Preoperative statin intake and morbid events after isolated coronary artery bypass grafting

Preoperative statin therapy for adults undergoing cardiac surgery

BACKGROUND

Despite significant advances in surgical techniques and perioperative care, people undertaking cardiac surgery due to cardiovascular disease are more prone to the development of postoperative adverse events. Statins (5-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-co-enzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors) are well-known for their anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects and are established for primary and secondary prevention of coronary artery disease. In addition, statins are thought to have clinical benefits in perioperative outcomes in people undergoing cardiac surgery. This review is an update of a review that was first published in 2012 and updated in 2015.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the benefits and harms of preoperative statin therapy in adults undergoing cardiac surgery compared to standard of care or placebo.

SEARCH METHODS

We performed a search of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (Issue 9, 2023), Ovid MEDLINE (1980 to 14 September 2023), and Ovid Embase (1980 to 2023 (week 36)). We applied no language restrictions.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing any statin treatment before cardiac surgery, for any given duration and dose, versus no preoperative statin therapy (standard of care) or placebo. We excluded trials without a registered trial protocol and trials without approval by an institutional ethics committee.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard Cochrane methodology. Primary outcomes were short-term mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events. Secondary outcomes were myocardial infarction, atrial fibrillation, stroke, renal failure, length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, length of hospital stay and adverse effects related to statin therapy. We reported effect measures as risk ratios (RRs) or mean differences (MDs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We used the RoB 1 tool to assess the risk of bias in included trials, and GRADE to assess the certainty of the evidence.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified eight RCTs (five new to this review) including 5592 participants. Pooled analysis showed that statin treatment before surgery may result in little to no difference in the risk of postoperative short-term mortality (RR 1.36, 95% CI 0.72 to 2.59; I2 = 0%; 6 RCTs, 5260 participants; low-certainty evidence; note 2 RCTs reported 0 events in both groups so RR calculated from 4 RCTs with 5143 participants). We are very uncertain about the effect of statins on major adverse cardiovascular events (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.13; 1 RCT, 2406 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Statins probably result in little to no difference in myocardial infarction (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.06; I2 = 0%; 5 RCTs, 4645 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), may result in little to no difference in atrial fibrillation (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.05; I2 = 60%; 8 RCTs, 5592 participants; low-certainty evidence), and may result in little to no difference in stroke (RR 1.47, 95% CI 0.90 to 2.40; I2 = 0%; 4 RCTs, 5143 participants; low-certainty evidence). We are very uncertain about the effect of statins on renal failure (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.34; I2 = 57%; 4 RCTs, 4728 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Additionally, statins probably result in little to no difference in length of ICU stay (MD 1.40 hours, 95% CI -1.62 to 4.41; I2 = 43%; 3 RCTs, 4528 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) and overall hospital stay (MD -0.31 days, 95% CI -0.64 to 0.03; I2 = 84%; 5 RCTs, 4788 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). No study had any individual risk of bias domain classified as high. However, two studies were at high risk of bias overall given the classification of unclear risk of bias in three domains.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In this updated Cochrane review, we found no evidence that statin use in the perioperative period of elective cardiac surgery was associated with any clinical benefit or worsening, when compared with placebo or standard of care. Compared with placebo or standard of care, statin use probably results in little to no difference in MIs, length of ICU stay and overall hospital stay; and may make little to no difference to mortality, atrial fibrillation and stroke. We are very uncertain about the effects of statins on major harmful cardiac events and renal failure. The certainty of the evidence validating this finding varied from moderate to very low, depending on the outcome. Future trials should focus on assessing the impact of statin therapy on mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events.

Does high dose statin pretreatment affect global strains in patients undergoing valve replacement

Purpose

To study the effect of rosuvastatin 40 mg (initiated 7 days prior to surgery) in patients undergoing valve replacement (VR) for rheumatic mitral valve disease on left ventricular (LV) strain and biomarker release kinetics.

Methods

In this randomized study, cardiac biomarkers viz. troponin I (TnI), Creatine kinase MB (CK-MB), N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NTPBNP) were measured before surgery; and 8, 24 and 48 h postoperatively. Global LV (circumferential, global circumferential strain (GCS); longitudinal, GLS; radial, global radial strain (GRS)) strains were measured preoperatively; and 48 h and 30 days postoperatively.

Results

Following VR, Global Longitudinal Strain (GLS), Global Circumferential Strain (GCS) and Global Radial Strain (GRS) declined at 48 h in both statin loaded (SL) and non loaded (NL) groups. The %decline in strain was significantly lower in SL group (% change in GLS 35.8% vs 38.8%, GCS 34% vs 44.1%, GRS 45.7% vs 52.6%; p < 0.001).All strain values improved at 30 days with higher improvement in SL group (GLS -15.92 ± 2.00% vs -12.6 ± 1.66%, GCS -15.12 ± 2.93% vs -13.04 ± 2.44%; GRS 22.12 ± 6.85% vs 19.32 ± 6.48%). While TnI, CKMB, NTPBNP increased following surgery, values at 8, 24 and 48 h were lower in the SL vs. NL group. Mean change (baseline to peak biomarker value) was also significantly lower in SL group.The SL group had shorter hospital and Intensive Care Unit (ICU) stay. On Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (ROC) analysis, baseline GCS ≤ 14% best predicted postoperative 30 day Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) ≤ 50%.

Conclusion

Pre-operative high dose rosuvastatin was "cardioprotective" with favorable effect on LV global strain and release kinetics of biomarkers. These cut-offs (described for the first time for rheumatic VR) can be used as prognostic predictors.

Statin reload before off-pump coronary artery bypass graft: Effect on biomarker release kinetics

Objectives

Statins confer protection from ischemia/reperfusion through various pathways including pleiotropic mechanisms. Following chronic administration, activation of intrinsic cellular mechanisms causes attenuation of these pleiotropic effects.

Methods

Since coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) represents a reversible ischemia-reperfusion sequence, we assessed if statin reload is effective in patients undergoing off-pump CABG (n = 100) in limiting myocardial injury. Patients received loading dose of rosuvastatin (40 mg initiated 7 days before surgery) while nonloaded patients continued whatever statin dose they were receiving and served as controls. Cardiac biomarkers (Troponin-I, creatine kinase muscle/brain [CK-MB], and B-type natriuretic peptide [BNP]) were measured at 8, 24, and 48 h postoperatively. The primary end-point was the extent of perioperative myocardial injury (area under the curve [AUC]: AUC of each biomarker).

Results

Despite similar baseline levels, all biomarkers at 8, 24, and 48 h were significantly lower in the loaded group. The AUC for each biomarker was also significantly lower in the loaded group (cTnI 37.96 vs. 70.12 ng. hr/ml, CK-MB 229.64 vs. 347.04 ng. hr/ml, and BNP 5257.56 vs. 15606.68 pg. hr/ml, all P < 0.001). Delta cTnI (change from baseline to peak level) (1.00 ± 1.34 vs. 2.25 ± 2.59), delta CK-MB (4.54 ± 5.89 vs. 10.68 ± 9.95), and delta BNP (120.41 ± 172.48 vs. 449.23 ± 790.95) all P < 0.001 were also significantly lower in the loaded group. Those loaded with rosuvastatin had lower inotrope duration (22.9 ± 23.33 vs. 31.26 ± 25.39 h, P = 0.04) and ventilator support time (16.94 ± 6.78 vs. 23.8 ± 20.53 h, P = 0.03).

Conclusion

In patients undergoing off-pump CABG, statin reload can "recapture" cardioprotection in patients already on statins with favorable effect on release kinetics of biomarkers and postoperative outcomes.

Lack of Association between Preoperative Statin Use and Respiratory and Neurologic Complications after Cardiac Surgery

Background

Statins may reduce the risk of pulmonary and neurologic complications after cardiac surgery.

Methods

The authors acquired data for adults who had coronary artery bypass graft, valve surgery, or combined procedures. The authors matched patients who took statins preoperatively to patients who did not. First, the authors assessed the association between preoperative statin use and the primary outcomes of prolonged ventilation (more than 24 h), pneumonia (positive cultures of sputum, transtracheal fluid, bronchial washings, and/or clinical findings consistent with the diagnosis of pneumonia), and in-hospital all-cause mortality, using logistic regressions. Second, the authors analyzed the collapsed composite of neurologic complications using logistic regression. Intensive care unit and hospital length of stay were evaluated with Cox proportional hazard models.

Results

Among 14,129 eligible patients, 6,642 patients were successfully matched. There was no significant association between preoperative statin use and prolonged ventilation (statin: 408/3,321 [12.3%] vs. nonstatin: 389/3,321 [11.7%]), pneumonia (44/3,321 [1.3%] vs. 54/3,321 [1.6%]), and in-hospital mortality (52/3,321 [1.6%] vs. 43/3,321 [1.3%]). The estimated odds ratio was 1.06 (98.3% CI, 0.88 to 1.27) for prolonged ventilation, 0.81 (0.50 to 1.32) for pneumonia, and 1.21 (0.74 to 1.99) for in-hospital mortality. Neurologic outcomes were not associated with preoperative statin use (53/3,321 [1.6%] vs. 56/3,321 [1.7%]), with an odds ratio of 0.95 (0.60 to 1.50). The length of intensive care unit and hospital stay was also not associated with preoperative statin use, with a hazard ratio of 1.04 (0.98 to 1.10) for length of hospital stay and 1.00 (0.94 to 1.06) for length of intensive care unit stay.

Conclusions

Preoperative statin use did not reduce pulmonary or neurologic complications after cardiac surgery.

WITHDRAWN: Preoperative statin therapy for patients undergoing cardiac surgery

This review has been withdrawn as authors are unable to complete the updating process.

The editorial group responsible for this previously published document have withdrawn it from publication.

Preoperative statin therapy for patients undergoing cardiac surgery

BACKGROUND

Patients referred to cardiac surgery for cardiovascular disease are at significant risk for the development of major postoperative adverse events despite significant advances in surgical techniques and perioperative care. Statins (5-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-co-enzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors) have gained a pivotal role in the primary and secondary prevention of coronary artery disease and are thought to improve perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. This review is an updated version of a review that was first published in 2012.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effectiveness of preoperative statin therapy in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (2013, Issue 11), MEDLINE (1950 to November 2013 Week 3), EMBASE (1980 to 3 December 2013 (Week 48)) and the metaRegister of Controlled Trials. Additionally, we searched ongoing trials through the National Research Register, the ClinicalTrials.gov registry and grey literature. We screened online conference indices from relevant scientific meetings (2006 to 2014) to look for eligible trials. We applied no language restrictions.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials comparing any statin treatment before cardiac surgery, for any given duration and dose, versus no preoperative statin therapy (standard of care) or placebo.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors evaluated trial quality and extracted data from titles and abstracts identified by electronic database searches according to predefined criteria. Accordingly, we retrieved full-text articles of potentially relevant studies that met the inclusion criteria to assess definitive eligibility for inclusion. We reported effect measures as odds ratios (ORs) or weighted mean differences (WMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs).

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 17 randomised controlled studies including a total of 2138 participants undergoing on-pump or off-pump cardiac surgical procedures, and added to this review six studies with 1154 additional participants. Pooled analysis showed that statin treatment before surgery reduced the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation (AF) (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.67; P value < 0.01; 12 studies, 1765 participants) but failed to influence short-term mortality (OR 1.80, 95% CI 0.38 to 8.54; P value = 0.46; two studies, 300 participants) or postoperative stroke (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.14 to 3.63; P value = 0.67; two studies, 264 participants). In addition, statin therapy was associated with a shorter stay for patients on the intensive care unit (ICU) (WMD -3.19 hours, 95% CI -5.41 to -0.98; nine studies, 721 participants) and in the hospital (WMD -0.48 days, 95% CI -0.78 to -0.19; 11 studies, 1137 participants) when significant heterogeneity was observed. Results showed no reduction in myocardial infarction (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.21 to 1.13; seven studies, 901 participants) or renal failure (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.30 to 1.10; five studies, 467 participants) and were not affected by subgroup analysis. Trials investigating this safety endpoint reported no major or minor perioperative side effects of statins.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative statin therapy reduces the odds of postoperative atrial fibrillation (AF) and shortens the patient's stay on the ICU and in the hospital. Statin pretreatment had no influence on perioperative mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction or renal failure, but only two of all included studies assessed mortality. As analysed studies included mainly individuals undergoing myocardial revascularisation, results cannot be extrapolated to patients undergoing other cardiac procedures such as heart valve or aortic surgery.

Effect of statins on preventing infectious complications after surgery: Systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

*These authors contributed equally to this work.A meta-analysis to investigate the association between preoperative statin use and the risk of postoperative infectious complications in patients undergoing surgery.

METHODS

PubMed(®) and Embase(®) databases were searched for relevant studies. Data were extracted using a standardized data collection form. The primary effect measure was the odds ratio (OR) of postoperative infectious complications. Summary OR were calculated.

RESULTS

The analysis included 10 cohort studies with a total of 147 263 participants. Statin use was associated with a lower incidence of postoperative infectious complications in all studies (summary OR 0.917, 95% confidence intervals [CI] 0.862, 0.975, fixed-effects model; summary OR 0.731, 95% CI 0.584, 0.870, random-effects model); cardiac surgery (summary OR 0.673; 95% CI 0.535, 0.847); treatment in the USA (summary OR 0.678; 95% CI 0.597, 0.770); retrospective cohort studies (summary OR 0.664; 95% CI 0.521, 0.846).

CONCLUSION

Preoperative statin use is associated with a reduced risk of postoperative infectious complications.

Association between Preoperative Statin Therapy and Postoperative Infectious Complications in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Infectious complications of cardiac surgery are often severe and life threatening. Statins having both immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory effects were intuitively thought to influence the development of postsurgical infections. We sought to systematically examine whether any association exists between statin use and risk of infectious complications in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. We searched Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, Thomson Scientific Web of Science, and Elsevier Scopus from inception through February 2011 for comparative studies examining the association between statin use and risk of postoperative infections in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. We contacted a study's author for missing information. We conducted a random-effects meta-analysis of individual studies' odds ratios (adjusted for potential confounders). We identified 6 cohort studies for inclusion, 3 of which were conducted in Canada and 3 of which were conducted in the United States. Four were single-center studies, and 2 were population based. Exposure ascertainment was based on a review of admission medication list or prescription databases. Infectious outcomes were heterogeneous and included surgical site infections within 30 days, serious infections (sepsis), or any other postoperative infection. Statin use in the preoperative period was associated with a trend toward reduction in the incidence of postoperative infections in patients who underwent cardiac surgery (odds ratio, 0.81 [95% confidence interval, 0.64–1.01]; P = .06; I2 = 75%). Heterogeneity was explained by country effect. Studies performed in Canada showed weaker associations than studies performed in the United States. This difference could not be attributed to study quality alone. We did not find good evidence to support an association between statin use and postoperative infectious complications. However, the trend toward statistical significance for this association indicates that further investigation is warranted.

Effect of preoperative statin therapy on postoperative acute kidney injury in patients undergoing major surgery: systemic review and meta-analysis

We aimed to examine the association between preoperative use of statins and postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients undergoing major surgery by performing a systemic review and meta-analysis. MEDLINE and EMBASE, from inception to April 2013, and the reference lists of related articles were searched for relevant studies. Trials comparing preoperative statin therapy with no preoperative statin in patients undergoing major surgery were included. Outcome measures of interest were the risk of cumulative postoperative AKI and postoperative AKI requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT). Fixed or random effect meta-analysis was performed to derive summary effect estimates. In five randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 19 observational studies, comprising a total of 989 173 patients undergoing major surgery, 112 840 patients (11.41%) received preoperative statin therapy. The specific type, dosage, and duration of statin therapy were not available in most studies. Preoperative statin therapy was associated with a significant risk reduction for cumulative postoperative AKI (weighted summary odds ratio (OR) 0.87, 95% CI 0.79 to 0.95). The effect of risk reduction was also significant when considering postoperative AKI requiring RRT (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.90). When restricting the analysis to the five RCTs, preoperative statin therapy did not show significant protective effect on postoperative AKI (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.22 to 1.09). In patients undergoing major surgery, preoperative statin therapy could associate with a reduced risk for postoperative AKI. However, considerable heterogeneity existed among included studies. Future randomized trials were warranted for this critical clinical question.

Role of statin on mortality outcome in pneumonia patients: A meta-analysis

AIM: To determine the role of statin on mortality outcome in patient with pneumonia.

METHODS: For the present meta-analysis, we search the published literatures online through PubMed, Embase, Scopus and the Cochrane Library databases and the search words used were “statins’”, “bacteraemia”, “pneumonia”, and “ICU infections”. During the online search our focus was on full text articles, peer-reviewed, observational cohort or case control studies and randomized controlled trials. Those studies were selected whose outcome was hospital mortality among patients with pneumonia whether or not on statins. In this meta-analysis, 30 d mortality was used as the primary outcome as it has been demonstrated in the previous research that 30 d mortality is primarily because of community acquired pneumonia. As all studies were observational, where statin users were compared with historical rather than randomized controls, odds ratio for in-hospital or all-cause 30 d mortality was used as the primary effect measure used in the meta-analysis.

RESULTS: We came across the total 25 studies comprising 35355 patients (2734 statin users and 32621 statin non-users) during the electronic search. Four studies out of 25 were included in the final analysis. In this meta-analysis, when data regarding the use of statin in pneumonia patients on mortality was pooled, its results showed the non-significant effect of the statin on mortality outcome.

CONCLUSION: Although statins seems to be useful in the treatment of pneumonia patients but for statistical conclusion, further randomized controlled trials needs to be done or their results still waited to be published of ongoing trials, with the conclusion that presently statins showing no clinical benefit in the pneumonia patients.

Inflammation in new-onset atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Postoperative new-onset atrial fibrillation (PNAF) is the most common complication following cardiac surgery. The pathogenesis of PNAF is multifactorial. The concept of the postoperative inflammatory response, as a potential underlying mechanism has been extensively studied. This review aims to provide a comprehensive summary of literature relevant to the association between the inflammatory response following cardiac surgery and PNAF.

DESIGN

MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register were systematically reviewed by two independent investigators for studies published between January 1980 and May 2012, in which an association between serum markers of inflammation and PNAF was evaluated, or the effect of drugs with anti-inflammatory properties on the risk of PNAF.

RESULTS

Sixty-three studies met selection criteria (39 observational and 24 randomized studies) including 27,363 patients. The mean incidence of PNAF after cardiac surgery was 25·5%. Elevated levels of various inflammatory mediators were associated with PNAF, and the most consistent association was found between white blood cell count and PNAF. Of the drugs with anti-inflammatory properties, statins gave the best protective effect against PNAF, followed by anti-oxidants, steroids and colchicine. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs did not prevent PNAF significantly.

CONCLUSION

The postoperative inflammation response may play a role in the pathogenesis of PNAF. However, of the inflammation biomarkers, only elevated white blood cell count reliably predicts PNAF. Pre- and perioperative use of statins and several other drugs with anti-inflammatory properties reduce the incidence of PNAF.

Meta-analysis of patients taking statins before revascularization and aortic valve surgery

Statin intake before cardiac surgery is associated with favorable outcomes. We sought to analyze the evidence for statin pretreatment before isolated coronary artery bypass graft surgery and aortic valve replacement surgery. In this meta-analysis, we demonstrate beneficial results for the endpoints mortality, stroke, atrial fibrillation, and length of stay in hospital in 36,053 statin-pretreated coronary artery bypass graft surgery patients compared with control subjects retrieved from 32 studies, but fail to detect relevant advantages through preoperative statin therapy for 3,091 patients undergoing aortic valve replacement from four trials. Strict adherence to guidelines recommending statin treatment before CABG surgery is therefore mandatory.

Can statins improve outcomes after isolated cardiac valve surgery? A systematic literature review

BACKGROUND

HMG CoA (3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A) reductase inhibitors, or statins, have been associated with an improvement in outcomes after coronary artery surgery for some time; however, their role in isolated valve surgery (IVS) remains undetermined.

HYPOTHESIS

The pleiotropic effects of statins may produce similar beneficial effects on outcomes after IVS.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was performed investigating the role of statins in bioprosthetic valve replacement.

RESULTS

Nine observational studies (7 retrospective, 2 prospective) incorporating a total of 18 154 patients were found investigating the role of statin therapy in bioprosthetic valve replacement.

CONCLUSIONS

There is presently insufficient evidence to recommend routine statin therapy in IVS, unless concomitant hypercholesterolemia or coronary artery disease is present. A prospective study clearly defining the dose, type, and duration of therapy is now required to finally clarify whether statins alone confer a postoperative benefit in these patients.

Preoperative statin therapy is associated with lower requirement of renal replacement therapy in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of observational studies

OBJECTIVES

Acute kidney injury (AKI) following cardiac surgery is a common complication associated with serious morbidity and mortality. Activation of inflammatory cascade and vascular endothelial dysfunction plays a vital role during the perioperative period leading to AKI. Statins are known to suppress inflammation and improve endothelial dysfunction over and above the cholesterol lowering efficacy.

METHODS

Observational studies with a defined population in terms of preoperative statin therapy and no preoperative statin therapy undergoing cardiac surgery (CABG, isolated valve surgery or both) and with reported data on the incidence of acute renal failure/injury and/or mortality were identified and analysed for inclusion in the analysis. Outcomes evaluated were occurrence of postoperative acute kidney injury/failure, requirement of any postoperative renal replacement therapy and short-term all-cause mortality rate. A meta-analysis was conducted and a pooled estimate of odds ratio (OR) was calculated using the inverse variance method.

RESULTS

A total of 17 studies with a total population of 24 998 statin users and 22 082 non-statin users were included in the final analysis. PST resulted in a significantly lower incidence of renal replacement therapy in patients undergoing CABG (OR: 0.56 [0.41-0.76]) but not in isolated valve surgery (OR: 1.80 [0.73-4.44]). Also preoperative statin therapy resulted in a significantly lower postoperative mortality (0.72 [0.61-0.84]) irrespective of the type of surgery. There was no effect of preoperative statin therapy on the incidence of AKI in any of the sub-group of the patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing CABG might derive benefit from preoperative statin therapy in terms of reducing the need for postoperative renal replacement therapy and mortality. However, the uncertainty concerning the reno-protective efficacy of preoperative statin therapy in patients undergoing isolated valve surgery needs further investigation.

Preoperative statin therapy in cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of 90,000 patients

The objective of this systematic literature review with meta-analysis was to determine the strength of evidence for a preoperative statin on the reduction of adverse postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Randomized controlled (RCT) and observational trials were searched in online databases that reported about the effects of preoperative statin therapy on major adverse clinical outcomes after cardiac surgery. Analysed outcomes included early all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, atrial fibrillation (AF), stroke and renal failure using a priori-defined criteria. Effect estimates were calculated and are given as odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) using fixed- or random-effect models. Literature search of all major databases retrieved 2371 studies. After screening, a total of 54 trials were identified (12 RCT, 42 observational) that reported outcomes of 91 491 cardiac surgery patients with (n = 46 614; 51%) or without (n = 44 877; 49%) preoperative statin therapy. Preoperative statin use resulted in a 0.9% absolute risk (2.6 vs 3.5%) and a 31% odds reduction for early all-cause mortality (OR 0.69; 95% CI 0.59-0.81; P < 0.0001). In addition, statin treatment before surgery was associated with a substantial reduction (P < 0.01) in the postoperative end-points AF (OR 0.71; 95% CI 0.61-0.82), new-onset AF (OR 0.68; 95% CI 0.54-0.85), stroke (OR 0.83; 95% CI 0.74-0.93), stay on intensive care unit (weighted mean difference [WMD] -0.14; 95% CI -0.23 to -0.03; P < 0.01) and in-hospital stay (WMD -0.57; 95% CI -0.76 to -0.38; P < 0.01). No statistical differences were found between groups with regard to myocardial infarction or renal failure. In conclusion, the current systematic review strengthens the evidence that preoperative statin therapy extends substantial clinical benefit to early postoperative outcomes in cardiac surgery patients.

Statins therapy can reduce the risk of atrial fibrillation in patients with acute coronary syndrome: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

It is a controversy whether statins therapy could be beneficial for the occurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) in acute coronary syndrome (ACS). To clarify this problem, we performed a meta-analysis with the currently published literatures.

METHODS

The electronic databases were searched to obtain relevant trials which met the inclusion criteria through October 2011. Two authors independently read the trials and extracted the related information from the included studies. Either fixed-effects models or random-effects models were assumed to calculate the overall combined risk estimates according to I(2 )statistic. Sensitivity analysis was conducted by omitting one study in each turn, and publication bias was evaluated using Begg's and Egger's test.

RESULTS

Six studies were eligible to inclusion criteria, of the six studies, 161305 patients were included in this meta-analysis, 77920 (48.31%) patients had taken the statins therapy, 83385 (51.69%) patients had taken non-statins therapy. Four studies had investigated the effect of statins therapy on occurrence of new-onset AF in ACS patients, another two had described the association between statins therapy and occurrence of AF in ACS patients with AF in baseline. The occurrence of AF was reduced 35% in statins therapy group compared to that in non-statins group (95% confident interval: 0.55-0.77, P<0.0001), and the effect of statins therapy seemed more beneficial for new-onset AF (RR=0.59, 95%CI: 0.48-0.73, p=0.096) than secondary prevention of AF (RR=0.70, 95%CI: 0.43-1.14, p=0.085). There was no publication bias according to the Begg's and Egger's test (Begg, p=0.71; Egger, p=0.73).

CONCLUSION

Statins therapy could reduce the risk of atrial fibrillation in patients with ACS.

Preoperative statin therapy for patients undergoing cardiac surgery

BACKGROUND

Patients referred to cardiac surgery for cardiovascular disease are at significant risk for the development of post-operative major adverse events despite significant advances in surgical techniques and perioperative care. Statins (HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors) have gained a pivotal role in the primary and secondary prevention of coronary artery disease, and are thought to improve perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effectiveness of a preoperative statin therapy in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL (Issue 2 of 4, 2010 on The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE (1950 to May, Week 1 2010), EMBASE (1980 to 2010 Week 19), and the metaRegister of Controlled Trials. Additionally, ongoing trials were searched through the National Research Register, the ClinicalTrials.gov registry and grey literature. Conference indices from relevant scientific meetings (2006-2009) were screened online for eligible trials. No language restrictions were applied.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomized controlled trials comparing any statin treatment before cardiac surgery, for any given duration and dose, to no preoperative statin therapy (standard of care) or placebo.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors evaluated trial quality and extracted data from titles and abstracts identified from the electronic database searches according to pre-defined criteria. Accordingly, full text articles of potentially relevant studies that met the inclusion criteria were retrieved to assess definite eligibility for inclusion. Effect measures are reported as odds ratios (OR) or weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% confidence intervals (95%-CI).

MAIN RESULTS

Eleven randomized controlled studies including a total of 984 participants undergoing on- or off-pump cardiac surgical procedures were identified. Pooled analysis showed that statin pre-treatment before surgery reduced the incidence of post-operative atrial fibrillation (AF) (OR 0.40; 95%-CI: 0.29 to 0.55; p<0.01), but failed to influence short-term mortality (OR 0.98, 95%-CI: 0.14 to 7.10; p=0.98) or post-operative stroke (OR 0.70, 95%-CI: 0.14 to 3.63; p=0.67). In addition, statin therapy was associated with a shorter length of stay of patients on the intensive care unit (ICU) (WMD: -3.39 hours; 95%-CI: -5.77 to -1.01) and in-hospital (WMD: -0.48 days; 95%-CI: -0.85 to -0.11) where significant heterogeneity was observed. There was no reduction in myocardial infarction (OR 0.52; 95%-CI: 0.2. to 1.30) or renal failure (OR 0.41; 95%-CI: 0.15 to 1.12). These results were unaffected after subgroup analysis. No major or minor perioperative statin side-effects were reported from trials investigating this safety endpoint.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative statin therapy reduces the odds of post-operative AF and shortens the stay on the ICU and in the hospital. Statin pretreatment had no influence on perioperative mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction or renal failure. Since analysed studies included mainly patients undergoing myocardial revascularizations the results cannot be extrapolated to patients undergoing other cardiac procedures such as heart valve or aortic surgery.

Statins reduce short- and long-term mortality associated with postoperative atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting: impact of postoperative atrial fibrillation and statin therapy on survival

BACKGROUND

Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is a frequent complication of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery. The objective of this study was to determine the impact of POAF on both short- and long-term mortality following isolated CABG.

HYPOTHESIS

POAF is associated with a poorer short and long-term mortality following CABG.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the preoperative and operative data of 6728 consecutive patients undergoing a first isolated CABG.

RESULTS

The incidence of POAF was 27.8%. Operative mortality was higher in patients with POAF compared to those without POAF (2.3% vs 0.9%, P < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, POAF remained an independent predictor of operative mortality (odds ratio [OR]: 1.78, P = 0.01). Patients with POAF also had reduced long-term survival (6-year survival: 85.3% vs 89.2%, P < 0.001). After adjusting for other predictors of mortality, POAF was significantly associated with increased long-term mortality (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.35, P = 0.04). Of note, after adjustment for potential confounders, statin treatment had a highly protective effect in POAF patients for both operative mortality (OR: 0.38, P = 0.003) and long-term mortality (HR: 0.62, P = 0.03), whereas it had no significant effect in patients without POAF.

CONCLUSIONS

POAF is an independent predictor of both short- and long-term mortality following CABG. Moreover, statin therapy was independently associated with better survival in patients with POAF.

Upstream therapies for management of atrial fibrillation: review of clinical evidence and implications for European Society of Cardiology guidelines. Part I: primary prevention

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. It is also a progressive disease secondary to continuous structural remodelling of the atria due to AF itself, to changes associated with ageing, and to deterioration of underlying heart disease. Current management aims at preventing the recurrence of AF and its consequences (secondary prevention) and includes risk assessment and prevention of stroke, ventricular rate control, and rhythm control therapies including antiarrhythmic drugs and catheter or surgical ablation. The concept of primary prevention of AF with interventions targeting the development of substrate and modifying risk factors for AF has emerged as a result of recent experiments that suggested novel targets for mechanism-based therapies. Upstream therapy refers to the use of non-antiarrhythmic drugs that modify the atrial substrate- or target-specific mechanisms of AF to prevent the occurrence or recurrence of the arrhythmia. Such agents include angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), statins, n-3 (ω-3) polyunsaturated fatty acids, and possibly corticosteroids. Animal experiments have compellingly demonstrated the protective effect of these agents against electrical and structural atrial remodelling in association with AF. The key targets of upstream therapy are structural changes in the atria, such as fibrosis, hypertrophy, inflammation, and oxidative stress, but direct and indirect effects on atrial ion channels, gap junctions, and calcium handling are also applied. Although there have been no formal randomized controlled studies (RCTs) in the primary prevention setting, retrospective analyses and reports from the studies in which AF was a pre-specified secondary endpoint have shown a sustained reduction in new-onset AF with ACEIs and ARBs in patients with significant underlying heart disease (e.g. left ventricular dysfunction and hypertrophy), and in the incidence of AF after cardiac surgery in patients treated with statins. In the secondary prevention setting, the results with upstream therapies are significantly less encouraging. Although the results of hypothesis-generating small clinical studies or retrospective analyses in selected patient categories have been positive, larger prospective RCTs have yielded controversial, mostly negative, results. Notably, the controversy exists on whether upstream therapy may impact mortality and major non-fatal cardiovascular events in patients with AF. This has been addressed in retrospective analyses and large prospective RCTs, but the results remain inconclusive pending further reports. This review provides a contemporary evidence-based insight into the role of upstream therapies in primary (Part I) and secondary (Part II) prevention of AF.

Current evidence for perioperative statins in cardiac surgery

Cardiac surgery improves life expectancy and quality of life for the constantly ageing population in developed countries. Mediated by their lipid-dependent and lipid-independent mechanisms, statins are sought to provide benefit with regard to better outcomes after cardiac surgery. Current guidelines recommend statin use in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting, while less evidence is available for patients referred to heart valve surgery. Optimal selection of statin drug and dosage including perioperative timing of statin therapy remains largely unknown, but results of ongoing meta-analyses and future randomized trials will add important evidence to guide perioperative statin treatment of cardiac surgery patients.

Lipid Control before CABG and Its Association with In-Hospital Mortality

BACKGROUND

Controlling risk factors such as dyslipidemia in patients with coronary artery disease, including candidates for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), is of great importance and has serious effects on CABG morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to evaluate lipid serum levels, comprising TG, LDL, and HDL, before CABG and their relation with in-hospital outcome.

METHODS

The clinical profiles of 3,593 patients in the hospital cardiac surgery databank who underwent isolated CABG between April 2006 and April 2008 were reviewed. Three components of lipid profile, including TG, LDL, and HDL serum levels, were checked at the time of hospitalization in all the patients. Lipid control was evaluated according to the published guidelines.

RESULTS

The mean LDL, HDL, and TG serum levels were 103.4±48.5, 40.9±16, and 168±87 mg/dl, respectively. Additionally, 487 (13.6%) patients had entire TG, LDL, and HDL serum levels within the acceptable range and in 668 (18.6%) patients, all of these components were within the uncontrolled range. After adjustment for confounders, in-hospital mortality in patients with uncontrolled TG, LDL, and HDL was higher than patients with controlled TG, LDL, and HDL (p value=0.042, OR=1.399, 95% CI =1.012-1.934).

CONCLUSION

The high prevalence of uncontrolled lipids in our patient population is alarming. Regular and frequent pre- and post-operative visits to monitor and modify patient risk factors, including dyslipidemia, seem necessary. An increase in statin dosage or adjunctive therapy with other lipid lowering agents may be helpful. Attempts to maintain all lipids within the controlled range may have beneficial effects on hospital outcome.

Preoperative Statins and Acute Kidney Injury After Cardiac Surgery: Utilization of a Consensus Definition of Acute Kidney Injury

Background

Previous trials investigating preoperative statin use for prevention of acute kidney injury following cardiovascular surgery were limited to patients undergoing a specific procedure and many used nonconsensus definitions of acute kidney injury.

Objective

To use a consensus definition of acute kidney injury for evaluating the association of preoperative statin use with the development of acute kidney injury following cardiac surgery utilizing cardiopulmonary bypass.

Methods

We retrospectively evaluated a cohort of 667 patients ≥18 years who underwent any cardiac surgery on cardiopulmonary bypass between April 2007 and May 2009 at Mercy Hospital in Scranton, PA. Patients were excluded if they were receiving preoperative renal replacement therapy, had stage 5 chronic kidney disease, or did not have a postoperative serum creatinine level assessed. The primary outcome was the odds of developing acute kidney injury given the use of preoperative statins. Acute kidney injury was defined based on the Acute Kidney Injury Network criteria as either an absolute increase in serum creatinine of ≥0.3 mg/dL or 1.5 times baseline, or the need for postoperative renal replacement therapy.

Results:

The final analysis included 563 patients; 356 were receiving preoperative statins. The incidence of acute kidney injury was 35.1% in the statin group and 26.1% in the non-statin group. On univariate analysis statins were associated with an increase in the odds of acute kidney injury (OR 1.53; 95% CI 1.05 to 2.24). Multivariate logistic regression did not demonstrate an association of statins with acute kidney injury (OR 1.36; 95% CI 0.904 to 2.05). Repeating the analysis using 312 propensity score–matched patients also showed no association of statins with acute kidney injury (OR 1.17; 95% CI 0.715 to 1.93).

Conclusions:

Our findings do not support the hypothesis that preoperative statin use is associated with a decrease in the incidence of acute kidney injury following cardiac surgery utilizing cardiopulmonary bypass.

Perioperative statin use: an update

HMG CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) are a proven modality to reduce serum cholesterol and have been shown to reduce morbidity and mortality in cardiovascular patients. Statins have also demonstrated improvements in postoperative outcomes among patients taking them in the perioperative period. Many of the studies are limited to select patient populations and/or select surgeries. This review will give an overview of the pharmacology of statins, summarize the mechanisms of the beneficial effects of statins, and provide an overview of evidence in the use of statins in the perioperative period.

Upstream effect for atrial fibrillation: still a dilemma?

Atrial fibrillation is the most common arrhythmia in clinical practice. Ion channel blocking agents are often characterized by limited long-term efficacy and several side effects. In addition, ablative invasive procedures are neither easily accessible nor always efficacious. The "upstream therapy," which includes angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, aldosterone receptor antagonists, statins, glucocorticoids, and ω-3 poly-unsaturated fatty acids, targets arrhythmia substrate, influencing atrial structural and electrical remodeling that play an essential role in atrial fibrillation induction and maintenance. The mechanisms involved and the most important clinical evidence regarding the upstream therapy influence on atrial fibrillation are presented in this review. Some open questions are also proposed.

Statin treatment and mortality in bacterial infections--a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Several studies have reported improved survival in severe bacterial infections among statin treated patients. In addition, statins have been ascribed beneficial anti-inflammatory effects. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of statin-treatment on mortality in patients with bacterial infections, by means of a systematic review and a meta-analysis.

METHODOLOGY AND PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Studies investigating the association between statin use and mortality in patients with bacterial disease were identified in a systematic literature review and a meta-analysis was performed to calculate the overall odds ratio of mortality in statin users. The literature search identified 947 citations from which 40 relevant studies were extracted. In all, 15 studies comprising 113,910 patients were included in the final analysis. Statin use was associated with a significantly (p<0.0001) reduced mortality in patients suffering from bacterial infections (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.42-0.66). However, all studies included were of observational design and funnel plot analyses indicated influence by a possible publication bias (Egger's bias test p<0.05). When a precision estimate test was used to adjust for publication bias the effect of statin treatment was no longer significant, with an OR of 0.79 (95% CI 0.58-1.07).

CONCLUSION/SIGNIFICANCE

According to the meta-analysis of observational studies presented here, patients on statin therapy seem to have a better outcome in bacterial infections. However, the association did not reach statistical significance after adjustment for apparent publication bias. Thus, there is a great need for randomised controlled trials investigating the possible beneficial effect of statins in bacterial infections.

Preoperative statin therapy is not associated with a reduced incidence of postoperative acute kidney injury after cardiac surgery

BACKGROUND

Our objective was to examine the association between preoperative statin therapy and the prevalence of postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with the use of cardiopulmonary bypass.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective investigation of 10,648 consecutive patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting using cardiopulmonary bypass and/or valve surgery between January 2002 and December 2006. Patients were divided into 2 groups depending on preoperative therapy with statin drugs. The primary outcome was postoperative AKI based on the RIFLE (Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss, End-stage) criteria. Secondary outcomes included requirement for postoperative dialysis and hospital mortality. Multivariable logistic regression models were developed for the primary and secondary outcomes. To control for selection bias related to statin therapy, a propensity score was developed using a greedy matching technique.

RESULTS

The incidence of AKI was 12.1% (n = 1286). AKI occurred in 13.31% of patients receiving preoperative statins (819 of 6152 patients) versus 10.41% in the no statin group (467 of 4487 patients) (P < 0.001). The incidence of postoperative dialysis was 1.71% (n = 182). Postoperative dialysis was needed in 1.75% of patients in the statin group (108 of 6157 patients) compared with 1.65% of patients (74 of 4491 patients) in the no statin group (P = 0.68). Hospital mortality after surgery occurred in 1.71% (n = 182) of patients. The incidence of mortality for patients in the statin group was 1.71% (105 of 6157 patients) and this was not different from mortality in the no statin group of 1.71% (77 of 4491 patients) (P = 0.97). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, statin therapy was not associated with AKI (odds ratio [OR] 0.97, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.84-1.12; P = 0.68), postoperative dialysis (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.55-118; P = 0.23), or hospital mortality (OR 0.803, 95% CI 0.56-1.16; P = 0.24). In 2646 propensity-matched pairs, the incidence of AKI was 12.0% in the statin group versus 12.8% in the no statin group (P = 0.38). The statin group had a 1.63% incidence of postoperative dialysis versus 2.08% in the no statin group (P = 0.22). In the same propensity-matched population, hospital mortality occurred in 1.63% of patients in the statin group compared with 2.1% in the no statin group (P = 0.19).

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that previously reported reductions in perioperative mortality for patients taking preoperative statins and undergoing cardiac surgery is likely not mediated through a reduction in postoperative AKI.

Primary and secondary prevention of atrial fibrillation with statins and polyunsaturated fatty acids: review of evidence and clinical relevance

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is an increasingly common arrhythmia that now stands at epidemic proportion, with more than 2.3 million people affected in the USA and over 4.5 million people affected in Western Europe. AF is an expression of underlying heart disease and is increasingly associated with hypertension, congestive heart failure, and ischemic heart disease. It is also a progressive disease secondary to continuous structural remodeling of the atria, which relates to AF itself, to changes associated with aging and to progression of the underlying heart disease. Traditionally, AF has been addressed only after it has already presented with pharmacological and nonpharmacological therapies designed for rhythm or rate control (secondary prevention). Although secondary prevention is the most feasible approach at present, the concept of primary prevention of AF with therapies aimed at preventing the development of substrate and correcting the risk factors for AF has emerged as a strategy, which is likely to produce a larger effect in the general population. Recent experiments provided new insights into AF pathophysiology, which generated background for new mechanism-based therapies. Agents targeting inflammation, oxidative injury, atrial myocyte metabolism, extracellular matrix remodeling, and fibrosis have theoretical advantages as novel therapeutic strategies. In this respect, drugs that are not traditionally antiarrhythmic such as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin-receptor blockers, aldosterone antagonists, statins, and omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids have shown an antiarrhythmic potential in addition to any treatment effect on the underlying disease. These agents are thought to have an advantage of targeting both the occurrence and progression of the substrate for AF, thus, providing primary and secondary prevention of the arrhythmia. Although first experimental and hypothesis-generating small clinical studies or retrospective analyses have been encouraging, several larger, properly designed, prospective trials have not confirmed earlier observations. This review provides a contemporary evidence-based insight into the possible preventative and reverse remodeling role of statins and polyunsaturated fatty acids in AF.

Statin use and neurologic morbidity after coronary artery bypass grafting: A cohort study

BACKGROUND

Statin use before surgery has been associated with reduced morbidity and mortality after vascular surgery. The effect of preoperative statin use on stroke and encephalopathy after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is unclear.

METHODS

A post hoc analysis was undertaken of a prospectively collected cohort of isolated CABG patients over a 10-year period at a single institution. Primary outcomes were stroke and encephalopathy. Univariable analyses identified risk factors for statin use, which were applied to a propensity score model using logistic regression and patients were divided into quintiles of propensity for statin use. Controlling for propensity score quintile, the odds ratio (OR) of combined stroke and encephalopathy (primary endpoint), cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, and length of stay were compared between statin users and nonusers.

RESULTS

There were 5,121 CABG patients, of whom 2,788 (54%) were taking statin medications preoperatively. Stroke occurred in 166 (3.2%) and encephalopathy in 438 (8.6%), contributing to 604 patients (11.8%) who met the primary endpoint. The unadjusted OR of stroke/encephalopathy in statin users was 1.053 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.888-1.248, p = 0.582). Adjustment based on propensity score resulted in balance of stroke risk factors among quintiles. The propensity score-adjusted OR of stroke/encephalopathy in statin users was 0.958 (95% CI 0.784-1.170, p = 0.674). There were no significant differences in cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, or length of stay between statin users and otherwise similar nonusers.

CONCLUSIONS

In this large data cohort study, preoperative statin use was not associated with a decreased incidence of stroke and encephalopathy after coronary artery bypass grafting.

Pleiotropic effects of statins in atrial fibrillation patients: the evidence

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained arrhythmia in clinical practice. The understanding of the pathophysiology of AF has changed during the last several decades, and a significant role of inflammation and of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system has been postulated both experimentally and clinically. There is emerging evidence of an association between inflammation and AF, and mounting evidence links increased C-reactive protein levels not only to already existing AF but also to the risk of developing future AF. The beneficial effects of statins on AF have been reported in several studies. Several randomized clinical and large observational studies have shown similar result that show the beneficial effect of statins in AF. In clinical studies, statins were considered effective in preventing AF after electrical cardioversion, post-ablation, and after permanent pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator insertion. The antiarrhythmic mechanisms of statins regarding AF prevention in patients with heart failure are still not clear. Perioperative statin use has been associated with favorable postoperative outcome in both cardiovascular and noncardiovascular conditions. Despite a growing body of evidence that drugs with anti-inflammatory properties such as statins may prevent AF, the observed positive effects of statins on the burden of AF appeared to be independent of their cholesterol-reducing properties. However, further data from large-scale randomized trials are clearly needed.

Statins for sepsis: a critical and updated review

There is increasing discussion of a potential role for statins in the management of sepsis. A search of PubMed, Embase, Scopus and the Cochrane Library databases was performed by combining the terms 'statins', 'infection', 'sepsis', 'bacteraemia', 'pneumonia', and 'ICU infections'. A total of 22 studies were retrieved, which included 177,260 people and compared clinical outcomes between 51,193 statin users and 126,067 non-statin users. Nineteen were cohort studies (seven prospective and 12 retrospective), two were retrospective case-control studies, and one was a randomized controlled study. Nine studies examined the use of statins in sepsis, four in community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), three in bacteraemia, and three in post-operative patients. Mortality data were presented in 15 studies; in ten, mortality was lower among statin users (three of six sepsis studies, five of six CAP studies, and two of three bacteraemia studies). In four studies, there was no difference in mortality (two of six sepsis studies, one of six CAP studies, and one of three bacteraemia studies) and in one study there was increased mortality among septic intensive-care unit patients receiving statins. Five of the nine studies that examined the risk of developing sepsis/infection as a primary outcome (six of nine sepsis studies and all studies in the postoperative setting) found a decreased risk among statin users, whereas the remaining studies found no difference. Irrespective of their design (matched vs. non-matched), the majority of the studies suggested that statins have a beneficial effect on the outcome of infection; however, their observational design does not allow us to draw firm conclusions. The clinical benefit of statin therapy in sepsis remains to be determined by ongoing randomized controlled trials.