Lingual Tonsil Hypertrophy: rescuing the airway with videolaryngoscopy

Airway management of lingual tonsillar hypertrophy: A narrative review

Lingual tonsillar hypertrophy is rarely identified on routine airway assessment but may cause difficulties in airway management. We conducted a narrative review of case reports of lingual tonsillar hypertrophy to examine associated patient factors, success rates of airway management techniques and complications. We searched the literature for anaesthetic management of cases with lingual tonsillar hypertrophy. We found 89 patients in various case reports, from which we derived 92 cases to analyse. 64% of cases were assessed as having a normal airway. Difficult and impossible face mask ventilation occurred in 29.6% and 1.4% of cases, respectively. Difficult intubation and failed intubation occurred in 89.1% and 21.7% of cases, respectively. Multiple attempts (up to six) at intubation were performed, with no successful intubation after the third attempt with direct laryngoscopy. Some 16.5% of patients were woken up and 4.3% required emergency front of neck access. Complications included oesophageal intubation (10.9%), bleeding (9.8%) and severe hypoxia (3.2%). Our findings show that severe cases of lingual hypertrophy may cause an unanticipated difficult airway and serious complications, including hypoxic brain damage and death. A robust airway strategy is required which includes limiting the number of attempts at laryngoscopy, and early priming and performance of emergency front of neck access if required. In patients with known severe lingual tonsillar hypertrophy, awake intubation should be considered.

Narrow Band Imaging for lingual tonsil hypertrophy and inflammation, in laryngo-pharyngeal reflux disease

PURPOSE

The objective of this study is to analyse the relationship between the endoscopic signs of laryngo-pharyngeal reflux, the lingual tonsil hypertrophy (LTH) and its inflammation, adopting Narrow Band Imaging (NBI) technology.

METHODS

We enrolled, as cases, patients with clinical diagnosis of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD), a Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) ≥ 13, and a Reflux Finding Score (RFS) ≥ 7. Controls were enrolled among patients who underwent the same transnasal endoscopy, equipped with NBI, with a RSI < 13 and a RFS < 7. Nasopharynx, Lingual Tonsils (LT), Hypopharynx and Larynx were evaluated by two experienced otolaryngologists, who calculated the Reflux Finding Scale (RFS) score and focused their attention on the base of the tongue, observing its surface with NBI technology.

RESULTS

82 patients with diagnosis of laryngopharyngeal reflux were enrolled as cases. Mean RFS was 11.7 (SD = 2.9). As controls, we enrolled 80 patients. Mean RFS was 2.7 (SD = 1.63). We found that RFS positivity was associated with a significant increase in LT dimension (2.5 vs 1.1, p < 0.001), with a higher LT crypt inflammation grading (1.8 vs 0.09, p < 0.001) and with a higher Roman Cobblestone pattern grading (1.48 vs 0.11, p < 0.001). A significant correlation between the crypt inflammation and the hyperemia subscore of RFS was present (r = 0.696, p < 0.0001), while it was not possible to find a correlation between crypt inflammation and either diffuse laryngeal edema (r = 0.166, p = 0.135) and posterior commissure hypertrophy (r = 0.089, p = 0.427).

CONCLUSIONS

NBI allowed us to identify endoscopically the presence of enlarged lingual tonsil, crypt inflammation and superficial mucosal changes, in patients affected by LPRD.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2 (prospective, case-control study).