1
|
Yanuck SB, Fox SK, Harting BR, Motyka TM. Effect of manual manipulation on mechanical gait parameters. J Osteopath Med 2024; 0:jom-2023-0203. [PMID: 38807459 DOI: 10.1515/jom-2023-0203] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2023] [Accepted: 04/09/2024] [Indexed: 05/30/2024]
Abstract
CONTEXT A variety of manual manipulation techniques are utilized in clinical practice to alleviate pain and improve musculoskeletal function. Many manual practitioners analyze gait patterns and asymmetries in their assessment of the patient, and an increasing number of gait motion capture studies are taking place with recent improvements in motion capture technology. This study is the first systematic review of whether these manual modalities have been shown to produce an objectively measurable change in gait mechanics. OBJECTIVES This study was designed to perform a systematic review of the literature to assess the impact of manual medicine modalities on biomechanical parameters of gait. METHODS A master search term composed of keywords and Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) search terms from an initial scan of relevant articles was utilized to search six databases. We screened the titles and abstracts of the resulting papers for relevance and then assessed their quality with the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. Clinical trials that featured both a manual manipulation intervention and multiple mechanical gait parameters were included. Case reports and other studies that only measured gait speed or other subjective measures of mobility were excluded. RESULTS We included 20 studies in our final analysis. They utilize manipulation techniques primarily from osteopathic, chiropractic, massage, and physiotherapy backgrounds. The conditions studied primarily included problems with the back, knee, and ankle, as well as healthy patients and Parkinson's patients. Control groups were highly variable, if not absent. Most studies measured their gait parameters utilizing either multicamera motion capture systems or force platforms. CONCLUSIONS Twelve of 20 papers included in the final analysis demonstrated a significant effect of manipulation on gait variables, many of which included either step length, walking speed, or sagittal range of motion (ROM) in joints of the lower extremity. However, the results and study design are too heterogeneous to draw robust conclusions from these studies as a whole. While there are initial indications that certain modalities may yield a change in certain gait parameters, the quality of evidence is low and there is insufficient evidence to conclude that manual therapies induce changes in biomechanical gait parameters. Studies are heterogeneous with respect to the populations studied and the interventions performed. Comparators were variable or absent across the studies, as were the outcome variables measured. More could be learned in the future with consistent methodology around blinding and sham treatment, and if the gait parameters measured were standardized and of a more robust clinical significance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Solomon B Yanuck
- Leon Levine Hall of Medical Sciences, 364432 Campbell University Jerry M. Wallace School of Osteopathic Medicine , Lillington, NC, USA
| | - Sarah K Fox
- Leon Levine Hall of Medical Sciences, 364432 Campbell University Jerry M. Wallace School of Osteopathic Medicine , Lillington, NC, USA
| | - Bethany R Harting
- Leon Levine Hall of Medical Sciences, 364432 Campbell University Jerry M. Wallace School of Osteopathic Medicine , Lillington, NC, USA
| | - Thomas M Motyka
- Department of Osteopathic Manipulative Medicine, 364432 Campbell University Jerry M. Wallace School of Osteopathic Medicine , Lillington, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Vismara L, Bergna A, Tarantino AG, Dal Farra F, Buffone F, Vendramin D, Cimolin V, Cerfoglio S, Pradotto LG, Mauro A. Reliability and Validity of the Variability Model Testing Procedure for Somatic Dysfunction Assessment: A Comparison with Gait Analysis Parameters in Healthy Subjects. Healthcare (Basel) 2024; 12:175. [PMID: 38255064 PMCID: PMC10815658 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12020175] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2023] [Revised: 12/28/2023] [Accepted: 01/08/2024] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Somatic dysfunction (SD) is an altered body function involving the musculoskeletal system. However, its clinical signs-tissue texture abnormalities, positional asymmetry, restricted range of motion, and tissue tenderness-did not achieve satisfactory results for reliability. A recent theoretical model proposed a revision assessing the movement variability around the joint rest position. The asymmetry and restriction of motion may characterize functional assessment in osteopathic clinical practice, demonstrating the reliability required. Hence, this study investigated the reliability of the new variability model (VM) with gait analysis (GA). Three blind examiners tested 27 young healthy subjects for asymmetry of motion around rest position and the SD grade on six body regions. The results were compared to the VICON procedure for 3D-GA. The inter-rater agreement for the detection of reduced movement variability ranged from 0.78 to 0.54, whereas for SD, grade ranged from 0.64 to 0.47. VM had a sensitivity and specificity of 0.62 and 0.53, respectively, in SD detection compared to step length normality. Global severity grade of SD demonstrated moderate to good correlation with spatial-temporal parameters. The VM showed palpatory reliability and validity with spatial-temporal parameters in GA. Those findings contribute to the innovation for SD examination with implications for the clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Vismara
- Division of Neurology and Neurorehabilitation—IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Strada Luigi Cadorna 90, 28824 Piancavallo-Verbania, Italy; (L.V.); (V.C.); (S.C.); (L.G.P.); (A.M.)
| | - Andrea Bergna
- Department of Research, SOMA Istituto Osteopatia Milano—Institute Osteopathy Milan, 20126 Milan, Italy; (A.B.); (A.G.T.); (F.D.F.)
| | - Andrea Gianmaria Tarantino
- Department of Research, SOMA Istituto Osteopatia Milano—Institute Osteopathy Milan, 20126 Milan, Italy; (A.B.); (A.G.T.); (F.D.F.)
- Division of Paediatric, Manima Non-Profit Organization Social Assistance and Healthcare, 20125 Milan, Italy;
| | - Fulvio Dal Farra
- Department of Research, SOMA Istituto Osteopatia Milano—Institute Osteopathy Milan, 20126 Milan, Italy; (A.B.); (A.G.T.); (F.D.F.)
- Department of Information Engineering, University of Brescia, 25123 Brescia, Italy
| | - Francesca Buffone
- Department of Research, SOMA Istituto Osteopatia Milano—Institute Osteopathy Milan, 20126 Milan, Italy; (A.B.); (A.G.T.); (F.D.F.)
- Division of Paediatric, Manima Non-Profit Organization Social Assistance and Healthcare, 20125 Milan, Italy;
- Principles and Practice of Clinical Research (PPCR), Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health–ECPE, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Davide Vendramin
- Division of Paediatric, Manima Non-Profit Organization Social Assistance and Healthcare, 20125 Milan, Italy;
| | - Veronica Cimolin
- Division of Neurology and Neurorehabilitation—IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Strada Luigi Cadorna 90, 28824 Piancavallo-Verbania, Italy; (L.V.); (V.C.); (S.C.); (L.G.P.); (A.M.)
- Department of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, 20133 Milan, Italy
| | - Serena Cerfoglio
- Division of Neurology and Neurorehabilitation—IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Strada Luigi Cadorna 90, 28824 Piancavallo-Verbania, Italy; (L.V.); (V.C.); (S.C.); (L.G.P.); (A.M.)
- Department of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, 20133 Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Guglielmo Pradotto
- Division of Neurology and Neurorehabilitation—IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Strada Luigi Cadorna 90, 28824 Piancavallo-Verbania, Italy; (L.V.); (V.C.); (S.C.); (L.G.P.); (A.M.)
- Department of Neurosciences “Rita Levi Montalcini”, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy
| | - Alessandro Mauro
- Division of Neurology and Neurorehabilitation—IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Strada Luigi Cadorna 90, 28824 Piancavallo-Verbania, Italy; (L.V.); (V.C.); (S.C.); (L.G.P.); (A.M.)
- Department of Neurosciences “Rita Levi Montalcini”, University of Turin, 10126 Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Grabowska W, Burton W, Kowalski MH, Vining R, Long CR, Lisi A, Hausdorff JM, Manor B, Muñoz-Vergara D, Wayne PM. A systematic review of chiropractic care for fall prevention: rationale, state of the evidence, and recommendations for future research. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2022; 23:844. [PMID: 36064383 PMCID: PMC9442928 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-022-05783-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2022] [Accepted: 08/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Falls in older adults are a significant and growing public health concern. There are multiple risk factors associated with falls that may be addressed within the scope of chiropractic training and licensure. Few attempts have been made to summarize existing evidence on multimodal chiropractic care and fall risk mitigation. Therefore, the broad purpose of this review was to summarize this research to date. BODY: Systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Databases searched included PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, PEDro, and Index of Chiropractic Literature. Eligible study designs included randomized controlled trials (RCT), prospective non-randomized controlled, observational, and cross-over studies in which multimodal chiropractic care was the primary intervention and changes in gait, balance and/or falls were outcomes. Risk of bias was also assessed using the 8-item Cochrane Collaboration Tool. The original search yielded 889 articles; 21 met final eligibility including 10 RCTs. One study directly measured the frequency of falls (underpowered secondary outcome) while most studies assessed short-term measurements of gait and balance. The overall methodological quality of identified studies and findings were mixed, limiting interpretation regarding the potential impact of chiropractic care on fall risk to qualitative synthesis. CONCLUSION Little high-quality research has been published to inform how multimodal chiropractic care can best address and positively influence fall prevention. We propose strategies for building an evidence base to inform the role of multimodal chiropractic care in fall prevention and outline recommendations for future research to fill current evidence gaps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weronika Grabowska
- Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School Division of Preventive Medicine, Osher Center for Integrative Medicine, 900 Commonwealth Avenue, 3rd Floor, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Wren Burton
- Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School Division of Preventive Medicine, Osher Center for Integrative Medicine, 900 Commonwealth Avenue, 3rd Floor, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
| | - Matthew H Kowalski
- Osher Clinical Center for Integrative Medicine, Brigham and Women's Healthcare Center, 850 Boylston Street, Suite 422, Chestnut Hill, MA, 02445, USA
| | - Robert Vining
- Palmer Center for Chiropractic Research, 1000 Brady Street, Davenport, IA, 52803, USA
| | - Cynthia R Long
- Palmer Center for Chiropractic Research, 1000 Brady Street, Davenport, IA, 52803, USA
| | - Anthony Lisi
- Yale University Center for Medical Informatics, 300 George Street, Suite 501, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Jeffrey M Hausdorff
- Center for the Study of Movement Cognition and Mobility, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Dafna St 5, Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel
| | - Brad Manor
- Hinda and Arthur Marcus Institute for Aging Research, 1200 Centre Street, Boston, MA, 02131, USA
| | - Dennis Muñoz-Vergara
- Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School Division of Preventive Medicine, Osher Center for Integrative Medicine, 900 Commonwealth Avenue, 3rd Floor, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Peter M Wayne
- Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School Division of Preventive Medicine, Osher Center for Integrative Medicine, 900 Commonwealth Avenue, 3rd Floor, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hill CN, Romero M, Rogers M, Queen RM, Brolinson PG. Effect of osteopathic manipulation on gait asymmetry. J Osteopath Med 2021; 122:85-94. [PMID: 34787381 DOI: 10.1515/jom-2021-0046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2021] [Accepted: 08/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Movement and loading asymmetry are associated with an increased risk of musculoskeletal injury, disease progression, and suboptimal recovery. Osteopathic structural screening can be utilized to determine areas of somatic dysfunction that could contribute to movement and loading asymmetry. Osteopathic manipulation treatments (OMTs) targeting identified somatic dysfunctions can correct structural asymmetries and malalignment, restoring the ability for proper compensation of stresses throughout the body. Little is currently known about the ability for OMTs to reduce gait asymmetries, thereby reducing the risk of injury, accelerated disease progression, and suboptimal recovery. OBJECTIVES To demonstrate whether osteopathic screening and treatment could alter movement and loading asymmetry during treadmill walking. METHODS Forty-two healthy adults (20 males, 22 females) between the ages of 18 and 35 were recruited for this prospective intervention. Standardized osteopathic screening exams were completed by a single physician for each participant, and osteopathic manipulation was performed targeting somatic dysfunctions identified in the screening exam. Three-dimensional (3-D) biomechanical assessments, including the collection of motion capture and force plate data, were performed prior to and following osteopathic manipulation to quantify gait mechanics. Motion capture and loading data were processed utilizing Qualisys Track Manager and Visual 3D software, respectively. Asymmetry in the following temporal, kinetic, and kinematic measures was quantified utilizing a limb symmetry index (LSI): peak vertical ground reaction force, the impulse of the vertical ground reaction force, peak knee flexion angle, step length, stride length, and stance time. A 2-way repeated-measures analysis of variance model was utilized to evaluate the effects of time (pre/post manipulation) and sex (male/female) on each measure of gait asymmetry. RESULTS Gait asymmetry in the peak vertical ground reaction force (-0.6%, p=0.025) and the impulse of the vertical ground reaction force (-0.3%, p=0.026) was reduced in males following osteopathic manipulation. There was no difference in gait asymmetry between time points in females. Osteopathic manipulation did not impact asymmetry in peak knee flexion angle, step length, stride length, or stance time. Among the participants, 59.5% (25) followed the common compensatory pattern, whereas 40.5% (17) followed the uncommon compensatory pattern. One third (33.3%, 14) of the participants showed decompensation at the occipitoatlantal (OA) junction, whereas 26.2% (11), one third (33.3%, 14), and 26.2% (11) showed decompensation at the cervicothoracic (CT), thoracolumbar (TL), and lumbosacral (LS) junctions, respectively. Somatic dysfunction at the sacrum, L5, right innominate, and left innominate occurred in 88.1% (37), 69.0% (29), 97.6% (41), and 97.6% (41) of the participants, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Correcting somatic dysfunction can influence gait asymmetry in males; the sex-specificity of the observed effects of osteopathic manipulation on gait asymmetry is worthy of further investigation. Osteopathic structural examinations and treatment of somatic dysfunctions may improve gait symmetry even in asymptomatic individuals. These findings encourage larger-scale investigations on the use of OMT to optimize gait, prevent injury and the progression of disease, and aid in recovery after surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cherice N Hill
- Department of Biomedical Engineering and Mechanics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA
| | - M'Lindsey Romero
- Department of Family and Sports Medicine, Edward Via College of Osteopathic Medicine, Blacksburg, VA, USA
| | - Mark Rogers
- Department of Family and Sports Medicine, Edward Via College of Osteopathic Medicine, Blacksburg, VA, USA
| | - Robin M Queen
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke, VA, USA
| | - Per Gunnar Brolinson
- Department of Family and Sports Medicine, Edward Via College of Osteopathic Medicine, Blacksburg, VA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
TOPRAK M, KARAGÖZOĞLU COŞKUNSU D, ALPTEKIN HK, İNAL HS. Evaluation of immediate effect of sacroiliac joint manipulation on balance and muscle strength. GAZZETTA MEDICA ITALIANA ARCHIVIO PER LE SCIENZE MEDICHE 2021. [DOI: 10.23736/s0393-3660.19.04215-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
|
6
|
Diebo BG, Shah NV, Pivec R, Naziri Q, Patel A, Post NH, Assi A, Godwin EM, Lafage V, Schwab FJ, Paulino CB. From Static Spinal Alignment to Dynamic Body Balance: Utilizing Motion Analysis in Spinal Deformity Surgery. JBJS Rev 2018; 6:e3. [DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.rvw.17.00189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
|