A cross-sectional study of preoperative medication adherence and early postoperative recovery

Preoperative Treatment of Severe Diabetes Mellitus and Hypertension Mitigates Healthcare Disparities and Prevents Adverse Postoperative Discharge to a Nursing Home

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether patients of Black race are at higher risk of losing the ability to live independently after surgery, and if a higher prevalence of severe diabetes mellitus and hypertension are contributing.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

It is unclear whether a patient's race predicts adverse discharge to a nursing home after surgery, and if preexisting diseases are contributing.

METHODS

368,360 adults undergoing surgery between 2007 and 2020 across two academic healthcare networks in New England were included. Patients of self-identified Black or White race were compared. The primary outcome was postoperative discharge to a nursing facility. Mediation analysis was used to examine the impact of preexisting severe diabetes mellitus and hypertension on the primary association.

RESULTS

10.3% (38,010/368,360) of patients were Black and 26,434 (7.2%) patients lost the ability to live independently after surgery. Black patients were at increased risk of postoperative discharge to a nursing facility (adjusted absolute risk difference [ARDadj] 1.9%;95%CI 1.6-2.2%;P<0.001). A higher prevalence of preexisting severe diabetes mellitus and hypertension in Black patients mediated 30.2% and 15.6% of this association. Preoperative medication-based treatment adherent to guidelines in patients with severe diabetes mellitus or hypertension mitigated the primary association (p-for-interaction<0.001). The same pattern of effect mitigation by pharmacotherapy was observed for the endpoint 30-day readmission.

CONCLUSIONS

Black race was associated with postoperative discharge to a nursing facility compared to White race. Optimized preoperative assessment and treatment of diabetes and hypertension improves surgical outcomes and provides an opportunity to the surgeon to help eliminate healthcare disparities.

Impact of a policy to improve the management of oral medications when patients are fasting before a procedure: an interrupted time series analysis

Background

Managing medications inappropriately when patients have oral intake restrictions can cause patient harm. This study evaluated the impact of a medication policy separating fasting from nil by mouth with respect to giving oral medications in patients fasting before a diagnostic or interventional procedure.

Methods

The policy stipulated that ‘fasting’ means oral medications should be given with a sip of water up to 1 hour before a procedure, unless there is a clinical reason to withhold, while ‘nil by mouth’ means nothing to be given orally, including medications.

The policy was implemented in Surgical areas in February 2015 and Medical areas in March 2015 at a tertiary referral hospital in Melbourne, Australia, and included bedside signs, clinical champions and education sessions.

The study was conducted in 2020. Admission and medication records were matched for non-elective procedure patients from January 2014 to May 2016. The monthly proportion of doses omitted inappropriately and overall omissions pre/post-policy implementation were compared using segmented regression.

Results

Pre-implementation, the proportion of doses withheld inappropriately and total omissions in medical areas were 18.1% and 28.0%, respectively. Post-implementation, an absolute reduction of 13.4% (95% CI 9.0% to 17.7%) and 11.1% (95% CI 2.6% to 19.6%), respectively, was seen. Post-implementation linear trend showed a 0.3% (95% CI 0.0% to 0.6%) increase in inappropriate omissions but not overall omissions.

In Surgical areas, pre-implementation proportions for inappropriate and overall omissions were lower than Medical areas’. Post-implementation, there was an absolute decrease in doses withheld inappropriately (8.3%, 95% CI 0.8% to 15.7%, from 11.9% pre-implementation) but not total omissions.

Conclusions

Distinguishing fasting from nil by mouth appeared to provide clarity for some staff: a reduction in inappropriate omissions was seen post-implementation. Although the small increase in post-implementation linear trend for inappropriate omissions in Medical areas suggests sustainability issues, total omissions were sustained. The policy’s concepts require verification beyond our institution.

Metabolic and the Surgical Stress Response Considerations to Improve Postoperative Recovery

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Enhanced recovery pathways are a multimodal, multidisciplinary approach to patient care that aims to reduce the surgical stress response and maintain organ function resulting in faster recovery and improved outcomes.

RECENT FINDINGS

A PubMed literature search was performed for articles that included the terms of metabolic surgical stress response considerations to improve postoperative recovery. The surgical stress response occurs due to direct and indirect injuries during surgery. Direct surgical injury can result from the dissection, retraction, resection, and/or manipulation of tissues, while indirect injury is secondary to events including hypotension, blood loss, and microvascular changes. Greater degrees of tissue injury will lead to higher levels of inflammatory mediator and cytokine release, which ultimately drives immunologic, metabolic, and hormonal processes in the body resulting in the stress response. These processes lead to altered glucose metabolism, protein catabolism, and hormonal dysregulation among other things, all which can impede recovery and increase morbidity. Fluid therapy has a direct effect on intravascular volume and cardiac output with a resultant effect on oxygen and nutrient delivery, so a balance must be maintained without excessively loading the patient with water and salt. All in all, attenuation of the surgical stress response and maintaining organ and thus whole-body homeostasis through enhanced recovery protocols can speed recovery and reduce complications. The present investigation summarizes the clinical application of enhanced recovery pathways, and we will highlight the key elements that characterize the metabolic surgical stress response and improved postoperative recovery.

Discontinuation and Nonadherence to Medications for Chronic Conditions after Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: A 6-Year Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION

Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is an established curative option for patients with hematological malignancies and other life-threatening conditions. Evidence on nonpersistence and nonadherence to oral medications for chronic conditions among patients following HCT is lacking.

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to examine patterns of oral medication use for chronic conditions following HCT in the U.S.

POPULATION

METHODS

Nonpersistence and nonadherence to oral medications for diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia among HCT recipients were assessed in a cohort that included 1382 autologous and 650 allogeneic HCT recipients with hematological malignancies using the Truven Health MarketScan Research Database between 2009 and 2014. Recipients of HCT were compared to propensity score-matched cancer patients receiving chemotherapy without transplantation. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models and generalized estimating equations were used to determine characteristics associated with nonpersistence and nonadherence to oral chronic medications, respectively.

RESULTS

Recipients of HCT had higher risks of discontinuing medication for diabetes mellitus (allogeneic HCT hazard ratio [HR] = 1.93, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.10-3.39; autologous HCT HR = 1.49, 95% CI 1.04-2.15); hypertension (allogeneic HCT HR = 1.75, 95% CI 1.21-2.53; autologous HCT HR = 1.32, 95% CI 1.07-1.62), and dyslipidemia (allogeneic HCT HR = 2.02, 95% CI 1.39-2.93; autologous HCT, HR = 1.26, 95% CI 0.98-1.61) compared to patients treated with only chemotherapy. Lower odds of adherence to antihypertensive medications (odds ratio [OR] = 0.58, 95% CI 0.38-0.89) and to lipid-lowering medications (OR = 0.38, 95% CI 0.22-0.65) were observed in allogeneic HCT recipients compared with propensity score-matched patients who underwent chemotherapy only.

CONCLUSIONS

Poor medication persistence and adherence to chronic disease medications are common after HCT. Further research to improve long-term outcomes following HCT should include management of medication therapy for chronic comorbid conditions.