A comparison of cataract surgical practices in Canada and the United States

Clinical study using a new phacoemulsification system with surgical intraocular pressure control

PURPOSE

To compare cumulative dissipated energy (CDE), aspiration fluid used, and aspiration time during phacoemulsification cataract extraction using 2 surgical configurations.

SETTING

Two clinical sites in the United States and 1 in Spain.

DESIGN

Prospective randomized clinical case series.

METHODS

For each patient, the first eye having surgery was randomized to the active-fluidics configuration (Centurion Vision System with Active Fluidics, 0.9 mm 45-degree Intrepid Balanced tip, and 0.9 mm Intrepid Ultra infusion sleeve) or the gravity-fluidics configuration (Infiniti Vision System with gravity fluidics, 0.9 mm 45-degree Mini-Flared Kelman tip, and 0.9 mm Ultra infusion sleeve). Second-eye surgery was completed within 14 days after first-eye surgery using the alternate configuration. The CDE, aspiration fluid used, and aspiration time were compared between configurations, and adverse events were summarized.

RESULTS

Patient demographics and cataract characteristics were similar between configurations (100 per group). The CDE was significantly lower with the active-fluidics configuration than with the gravity-fluidics configuration (mean ± standard error, 4.32 ± 0.28 percent-seconds) (P < .001). The active-fluidics configuration used significantly less aspiration fluid than the gravity-fluidics configuration (mean 46.56 ± 1.39 mL versus 52.68 ± 1.40 mL) (P < .001) and required significantly shorter aspiration time (mean 151.9 ± 4.1 seconds versus 167.6 ± 4.1 seconds) (P < .001). No serious ocular adverse events related to the study devices or device deficiencies were observed.

CONCLUSION

Significantly less CDE, aspiration fluid used, and aspiration time were observed with the active-fluidics configuration than with the gravity-fluidics configuration, showing improved surgical efficiency.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES

Drs. Solomon and Cionni are consultants to Alcon Research, Ltd., and received compensation for conduct of the study. Dr. Lorente received compensation for clinical work in the study. Mr. Fanney is an employee of Alcon Research, Ltd.

Effect of pulsing ultrasound on phacoemulsification efficiency

PURPOSE

To evaluate pulse type technology used to remove lens fragments during phacoemulsification.

SETTING

John A. Moran Eye Center Laboratories, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.

DESIGN

Experimental study.

METHODS

Lens nuclei soaked in 10 mL of 10% neutral buffered formalin for 2 hours were placed in 10 mL of balanced salt solution. Lenses were cut into 2 mm × 2 mm cubes; no more than 36 hours later, cubes were randomly selected for testing. Two aspiration and 2 vacuum settings were assessed at moderate- and high-flow and vacuum (30 mL/min and 300 mm/Hg, low-flow vacuum; 50 mL/min and 500 mm/Hg, high-flow vacuum), with continuous 50 milliseconds on and off (long pulse) and 6 milliseconds on and off (micropulse) ultrasound.

RESULTS

There was a significant difference in efficiency favoring micropulse compared with combined long pulse and continuous pulse in high-flow vacuum at 80% power (P = .018) and between combined long pulse and continuous pulse versus micropulse in high-flow vacuum at 20% power (P = .019). Low-flow vacuum micropulse was more efficient than continuous (19.7%) (P < .0001) and long pulse (22.7%) (P < .0001). Continuous and long pulses were not significantly different from one other. There was a significant difference in chatter rates between high-flow vacuum and low-flow vacuum when all results were compared (P < .0001), with no additional significant differences found.

CONCLUSION

Micropulse technology was better than continuous and long pulse at moderate but not high-flow and vacuum settings. At the higher setting, chatter was observed less often, with all modalities more efficient than the lower setting.