Central corneal thickness in patients with mild to moderate rosacea

Assessment of Frequency of Rosacea Subtypes in Patients With Rosacea: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Importance

Four distinct rosacea subtypes have traditionally been recognized, but the frequency of these subtypes among patients with rosacea remains unknown.

Objective

To assess the frequency of 4 rosacea subtypes.

Data Sources

This systemic review and meta-analysis included a search of 2 databases, PubMed and Embase, from inception of the databases to November 2, 2021. The search was filtered to include only studies of human participants published in English, French, and German.

Study Selection

Studies were screened independently by 2 of the authors and were included if they were original with a sample size of 25 or more patients and reported absolute numbers or frequency of patients affected by rosacea subtypes. Studies that did not report sufficient data to calculate the proportions of subtypes were excluded.

Data Extraction and Synthesis

Data extraction was performed independently and in duplicate by 2 of the authors, using the search term rosacea, according to the Preferred Reporting items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The search term, objectives, and study protocol methods were defined before the study was initiated. A total of 292 studies were included for full-text assessment. Owing to the heterogeneity of the included studies, a random-effects model was used.

Main Outcome and Measures

The main outcome was the proportion of patients with rosacea in each of the 4 major subtype groups defined by the 2002 National Rosacea Society classification system. Measures were absolute numbers or frequency of patients affected by each of the 4 rosacea subtypes.

Results

A total of 39 studies examining 9190 patients with rosacea were included. The pooled proportion of erythematotelangiectatic rosacea was 56.7% (95% CI, 51.4%-62.0%), of papulopustular rosacea was 43.2% (95% CI, 38.8%-47.6%), of phymatous rosacea was 7.4% (95% CI, 6.1%-8.9%), and of ocular rosacea was 11.1% (95% CI, 6.7%-16.3%). Subtype distribution occurred equally among men and women except for phymatous rosacea, which was more prevalent in men. Studies from Africa showed the lowest proportion of erythematotelangiectatic rosacea. Differences in frequency of subtypes were observed when stratification by publication year was performed.

Conclusion and Relevance

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, differences were found in rosacea subtypes by patient sex and by continent of origin and publication year of included studies. Erythematotelangiectatic and papulopustular rosacea were the most prevalent subtypes, but data should be interpreted with caution. Future studies should use the phenotype-based rosacea approach.

Ocular response analyser measurements and central corneal thickness in ocular rosacea patients

Rosacea is a chronic cutaneous disorder which is known to cause inflammation and increased proteolytic activity on the ocular surface that might lead to corneal biomechanical alterations. The aim of this study is to evaluate the corneal biomechanical properties of ocular rosacea patients and compare the measurements with healthy individuals as measured with Reichert ocular response analyser (ORA). Besides full eye examination [best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure (IOP) measured with Goldmann applanation tonometry (IOP-G)], central corneal thickness (CCT), and ORA [corneal hysteresis (CH), corneal resistance factor (CRF), corneal compensated IOP (IOPcc), Goldmann correlated IOP (IOPg)] measurements of 30 eyes of 15 ocular rosacea patients (study group) and 30 eyes of 15 healthy individuals (control group) were performed. For comparisons paired t test was used. Mean age of study group was 45.26 ± 11.65 (range 25 and 63) and control group was 45.00 ± 8.91 (range 26 and 58) years (p = 0.865). No significant difference in BCVA, CCT, IOP-G, IOPcc was detected among groups. However, IOPg, CH, and CRF in the study group were significantly lower than in the control group (p = 0.013, p = 0.013, p = 0.009, respectively). IOPg, CH, and CRF parameters of ocular rosacea patients were significantly lower than normal individuals. These differences and their probable clinical reflections that might effect making decisions in conditions such as glaucoma should be investigated in larger number of patients.

Corneal and conjunctival sensitivity in rosacea patients

Purpose

To assess corneal and conjunctival sensitivity in rosacea patients.

Methods

A total of 55 patients with rosacea and 37 control subjects participated in the study. Corneal and conjunctival sensitivity was determined by Cochet-Bonnet esthesiometer. Subjective symptoms of ocular dryness were evaluated using Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI). Schirmer’s I test (ST), tear breakup time (tBUT) and ocular surface staining with fluorescein were carried out to measure objective signs.

Results

The mean corneal and conjunctival sensitivity did not differ significantly between rosacea patients and controls (all p > 0.05). Schirmer’s I test and tBUT were significantly reduced (p = 0.004 for OD and p < 0.001 for OS) and grade of ocular surface staining was significantly high (p = 0.018 for OD and p = 0.038 for OS) in rosacea patients. Corneal and conjunctival sensitivity did not show significant correlation with ST, tBUT, ocular surface staining (Oxford Schema), duration of rosacea and OSDI score.

Conclusions

Corneal and conjunctival sensitivity did not change significantly in rosacea.

Topographic and biomechanical evaluation of corneas in patients with ocular rosacea

PURPOSE

To compare the topographic and biomechanical properties of corneas in the eyes of patients with ocular rosacea (OR) with those of healthy individuals.

METHODS

Thirty-four healthy individuals (control group) and 34 patients with OR (study group) were evaluated in this study. Topographic measurements including keratometry values, irregularity, and surface asymmetry index in the right eye of each participant were obtained using a Scheimpflug camera with a Placido disc topographer (Sirius). Corneal hysteresis (CH), corneal resistance factor (CRF), corneal-compensated intraocular pressure (IOP), and Goldmann-related IOP were measured using the Reichert Ocular Response Analyzer. Central corneal thickness was also measured using ultrasonic pachymetry and the Sirius corneal topography system.

RESULTS

Topographic parameters were not significantly different between the groups (P > 0.05). Mean CH and CRF were significantly lower in patients with OR (P = 0.003 and 0.001, respectively). Central corneal thickness was significantly lower in patients with OR compared with healthy controls (P < 0.001). Mean Goldmann-related IOP and corneal-compensated IOP were not significantly different between the groups (P = 0.09 and 0.13, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that although the eyes of patients with OR had corneal topographic findings similar to those of healthy controls, corneal biomechanical measurements (CH and CRF) were significantly lower in patients with OR. These results need to be considered when planning corneal refractive surgery in patients with OR.