Criteria for immediate postoperative extubation in adult recipients following living-related liver transplantation with total intravenous anesthesia

Utilization of immediate extubation in a multidisciplinary pathway for pediatric liver transplantation associated with improved postoperative outcomes

BACKGROUND

Immediate extubation is becoming more common in liver transplantation. However, limited data exist on how to identify pediatric patients with potential for successful immediate extubation and how this intervention may affect recovery.

METHODS

This retrospective review evaluated patients who underwent liver transplantation from 2015 to 2021 at Children's Healthcare of Atlanta. Preoperative status and intraoperative management were evaluated and compared. Outcomes comprised thrombosis, surgical reexploration, retransplantation, as well as reintubation, high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) usage, postoperative infection, the length of stay (LOS), and mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 173 patients were analyzed, with 121 patients (69.9%) extubated immediately. The extubation group had older age (median 4.0 vs 1.25 years, p = .048), lower PELD/MELD (28 vs. 34, p = .03), decreased transfusion (10.2 vs. 41.7 mL/kg, p < .001), shorter surgical time (332 vs. 392 min, p < .001), and primary abdominal closure (81% vs. 40.4%, p < .001). Immediate extubation was associated with decreased HFNC (0.21 vs. 0.71 days, p = .02), postoperative infection (9.9% vs. 26.9%, p = .007), mortality (0% vs. 5.8%, p = .036), and pediatric intensive care unit LOS (4.7 vs. 11.4 days, p < .001). The complication rate was lower in the extubation group (24.8% vs. 36.5%), but not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately 70% of patients were able to be successfully extubated immediately, with only 2.5% requiring reintubation. Those immediately extubated had decreased need for HFNC, lower infection rates, shorter LOS, and decreased mortality. Our results show that with proper patient selection and a multidisciplinary approach, immediate extubation allows for improved recovery without increased respiratory complications after pediatric liver transplantation.

The Practice of Fast-Track Liver Transplant Anesthesia

Prior to the 1990s, prolonged postoperative intubation and admission to the intensive care unit was considered the standard of care following liver transplantation. Advocates of this practice speculated that this time allowed patients to recover from the stress of major surgery and allowed their clinicians to optimize the recipients' hemodynamics. As evidence in the cardiac surgical literature on the feasibility of early extubation grew, clinicians began applying these principles to liver transplant recipients. Further, some centers also began challenging the dogma that patients need to be cared for in the intensive care unit following liver transplantation and instead transferred patients to the floor or stepdown units immediately following surgery, a technique known as "fast-track" liver transplantation. This article aims to provide a history of early extubation for liver transplant recipients and offer practical advice on how to select patients that may be able to bypass the intensive care unit and be recovered in a non-traditional manner.

Immediate Postoperative Extubation Decreases Pulmonary Complications in Liver Transplant Patients

BACKGROUND

Fast-track anesthesia in liver transplantation (LT) has been discussed over the past few decades; however, factors associated with immediate extubation after LT surgery are not well defined. This study aimed to identify predictive factors and examine impacts of immediate extubation on post-LT outcomes.

METHODS

A total of 279 LT patients between January 2014 and May 2017 were included. Primary outcome was immediate extubation after LT. Other postoperative outcomes included reintubation, intensive care unit stay and cost, pulmonary complications within 90 days, and 90-day graft survival. Logistic regression was performed to identify factors that were predictive for immediate extubation. A matched control was used to study immediate extubation effect on the other postoperative outcomes.

RESULTS

Of these 279 patients, 80 (28.7%) underwent immediate extubation. Patients with anhepatic time >75 minutes and with total intraoperative blood transfusion ≥12 units were less likely to be immediately extubated (odds ratio [OR], 0.48; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.26-0.89; P = 0.02; OR, 0.11; 95% CI, 0.05-0.21; P < 0.001). The multivariable analysis showed immediate extubation significantly decreased the risk of pulmonary complications (OR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.15-0.77; P = 0.01). According to a matched case-control model (immediate group [n = 72], delayed group [n = 72]), the immediate group had a significantly lower rate of pulmonary complications (11.1% versus 27.8%; P = 0.012). Intensive care unit stay and cost were relatively lower in the immediate group (2 versus 3 d; P = 0.082; $5700 versus $7710; P = 0.11). Reintubation rates (2.8% versus 2.8%; P > 0.9) and 90-day graft survival rates (95.8% versus 98.6%; P = 0.31) were similar.

CONCLUSIONS

Immediate extubation post-LT in appropriate patients is safe and may improve patient outcomes and resource allocation.

Predictors of Immediate Tracheal Extubation in the Operating Room After Pediatric Liver Transplantation

OBJECTIVES

Pediatric orthotopic liver transplant recipients frequently need mechanical ventilation during the immediate posttransplant period. However, intensive care unit beds are costly and scarce; therefore, anticipating which patients will require postoperative mechanical ventilation support is important. In addition, immediate postoperative extubation may reduce the incidence of postoperative respiratory complications and improve patient outcomes after orthotopic liver transplant. Here, we aimed to determine the predictors of need for mechanical ventilation after orthotopic liver transplant in pediatric patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the records of 57 pediatric patients who underwent orthotopic liver transplant (performed by the same team at Baskent University Hospital from April 1996 to August 2009). Patients were divided into 2 groups according to whether they required postoperative mechanical ventilation or not. Collected data included demographic features; comorbidities; cause of liver failure; perioperative laboratory values; intraoperative hemodynamic parameters; use and volume of crystalloids, colloids, and blood products; albumin levels; portal vein clamping time, requirement of inotropes/vasopressors; and anesthesia duration.

RESULTS

Mean age and body weight of patients were 25.0 ± 23.1 months and 10.8 ± 5.3 kg, respectively. Of 57 patients, 26 (46%) needed postoperative mechanical ventilation. Compared with those who did not require postoperative mechanical ventilation, patients who required mechanical ventilation had growth failure (P = .03), higher mean intraoperative lactate level (P = .03), and higher mean intraoperative fresh frozen plasma/erythrocyte suspension (P = .049) and intraoperative vasopressor (P = .022) requirements. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that growth failure (odds ratio = 37; P = .03) and higher intraoperative lactate level (odds ratio = 1.5; P = .03) were predictors of the need for mechanical ventilation.

CONCLUSIONS

About 46% of our pediatric orthotopic liver transplant recipients required mechanical ventilation postoperatively. Growth failure and higher intraoperative lactate levels were associated with need for postoperative mechanical ventilation.

Immediate Tracheal Extubation After Pediatric Liver Transplantation

OBJECTIVES

We examined whether immediate tracheal extubation among pediatric liver transplant recipients was safe and feasible.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed medical records of pediatric liver transplant recipients at Baskent University Hospital from January 2012 to December 2017. We grouped children who were extubated in the operating room versus those extubated in the intensive care unit.

RESULTS

In our study group of 81 pediatric patients, median age was 4 years (range, 4 mo to 16 y) and 44 (54%) were male. Immediate tracheal extubation in the operating room was performed in 39 patients (48%). Children who remained intubated (n = 42) had more frequent massive hemorrhage (14% vs 0%; P = .015), received larger amounts of packed red blood cells (19.3 vs 10.2 mL/kg; P < .001), and had higher serum lactate levels (9.0 vs 6.9 mmol/L; P = .001) intraoperatively. All children with open abdomens postoperatively remained intubated (n = 7). Patients extubated in the operating room received less vasopressors (1 [3%] vs 12 [29%]; P = .002) and antibiotics (11 [28%] vs 22 [52%]; P = 0.041) and developed infections less frequently postoperatively (3.0 [8%] vs 15.0 [36%]; P = .003). Children extubated in the operating room had shorter mean stay in the intensive care unit (2.0 vs 4.5 days; P < .001). Hospital mortality was higher in children who remained intubated (12% vs 0%; P = .026).

CONCLUSIONS

Immediate tracheal extubation was well tolerated in almost half of our patients and did not compromise their outcomes. Patients who remained intubated had longer intensive care unit stays and higher hospital mortalities. Therefore, we recommend immediate tracheal extubation in the operating room after pediatric liver transplant among those children without intraoperative requirements for massive blood transfusion, high-dose vasopressors, high serum lactate levels, and open abdomen.

Extubation in the operating room after pediatric liver transplant: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Early extubation immediately following liver transplantation is increasingly common in adult practice. Some pediatric institutions have begun to adopt this strategy. Careful patient selection is essential in minimizing risk.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study evaluated infants and children who underwent liver transplantation between July 2011 and December 2014. Our primary objective was to determine early extubation rate. Secondary objectives were to identify clinical factors associated with successful early extubation compared with delayed extubation and to examine significant postoperative complications, intensive care unit length of stay, and hospital length of stay.

RESULTS

The early extubation rate was 57.8% (37/64, confidence interval [CI] 44.8%-70.1%) over this 3.5-year period, increasing from 42% in 2012 to 58% by the end of 2014. The patients in the early extubation group were more likely to be older than the delayed extubation group (mean [SD], 7 [5.3] years vs 3.5 [5.5] years, difference between the mean [95% CI], 3.5 [0.8, 6.2] years); were to have come from home on the day of surgery (78.4% vs 25.9%); and were less likely to be listed as United Network for Organ Sharing status 1A (2.7% vs 25.9%). The early extubation group received less packed red blood cell volume (mean [SD], 9 [13.2] mL/kg vs 40.6 [48.5] mL/kg, difference between the mean [95% CI], 31.6 [95% CI 14.9, 48.3] mL/kg) and fresh-frozen plasma (mean 2.7 [SD 9.5] vs 13.3 [SD15.1], difference between the mean [95% CI], 10.5 [4.4,16.7] mL/kg). None of the patients in the early extubation group required reintubation in the first 24 hours following transplant and none experienced hepatic artery thrombosis. The early extubation group had a shorter average postoperative PICU stay (mean 3.8 [SD 2.1] days vs 17.6 [SD 31.3] days, difference between the mean [95% CI], 9.5 [4.3, 14.7] days) and a shorter postoperative hospital stay overall (mean 10.7 [SD 4.3] days vs 29.7 [SD 43.1] days, difference between the mean [95% CI], 19.1 [8.6, 29.6] days).

CONCLUSION

More than half of our pediatric liver transplant patients were successfully extubated in the operating room immediately following surgery. We believe early extubation to be safe when employed in selected subpopulations of pediatric patients undergoing liver transplantation.

Fast tracking in adult living donor liver transplantation: A case series of 15 patients

Background and Aims:

Fast tracking (FT) for more efficacious use of resources may be difficult after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) due to a partial liver graft, complex vascular anastomoses and longer operating time. Our study was aimed at reporting our experience with FT (on table extubation) in LDLT recipients. A secondary objective of our study was to look at defining a subgroup of patients who could be prospectively planned for FT.

Methods:

We studied the demographics and outcomes of 15 LDLT recipients extubated immediately in the operating suite based on an uneventful intraoperative course, haemodynamic stability after graft reperfusion and improvement of metabolic parameters post-implantation and vascular anastomoses.

Results:

Twelve recipients were males, and mean age, body mass index (BMI) and Model for End Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score were 43 ± 12 years, 23 ± 3 kg/m² and 15.5 ± 6, respectively, most were Child–Turcotte–Pugh Class B. Diabetes and hypothyroidism were present in 1 and 2 patients, respectively. Post-extubation, none required immediate re-intubation and one patient needed non-invasive ventilation for 2 h.

Conclusion:

Fast tracked recipients were young, with a low BMI, low MELD scores, minimal comorbidities and good immediate graft function post-reperfusion.

Review of anesthesia in liver transplantation

Liver transplantation (LT) is a well-accepted treatment modality of many end-stage liver diseases. The main issue in LT is the shortage of deceased donors to accommodate the needs of patients waiting for such transplants. Live donors have tremendously increased the pool of available liver grafts, especially in countries where deceased donors are not common. The main ethical concern of this procedure is the safety of healthy donors, who undergo a major abdominal surgery not for their own health, but to help cure others. The first part of the review concentrates on live donor selection, preanesthetic evaluation, and intraoperative anesthetic care for living liver donors. The second part reviews patient evaluation, intraoperative anesthesia monitoring, and fluid management of the recipient. This review provides up-to-date information to help improve the quality of anesthesia, and contribute to the success of LT and increase the long-term survival of the recipients.

Maintenance of unconsciousness with low plasma propofol concentrations in the neohepatic phase of liver transplantation using bispectral index-guided propofol anesthesia: a case report

The authors present a case where a drug-effect parameter, the bispectral index, was used to guide propofol infusion when propofol-remifentanil anesthesia was used for liver transplantation. The target concentration of remifentanil was kept constant throughout the operation, and the bispectral index indicated that propofol infusion was not required during the anhepatic and neohepatic phases of the operation. The measured plasma propofol concentrations during the neohepatic phase were far below the usual values that are used to maintain anesthesia. However, the bispectral index indicated a state of unconsciousness. The patient regained consciousness rapidly several minutes after administration of neostigmine and cessation of remifentanil infusion. The measured plasma propofol concentrations were similar before and after recovery of consciousness. The possible mechanisms for the maintenance of anesthesia at reduced propofol concentrations are multifactorial and may be related to reduced liver function as well as an interaction between propofol and remifentanil or the use of a neuromuscular relaxant to suppress somatic afferent activity.

Clinical practice of early extubation after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Anesthetic practices such as early tracheal extubation facilitate postoperative recovery. Early extubation after liver transplantation has been adopted by some centers in the recent two decades. No universal clinical guidelines are used and questions remain. This review aimed to address the current status of early extubation after liver transplantation.

DATA SOURCES

A literature search of MEDLINE and ISI Web of Knowledge databases was performed using terms such as liver transplantation, early extubation, immediate tracheal extubation, fast tracking or fast track anesthesia and postoperative tracheal extubation. Additional papers were identified by a manual search of the references in the key articles.

RESULTS

Review of the available literature provided an insight into the definition, evolution, advantages and risks of early extubation, and anesthetic techniques that prompt early extubation in liver transplant patients. Early extubation has proved to be feasible and safe in these patients, but the outcomes are still uncertain.

CONCLUSIONS

Early extubation after liver transplantation is feasible, safe and cost-effective in the majority of patients and has been increasingly accepted as an option for conventional postoperative ventilation. Comprehensive and individualized evaluation of the patient's condition before extubation by an experienced anesthesiologist is the cornerstone of success. Understanding of its effect on the outcome remains incomplete. In the future, additional trials are required to establish universal early extubation guidelines and to determine its benefits for patients and practitioners.

Immediate postoperative extubation after liver transplantation at our centre: A report of two cases

Liver transplantation is a dynamic field undergoing continuous changes in management. Prolonged postoperative mechanical ventilation has been a norm but now there is a trend towards early extubation. We developed a protocol for early extubation based on bispectral index monitoring. This protocol was applied in two cases with satisfactory outcome.

Optimizing cost-effectiveness in perioperative care for liver transplantation: a model for low- to medium-income countries

Although liver transplantation (LT) is a highly effective treatment, it has been considered too costly for publicly funded health systems in many countries with low to medium average incomes. However, with economic growth and improving results, some governments are reconsidering this position. Cost-effectiveness data for LT are limited, especially in perioperative care, and the techniques and costs vary widely between centers without overt differences in outcomes. Anesthesiologists working in new programs find it difficult to determine which modalities are essential, which are needed only in exceptional circumstances, and which may be omitted without effects on outcomes. We investigated key elements of preoperative evaluations, intraoperative management, and early postoperative care that might significantly affect costs in order to develop a best-value approach for new programs in resource-limited health systems. We identified all modalities of care commonly used in anesthesia and perioperative care for adult LT along with their costs. Those considered to be universally accepted as minimum requirements for safe care were excluded from the analysis, and so were those considered to be safe and low-cost, even when evidence of efficacy was lacking. The remaining items were, therefore, those with uncertain or context-restricted value and significant costs. A systematic review of the published evidence, practice surveys, and institutional guidelines was performed, and the evidence was graded and summarized. With respect to costs and benefits, each modality was then cited as strongly recommended, recommended or optional, or no recommendation was made because of insufficient evidence. Sixteen modalities, which included preoperative cardiovascular imaging, venovenous bypass, pulmonary artery catheterization, high-flow fluid warming devices, drug therapies for hemostasis, albumin, cell salvage, anesthetic drugs, personnel (staffing) requirements, and early extubation, were assessed. Only high-flow fluid warming was strongly recommended. The recommended modalities included preoperative echocardiography, cell salvage, tranexamic acid and early extubation. Six others were rated optional, and there was insufficient evidence for 5 modalities. We conclude that some costly techniques and treatments can be omitted without adverse effects on outcomes.

Volatile anesthetics might be more beneficial than propofol for postoperative liver function in cirrhotic patients receiving hepatectomy

Hepatic inflow occlusion during the liver surgery may result in a transient ischemia period followed by reperfusion, and may initiate liver injury and lead to postoperative liver dysfunction. Especially in cirrhotic patients, the tolerance time of ischemia is much shorter and the outcome would be worse. Recently, clinical trials had proved that volatile anesthetics rather than propofol can protect myocardial cells from ischemia reperfusion (IR) injury in cardiac surgery. Meanwhile, animal studies had revealed that volatile anesthetics could induce some endogenous protective molecules in the liver such as hypoxia induced factor-1 (HIF-1), heme oxygenase (HO) enzyme system and inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), which make the volatile anesthetics posing the extraordinary anti-oxidative, anti-inflammatory, anti-apoptotic, and vasodilatory characteristics. However, there is still lack of trials to compare the postoperative outcomes such as liver function in cirrhotic patients undergoing liver surgery with inflow occlusion between volatile anesthetics and propofol anesthesia. Hence we hypothesize that with its anti-IR injury characteristics, volatile anesthetics might be the more appropriate choice in cirrhotic patients undergoing liver surgery with occlusion.

Drug management in emergent liver transplantation of mitochondrial disorder carriers: review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Mitochondrial respiratory-chain disorders (MRCD) lead to progressive disabling of neurological and cellular conditions that involve muscles, brain, kidney, and liver dysfunction. Affected individuals may need surgery, including orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). Surgery poses anesthesia challenges because of the prolonged use of anesthetic drugs and sedatives, which may inhibit oxidative phosphorylation, mimic mitochondrial cytopathic disorders, or unveil them ex novo.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a multilingual PubMed search of surgical and non-surgical anesthesia reports between the years 1992 and 2008, where anesthetic drugs were used in MRCD patients, especially for those undergoing urgent OLTs.

RESULTS

There were 51 case reports of 210 anesthesia and critical care interventions in patients with MRCD, a large part of them were children. Data pertaining to the safe usage of anesthesia and perioperative drugs were limited and conflicting. We found no article that addressed the issue of perioperative handling of urgent OLT in MRCD patients. We therefore suggest our own - although limited - experience for such occasions.

CONCLUSION

There are no randomized, controlled, trial-based indications regarding safe anesthetic drugs to be used perioperatively in MRCD carriers. Consultation among geneticists, anesthesiologists, intensivists, and surgeons is essential in patients with known/suspected metabolic syndrome for planning appropriate perioperative care.

The effects of desflurane and propofol-remifentanil on postoperative hepatic and renal functions after right hepatectomy in liver donors

Various volatile anesthetics have been used in hepatectomy in living donors, and their effects on major organs have been extensively evaluated. However, the impact of total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) on postoperative liver and renal functions after large liver resections has been less extensively investigated than that of volatile agents. The aim of this study was to compare the postoperative hepatic and renal functions between volatile anesthesia with desflurane and TIVA with propofol-remifentanil in living donors undergoing right hepatectomy. Seventy adult patients were randomly allocated into 2 groups: the desflurane group (n = 35) and TIVA group (n = 35). Aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, prothrombin time (PT), albumin, total bilirubin (TB), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine (Cr), BUN/Cr ratio, estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR), platelet count, and hemoglobin levels were analyzed in the preoperative period, immediately after the operation, and on the first, second, third, fifth, seventh, and thirtieth postoperative days (PODs). Most of the liver function test results were not significantly different between the 2 groups. However, PT (international normalized ratio) and TB were significantly greater on POD 5 in the TIVA group. Among the renal function tests, Cr was significantly higher and estimated GFR was significantly lower on POD 1 in the TIVA group. The platelet counts and hemoglobin levels were similar between the 2 groups. In conclusion, the results of our study suggest that living related donors for liver transplant may have a better outcome following anesthesia with desflurane. However, further testing will be necessary to prove this hypothesis.

Predictors of Immediate Tracheal Extubation in the Operating Room After Liver Transplantation

Immediate postoperative extubation may reduce the incidence of postoperative respiratory complications after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). We evaluated the predictors of immediate tracheal extubation in the operating room (OR) in our patients by retrospectively reviewing data from all patients who underwent OLT between January 2004 and June 2006. The patients were divided into two groups according to whether they had undergone extubation in the OR (group 1 n=52) or in the intensive care unit (ICU; group 2 n=48). When compared with the patients in group 2, those in group 1 had lower mean preoperative serum creatinine levels (0.9 +/- 1 vs 0.6 +/- 0.3 mg/dL, P=.04) and intraoperative transfusion requirements (packed red blood cells, 35.5 +/- 29.8 vs 25.6 +/- 19.0 mL/kg; P=.05, and fresh frozen plasma, 33.1 +/- 15.6 vs 25.7 +/- 14.3 mL/kg; P=.01). The incidence of intraoperative hypotension and emergent OLT was significantly greater in group 2 than group 1 (33.3% vs 13.5%, P=.01 and 45.8% vs 21.2%, respectively, P=.009). On logistic regression analysis, only emergent OLT (P=.009, odds ratio = 3.5) and intraoperative hypotension (P=.018, odds ratio = 3.7) were significantly associated with a lower probability of immediate postoperative extubation in the OR. Our results suggested that hemodynamic stability and elective OLT were predictors of successful immediate tracheal extubation in the OR.

Effect of continuous infusion of propofol on its concentration in blood with and without the liver in pigs

In living donor liver transplantation, propofol, an intravenous anesthetic drug, has recently been used in both donors and recipients. Propofol is known to have intra- and extrahepatic metabolic pathways, but the effect of its continuous infusion during a long-term anhepatic state is yet to be determined. Recently, we successfully established a simplified pig model of the complete anhepatic state. In this state, we first evaluated hemodynamic parameters relating to the pharmacokinetics of continuously infused propofol (6 mg.kg(-1) x h(-1)). No significant changes in the concentration of hemoglobin or in hemodynamic parameters other than the heart rate were observed during the anhepatic phase when porpofol was continuously infused at the rate that maintains the state. Blood propofol concentrations in the mixed vein, artery, and portal vein were stable during the anhepatic phase. Finally, we confirmed the pharmacokinetics of continuously infused propofol using orthotropic liver transplantation in miniature pigs. The propofol concentration did not change markedly during the transplant procedure. In conclusion, the pharmacokinetics of continuously infused propofol was almost stable with and without the liver in pigs. Extrahepatic metabolism of propofol might help prevent changes in propofol concentrations.

Living-related liver transplantation: implication for the anaesthetist

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Living donor liver transplantation, originally introduced about a decade ago to overcome paediatric cadaveric organ shortage, has rapidly gained acceptance within the transplant community and is nowadays almost routinely applied to the growing number of adult and paediatric patients awaiting a live-saving liver transplantation. In fact its introduction has contributed to a continuing decrease of waiting list deaths.

RECENT FINDINGS

The risk of potential complications and even death for the donor increases with the extent of liver tissue resected. Better preoperative evaluation of suitability, refinement of surgical technique and smarter anaesthetic management, based on extended knowledge of underlying pathophysiology, have made the procedure safer for donors, with low morbidity and even lower mortality rates, tending towards zero in experienced centres. Despite these improvements, a certain risk is inherent. Yet from an ethical point of view it has to remain unacceptable especially because donors are otherwise healthy people and their only motives are altruistic. The procedure of living donor liver transplantation like conventional liver transplantation involves various disciplines, each of which contributes in a specific manner. There is a broad scope of issues that anaesthetists are responsible for and these largely depend on the department and hospital requirements. These issues may range from perioperative anaesthetic management and pain relief, to--and there are definite continental differences--the coordination of donor evaluation, intensive care management, postoperative complication management, as well as psychological support for donors, recipients and their relatives.

SUMMARY

In this paper we review and summarize the potential impact of findings and advances made in this particular field as described by the most important articles published during the past year.