Mechanical exposure of ophthalmic surgeons: a quantitative ergonomic evaluation of indirect ophthalmoscopy and slit-lamp biomicroscopy

Comparison of Ergonomics in Vitreoretinal Surgery With Heads-up Visualization Versus the Standard Operating Microscope as Measured by a Wearable Device

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Three-dimensional heads-up display (HUD) systems have emerged as an alternative to standard operating microscope (SOM) in the operating room. The goal of this study was to quantitatively measure vitreoretinal surgeon posture across visualization methods.

METHODS

Ergonomic data was collected from 64 cases at two tertiary eye care centers. Surgeons wore an Upright Go 2TM posture training device while operating either using the NGENUITY 3D heads-up display visualization system or the SOM.

RESULTS

Total percentage of time with upright posture as primary surgeon was significantly higher in surgeries performed using HUD (median 100%, interquartile range [IQR], 85.1% to 100.0%) as compared to surgeries performed using the SOM (median 60.0%, IQR 1.8% to 98.8%) (P = 0.001, Wilcoxon rank-sum test). Percent time with upright posture was significantly higher in surgeries performed using HUD for two of the three surgeons when assessed independently across systems. Results remained significant when accounting for length of surgery (P < 0.001, multiple linear regression).

CONCLUSIONS

Ergonomic positioning was improved for surgeons operating using HUD. Given the high prevalence of back and neck pain among vitreoretinal surgeons, increased use of HUD systems may limit musculoskeletal pain and long-term disability from poor ergonomics. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 2024;55:638-645.].

Intraoperative Electromyogram Analysis of Postural Musculature With Three-dimensional Screen Display Versus Operating Microscope in Ophthalmic Surgery: A Clinical Methods Study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

To objectively analyze the effect of three-dimensional screen-based surgery (3D SBS) versus traditional operating microscope (TOM) on operating surgeon posterior chain postural musculature during ophthalmic surgery. We hypothesized an increase in median amplitude of electromyography (EMG) signals when using a TOM compared to 3D SBS. The goal was to assess surgical ergonomics that may contribute to cervical and lumbar spine pathology. EMG analysis was conducted at the University of Cincinnati Medical Center Epilepsy Monitoring Unit. Data were collected in the private practice setting at Cincinnati Eye Institute.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was an institutional review board exempt, nonrandomized, prospective, single center, n = 1 clinical methods study. EMG surface electrodes were affixed to the bilateral splenius capitis, sternocleidomastoid, upper trapezius, anterior deltoid, and quadratus lumborum musculature. EMG data were collected across four sessions consisting of one day each using 3D SBS or a TOM, and two cross-over days. A survey regarding surgeon comfort was administered before, during, and after each surgery, and at the end of each day.

RESULTS

EMG cross-over data demonstrated an increase in muscle activation in all measured muscles except the anterior deltoids and right quadratus lumborum with use of a TOM. Survey data showed increased fatigue when using a TOM relative to 3D SBS.

CONCLUSION

EMG demonstrated increased postural muscle activation when utilizing TOM relative to 3D SBS. Similar to previous studies, our survey data suggest inferior ergonomics of TOM relative to 3D SBS. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 2024;55:628-636.].

Effect of slit lamp table design on neck position and the prevalence of neck pain in eye care professionals

BACKGROUND

Ophthalmologists/Optometrists have a high incidence of neck pain. Little research has been conducted on specific equipment that predisposes these professionals to cervical discomfort.

OBJECTIVE

Primary purpose: to determine if neck position is altered by slit lamp table design. Secondary purpose: to confirm the prevalence of neck pain in eye care professionals.

METHODS

A survey of work-related pain was administered to 36 subjects (8 ophthalmologist, 2 optometrists, 26 technicians). The craniovertebral (CV) angle was measured in each subject in three separate positions (resting posture, best posture, slit lamp posture) between two different slit lamps/tables: slit lamp-deep and slit lamp-shallow.

RESULTS

79% of subjects reported neck pain in the last 6 months. The mean CV angle of all subjects at resting posture, best posture, and both slit lamp postures differed significantly. There was also a difference in CV angle between slit lamps.

CONCLUSION

Neck pain is more prevalent in eye professionals than in the general population. The use of slit lamps promotes a forward head posture which decreases the CV angle, putting the user at risk for neck pain. By altering slit lamp table design, the CV angle of eye care professionals can be increased, reducing the risk for neck injury.

The Prevalence of Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disease Among Pediatric Ophthalmologists

Introduction

Work-related musculoskeletal disease (MSD) is the second leading cause of disability globally. Ophthalmologists widely report MSDs in the neck (70%) and back pain (40–80%). Our study intended to identify the prevalence of MSDs among pediatric ophthalmologists.

Methods

Pediatric ophthalmologists self-reported chronic pain, instrumentation used, years practiced, surgeries performed, work schedule/environment modifications due to MSD, and treatment for MSD via an anonymous online survey. Statistical analysis of responses included odds ratios, Pearson chi-square testing, and Spearman correlations.

Results

This study had 101 respondents, with 66% reporting chronic pain. Chronic neck pain (41%) and lower back pain (31%) followed by shoulder pain (30%) were the leading MSD complaints and significantly correlated with years of experience (p<0.05). Participants often had multiple types of pain, including 13% of the sample who experienced all three types of pain. Those reporting shoulder and back pain also reported a greater incidence in work modification (68–83%). Those suffering from chronic neck, shoulder, and lower back pain have sought treatment for their MSD (p<0.05).

Discussion

With such wide reporting of chronic neck, back, and shoulder pain, the development of MSDs likely leads to disability. Ergonomic innovations in the workplace may reduce the healthcare burden and prolong pediatric ophthalmologists’ ability to provide services.

Conclusion

In our study, the reported prevalence of chronic neck and back pain was comparable to previous studies and published literature, with 2/3 of participants reporting pain. There is a tremendous need for ongoing innovations, especially surgical loupes, operating microscopes, and slit-lamp modifications to prevent musculoskeletal disease.

A systematic review of biomechanical risk factors for the development of work-related musculoskeletal disorders in surgeons of the head and neck

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have shown high rates (47-72%) of self-reported work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WRMDs) in surgeons of the head and neck. Physical requirements in the workplace, individual factors (e.g. poor posture, obesity) and psychosocial factors have been identified as risk factors. Establishing biomechanical risk factors may help prevent further development of WRMDs in this population.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this critical review was to source studies that identified the biomechanical risk factors for WRMDs in this surgical sub-specialty.

METHODS

Searches were conducted of Medline, CINAHL, and AMED databases from 1980 until September 2018.

RESULTS

A total of 182 article were identified. Exclusion criteria lead to 163 full-text articles being screened, generating a total of 6 articles for review. The aims of the included studies varied significantly. Surgeons spend the majority of operating time in static, asymmetrical positions. Surgical loupes/headlamps significantly increased cervical spine loading. Articulated surgical arm supports provided optimal ergonomic conditions. Performing surgical operations with the surgeon in standing or sitting had no effect on task performance or demand. Physical fatigue was also measured in both positions.

CONCLUSIONS

A combination of equipment-based and patient/surgeon position-based factors predispose surgeons to biomechanical risk factors. Studies of greater methodological quality are required.

Use of the heads-up NGENUITY 3D Visualization System for vitreoretinal surgery: a retrospective evaluation of outcomes in a French tertiary center

Heads-up three-dimensional (3D) surgical visualization systems allow ophthalmic surgeons to replace surgical microscope eyepieces with high-resolution stereoscopic cameras transmitting an image to a screen. We investigated the effectiveness and safety of the heads-up NGENUITY 3D Visualization System in a retrospective evaluation of 241 consecutive vitreoretinal surgeries performed by the same surgeon using conventional microscopy (CM group) over a 1-year period versus the NGENUITY System (3D group) over a consecutive 1-year period. We included for study vitreoretinal surgeries for treatment of retinal detachment (RD) (98 surgeries), macular hole (MH) (48 surgeries), or epiretinal membrane (ERM) (95 surgeries). A total of 138 and 103 eyes were divided into 3D and CM groups, respectively. We found no differences in 3-month postoperative rates of recurrence of RD (10% versus 18%, p = 0.42), MH closure (82% versus 88%, p = 0.69), or decrease in central macular thickness of ERMs (134 ± 188 µm versus 115 ± 105 µm, p = 0.57) between the 3D and CM groups, respectively. Surgery durations and visual prognosis were also similar between both groups. We consolidate that the NGENUITY System is comparable in terms of visual and anatomical outcomes, giving it perspectives for integration into future robotized intervention.

Can the Three-Dimensional Heads-Up Display Improve Ergonomics, Surgical Performance, and Ophthalmology Training Compared to Conventional Microscopy?

Purpose

To explore ophthalmic surgeons’ opinions regarding three-dimensional heads-up display (3D HUD) use and investigate musculoskeletal (MSK) complaints among ophthalmologists.

Methods

Physicians were invited to complete an online questionnaire. Musculoskeletal complaints and data of the HUD system use were correlated with demographic information. We explored surgeons’ feedback on image quality, depth perception, and the educational value of 3D microscopy.

Results

In this study, the prevalence of self-reported MSK pain was 82.6% (n=132). The pain started after joining ophthalmology practice and significantly improves on weekends and vacations. We found that the pain intensity in non-HUD users is higher than in HUD users, but this correlation was not statistically significant. Sixty-one (84.7%) of HUD system users were satisfied with depth perception, and 27 (37.5%) reported improvement in peripheral acuity. Thirty-seven (51.4%) of the participants believed they perform surgeries better through HUD; this was why most participants (83.3%) recommended its use in surgical training.

Conclusion

Heads-up display use provides more comfortable sitting positions for surgeons, superior depth perception, and serves as a better educational tool. We believe that adopting this technology may help improve career longevity and productivity.

Survey of musculoskeletal disorders among US ophthalmologists

Purpose

To characterize the prevalence of work-related musculoskeletal disorders (MSD), symptoms, and risk factors among ophthalmologists.

Methods

An online survey was distributed to ophthalmologist members of the Maryland Society of Eye Physicians and Surgeons. The survey consisted of 34 questions on respondent demographics, practice characteristics, pain, and effects of MSD on their practice patterns. Participants were excluded if they were not ophthalmologists or if they had MSD symptoms prior to the start of their ophthalmology career. Demographics and practice patterns were compared for those with or without MSD symptoms using the Welch t test and the Fisher exact test.

Results

The survey was completed by 127 of 250 active members (response rate, 51%). Of the 127, 85 (66%) reported experiencing work-related pain, with an average pain level of 4/10. With regard to mean age, height, weight, years in practice, number of patients seen weekly, and hours worked weekly, there was no difference between respondents reporting pain and those without. Those reporting MSD symptoms spent significantly more time in surgery than those who did not (mean of 7.9 vs 5.3 hours/week [P < 0.01]). Fourteen percent of respondents reported plans to retire early due to their symptoms.

Conclusions

A majority of respondents experienced work-related MSD symptoms, which was associated with time spent in surgery. Modifications to the workplace environment focusing on ergonomics, particularly in the operating room, may benefit ophthalmologists.

Ergonomics in Dermatologic Surgery: Lessons Learned Across Related Specialties and Opportunities for Improvement

BACKGROUND

As the practice of dermatology becomes increasingly procedurally based, there is a concordant rise in musculoskeletal injury (MSI) risk. Dermatologic surgeons are most susceptible and, although the majority suffer from MSI, few have received any formal ergonomics training. This stems from a lack of awareness of this troubling trend and a paucity of research and education on the ergonomics of dermatologic surgery.

OBJECTIVE

To highlight pertinent ergonomics principles and strategies from other specialties that could be translated into dermatology, and to synthesize general recommendations aimed at reducing MSI among dermatologic surgeons.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A comprehensive search of the PubMed and Cochrane Reviews databases from 1975 to 2019 was conducted, using a combination of ergonomics-related search terms, generating 6 publications from the dermatology literature and 58 from the fields of dentistry, medicine, and select surgical subspecialties.

RESULTS

This multidisciplinary approach yielded multiple interventions that could be applied directly (i.e., adequate lighting, adjustable operating tables, and surgical seat heights) or indirectly pending further investigation into their feasibility (i.e., video displays of the surgical field to allow neutral head and neck postures).

CONCLUSION

Although much can be learned from decades of prior ergonomics research from other specialties, considerations that are unique to dermatology remain and must be addressed with specialty-specific research.

Microscope-Assisted ab externo Surgery for the Treatment of Primary Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment - New Tech Meets Old Art

AIM

To report the outcomes of ab externo surgery using a surgical microscope, wide-angle viewing system, and chandelier endoilluminator (microscope-assisted ab externo surgery) for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD).

METHODS

This was a retrospective study. Consecutive charts of patients with RRD who underwent microscope-assisted ab externo surgery were analyzed. The following demographic parameters were analyzed: age (years), gender (male/female), and eye (right/left). Clinical parameters were axial length (AL) measured in millimeters (mm), preoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) measured in logarithm of minimum angle of resolution (logMAR), intraocular pressure (IOP), and lens status (phakic/pseudophakic). The parameters of RRD were number and type of retinal breaks, location of retinal breaks, extent of retinal detachment (RD) (number of detached quadrants), and macular detachment (MD), as well as retinal breaks not detected preoperatively. Use of cryopexy, circumferential or segmental scleral buckle, drainage of subretinal fluid, injection of air or gas, and duration of surgery were recorded. The postoperative parameters analyzed were BCVA, IOP and recurrence of RD and postoperative complications. Follow-up was established at 3 months.

RESULTS

A total of 213 eyes (97 right, 116 left) of 205 patients (114 males, 91 females) affected by primary RRD were included. Fifty-two eyes (24.4%) were affected by high myopia (AL >26.5 mm), and 160 patients (75.1%) were affected by RRD caused by a single retinal break and involving only one quadrant. The superior quadrant was the most frequently involved (49.3%). Forty-two eyes (19.7%) were affected by MD. In 13 eyes (11.3%), retinal breaks were not detected preoperatively. The duration of surgery was 75.5 ± 42 min. No significant BCVA changes were observed in the whole group, whereas a significant improvement of BCVA from the baseline (2.83 ± 0.87 logMAR) to each time point of follow-up was observed in the subgroup of patients affected by MD. Six eyes (2.8%) developed a recurrent RD, secondary to proliferative vitreoretinopathy (3 eyes) and secondary to a new retinal break (3 eyes). Two eyes developed a persistent vitreous hemorrhage, and one eye developed a macular hole after 1 week. PPV was performed for both.

CONCLUSION

Microscope-assisted ab externo surgery is effective and safe, it reduces discomfort, it allows the surgeon to work with both hands free, and provides an adequate visualization of each step being performed.

Ergonomics in strabismus surgery

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Although much has been written regarding ergonomics in ophthalmology, little information is available regarding the specific ergonomic concerns of pediatric ophthalmology and in particular, of strabismus surgery. This article will summarize current findings pertaining to musculoskeletal disorders in ophthalmology and review their implications for strabismus surgeons.

RECENT FINDINGS

Optical motion capture is a promising alternative to older qualitative and quantitative methods for evaluating ergonomic posture. Recent studies support the need for training to reduce work-related musculoskeletal disorders.

Competency-Based Education Assessment Tools for Laser Capsulotomy, Peripheral Iridotomy, and Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty

PURPOSE

To produce Competency-Based Education Assessment Tools (C-BEAT) for performance of neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd:YAG) laser capsulotomy, laser peripheral iridotomy (LPI), and selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) on an artificial eye model that can be used in competency-based medical education (CBME) of ophthalmology residents.

DESIGN

Survey.

PARTICIPANTS

Eight content experts (residency program director and faculty members involved in ophthalmology resident training).

METHODS

Task-specific checklists were created to assess the performance of Nd:YAG capsulotomy, LPI, and SLT on artificial eye models designed for each of these procedures, as well as a global rating scale (GRS). A modified Delphi process was used to establish face and content validity of the C-BEAT for lasers. Eight content experts participated in the Delphi process, and the consensus was achieved after 4 rounds.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Survey responses.

RESULTS

Final versions of checklists for Nd:YAG capsulotomy, LPI, and SLT, and a GRS for these laser procedures were produced with face and content validity. Modifications to the energy settings and the number of applications in the capsulotomy and peripheral iridotomy were implemented into the checklist and instructions, because the artificial models were not identical in their responses to the laser applications compared with real tissue.

CONCLUSIONS

The C-BEAT for lasers can be used in an examination setting within ophthalmology residency training programs to establish competency in these procedures before performing them on real patients. These tools help to meet the demand for assessment modalities within a CBME model that is being implemented into residency training worldwide. To establish interrater and construct validities, further studies are required.

Scleral Buckling Using a Non-contact Wide-Angle Viewing System with a 25-Gauge Chandelier Endoilluminator

Purpose

To report the outcome of scleral buckling using a non-contact wide-angle viewing system with a 25-gauge chandelier endoilluminator.

Methods

Retrospective analyses of medical records were performed for 17 eyes of 16 patients with primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) without proliferative vitreoretinopathy who had undergone conventional scleral buckling with cryoretinopexy using the combination of a non-contact wide-angle viewing system and chandelier endoillumination.

Results

The patients were eight males and five females with a mean age of 26.8 ± 10.2 (range, 11 to 47) years. The mean follow-up period was 7.3 ± 3.1 months. Baseline best-corrected visual acuity was 0.23 ± 0.28 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution units. Best-corrected visual acuity at the final visit showed improvement (0.20 ± 0.25 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution units), but the improvement was not statistically significant (p = 0.722). As a surgery-related complication, there was vitreous loss at the end of surgery in one eye. As a postoperative complication, increased intraocular pressure (four cases) and herpes simplex epithelial keratitis (one case) were controlled postoperatively with eye drops. One case of persistent RRD after primary surgery needed additional vitrectomy, and the retina was postoperatively attached.

Conclusions

Scleral buckling with chandelier illumination as a surgical technique for RRD has the advantages of relieving the surgeon's neck pain from prolonged use of the indirect ophthalmoscope and sharing the surgical procedure with another surgical team member. In addition, fine retinal breaks that are hard to identify using an indirect ophthalmoscope can be easily found under the microscope by direct endoillumination.