Randomized crossover trial comparing effectiveness and tolerability of generic and brand-name travoprost

Adverse effects and Safety in Glaucoma Patients - Agreement on Clinical Trial Outcomes for Reports on Eye Drops (ASGARD) - A Delphi Consensus Statement

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to establish consensus among experts on outcomes and methods to be used in clinical trials to assess adverse effects of anti-glaucomatous eye drops.

DESIGN

Modified Delphi method.

METHODS

Clinical experts from Europe, North America, South America, the Middle East, and Asia were invited to participate in two sequential web-based surveys administered from June 27 to August 29, 2021. A total of 91 clinical experts were invited to participate. Of these, 71 (78%) experts from 23 different countries accepted the invitation and answered the first questionnaire. The importance of items was ranked using a 10-point scale (1 as not important, 10 as very important).

RESULTS

A total of 84 items were rated in round one by 71 participants. Of these, 68 (81%) reached consensus. In round two, 19 items, including three additional items, were rated by 53 (75%) participants. Consensus was reached in 98% of investigated items. Eight outcomes were agreed as important to assess when conducting future trials: ocular surface, dryness, epithelial damage, local adverse effects related to eye drops as reported by patients, periocular surroundings and eyelids, quality of life questionnaires, hyperemia, visual acuity, tear film, and anterior chamber inflammation.

CONCLUSION

We propose a consensus-based series of outcomes and assessment methods to be used in clinical trials assessing adverse effects of anti-glaucomatous eye drops. This will hopefully improve the comparability of results from future trials and thus facilitate meta-analyses and progress in this field.

Changes in Prices and Eye-Care Providers Prescribing Patterns of Glaucoma Medications in the United States Between 2013 and 2019

PRECIS

Brand glaucoma medication prices vastly increased in the United States over the past 7 years, despite a reduction in eye-care providers' tendency to prescribe brand medications over generics.

PURPOSE

Determine the changes in prices of brand and generic glaucoma medications and to identify changes in eye-care providers prescribing patterns since 2013.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The National Average Drug Acquisition Cost (NADAC) database (2013-2019) was used analyze per-unit drug price. Medicare Part D prescriber profile was used to identify eye-care providers prescribing patterns between 2013 and 2017.

RESULTS

Brand-name medication prices increased by 59% between 2013 and 2019, while generic medications decreased by 22%. Brand-name drugs were 13 to 162 times more expensive than their generic counterparts. Eye-care Providers prescribed 25% less brand name medications in 2017 compared with 2013.

CONCLUSION

Brand glaucoma medication prices vastly increased in the United States over the past 7 years, despite a reduction in eye-care providers' tendency to prescribe brand medications over generics. A change in government policy, allowing Medicare medication prices negotiations, could greatly reduce health expenditure on glaucoma treatment.

NCX 1741, a Novel Nitric Oxide-Donating Phosphodiesterase-5 Inhibitor, Exerts Rapid and Long-Lasting Intraocular Pressure-Lowering in Cynomolgus Monkeys

Purpose: We studied the IOP-lowering effects of NCX 1741, a novel nitric oxide (NO)-donating derivative of the phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitor, avanafil, in Cynomolgus monkey with laser-induced ocular hypertension (OHT-monkeys). NCX 1193 (NO-donating moiety), NCX 1744 (NCX 1741 without ester nitrate moiety), and travoprost (PGF2α analogue) were used for comparison. Ocular exposure after NCX 1741 dosing also was addressed. Methods: Vehicle (phosphate buffer pH 6.0, Kolliphor^® 5%, DMSO 0.3%, benzalkonium chloride 0.02%), NCX 1741, NCX 1193, NCX 1744, or travoprost were instilled (30 μL; single dose) masked and conscious IOPs were measured by pneumatonometry. LC-MS/MS-based methods were employed to monitor ocular exposure of NCX 1741 and main metabolites after ocular dosing in New Zealand White rabbits. Results: NCX 1741 (2.2%, 0.8 μmol/eye) lowered IOP with an E_max (ΔΔIOP, IOP change vs. pre-dose and vehicle) between 5 and 8 h post-dosing (ΔΔIOP_5h, -5.3 ± 2.0 mmHg and ΔΔIOP_8h, -6.0 ± 2.1 mmHg). Conversely, equimolar (0.47%, 0.8 μmol/eye) NCX 1193 IOP-lowering effects were maximal 3 h post-dosing (ΔΔIOP_3h, -4.7 ± 1.6 mmHg) and declined thereafter (ΔΔIOP_5h, -1.6 ± 1.1 mmHg). In a follow-up study, NCX 1741 (1.5%, 0.5 μmol/eye) was more effective than NCX 1744 despite a similar duration. Further, NCX 1741 was as effective as travoprost (0.1%, 0.06 μmol/eye) at 5 and 8 h post-dosing (travoprost, ΔΔIOP_5h, -3.4 ± 2.2 mmHg and ΔΔIOP_8h, -4.9 ± 1.3 mmHg) but had shorter duration (NCX 1741, ΔΔIOP_24h, -1.5 ± 1.1 mmHg; travoprost, ΔΔIOP_24h, -7.1 ± 2.8 mmHg). NCX 1741 resulted in significant aqueous humor exposure, as determined by the levels of the main metabolite, avanafil. Conclusions: NCX 1741 rapidly and effectively lowers IOP in OHT-monkeys for several hours post-dosing. How these effects translate in humans is still to be defined.

Evaluation of Generic versus Original Prostaglandin Analogues in the Treatment of Glaucoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

TOPIC

An evaluation of the efficacy and tolerability of generic prostaglandin analogues (PGAs) compared with their original counterpart.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This systematic review was initiated to enlighten ophthalmologists and patients in the use of original and generic ophthalmic solutions.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted on PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Clinicaltrials.gov, and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, along with a manual search, from the marketing of the first PGA, latanoprost, in 1995 to the present. Randomized controlled trials comparing an original PGA with its generic counterpart were included. The last literature search was conducted in June 2019. Risk of bias was assessed by 2 independent reviewers using the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews Tool. The primary outcome was reduction of intraocular pressure (IOP) from baseline. Secondary outcomes included tolerability, ocular surface health, quality of life, disease progression, and cost-effectiveness. Meta-analysis of the primary outcome was planned.

RESULTS

Of 385 screened articles, 6 were included in a broad characterization and in the meta-analysis. A total of 619 patients were enrolled. The duration of the studies ranged from 3 to 16 weeks. Meta-analysis of all 6 studies denied any clinically significant difference in efficacy, and the 95% confidence interval included nil (-0.50 to 0.04 mmHg). The evidence was of moderate certainty because of unclear or high risk of bias in all studies. There were no reported differences in tolerability.

CONCLUSIONS

Trials comparing original and generic PGAs did not show a clinically significant difference in IOP-lowering effect or tolerability. However, the quality of the trials is suboptimal. Overall, there is uncertainty, and further research is needed to confirm equivalence.