1
|
Jonathan C, Senthil N, Suja L, Rajendran V. Adhesive arachnoiditis: a rare cause of postoperative urinary retention. BMJ Case Rep 2024; 17:e261139. [PMID: 39277192 DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2024-261139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/17/2024] Open
Abstract
Postoperative urinary retention is a common consequence of pelvic surgeries. It is often related both to the nature of surgery and the medication used in the perioperative period. Adhesive arachnoiditis (AA) is a rare condition, which has various clinical presentations ranging from back pain to disabling neurological deficits. Numerous aetiologies for AA have been described in the literature, one such noted is spinal anaesthesia. We report a patient who presented with isolated bladder dysfunction in the form of urinary retention after spinal anaesthesia. She was evaluated and diagnosed with AA as the cause of her urinary retention. AA was complicated by raised intracranial pressure. She was treated with corticosteroids and acetazolamide, following which she made a full recovery. We would like to highlight this rare presentation, as well as lay emphasis on the early evaluation of seemingly anticipated symptoms such as postoperative urinary retention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cheruba Jonathan
- General Medicine, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research (Deemed to be University), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Narayanasamy Senthil
- General Medicine, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research (Deemed to be University), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Lakshmanan Suja
- General Medicine, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research (Deemed to be University), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Vaasanthi Rajendran
- General Medicine, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research (Deemed to be University), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chen Q, Wang Z, Zhang S. Mechanism, application and effect evaluation of nerve mobilization in the treatment of low back pain: A narrative review. Medicine (Baltimore) 2023; 102:e34961. [PMID: 37653794 PMCID: PMC10470699 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000034961] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2023] [Revised: 07/14/2023] [Accepted: 08/04/2023] [Indexed: 09/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Lower back pain is a prevalent condition affecting people across all age groups and causing significant personal and societal burdens. While numerous treatments exist, nerve mobilization has emerged as a promising approach for managing lower back pain. Nerve mobilization involves applying gentle and rhythmic movements to the affected nerves, promoting normal nerve function and releasing tension. It has been well documented that nerve mobilization can be effective in reducing pain and improving function in patients with lower back pain, but the underlying mechanisms have not been clarified. This study aims to review the mechanisms of nerve mobilization in the management of lower back pain, its application, and effectiveness evaluation, and provide a potential solution for managing lower back pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Quanzheng Chen
- Department of Physical Education and Health, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin, China
| | - Zhenshan Wang
- Department of Physical Education and Health, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin, China
| | - Shuna Zhang
- Department of Physical Education and Health, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Muacevic A, Adler JR, Medeiros F, Farid G, Santa Maria PE, Perret CM, Koester SW, Bertani R. Spinal Adhesive Arachnoiditis: A Literature Review. Cureus 2023; 15:e33697. [PMID: 36788823 PMCID: PMC9922032 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.33697] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/11/2023] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Adhesive arachnoiditis (AA) is a rare inflammatory and scar-forming disease with several etiologies that may lead to incapacitating sequelae if not managed early. Nevertheless, as the onset of symptoms varies from days to years, the etiology is not often discovered. The disease is characterized by adhesions disrupting the cerebrospinal fluid flow and causing encapsulation and atrophy of the nerve root. Therefore, a range of clinical features may be present, including urinary, gastroenterology, dermatologic, and neurologic. In terms of diagnosis, magnetic resonance imaging is the gold standard showing pseudocysts with adherent and narrow nerve roots toward the center of the dural sac or peripherally cluster and narrow nerve roots with empty thecal sac. Despite its sensitivity and specificity, the imaging findings are not often associated with clinical manifestations, requiring treatment being based on anamneses and clinical findings. Nowadays, AA can be managed with pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment, although none provides a completely satisfying result.
Collapse
|
4
|
Palackdkharry CS, Wottrich S, Dienes E, Bydon M, Steinmetz MP, Traynelis VC. The leptomeninges as a critical organ for normal CNS development and function: First patient and public involved systematic review of arachnoiditis (chronic meningitis). PLoS One 2022; 17:e0274634. [PMID: 36178925 PMCID: PMC9524710 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274634] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2022] [Accepted: 08/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND & IMPORTANCE This patient and public-involved systematic review originally focused on arachnoiditis, a supposedly rare "iatrogenic chronic meningitis" causing permanent neurologic damage and intractable pain. We sought to prove disease existence, causation, symptoms, and inform future directions. After 63 terms for the same pathology were found, the study was renamed Diseases of the Leptomeninges (DLMs). We present results that nullify traditional clinical thinking about DLMs, answer study questions, and create a unified path forward. METHODS The prospective PRISMA protocol is published at Arcsology.org. We used four platforms, 10 sources, extraction software, and critical review with ≥2 researchers at each phase. All human sources to 12/6/2020 were eligible for qualitative synthesis utilizing R. Weekly updates since cutoff strengthen conclusions. RESULTS Included were 887/14286 sources containing 12721 DLMs patients. Pathology involves the subarachnoid space (SAS) and pia. DLMs occurred in all countries as a contributor to the top 10 causes of disability-adjusted life years lost, with communicable diseases (CDs) predominating. In the USA, the ratio of CDs to iatrogenic causes is 2.4:1, contradicting arachnoiditis literature. Spinal fusion surgery comprised 54.7% of the iatrogenic category, with rhBMP-2 resulting in 2.4x more DLMs than no use (p<0.0001). Spinal injections and neuraxial anesthesia procedures cause 1.1%, and 0.2% permanent DLMs, respectively. Syringomyelia, hydrocephalus, and arachnoid cysts are complications caused by blocked CSF flow. CNS neuron death occurs due to insufficient arterial supply from compromised vasculature and nerves traversing the SAS. Contrast MRI is currently the diagnostic test of choice. Lack of radiologist recognition is problematic. DISCUSSION & CONCLUSION DLMs are common. The LM clinically functions as an organ with critical CNS-sustaining roles involving the SAS-pia structure, enclosed cells, lymphatics, and biologic pathways. Cases involve all specialties. Causes are numerous, symptoms predictable, and outcomes dependent on time to treatment and extent of residual SAS damage. An international disease classification and possible treatment trials are proposed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Stephanie Wottrich
- Case Western Reserve School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, United States of America
| | - Erin Dienes
- Arcsology®, Mead, Colorado, United States of America
| | - Mohamad Bydon
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, Orthopedic Surgery, and Health Services Research, Mayo Clinic School of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America
| | - Michael P. Steinmetz
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine Neurologic Institute, Cleveland, Ohio, United States of America
| | - Vincent C. Traynelis
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rush University School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hackert J, Maßmann L, Sure U, Forsting M, Kleinschnitz C, Pul R, Hagenacker T. Immunotherapies in chronic adhesive arachnoiditis - A case series and literature review. eNeurologicalSci 2021; 24:100350. [PMID: 34195394 PMCID: PMC8225987 DOI: 10.1016/j.ensci.2021.100350] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2021] [Revised: 05/10/2021] [Accepted: 06/09/2021] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Chronic spinal adhesive arachnoiditis (CSAA) is a rare condition with limited therapeutic options. Surgical treatment proves effective in approximately 60% of cases. Conservative treatment options have not been extensively investigated. Here, we report the course of the disease, analyze the effect of immune treatments in patients with CSAA who were treated in the University Hospital Essen between 2015 and 2020, and conduct a literature review. Three out of four patients showed no improvement after treatment with corticosteroids, methotrexate, or plasmapheresis. All non-responders suffered from CSAA for several years, while one patient who had a disease duration of less than one month fully recovered. It is necessary to verify whether treatment at an early stage of the disease is better than treatment after chronic adhesion manifestation, as it interrupts the development of adhesions and all subsequent complications. Surgical treatment of CSAA patients proves effective in approx. 60% of cases. High-dose steroid treatment may be effective in early stages of CSAA. Only conservative therapy cannot be recommended in long-standing CSAA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jana Hackert
- University Medicine Essen, Department of Neurology, Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Louisa Maßmann
- University Medicine Essen, Department of Neurology, Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Ulrich Sure
- University Medicine Essen, Department of Neurosurgery and Spine Surgery, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Michael Forsting
- University Medicine Essen, Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Christoph Kleinschnitz
- University Medicine Essen, Department of Neurology, Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Refik Pul
- University Medicine Essen, Department of Neurology, Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Tim Hagenacker
- University Medicine Essen, Department of Neurology, Center for Translational Neuro- and Behavioral Sciences, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45147 Essen, Germany
- Corresponding author.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Imaging Assessment of the Postoperative Spine: An Updated Pictorial Review of Selected Complications. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2021; 2021:9940001. [PMID: 34113681 PMCID: PMC8154286 DOI: 10.1155/2021/9940001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2021] [Revised: 04/25/2021] [Accepted: 05/05/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Imaging of the postoperative spine requires the identification of several critical points by the radiologist to be written in the medical report: condition of the underlying cortical and cancellous bone, intervertebral disc, and musculoskeletal tissues; location and integrity of surgical implants; evaluation of the success of decompression procedures; delineation of fusion status; and identification of complications. This article presents a pictorial narrative review of the most common findings observed in noninstrumented and instrumented postoperative spines. Complications in the noninstrumented spine were grouped in early (hematomas, pseudomeningocele, and postoperative spine infection) and late findings (arachnoiditis, radiculitis, recurrent disc herniation, spinal stenosis, and textiloma). Complications in the instrumented spine were also sorted in early (hardware fractures) and late findings (adjacent segment disease, hardware loosening, and implant migration). This review also includes a short description of the most used diagnostic techniques in postoperative spine imaging: plain radiography, ultrasound (US), computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance (MR), and nuclear medicine. Imaging of the postoperative spine remained a challenging task in the early identification of complications and abnormal healing process. It is crucial to consider the advantages and disadvantages of the imaging modalities to choose those that provide more accurate spinal status information during the follow-up. Our review is directed to all health professionals dealing with the assessment and care of the postoperative spine.
Collapse
|
7
|
Trager RJ, Dusek JA. Chiropractic case reports: a review and bibliometric analysis. Chiropr Man Therap 2021; 29:17. [PMID: 33910610 PMCID: PMC8080364 DOI: 10.1186/s12998-021-00374-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2021] [Accepted: 04/13/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine publication trends, gaps, and predictors of citation of chiropractic case reports (CRs). METHODS A bibliometric review was conducted by searching PubMed, Index to Chiropractic Literature (ICL), and Google Scholar to identify PubMed-indexed CRs, which were screened according to selection criteria. Case reports were categorized by International Classification of Disease (ICD-10) code, patient age, topic describing case management or adverse effects of care, focus being spinal or non-spinal, journal type, integrative authorship, title metrics, and citation metrics. Binary logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors of citations per year and total citations greater than the median values. RESULTS The search identified 1176 chiropractic CRs meeting selection criteria. There was an increasing trend of CRs having a case management topic, non-spinal focus, non-chiropractic journal, neuromusculoskeletal-focus, diagnosis of vascular pathology, and a decreasing trend of adverse effect vascular pathology CRs. Independent predictors of greater total citations (or citation rate) included ICD-10 categories of perinatal conditions, infections, "case" in title, case management topic, and physical therapy, integrative, and dental journal type. Predictors of fewer citations included diseases of the blood, neoplasms, other findings not elsewhere classified, a title > 11 words, and multidisciplinary authorship. ICD-10 categories describing non-musculoskeletal diseases and special populations such as pediatrics, pregnancy, and perinatal conditions had few CRs. CONCLUSION Chiropractic CRs are diversifying from spine-related topics. Chiropractors are encouraged to publish objective, structured CRs within defined research gaps. Published CRs can inform the design of future research studies with a higher level of clinical relevance and evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert J. Trager
- Connor Integrative Health Network, Cleveland Medical Center, 11000 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
| | - Jeffery A. Dusek
- Connor Integrative Health Network, Cleveland Medical Center, 11000 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Daniels CJ, Cupler ZA, Gliedt JA, Walters S, Schielke AL, Hinkeldey NA, Golley DJ, Hawk C. Manipulative and manual therapies in the management of patients with prior lumbar surgery: A systematic review. Complement Ther Clin Pract 2020; 42:101261. [PMID: 33276229 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2020.101261] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2020] [Revised: 11/12/2020] [Accepted: 11/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Pain and disability may persist following lumbar spine surgery and patients may subsequently seek providers trained in manipulative and manual therapy (MMT). This systematic review investigates the effectiveness of MMT after lumbar surgery through identifying, summarizing, assessing quality, and grading the strength of available evidence. Secondarily, we synthesized the impact on medication utilization, and reports on adverse events. METHODS Databases and grey literature were searched from inception through August 2020. Article extraction consisted of principal findings, pain and function/disability, medication consumption, and adverse events. RESULTS Literature search yielded 2025 articles,117 full-text articles were screened and 51 citations met inclusion criteria. CONCLUSION There is moderate evidence to recommend neural mobilization and myofascial release after lumbar fusion, but inconclusive evidence to recommend for or against most manual therapies after most surgical interventions. The literature is primarily limited to low-level studies. More high-quality studies are needed to make recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Cheryl Hawk
- Texas Chiropractic College, Pasadena, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Formation of Adhesive Arachnoiditis with Epidural Fibrosis as a Cause of Repeated Surgical Interventions (Clinical Case). ACTA BIOMEDICA SCIENTIFICA 2020. [DOI: 10.29413/abs.2020-5.3.8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
The work presents a rare clinical case of adhesive arachnoiditis, which developed against the background of epidural fibrosis during repeated surgical interventions. The cicatricial adhesion in the epidural space is formed in 100% of cases after surgery and is a frequent cause of intraoperative complications during repeated surgical interventions (bleeding, damage to the spinal cord and the dura mater with subsequent outflow of cerebrospinal fluid) and, therefore, an unsatisfactory result of surgical treatment with the formation of constant pain of various intensity, pseudomeningocele, commissural arachnoiditis, etc. The cicatricial adhesion in the epidural space is the main reason for the development of failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS), which today is an important and unresolved problem in spinal surgery. The epidural, as well as the subdural and subarachnoid space of the operated spinal motor segment of the spinal canal can be involved in the cicatricial adhesion, as it is shown in our clinical example. In this regard, it is important to prevent the development of the cicatricial adhesion in the epidural space during primary spinal surgeries, since with the increase in life expectancy of the population and increase in surgical activity during spinal surgeries, the patient can be operated repeatedly. Consequently, the question arises of preventing the formation of the cicatricial adhesion in 100% of cases with each surgical intervention, since the formed cicatricial adhesion in the epidural space does not have effective methods of conservative and surgical treatment and worsens favorable and satisfactory forecasts of surgical treatment for repeated surgical interventions.
Collapse
|