Comparison of adjuvant pharmaceuticals for caudal block in pediatric lower abdominal and urological surgeries: A network meta-analysis

Application of wireless ultrasound for guided caudal anesthesia in children undergoing concealed penis surgery

Caudal anesthesia alleviates the strong pain endured by children during surgical treatment for concealed penis. In the traditional method, anesthesiologists identify the puncture point using the 'blind probe' method, which leads to anesthesia induction failure in children. Ultrasound has recently gained wide attention for its guidance in peripheral nerve block analgesia. However, the clinical significance of wireless ultrasound - guided caudal anesthesia technology in children remains unexplored. This study investigated the clinical value of wireless ultrasound - guided caudal anesthesia in children undergoing concealed penis surgery. From April 2022 to August 2022, 120 pediatric patients aged 3-10 years were selected for concealed penis surgery. They were divided into the wireless ultrasound - guided sacral block group (group A) and the traditional sacral block group (group B), with 60 children in each group. Children in group A and group B underwent wireless ultrasound - guided caudal anesthesia and traditional caudal anesthesia, respectively. The success rates of the first puncture and total punctures, time taken for the punctures, and number of punctures were compared between the groups. The success rates of the first puncture (95% vs 68.3%) and total puncture (100% vs 90%) were significantly higher in group A than in group B (P<0.05). The average puncture time and the average number of punctures were, respectively, significantly shorter and lesser in group A than in group B (both P<0.05). Compared with the traditional method, wireless ultrasound visualization technology can effectively improve the success rate of sacral block puncture and reduce puncture time, which is worthy of clinical application.

Dexamethasone as a perineural adjuvant to a ropivacaine popliteal sciatic nerve block for pediatric foot surgery: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

This study assessed the effect of perineural dexamethasone on block duration, opioid requirement, blood glucose levels, and stress response to surgery as measured by the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), following pediatric foot and ankle surgery.

METHODS

In this parallel, double-blinded randomized controlled trial, 90 children (ages 2-5 years, >5 kg) scheduled for foot or ankle surgery under spinal anesthesia with ultrasound-guided single-shot popliteal sciatic nerve block were randomized into 3 groups: 0.5% ropivacaine with saline (control), 0.5% ropivacaine plus dexamethasone 0.1 mg/kg (DEX0.1), and 0.5% ropivacaine plus dexamethasone 0.05 mg/kg (DEX0.05). Primary outcome was the time to first rescue opioid analgesia. Secondary outcomes included motor block duration, pain scores, NLR, PLR, and blood glucose levels.

RESULTS

Time to first rescue opioid analgesia was significantly longer in the DEX0.1 group compared with the DEX0.05 group (18.4 hours, SD 2.6 hours vs 16 hours, SD 2.8 hours), with a mean difference of 2.2 hours (95% CI 0.7 to 3.6), p<0.01; and the control group (8.5 hours, SD 1.5 hours), with a mean difference of -9.9 (95% CI -11.4 to -8.4), p<0.001. Motor block was significantly longer in the DEX0.1 group (17.3 hours, SD 2.5 hours) compared with the DEX0.05 (15.2 hours, SD 2.7 hours; p<0.01) and control groups (7.8±1.1, p<0.001). Total opioid consumption was significantly lower in the DEX0.1 group compared with the control group (p=0.01). NLR, PLR, and glucose levels did not differ significantly between the groups at baseline, 24 hours, and 48 hours post surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Perineural dexamethasone significantly prolonged postoperative motor block duration and did not influence blood glucose, NLR, or PLR levels.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT06086418.

Methods of prolonging the effect of caudal block in children

Caudal epidural blockade is one of the most frequently administered regional anesthesia techniques in children. It is a supplement during general anesthesia and for providing postoperative analgesia in pediatrics for sub-umbilical surgeries, especially for genitourinary surgeries. However, the duration of the analgesic effect is occasionally unsatisfactory. In this review, we discuss the main advantages and disadvantages of different techniques to prolong postoperative analgesia for single-injection caudal blockade in children. A literature search of the keywords "caudal", "analgesia", "pediatric", and "children" was performed using PubMed and Web of Science databases. We highlight that analgesic quality correlates substantially with the local anesthetic's type, dose, the timing relationship between caudal block and surgery, caudal catheterization, and administration of epidural opioids or other adjuvant drugs.

Efficacy of adjuvant dexmedetomidine on penile block for pediatric hypospadias repair

INTRODUCTION

The management of postoperative pain, particularly in younger children, presents a challenge due to their limited ability to articulate the intensity of pain, lower pain threshold, and restricted availability of approved analgesics for pediatric use. Peripheral nerve blocks may be favored over neuraxial blocks because they allow quicker mobilization after surgery.

OBJECTIVE

The present study aims to investigate the potential impact of adding dexmedetomidine to a local anesthetic (bupivacaine) on the analgesic efficacy in dorsal penile nerve block in hypospadias repair surgery.

METHOD

In this prospective double-blinded clinical trial, 50 children aged between 6 months and 6 years old undergoing hypospadias repair surgery participated. Analgesia was administered through a dorsal penile nerve block (DPNB) at the end of surgery. Participants were divided into two groups; one received bupivacaine alone, and the other received dexmedetomidine and bupivacaine in DPNB. Pain and sedation levels were assessed with FLACC score and MOAA/S score, respectively, at 0,1,2 and 4 h after surgery. Vital signs and adverse effects were also recorded, including hemodynamic changes, nausea, and vomiting.

RESULT

There was no statistically significant difference in demographic variables. As illustrated in Figure, the median of FLACC score in group BD was significantly lower compared to group B at every measured time point. MOAA/S score was significantly lower in group BD than in group B (p < 0.001), indicating a higher sedation level. None of the participants in either group experienced any adverse effect except for vomiting, which was not statistically significant (8 % in group B vs. 4 % in group BD, p > 0.999).

DISCUSSION

Several studies have documented the supplementary analgesic properties of dexmedetomidine when used in conjunction with local anesthetic during various surgical procedures and nerve blocks. The present study provides evidence for the additional analgesic efficacy of dexmedetomidine and bupivacaine in the context of dorsal penile nerve block during hypospadias repair surgery while not yielding any significant adverse outcomes. Although the patients in our study were monitored for 4 h in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU), conducting a more comprehensive assessment of patients is advisable.

CONCLUSION

The findings of our study indicate that incorporating dexmedetomidine alongside bupivacaine in dorsal penile nerve block during hypospadias repair surgery may lead to enhanced management of postoperative pain. The lack of adverse effects implies it may be a potentially safe supplementary pain reliever for surgical procedures.

Comparison of the effect of dexmedetomidine intrathecal injection and intravenous infusion on subarachnoid blockade during knee arthroscopy procedures: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Comparison of whether intrathecal dexmedetomidine prolongs spinal anesthesia-associated sensorimotor blockade more than intravenous infusion during knee arthroscopy procedures performed under subarachnoid blockade.

METHODS

Ninety patients aged 18-75 years, ASA class I-II, who underwent knee arthroscopy between October 2022 and April 2023 were randomized into intrathecal、intravenous and control groups.Subjects received three modes of administration: an intrathecal group (2 ml of 1% ropivacaine + 1 ml of 5 μg dexmedetomidine, along with intravenous saline infusion), an intravenous group (intrathecal 2 ml of 1% ropivacaine + 1 ml of 0.9% saline, with dexmedetomidine pumped intravenously at a dose of 0.5 μg/kg/h), and a control group (intrathecal 2 ml of 1% ropivacaine + 1 ml of 0.9% saline, along with intravenous saline infusion). Total analgesic duration, duration of sensory and motor blockade, Ramsay sedation score, Visual Analogue Score (VAS) at different postoperative time points, and occurrence of adverse effects were recorded.

RESULTS

The total analgesia duration was significantly longer in the intrathecal group than in the intravenous and control groups (352.13 ± 51.70 min VS 273.47 ± 62.57 min VS 241.41 ± 59.22 min, P < 0.001).The onset of sensory block was shorter in the intrathecal group than in the intravenous and control groups (4 [3-4]min VS 5 [4-5]min VS 5 [4-5]min; P < 0.001);the onset of motor block was shorter in the intrathecal group than in the intravenous group and the control group (5 [4-5]min VS 5 [5-6]min VS 6[5.5-7]min; P < 0.001).Sedation scores were higher in the intravenous group than in the intrathecal and control groups (P < 0.001). At 5 h postoperatively, the VAS score in the intrathecal group was lower than that in the intravenous and control groups (P < 0.001). At 24 h postoperatively, the VAS score in the intrathecal group was lower than that in the control group (P < 0.001). In addition, the incidence of bradycardia was significantly higher in the intravenous group than in the intrathecal and control groups (30%, 6.5%, and 3.4%, respectively; P = 0.018, P = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

Intrathecal administration of dexmedetomidine did prolong the total analgesia duration, as well as accelerate the onset of sensory-motor blockade compared with intravenous infusion, and did not result in any hemodynamic instability or other adverse events at the doses studied.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This single-center, prospective, RCT has completed the registration of the Chinese Clinical Trial Center at 26/09/2023 with the registration number ChiCTR2300076170.