Moderate efficiency of clinicians' predictions decreased for blurred clinical conditions and benefits from the use of BRASS index. A longitudinal study on geriatric patients' outcomes

Patients recovering from COVID-19 pneumonia in sub-acute care exhibit severe frailty: Role of the nurse assessment

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

To document the level of frailty in sub-acute COVID-19 patients recovering from acute respiratory failure and investigate the associations between frailty, assessed by the nurse using the Blaylock Risk Assessment Screening Score (BRASS), and clinical and functional patient characteristics during hospitalisation.

BACKGROUND

Frailty is a major problem in patients discharged from acute care, but no data are available on the frailty risk in survivors of COVID-19 infection.

DESIGN

A descriptive cross-sectional study (STROBE checklist).

METHODS

At admission to sub-acute care in 2020, 236 COVID-19 patients (median age 77 years - interquartile range 68-83) were administered BRASS and classified into 3 levels of frailty risk. The Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) was also administered to measure physical function and disability. Differences between BRASS levels and associations between BRASS index and clinical parameters were analysed.

RESULTS

The median BRASS index was 14.0 (interquartile range 9.0-20.0) denoting intermediate frailty (32.2%, 41.1%, 26.7% of patients exhibited low, intermediate and high frailty, respectively). Significant differences emerged between the BRASS frailty classes regards to sex, comorbidities, history of cognitive deficits, previous mechanical ventilation support and SPPB score. Patients with no comorbidities (14%) exhibited low frailty (BRASS: median 5.5, interquartile range 3.0-12.0). Age ≥65 years, presence of comorbidities, cognitive deficit and SPPB % predicted <50% were significant predictors of high frailty.

CONCLUSIONS

Most COVID-19 survivors exhibit substantial frailty and require continuing care after discharge from acute care.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

The BRASS index is a valuable tool for nurses to identify those patients most at risk of frailty, who require a programme of rehabilitation and community reintegration.

Assessment tools and factors used to predict discharge from acute general medical wards: a systematic review

PURPOSE

To identify assessment tools and patient factors statistically associated with discharge destination in general medical inpatients.

MATERIALS AND METHOD

A systematic review was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews (PRISMA) guidelines. Four electronic databases were searched. Studies were eligible if they were a quantitative study design, had adult acute general medical inpatients and published in English. Outcomes of interest were tools or factors with statistical correlations with discharge destination (home, subacute or residential care). Articles were screened by two independent assessors. Data were extracted by one reviewer and independently checked by a second reviewer. Data were analysed/described descriptively.

RESULTS

Twenty-three studies were included. Twenty-three tools and 44 factors were identified, which spanned Health Condition, Body Structure and Function, Activity, Participation, Environment and Personal concepts of the World Health Organisation International Classification of Function, Disability and Health (WHO ICF).

CONCLUSIONS

The large number of tools and factors found and their distribution across several WHO ICF concepts exemplifies the complexities of predicting discharge. No single assessment tool that best predicts discharge destination was identified, but rather there were a variety of potential tools identified. Further research is needed to determine the psychometric properties of the identified assessment tools as well as additional predictors of subacute care (including rehabilitation). This is important as it may allow for timely clinical decision making.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

A priori, PROSPERO (CRD42017064209).IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONThis systematic review identified a large number of assessment tools and patient factors associated with discharge destination (home, subacute and residential care) in general medical inpatients.All of the domains of the WHO ICF framework are associated with discharge destination and must be considered.Clinicians in the acute setting can use these findings to assist selection of assessment tools to identify patients likely to need rehabilitation or subacute care.Early identification of patients who are unable to return to their place of residence is essential as it allows for provision of early rehabilitation and subsequent discharge planning.

Clinical utility of scores on the Blaylock Risk Assessment Screen (BRASS): An analysis of administrative data

PURPOSE

Project was undertaken to examine the utility of the Blaylock Risk Assessment Screen (BRASS) in identifying patients who may experience discharge complications as indicated by longer hospital stays or readmission within 30-days of a discharge to home.

BACKGROUND

Before measures can be put in place to facilitate discharge planning and to prevent unplanned readmission by recently discharged patients, those at risk of such events must be identified.

METHODS

Project involved an analysis of 13-months of administrative data from one tertiary care hospital. Utility of the BRASS was examined in terms of its sensitivity and specificity as well as its positive and negative predictive values.

RESULTS

Majority (83%) of hospital discharges were to home. Approximately 7% of patients experienced at least one readmission within 30-days of being discharged to home. Using scores of 10 or higher as an indicator of risk, BRASS exhibited a high degree of specificity suggesting it is useful for 'ruling in' those who have the outcomes-of-interest. However low sensitivity indicates many who experienced the outcomes were incorrectly classified by the BRASS as low risk. The low positive predictive value for 30-day readmission also suggests many who were classified by the BRASS as being 'at risk' were not readmitted.

CONCLUSION

The observed rate of 30-day readmission is likely conservative as the analysis involved data from only one acute care facility. One explanation for the low positive predictive value for 30-day readmission is that completion of the BRASS on admission enabled the implementation of preventive measures.

BRASS score and complex discharge: a pilot study

Aims:

A highly functional continuity of patient care, which is linked to the reduction of the risk of long-term hospitalization, above all for ‘at-risk’ patients. Research into an objective, reliable instrument for redirecting individual results to organizational aims to extend the entire country, is a fundamental step to move from a reactive assistance approach to a pro-active one.

Methods:

An observational and descriptive retrospective study was carried out July - November 2014 in two Italian state hospitals, completing the BRASS Index within 48/72 hours of admission.

Results:

The study group consisted of 122 inpatients. A correlation presented itself, albeit low (ρ=0.05191), between age and the number of ‘revolving door’ admissions; a medium correlation (ρ=0.485131) between age and risk band (according to BRASS).

Conclusions:

The BRASS Index is straightforward and swift, and can prove a valuable tool in directing nurses’ attention to those patients most at risk of prolonged hospitalization. (www.actabiomedica.it)