Complications of ophthalmologic nerve blocks: a review

DEVELOPMENT OF RETROBULBAR AND AURICULOPALPEBRAL NERVE BLOCKS IN CALIFORNIA SEA LIONS (ZALOPHUS CALIFORNIANUS)

Eye lesions are commonly observed in pinnipeds. Clinical assessment is challenging because animals are often blepharospastic and under inhalant anesthesia the globe rotates ventrally, making observation difficult. Retrobulbar and auriculopalpebral nerve block techniques have been developed in other species to alleviate these difficulties and allow for a more thorough ophthalmic exam. Ocular nerve block techniques were developed for California sea lions (CSLs) (Zalophus californianus) using lidocaine hydrochloride 2%. To develop the retrobulbar block, a variety of needle sizes, anatomic approaches, and volumes of methylene blue were injected into the orbits of 10 CSL cadavers. An optimal technique, based on desired distribution of methylene blue dye into periocular muscles and tissues, was determined to be a two-point (ventrolateral and ventromedial) transpalpebral injection with a 20-ga, 1 1/2-inch needle. This technique was then tested using lidocaine on 26 anesthetized animals prior to euthanasia, and on one case with clinical ocular disease. A dose of 4 mg/kg of lidocaine was considered ideal, with positive results and minimal complications. The retrobulbar block had a 76.9% rate of success (using 4 mg/kg of lidocaine), which was defined as the globe returning at least halfway to its central orientation with mydriasis. No systemic adverse effects were noted with this technique. The auriculopalpebral nerve block was also adapted for CSLs from techniques described in dogs, cattle, and horses. Lidocaine was injected (2-3 ml) by subcutaneous infiltration lateral to the orbital rim, where the auriculopalpebral nerve branch courses over the zygomatic arch. This block was used in five blepharospastic animals that were anesthetized for ophthalmic examinations. The auriculopalpebral nerve block was successful in 60% of the cases, which was defined as reduction or elimination of blepharospasm for up to 3 hr. Success appeared to be dependent more on the location of injection rather than on the dose administered.

Focused local anesthesia and analgesia for head and neck surgery

Facility in the use of head and neck regional blocks will provide excellent perioperative analgesia and patient satisfaction. The scope of ambulatory surgical care for head and neck surgery will undoubtedly increase as expertize in these blocks expand in the face of strict criteria for patient selection. Supplemental sedation will be more precise with the intended result of less hangover and nausea and vomiting.

Needle-based blocks for the 21st century ophthalmology

PURPOSE

This paper reviews history of the needle orbital blocks used in the earlier centuries and how they have evolved towards safer anaesthesia in the modern clinical practice.

METHODS

Material is derived from literature searches from major ophthalmic and anaesthetic journals on the use of orbital needle blocks over earlier centuries.

RESULTS

Needle-based anaesthetic techniques were described shortly after the invention of reliable medical needles. Atkinson popularized the classical retrobulbar block in a series of papers published in the early 20th century. This technique,which utilises a relatively long needle inserted towards the apex of the muscle cone behind the globe, has been criticized by some as unsuitable for modern 21st century ophthalmic surgery because of the extremely rare potential for serious complications. Satisfactory anaesthesia and akinesia can be obtained with short sharp or dull needles with slightly higher volumes of local anaesthetic agent placed in the farthest inferotemporal quadrant.

CONCLUSION

Aside from relative safety, modern needle blocks offer the advantage of lid akinesia without a need for a second injection for the seventh nerve that is often performed con-comitantly with retrobulbar block.

The use of peribulbar anaesthesia in paediatric cataract surgery (age 7-15 years) in a mobile eye camp in China

AIM

To evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the use of peribulbar anaesthesia (PA) in paediatric cataract surgery in rural areas in China, where there are limitations in expertise and equipment for general anaesthesia (GA).

METHODS

We prospectively evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of carrying out paediatric cataract surgery under PA in children aged 7-15 years. Informed consent was obtained from the subjects and their parents. Children were assessed for their suitability for PA. Peribulbar anaesthesia was given as a peribulbar block using a 2% lidocaine, 0.5% bupivacaine-hyaluronidase mixture administered before lens aspiration with intraocular lens implantation. The acceptability of the PA was evaluated by questionnaire.

RESULTS

A total of 19 patients were recruited. Their mean age was 12 +/- 2 years (range 7-15 years). None required conversion to GA. All subjects regarded PA as either totally acceptable (63.2%) or acceptable (36.8%). The mean pain scores (from 0 to 100) during the injection and surgery were 28 +/- 26 and 6 +/- 8, respectively. Seventeen patients (89.5%) said they would prefer PA if choices in anaesthesia were offered again.

CONCLUSIONS

Peribulbar anaesthesia can be considered as a viable option in selected children undergoing cataract surgery when facilities for safe and optimal general anaesthesia are unavailable.