1
|
Kovic Ž, Kobua M, Fogarty M, Donohoe CL, Kelly ME, Fitzmaurice GJ, Fitzgerald M, Zambra P, Geary U, Ward ME. Valid consent in the acute hospital setting: perspectives of patients and members of the public. Ir J Med Sci 2024; 193:1703-1714. [PMID: 38578384 PMCID: PMC11294267 DOI: 10.1007/s11845-024-03658-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2023] [Accepted: 02/29/2024] [Indexed: 04/06/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND People who interact with healthcare services have an ethical and legal right to control their own lives, to make informed decisions, and to consent to what happens to them. For consent to be considered ethically and legally valid, three key criteria must be met: consent must be given voluntarily; people must be sufficiently informed of all options; and people should have capacity to make the decision to give or withhold their consent. AIM This study set out to explore, through the use of surveys, the perspectives of patients and public in relation to consent. METHOD Surveys were developed for patients and the public and administered paper based (patients) and through social media (public). RESULTS One hundred and forty surveys were posted to patients, with a 38% response rate; 104 responses were received from the public. Ninety-six percent of patients were satisfied that the decision they made was informed; 100% felt they had made a voluntary decision; 98% felt the clinician seemed knowledgeable about the procedure. What matters most to the public were being informed about the risks associated with the proposed procedure and being assured that whatever choice they make they will receive the best care possible. CONCLUSIONS The results highlight interesting similarities and differences in relation to consent between members of the public thinking about a possible treatment, surgery, or procedure and those patients who have actually been through the process in the past 12 months. Recommendations have been developed on the basis of these findings to co-design improvements in consent practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Živa Kovic
- School of Medicine, Trinity College, The University of Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland
| | - Motheo Kobua
- School of Medicine, Trinity College, The University of Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland
| | - Mary Fogarty
- Quality and Safety Improvement Directorate, St James's Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland
| | - Claire L Donohoe
- Gastrointestinal and General Surgery, St James's Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland
| | | | | | | | - Paul Zambra
- Quality and Safety Improvement Directorate, St James's Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland
| | - Una Geary
- Quality and Safety Improvement Directorate, St James's Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland
| | - Marie E Ward
- Quality and Safety Improvement Directorate, St James's Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland.
- Centre for Innovative Human Systems, School of Psychology, Trinity College, The University of Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wootton SH, Rysavy M, Davis P, Thio M, Romero-Lopez M, Holzapfel LF, Thrasher T, Wade JD, Owen L. Practical approaches for supporting informed consent in neonatal clinical trials. Acta Paediatr 2024; 113:923-930. [PMID: 38389165 PMCID: PMC11006570 DOI: 10.1111/apa.17165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2023] [Revised: 01/23/2024] [Accepted: 02/13/2024] [Indexed: 02/24/2024]
Abstract
The survival and health of preterm and critically ill infants have markedly improved over the past 50 years, supported by well-conducted neonatal research. However, newborn research is difficult to undertake for many reasons, and obtaining informed consent for research in this population presents several unique ethical and logistical challenges. In this article, we explore methods to facilitate the consent process, including the role of checklists to support meaningful informed consent for neonatal clinical trials. CONCLUSION: The authors provide practical guidance on the design and implementation of an effective consent checklist tailored for use in neonatal clinical research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan H. Wootton
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, McGovern Medical School at UTHealth Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
- Institute for Clinical Research and Learning Health Care, McGovern Medical School at UTHealth Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
- Children's Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Matthew Rysavy
- Institute for Clinical Research and Learning Health Care, McGovern Medical School at UTHealth Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
- Children's Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA
- Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, McGovern Medical School at UTHealth, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Peter Davis
- Newborn Research, Neonatal Services, Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Newborn Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Clinical Sciences, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Marta Thio
- Newborn Research, Neonatal Services, Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Newborn Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Clinical Sciences, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia
- Gandel Simulation Service, Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Mar Romero-Lopez
- Institute for Clinical Research and Learning Health Care, McGovern Medical School at UTHealth Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
- Children's Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA
- Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, McGovern Medical School at UTHealth, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Lindsay F. Holzapfel
- Children's Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA
- Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, McGovern Medical School at UTHealth, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Tamara Thrasher
- Children's Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA
- March of Dimes NICU Family Support Program, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jaleesa D. Wade
- Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, McGovern Medical School at UTHealth, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Louise Owen
- Newborn Research, Neonatal Services, Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Newborn Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Clinical Sciences, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Glaser J, Nouri S, Fernandez A, Sudore RL, Schillinger D, Klein-Fedyshin M, Schenker Y. Interventions to Improve Patient Comprehension in Informed Consent for Medical and Surgical Procedures: An Updated Systematic Review. Med Decis Making 2020; 40:119-143. [PMID: 31948345 DOI: 10.1177/0272989x19896348] [Citation(s) in RCA: 89] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
Background. Patient comprehension is fundamental to valid informed consent. Current practices often result in inadequate patient comprehension. Purpose. An updated review to evaluate the characteristics and outcomes of interventions to improve patient comprehension in clinical informed consent. Data Sources. Systematic searches of MEDLINE and EMBASE (2008-2018). Study Selection. We included randomized and nonrandomized controlled trials evaluating interventions to improve patient comprehension in clinical informed consent. Data Extraction. Reviewers independently abstracted data using a standardized form, comparing all results and resolving disagreements by consensus. Data Synthesis. Fifty-two studies of 60 interventions met inclusion criteria. Compared with standard informed consent, a statistically significant improvement in patient comprehension was seen with 43% (6/14) of written interventions, 56% (15/27) of audiovisual interventions, 67% (2/3) of multicomponent interventions, 85% (11/13) of interactive digital interventions, and 100% (3/3) of verbal discussion with test/feedback or teach-back interventions. Eighty-five percent of studies (44/52) evaluated patients' understanding of risks, 69% (41/52) general knowledge about the procedure, 35% (18/52) understanding of benefits, and 31% (16/52) understanding of alternatives. Participants' education level was reported heterogeneously, and only 8% (4/52) of studies examined effects according to health literacy. Most studies (79%, 41/52) did not specify participants' race/ethnicity. Limitations. Variation in interventions and outcome measures precluded conduct of a meta-analysis or calculation of mean effect size. Control group processes were variable and inconsistently characterized. Nearly half of studies (44%, 23/52) had a high risk of bias for the patient comprehension outcome. Conclusions. Interventions to improve patient comprehension in informed consent are heterogeneous. Interactive interventions, particularly with test/feedback or teach-back components, appear superior. Future research should emphasize all key elements of informed consent and explore effects among vulnerable populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johanna Glaser
- School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Sarah Nouri
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Alicia Fernandez
- Division of General Internal Medicine at Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.,UCSF Center for Vulnerable Populations, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Rebecca L Sudore
- Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.,San Francisco Veterans Affairs Health Care System, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Dean Schillinger
- Division of General Internal Medicine at Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.,UCSF Center for Vulnerable Populations, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | - Yael Schenker
- Section of Palliative Care and Medical Ethics, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kent S, Bardach SH, Zhang X, Abner EL, Grill JD, Jicha GA. Public Understanding and Opinions regarding Genetic Research on Alzheimer's Disease. Public Health Genomics 2019; 21:228-237. [PMID: 31326966 DOI: 10.1159/000501464] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2019] [Accepted: 06/11/2019] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Participants willing to provide genetic samples are needed to propel research on Alzheimer's disease (AD) treatment and prevention forward. A limited public understanding of what AD genetic research entails and concerns about participation may constitute recruitment challenges. OBJECTIVES This study seeks to understand how well older adults understand AD genetic research and whether their understanding is related to concerns about participation or willingness to engage. METHODS Our surveys included a mock consent form with corresponding knowledge and opinion questions regarding AD. The surveys were mailed to participants from the University of Kentucky Alzheimer's Disease Center and to a list of randomly selected individuals within the same age range from a local voter registration list. Descriptive and multivariable linear regression analyses were conducted. RESULTS The returned surveys (n = 502) demonstrated limits to what the respondents understood immediately after reading the relevant material, with a mean summary knowledge score of 74.5 out of 100. While comprehension gaps were not related to level of concern or willingness to engage, concerns were related to willingness to engage. Concerns were greater among individuals not actively involved in research, individuals from minority groups, and those with higher levels of education. CONCLUSIONS Focusing on concerns specifically, rather than on knowledge more generally, may help increase participation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saida Kent
- University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - Shoshana H Bardach
- Sanders-Brown Center on Aging, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA, .,University of Kentucky College of Public Health, Lexington, Kentucky, USA,
| | - Xuan Zhang
- Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Erin L Abner
- Sanders-Brown Center on Aging, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.,University of Kentucky College of Public Health, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - Joshua D Grill
- Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California, USA
| | - Gregory A Jicha
- University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.,Sanders-Brown Center on Aging, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ittenbach RF, Corsmo JJ, Miller RV, Korbee LL. Older Teens' Understanding and Perceptions of Risks in Studies With Genetic Testing: A Pilot Study. AJOB Empir Bioeth 2019; 10:173-181. [PMID: 31002290 DOI: 10.1080/23294515.2019.1577313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
Background: The consent process used in clinical research today falls markedly short of the ideal process envisioned nearly 30 years ago. Critics have suggested that the informed consent process has become challenging, formalistic, and incompletely understood by researchers and participants alike. Hence, the purpose of this pilot study was to identify and characterize important aspects of the informed consent process that teens believe impact their understanding of risks of participation in studies with genetic testing. Methods: The personal research experiences of 15 teens regarding consent/assent and research participation in studies with genetic testing were solicited through focus-group interviews. All participants had enrolled in at least one research study involving genetic testing in the prior 2 years. All groups were facilitated by the same experienced focus-group moderator. Themes and subthemes were identified, summarized, and interpreted using conventional qualitative content analysis. Results: Three overarching themes emerged from the interviews: fear of what could happen, need for additional information regarding risks, and need for autonomy and decision-making control throughout the consent process. Conclusion: Results of this pilot study provide preliminary evidence that teens can identify and characterize key issues in the informed consent/assent process when it comes to the risks of research participation. These findings are consistent with other research regarding teens' perceptions and recommendations for genetic testing research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard F Ittenbach
- a Division of Biostatistics and Epidemiology (MLC 5041), Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center , Cincinnati , Ohio , USA
| | - Jeremy J Corsmo
- b Cincinnati Children's Hospital, Office of Research Compliance and Regulatory Affairs (MLC 7040) , Cincinnati , Ohio , USA
| | | | - Leslie L Korbee
- d Academic and Regulatory Monitoring Services, LLC , Cincinnati , Ohio , USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
|