Effects of mild hypoalbuminemia on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of dexmedetomidine in patients after major abdominal or thoracic surgery

Determination of the effective dose of dexmedetomidine to achieve loss of consciousness during anesthesia induction

Background

Dexmedetomidine (DEX) is a sedative with greater preservation of cognitive function, reduced respiratory depression, and improved patient arousability. This study was designed to investigate the performance of DEX during anesthesia induction and to establish an effective DEX induction strategy, which could be valuable for multiple clinical conditions.

Methods

Patients undergoing abdominal surgery were involved in this dose-finding trial. Dixon's up-and-down sequential method was employed to determine the effective dose of DEX to achieve the state of "loss of consciousness", and an effective induction strategy was established with continuous infusion of DEX and remifentanil. The effects of DEX on hemodynamics, respiratory state, EEG, and anesthetic depth were monitored and analyzed.

Results

Through the strategy mentioned, the depth of surgical anesthesia was successfully achieved by DEX-led anesthesia induction. The ED50 and ED95 of the initial infusion rate of DEX were 0.115 and 0.200 μg/kg/min, respectively, and the mean induction time was 18.3 min. The ED50 and ED95 of DEX to achieve the state of "loss of consciousness" were 2.899 (95% CI: 2.703-3.115) and 5.001 (95% CI: 4.544-5.700) μg/kg, respectively. The mean PSI on the loss of consciousness was 42.8 among the patients. During anesthesia induction, the hemodynamics including BP and HR were stable, and the EEG monitor showed decreased α and β powers and increased θ and δ in the frontal and pre-frontal cortices of the brain.

Conclusion

This study indicated that continuous infusion of combined DEX and remifentanil could be an effective strategy for anesthesia induction. The EEG during the induction was similar to the physiological sleep process.

Protective effects of dexmedetomidine in vital organ injury: crucial roles of autophagy

Vital organ injury is one of the leading causes of global deaths. Accumulating studies have demonstrated that dexmedetomidine (DEX) has an outstanding protective effect on multiple organs for its antiinflammatory and antiapoptotic properties, while the underlying molecular mechanism is not clearly understood. Autophagy, an adaptive catabolic process, has been found to play a crucial role in the organ-protective effects of DEX. Herein, we present a first attempt to summarize all the evidence on the proposed roles of autophagy in the action of DEX protecting against vital organ injuries via a comprehensive review. We found that most of the relevant studies (17/24, 71%) demonstrated that the modulation of autophagy was inhibited under the treatment of DEX on vital organ injuries (e.g. brain, heart, kidney, and lung), but several studies suggested that the level of autophagy was dramatically increased after administration of DEX. Albeit not fully elucidated, the underlying mechanisms governing the roles of autophagy involve the antiapoptotic properties, inhibiting inflammatory response, removing damaged mitochondria, and reducing oxidative stress, which might be facilitated by the interaction with multiple associated genes (i.e., hypoxia inducible factor-1α, p62, caspase-3, heat shock 70 kDa protein, and microRNAs) and signaling cascades (i.e., mammalian target of rapamycin, nuclear factor-kappa B, and c-Jun N-terminal kinases pathway). The authors conclude that DEX hints at a promising strategy in the management of vital organ injuries, while autophagy is crucially involved in the protective effect of DEX.

Protein Binding and Population Pharmacokinetics of Dexmedetomidine after Prolonged Infusions in Adult Critically Ill Patients

PURPOSE

Dexmedetomidine (DEX) is a highly selective α₂-adrenoceptor agonist with high protein binding of 94%. Critical illness may affect protein binding and the pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters of many drugs, including DEX. In critically ill patients receiving prolonged infusions of DEX, there is little information documenting the relationship between key pathophysiologic factors and DEX protein binding or PK parameters. The purpose of this study was to characterize the protein binding and PK profile of prolonged DEX infusion in critically ill patients.

METHODS

Critically ill, adult intensive care unit patients at a university hospital in Hong Kong were studied. The association between the pathophysiologic changes of critical illness and protein binding was evaluated using a generalized estimating equation. A population pharmacokinetic model to establish the PK profile of DEX was developed, and key pathophysiologic covariate effects of severity of illness, organ dysfunction measures, and altered protein binding on DEX PK parameters in this critically ill population were evaluated.

FINDINGS

A total of 22 critically ill patients and 1 healthy control were included. Mean protein binding of DEX in the critically ill patients was 90.4% (95% CI, 89.1-91.7), which was 4% lower than that in the healthy control. The PK data were adequately described by a 2-compartment model. The estimated population mean (relative standard error [RSE]) values of systemic clearance (CL), volume of distribution of the central compartment (V2), intercompartmental clearance (Q), and V_d in the peripheral compartment (V3) were 38.6 (11.7) L/h, 32.1 (46.1) L, 114.5 (58.3) L/h and 95.1 (30.6) L, respectively. The corresponding estimated interindividual variability expressed as CV% (RSE) was 52.4 (23.8) for CL, 172.9 (19.3) for V2, 123.7 (33.7) for Q, and 106 (39.9) for V3. No significant explanatory pathophysiologic covariates were identified.

IMPLICATIONS

Although a marginally significant reduction of protein binding in critically ill patients was demonstrated, the magnitude of the difference was unlikely to be of clinical significance. Higher alanine aminotransferase concentration was associated with decreased protein binding. No significant pathophysiologic covariates were associated with the observed PK parameters. The high interindividual variability of PK parameters supports the current practice of dose titration to ensure the desired clinical effects of DEX infusion in the intensive care unit setting.

Population Pharmacokinetic Model of Dexmedetomidine in a Heterogeneous Group of Patients

Dexmedetomidine is a hepatically eliminated drug with sedative, anxiolytic, sympatholytic, and analgesic properties that has been increasingly used for various indications in the form of a short or continuous intravenous infusion. This study aimed to propose a population pharmacokinetic (PK) model of dexmedetomidine in a heterogeneous group of intensive care unit patients, incorporating 29 covariates potentially linked with dexmedetomidine PK. Data were collected from 70 patients aged between 0.25 and 88 years and treated with dexmedetomidine infusion for various durations at 1 of 4 medical centers. Statistical analysis was performed using a nonlinear mixed-effect model. Categorical and continuous covariates including demographic data, hemodynamic parameters, biochemical markers, and 11 single-nucleotide polymorphisms were tested. A 2-compartment model was used to describe dexmedetomidine PK. An allometric/isometric scaling was used to account for body weight difference in PK parameters, and the Hill equation was used to describe the maturation of clearance. Typical values of the central and peripheral volume of distribution and the systemic and distribution clearance for a theoretical adult patient were central volume of distribution = 22.50 L, peripheral volume of distribution  = 86.1 L, systemic clearance =  34.7 L/h, and distribution clearance = 40.8 L/h. The CYP1A2 genetic polymorphism and noradrenaline administration were identified as significant covariates for clearance. A population PK model of dexmedetomidine was successfully developed. The proposed model is well calibrated to the observed data. The identified covariates account for <5% of interindividual variability and consequently are of low clinical significance for the purpose of dose adjustment.

Dexmedetomidine Improves Cardiovascular and Ventilatory Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients: Basic and Clinical Approaches

Dexmedetomidine (DEX) is a highly selective α2-adrenergic agonist with sedative and analgesic properties, with minimal respiratory effects. It is used as a sedative in the intensive care unit and the operating room. The opioid-sparing effect and the absence of respiratory effects make dexmedetomidine an attractive adjuvant drug for anesthesia in obese patients who are at an increased risk for postoperative respiratory complications. The pharmacodynamic effects on the cardiovascular system are known; however the mechanisms that induce cardioprotection are still under study. Regarding the pharmacokinetics properties, this drug is extensively metabolized in the liver by the uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferases. It has a relatively high hepatic extraction ratio, and therefore, its metabolism is dependent on liver blood flow. This review shows, from a basic clinical approach, the evidence supporting the use of dexmedetomidine in different settings, from its use in animal models of ischemia-reperfusion, and cardioprotective signaling pathways. In addition, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics studies in obese subjects and the management of patients subjected to mechanical ventilation are described. Moreover, the clinical efficacy of delirium incidence in patients with indication of non-invasive ventilation is shown. Finally, the available evidence from DEX is described by a group of Chilean pharmacologists and clinicians who have worked for more than 10 years on DEX.

Effects of dexmedetomidine versus remifentanil on mothers and neonates during cesarean section under general anesthesia

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Dexmedetomidine and remifentanil use in obstetric general anesthesia is controversial. This study aimed to compare the effects of remifentanil and dexmedetomidine on mothers and neonates during cesarean section under general anesthesia.

METHODS

A total of 120 patients scheduled for elective cesarean section under general anesthesia were randomly allocated to dexmedetomidine (D), remifentanil (R), and control (C) groups. Anesthesia was induced with propofol and muscle relaxants in all groups. Anesthesia in groups D and R was induced with dexmedetomidine (induction, 0.5 µg/kg; maintenance, 0.5 µg/kg.h) and remifentanil (induction, 0.5 µg/kg; maintenance, 2 µg/kg.h), respectively, until birth. Group C received equivalent volumes of normal saline. Mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), plasma catecholamine, visual analog pain score (VAS), and total tramadol consumption at 1, 2, and 3 hours after extubation were recorded. Neonatal effects were assessed by Apgar scores and umbilical blood gas analysis.

RESULTS

Post induction, MAP was significantly higher in group D compared to groups C and R, and significantly lower in group R than in group C. At intubation/skin incision and delivery, MAP, HR, and plasma epinephrine and norepinephrine concentrations were significantly lower in groups D and R than in group C. Compared to group R, MAP was significantly higher, and HR, plasma epinephrine, and norepinephrine concentrations were significantly lower in group D. Compared with groups C and D, the percentage of neonates with Apgar score < 7 was higher in group R at 1 min after delivery. Compared with groups C and R, the VAS was significantly lower in group D at 1 and 2 h postoperatively. Total tramadol consumption was significantly lower in group D at 3 hours postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

During general anesthesia for cesarean section, remifentanil demonstrated better control of hemodynamic stability, while dexmedetomidine demonstrated better neonatal Apgar scores, postoperative analgesia, and decreased catecholamine release.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Register (ChiCTR) - ChiCTR1800017125.

Population Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Dexmedetomidine in Children Undergoing Ambulatory Surgery

BACKGROUND

Dexmedetomidine (DEX) is an α-2 adrenergic agonist with sedative and analgesic properties. Although not approved for pediatric use by the Food and Drug Administration, DEX is increasingly used in pediatric anesthesia and critical care. However, very limited information is available regarding the pharmacokinetics of DEX in children. The aim of this study was to investigate DEX pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics (PK-PD) in Mexican children 2-18 years of age who were undergoing outpatient surgical procedures.

METHODS

Thirty children 2-18 years of age with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status score of I/II were enrolled in this study. DEX (0.7 μg/kg) was administered as a single-dose intravenous infusion. Venous blood samples were collected, and plasma DEX concentrations were analyzed with a combination of high-performance liquid chromatography and electrospray ionization-tandem mass spectrometry. Population PK-PD models were constructed using the Monolix program.

RESULTS

A 2-compartment model adequately described the concentration-time relationship. The parameters were standardized for a body weight of 70 kg by using an allometric model. Population parameters estimates were as follows: mean (between-subject variability): clearance (Cl) (L/h × 70 kg) = 20.8 (27%); central volume of distribution (V1) (L × 70 kg) = 21.9 (20%); peripheral volume of distribution (V2) (L × 70 kg) = 81.2 (21%); and intercompartmental clearance (Q) (L/h × 70 kg) = 75.8 (25%). The PK-PD model predicted a maximum mean arterial blood pressure reduction of 45% with an IC50 of 0.501 ng/ml, and a maximum heart rate reduction of 28.9% with an IC50 of 0.552 ng/ml.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that in Mexican children 2-18 years of age with American Society of Anesthesiologists score of I/II, the DEX dose should be adjusted in accordance with lower DEX clearance.

Effects of Plasma Albumin on the Pharmacokinetics of Esomeprazole in ICU Patients

Objectives

To evaluate the effects of plasma albumin on pharmacokinetics of esomeprazole in ICU patients.

Methods

This study was performed in 32 consecutive intensive care unit (ICU) patients. They were divided into two groups according to the plasma albumin levels. Nineteen patients with low plasma albumin levels (<30 g/L; male/female, 12/7) were assigned to low plasma albumin group (LPAG). Thirteen patients with plasma albumin levels >30 g/L (male/female, 9/4) were assigned to high plasma albumin group (HPAG). All patients were received intravenous (IV) of 40 mg esomeprazole in 5 min. Blood samples were collected via basilic vein at different time points and concentrations of esomeprazole were determined by UPLC-MS/MS.

Results

MRT_(0-∞), t_1/2, V, CL, and C_max between two groups were significantly difference (P<0.05). Compared with HPAG, MRT_(0-∞), t_1/2, and V of esomeprazole in LPAG were increased by 1.42-fold, 1.49-fold, and 1.24-fold, respectively; the maximum drug concentration of esomeprazole in LPAG was decreased to 82.5%. AUC_(0-∞) of LPAG was 1.23 times than that of group B. CL in LPAG was 80% of HPAG. There was no statistical difference between the two groups of AUC_(0-∞) and CL.

Conclusions

Some pharmacokinetic parameters of esomeprazole may be changed in ICU patients with low plasma albumin.

Early post-operative serum albumin level predicts survival after curative nephrectomy for kidney cancer: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have shown that albumin-related systemic inflammation is associated with the long-term prognosis of cancer, but the clinical significance of an early (≤ 7 days) post-operative serum albumin level has not been well-documented as a prognostic factor in patients with renal cell cancer.

METHODS

We retrospectively included patients hospitalized for kidney cancer from January 2009 to May 2014. First, the receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to define the best cut-off of an early post-operative serum albumin level in determining the prognosis, from which survival analysis was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 329 patients were included. The median duration of follow-up was 54.8 months. Patients with an early post-operative serum albumin level < 32 g/L had a significantly shorter median recurrence-free survival (RFS; 49.1 versus 56.5 months, P = 0.001) and median overall survival (OS; 52.2 versus 57.0 months, P = 0.049) than patients with an early post-operative serum albumin level ≥ 32 g/L. After adjusting for age, BMI, tumor stage, post-operative hemoglobin concentration, and pre-operative albumin, globulin, and hemoglobin levels, multivariate Cox regression showed that an early post-operative serum albumin level < 32 g/L was an independent prognostic factor associated with a decreased RFS (HR = 3.60; 95% CI,1.05-12.42 [months], P = 0.042) and decreased OS (HR = 9.95; 95% CI, 1.81-54.80 [months], P = 0.008).

CONCLUSION

An early post-operative serum albumin level < 32 g/L is an independent prognostic factor leading to an unfavorable RFS and OS. Prospective trials and further studies involving additional patients are warranted.

Impact of CYP2A6 gene polymorphism on the pharmacokinetics of dexmedetomidine for premedication

BACKGROUND

Dexmedetomidine is a widely used sedative in clinic, which is mainly metabolized by cytochrome P450 2A6 (CYP2A6). Dexmedetomidine was rarely reported for off-label usage of premedication, but lacking relevant pharmacokinetic investigations. Therefore, our study determined the dexmedetomidine pharmacokinetics of CYP2A6*4 allele in Chinese patients pretreated with dexmedetomidine whose mutation frequency of CYP2A6*4 are high, in order to provide clinical references.

METHODS

Thirty-one elective surgery patients received premedication with 0.5 μg/kg dexmedetomidine via intravenous pump. Their plasma concentrations at multiple time-points and polymorphism of CYP2A6*4 were determined and statistically analyzed.

RESULTS

9 patients were *1/*4 or *4/*4, and 22 patients were *1/*1. The main pharmacokinetic parameters were area under curve (AUC) 1396.19 ± 332.47h· ng· l^-1, peak blood concentration (C_max) 495.50 ± 104.90ng· l^-1, distribution volume (V) 0.68 ± 0.20 L/kg, clearance (CL) 0.38 ± 0.11 L/h/kg, distribution half-life (t_1/2α) 0.05 ± 0.01h, elimination half-life (t_1/2β) 2.53 ± 0.04h. No significant pharmacokinetic differences were found among CYP2A6*1/*1, *1/*4, and *4/*4 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In Chinese patients pretreated with dexmedetomidine, T_1/2β was consistent with that published, but T_1/2α, V and Cl were lower. It was unnecessary to consider the mutation when developing the precision regimen of dexmedetomidine.

Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Dexmedetomidine

Dexmedetomidine is an α₂-adrenoceptor agonist with sedative, anxiolytic, sympatholytic, and analgesic-sparing effects, and minimal depression of respiratory function. It is potent and highly selective for α₂-receptors with an α₂:α₁ ratio of 1620:1. Hemodynamic effects, which include transient hypertension, bradycardia, and hypotension, result from the drug’s peripheral vasoconstrictive and sympatholytic properties. Dexmedetomidine exerts its hypnotic action through activation of central pre- and postsynaptic α₂-receptors in the locus coeruleus, thereby inducting a state of unconsciousness similar to natural sleep, with the unique aspect that patients remain easily rousable and cooperative. Dexmedetomidine is rapidly distributed and is mainly hepatically metabolized into inactive metabolites by glucuronidation and hydroxylation. A high inter-individual variability in dexmedetomidine pharmacokinetics has been described, especially in the intensive care unit population. In recent years, multiple pharmacokinetic non-compartmental analyses as well as population pharmacokinetic studies have been performed. Body size, hepatic impairment, and presumably plasma albumin and cardiac output have a significant impact on dexmedetomidine pharmacokinetics. Results regarding other covariates remain inconclusive and warrant further research. Although initially approved for intravenous use for up to 24 h in the adult intensive care unit population only, applications of dexmedetomidine in clinical practice have been widened over the past few years. Procedural sedation with dexmedetomidine was additionally approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2003 and dexmedetomidine has appeared useful in multiple off-label applications such as pediatric sedation, intranasal or buccal administration, and use as an adjuvant to local analgesia techniques.