, please refer to Introduction and Methodology. Readers who wish to comment on the Standards of Care are invited to do so at professional.diabetes.org/SOC.

14. Children and Adolescents: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2024

The American Diabetes Association (ADA) "Standards of Care in Diabetes" includes the ADA's current clinical practice recommendations and is intended to provide the components of diabetes care, general treatment goals and guidelines, and tools to evaluate quality of care. Members of the ADA Professional Practice Committee, an interprofessional expert committee, are responsible for updating the Standards of Care annually, or more frequently as warranted. For a detailed description of ADA standards, statements, and reports, as well as the evidence-grading system for ADA's clinical practice recommendations and a full list of Professional Practice Committee members, please refer to Introduction and Methodology. Readers who wish to comment on the Standards of Care are invited to do so at professional.diabetes.org/SOC.

Implementation of Psychosocial Screening into Diabetes Clinics: Experience from the Type 1 Diabetes Exchange Quality Improvement Network

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Although advances in diabetes technology and pharmacology have significantly and positively impacted diabetes management and health outcomes for some, diabetes care remains burdensome and can be challenging to balance with other life priorities. The purpose of this article is to review the rationale for assessment of psychosocial domains in diabetes care settings and strategies for the implementation of psychosocial screening into routine practice. Survey data from the Type 1 Diabetes Exchange Quality Improvement Network is highlighted.

RECENT FINDINGS

Implementation of psychosocial screening requires identifying the population; selecting validated tools to assess target domains; determining frequency of screening and mode of survey delivery; and scoring, interpreting, documenting, and facilitating referrals such that these processes are part of clinical workflows. Recognizing the influence of psychosocial factors for people with diabetes (PWD), professional society guidelines for comprehensive diabetes care recommend the integration of psychosocial screening into routine care.

5. Facilitating Positive Health Behaviors and Well-being to Improve Health Outcomes: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2023

The American Diabetes Association (ADA) "Standards of Care in Diabetes" includes the ADA's current clinical practice recommendations and is intended to provide the components of diabetes care, general treatment goals and guidelines, and tools to evaluate quality of care. Members of the ADA Professional Practice Committee, a multidisciplinary expert committee, are responsible for updating the Standards of Care annually, or more frequently as warranted. For a detailed description of ADA standards, statements, and reports, as well as the evidence-grading system for ADA's clinical practice recommendations and a full list of Professional Practice Committee members, please refer to Introduction and Methodology. Readers who wish to comment on the Standards of Care are invited to do so at professional.diabetes.org/SOC.

14. Children and Adolescents: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2023

The American Diabetes Association (ADA) "Standards of Care in Diabetes" includes the ADA's current clinical practice recommendations and is intended to provide the components of diabetes care, general treatment goals and guidelines, and tools to evaluate quality of care. Members of the ADA Professional Practice Committee, a multidisciplinary expert committee, are responsible for updating the Standards of Care annually, or more frequently as warranted. For a detailed description of ADA standards, statements, and reports, as well as the evidence-grading system for ADA's clinical practice recommendations and a full list of Professional Practice Committee members, please refer to Introduction and Methodology. Readers who wish to comment on the Standards of Care are invited to do so at professional.diabetes.org/SOC.

Mental health comorbidity is common in children with type 2 diabetes

OBJECTIVE

To describe the prevalence of mental health comorbidity in children with type 2 diabetes compared to a matched population without diabetes and children with type 1 diabetes.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Population-based cohorts of 528 youth (7-18 years of age) with prevalent type 2 diabetes, 1519 matched children without diabetes and 778 youth with type 1 diabetes were identified from a clinical registry and linked to provincial health care records to assess the prevalence of mental health comorbidity using ICD-9CM, ICD-10CA and ATC codes.

RESULTS

The majority of children with type 2 diabetes were of First Nations heritage. Compared to their matched peers, children with type 2 diabetes where more likely to have a mood or anxiety disorder before and after diagnosis [RR 2.38 (1.63, 3.48) p < 0.001 and 1.70 (1.39, 2.08) p < 0.001 respectively], to attempt/complete suicide [RR 3.18 (1.30, 7.81) p = 0.012 and 2.18 (1.32, 3.60) p = 0.0002 respectively] and be prescribed an antipsychotic [RR 2.33 (1.23, 4.39) p = 0.009 and 1.76 (1.23, 2.52) p = 0.002 respectively]. Following adjustment for age and sex, children with type 2 diabetes, compared to children with type 1 diabetes where more likely to have a mood or anxiety disorder and be prescribed an antipsychotic after diagnosis [RR 1.43 (1.07, 1.91) p = 0.015; RR 2.41 (1.44, 4.06) p = 0.0009 respectively].

CONCLUSIONS

Children with type 2 diabetes have high rates of comorbid mental illness. Programs to provide care, support, and education must address the mental health comorbidity in the context of the demographic, socioeconomic, and psycho-cultural characteristics of the population.

Glycemic control, depression, diabetes distress among adolescents with type 2 diabetes: effects of sex, race, insurance, and obesity

AIMS

To determine (1) differences in depression and distress scores between adolescents with type 1 (T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D), (2) how socioeconomic factors, obesity, race, and treatment regimen affect depression and diabetes distress in adolescent T2D, (3) the relationships between depression and diabetes distress scores in adolescents with T2D, and (4) how depression and diabetes distress scores relate to current and future glycemic control in adolescents with T2D.

BACKGROUND

Diabetes distress is a negative emotional reaction to diabetes complications, self-management demands, unresponsive providers, poor interpersonal relationships, and to diabetes itself. It is frequently mistaken for depression and the two are interrelated. Increases in both predict poor glycemic control in adolescents with T1D.

METHOD

Depression (PHQ-9) and diabetes distress (PAID-T) scores from self-administered tests were studied in 364 patients with diabetes between the ages of 13-17. Kruskal-Wallis test was used to assess differences between types of diabetes, sexes, races, and insurance status. Spearman correlations, and robust rank order multivariable regression analysis were used to assess relationships. Medical records were reviewed for follow-up hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels over 3 years.

RESULTS

HbA1c was significantly lower in females with T2D than with T1D (p  =  0.019) but not in males. It, also, did not differ between females and males with T2D. Median PHQ-9 score in females with T2D was significantly greater than in females with T1D (p = 0.007) but did not differ between females and males with T2D. PHQ-9 scores did not differ between males with T2D and T1D. PAID-T scores, however, were higher in males with T2D than in males with T1D but did not differ between females. PHQ-9 scores and PAID-T scores were significantly related in T2D (r_s = 0.65, p < 0.001). Neither was related to HbA1c in T2D.

CONCLUSIONS

As in adolescents with T1D, depression and diabetes distress screening scores are closely related in adolescent T2D. However, unlike T1D, they are not related to glycemic control in T2D. Depression and diabetes distress may be more closely related to weight and lifestyle concerns.