Transparency, openness, and reproducible research practices are frequently underused in health economic evaluations

Female authorship positions in health economic evaluations: a cross-sectional analysis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the gender of the authors who publish articles of health economic evaluations in medicine and healthcare journals.

METHOD

We evaluated a random sample of economic evaluations indexed in MEDLINE during 2019. Gender of the first, last and corresponding author was determined by review of the author's first name. Data were summarized as frequency and percentage for categorical items and median and interquartile range (IQR) for continuous items. We also calculated the index of authors per paper.

RESULTS

We included 200 studies with 1365 authors (median of 6 authors per paper; IQR: 4-9). Gender identification was possible for all authors in the study sample: 802 (59%) were men and 563 (41%) were women. The number of female first, last, and corresponding authors respectively were 78 (39%), 68 (34%), and 80 (40%) for health economic evaluations.

DISCUSSION

Female scientists were underrepresented as co-authors and in prominent authorship positions in health economic evaluations. This study serves as a call to action for the scientific community to actively work towards equity and inclusion.

Cost-effectiveness of occupational therapy for older adults: a protocol for an updated systematic review

INTRODUCTION

The ageing populations in developed countries are a global concern, with increasing numbers of older adults facing physical, cognitive and psychological challenges, resulting in reduced quality of life and higher healthcare costs. Healthcare expenditure worldwide has been on the rise, especially among older adults, emphasising the importance of enabling independent living while reducing healthcare costs. Occupational therapy holds promising outcomes in promoting functional independence and enhancing the quality of life for older adults, but research on its cost-effectiveness remains limited. This systematic review aims to evaluate the recent evidence on the cost-effectiveness of occupational therapy interventions for older adults from a pragmatic perspective.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This systematic review will cover full economic evaluations, including cost-effectiveness, cost-utility and cost-benefit analyses, by reviewing randomised and cluster randomised controlled trials. The participants will be aged over 65 years without disease or disability restrictions. Primary outcomes will be assessed using functional status and quality-of-life assessments. Studies published before July 2023 will be searched in PubMed, Web of Science and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) databases, with no language restrictions.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval is not required for this literature-based systematic review. The study's findings will update the evaluation of occupational therapy's cost-effectiveness in older adults and will be made public by publishing them in scholarly journals.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42023453558.