Percutaneous interventions for left atrial appendage exclusion: options, assessment, and imaging using 2D and 3D echocardiography

A comparison of conventional and advanced 3D imaging techniques for percutaneous left atrial appendage closure

Background

Understanding complex cardiac anatomy is essential for percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure. Conventional multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT) and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) are now supported by advanced 3D printing and virtual reality (VR) techniques for three-dimensional visualization of volumetric data sets. This study aimed to investigate their added value for LAA closure procedures.

Methods

Ten patients scheduled for interventional LAA closure were evaluated with MSCT and TEE. Patient-specific 3D printings and VR models were fabricated based on MSCT data. Ten cardiologists then comparatively assessed LAA anatomy and its procedure relevant surrounding structures with all four imaging modalities and rated their procedural utility on a 5-point Likert scale questionnaire (from 1 = strongly agree to 5 = strongly disagree).

Results

Device sizing was rated highest in MSCT (MSCT: 1.9 ± 0.8; TEE: 2.6 ± 0.9; 3D printing: 2.5 ± 1.0; VR: 2.5 ± 1.1; p < 0.01); TEE, VR, and 3D printing were superior in the visualization of the Fossa ovalis compared to MSCT (MSCT: 3.3 ± 1.4; TEE: 2.2 ± 1.3; 3D printing: 2.2 ± 1.4; VR: 1.9 ± 1.3; all p < 0.01). The major strength of VR and 3D printing techniques was a superior depth perception (VR: 1.6 ± 0.5; 3D printing: 1.8 ± 0.4; TEE: 2.9 ± 0.7; MSCT: 2.6 ± 0.8; p < 0.01). The visualization of extracardiac structures was rated less accurate in TEE than MSCT (TEE: 2.6 ± 0.9; MSCT: 1.9 ± 0.8, p < 0.01). However, 3D printing and VR insufficiently visualized extracardiac structures in the present study.

Conclusion

A true 3D visualization in VR or 3D printing provides an additional value in the evaluation of the LAA for the planning of percutaneous closure. In particular, the superior perception of depth was seen as a strength of a 3D visualization. This may contribute to a better overall understanding of the anatomy. Clinical studies are needed to evaluate whether a more comprehensive understanding through advanced multimodal imaging of patient-specific anatomy using VR may translate into improved procedural outcomes.

Validation study of new left atrial appendage closure device measurement by two-dimensional and three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography

BACKGROUND

In left atrial appendage closure using WATCHMAN FLX, accurate device measurement by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is important. We aimed to experimentally validate appropriate methods of device measurement with two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) TEE compared with actual size.

METHODS

We prepared a full range of device sizes (20, 24, 27, 31, 35 mm), each with five different compression rates. Each device was measured by 2D and 3D TEE at depths of 2, 4, and 6 cm in vitro using inner, outer, and middle line methods. We compared the difference between the actual size by caliper and measurements at each compression rate and depth by the three methods in 2D and 3D TEE.

RESULTS

A total of 450 patterns of measurements were analyzed. The differences using the middle line method were much less than those using the inner and outer line methods in 2D and 3D TEE (2D TEE: 0.45 ± 0.36 vs. 2.55 ± 0.99 vs. 2.59 ± 0.72 mm, p < 0.01; 3D TEE: 0.34 ± 0.27 vs. 2.38 ± 0.69 vs. 1.86 ± 0.77 mm, p < 0.01). Moreover, the differences in measurements by 3D TEE were more accurate than those of 2D TEE in the inner (2.47 ± 1.86 vs. 1.86 ± 0.77 mm, p < 0.01) and middle (0.58 ± 0.37 vs. 0.34 ± 0.27 mm, p < 0.01) line methods.

CONCLUSIONS

Middle line method by 3D TEE is the most reliable approach for device measurement at left atrial appendage closure using WATCHMAN FLX device.

Twice-daily rivaroxaban after percutaneous left atrial appendage closure for atrial fibrillation

Background and aim: Rivaroxaban is an emerging oral anticoagulant for postoperative anticoagulation after percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC). Because a once-daily dosing regimen of rivaroxaban causes fluctuations in the drug plasma concentration, we studied the feasibility and safety of twice-daily rivaroxaban as a postoperative anticoagulation regimen for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing LAAC. Methods: This study involved patients with AF who underwent LAAC and took rivaroxaban postoperatively. A total of 326 patients who received a standard total dose (15 or 20 mg) of rivaroxaban based on their creatinine clearance rate were divided into the twice-daily (BID) rivaroxaban group (n = 208) and once-daily (QD) rivaroxaban group (n = 118) according to their anticoagulation strategy. Transesophageal echocardiography was recommended at 3-6 months postoperatively to check for device-related thrombosis (DRT). Clinical outcomes were evaluated during postoperative anticoagulation. Results: The median CHA2DS2-VASc score (4 [3, 5] vs. 4 [3, 5], p = 0.28) and HAS-BLED score (2 [2, 3] vs. 2 [2, 3], p = 0.48) were not significantly different between the groups. During the anticoagulation period (4.1 ± 0.7 vs. 4.1 ± 0.9 months, p = 0.58), 148 (71.2%) patients in the BID group and 75 (63.6%) in the QD group underwent follow-up transesophageal echocardiography. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of DRT (1.4% vs. 2.7%, p = 0.60), minor bleeding (8.2% vs. 11.0%, p = 0.39), thromboembolic events (1.0% vs. 0.8%, p = 1.00), major bleeding (0.5% vs. 0.8%, p = 1.00), or death. Conclusion: A short course of twice-daily rivaroxaban following LAAC is a feasible alternative regimen with a low rate of major bleeding events, DRT, and thromboembolic events for patients with AF.

Deep learning networks in the segmentation of the left atrial appendage in 2D ultrasound: A comparative analysis

Left atrial appendage (LAA) is the major source of thromboembolism in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Currently, LAA occlusion can be offered as a treatment for these patients, obstructing the LAA through a percutaneously delivered device. Nevertheless, correct device sizing is a complex task, requiring manual analysis of medical images. This approach is sub-optimal, time-demanding, and highly variable between experts. Different solutions were proposed to improve intervention planning, but, no efficient solution is available to 2D ultrasound, which is the most used imaging modality for intervention planning and guidance. In this work, we studied the performance of recently proposed deep learning methods when applied for the LAA segmentation in 2D ultrasound. For that, it was created a 2D ultrasound database. Then, the performance of different deep learning methods, namely Unet, UnetR, AttUnet, TransAttUnet was assessed. All networks were compared using seven metrics: i) Dice coefficient; ii) Accuracy iii) Recall; iv) Specificity; v) Precision; vi) Hausdorff distance and vii) Average distance error. Overall, the results demonstrate the efficiency of AttUnet and TransAttUnet with dice scores of 88.62% and 89.28%, and accuracy of 88.25% and 86.30%, respectively. The current results demonstrate the feasibility of deep learning methods for LAA segmentation in 2D ultrasound.Clinical relevance- Our results proved the clinical potential of deep neural networks for the LAA anatomical analysis.

Real-Time Multiplanar Reconstruction Imaging Using 3-Dimensional Transesophageal Echocardiography in Structural Heart Interventions

The complexity of structural heart interventions has led to a demand for sophisticated periprocedural imaging guidance. Although traditional 2-dimensional (2D) transesophageal techniques are used widely, new-generation 3D ultrasound probes enable high temporal and spatial resolution. Multiplanar reconstruction of acquired 3D datasets has gained considerable momentum for precise imaging and to increase the validity of measurements. Previously, this technique was used after the acquisition of suitable 3D datasets. Recent advances in technology have enabled the use of live mode for multiplanar reconstruction across different ultrasound vendor platforms. The use of live multiplanar reconstruction can enhance the precision in real-time imaging, enable simultaneous visualization of structures of interest in multiple planes, reduce the need for probe manipulation, and thereby contribute to the success of the procedures. In this narrative review, the authors describe the rationale and utility for 3D transesophageal live multiplanar reconstruction, and outline its use for the structural heart interventions of mitral and tricuspid valve edge-to-edge repair, left atrial appendage occlusion, and the Lampoon procedure. A 3D transesophageal echocardiogram with live-multiplanar reconstruction has the potential to advance guidance of these complex interventions.

A prediction model based on functional mitral regurgitation for the recurrence of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) after post-circular pulmonary vein radiofrequency ablation (CPVA)

AIM

To construct a prediction model based on functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) to predict atrial fibrillation recurrence after the post-circular pulmonary vein radiofrequency ablation (CPVA).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 289 patients with PAF who underwent CPVA for the first time. The patients were randomly divided into modeling group and verification group at the ratio of 75:25. In the modeling group, the multivariate logistic regression was used to analyze and construct a prediction model for post-CPVA recurrence in PAF patients, which was then validated in the verification group.

RESULTS

(1) After 3-6 months of follow-up, the patients were divided into sinus rhythm group (252 cases) and recurrence group (24 cases); (2) In the modeling group, the age, left atrial diameter (LAD), and the degree of MR (mild, moderate, severe) were higher in recurrence group than that of the sinus rhythm group, and the left atrial appendage emptying velocity (LAAV) was lower in recurrence group (all p < .05). (3) A model for predicting the recurrence of PAF after radiofrequency ablation was constructed in the modeling group. The equation was: Logit(P) = -3.253 + .092 × age + 1.263 × mild MR + 2.325 × moderate MR + 5.111 × severe MR -.113 × LAAV. The area under the curve (AUC) of the model was .889 in modeling group and .866 in verification group, and the difference was not statistically significant (p > .05).

CONCLUSION

The prediction model of atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence after CPVA in PAF patients has good predictive efficacy, specificity, and accuracy.

Real-time 3D echocardiographic transilluminated imaging combined with artificially intelligent left atrial appendage measurement for atrial fibrillation interventional procedures

Aims: This study investigated the feasibility and accuracy of real-time three-dimensional (3D) echocardiographic transilluminated imaging (TrueVue Glass) in left atrial appendage (LAA) anatomical morphology and artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted 3D automated LAA measurement (3D Auto LAA) software in the preoperative evaluation of LAA occlusion (LAAO) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).

Method and results: Thirty-seven patients with AF were selected. Two-dimensional (2D) and real-time 3D transesophageal echocardiography (RT3D-TEE) were performed preoperatively, using conventional 3D, the new 3D TrueVue Glass mode, and cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA) to assess and type the morphology of LAA. Physiological parameters were measured using traditional 2D and 3D manual (3D Manual LAA), 3D Auto LAA, and CCTA. TrueVue Glass for LAA outer contour display was compared with CCTA. Comparisons were based on correlation and consistency in measuring the maximum diameter (LZ max), minimum diameter (LZ min), area (LZ area), and circumference (LZ cir) of LAA landing zone (LZ). Times and variabilities were compared. The concordance rate for external shape of LAA was 97.14% between TrueVue Glass and CCTA. 3D Auto LAA and 3D Manual LAA have a stronger correlation and higher consistency in all parameters. 3D Auto LAA showed higher intra- and interobserver reproducibility and allowed quicker analysis (p < 0.05). LAAO was performed in 35 patients (94.59%), and none of which had serious adverse events.

Conclusion: TrueVue Glass is the first non-invasive and radiation-free visualization of the overall external contour of LAA and its adjacent structures. 3D Auto LAA simplifies the measurement, making the preoperative assessment more efficient and convenient while ensuring the accuracy and reproducibility. A combination of the two is feasible for accurate and rapid assessment of LAA anatomy and physiology in AF patients and has practical application in LAAO.

Heart Team for Left Appendage Occlusion without the Use of Antithrombotic Therapy: The Epicardial Perspective

BACKGROUND

Left atrial appendage occlusion is an increasingly proposed treatment for patients with atrial fibrillation and poor tolerance to anticoagulants. All endovascular devices require antithrombotic therapy. Anatomical and clinical variables predisposing to device-related thrombosis, as well as post-procedural peri-device leaks, could mandate the continuation or reintroduction of aggressive antithrombotic treatment. Because of the absence of foreign material inside the heart, epicardial appendage closure possibly does not necessitate antithrombotic therapy, but data of large series are missing.

METHODS

Multidisciplinary team evaluation for standalone totally thoracoscopic epicardial appendage closure was done in 180 consecutive patients with atrial fibrillation and poor tolerance to antithrombotic therapy. One hundred and fifty-two patients consented (male 66.1%, mean age 76.1 ± 7.4, CHA2DS2VASc mean 5.3 ± 1.6, HASBLED mean 3.8 ± 1.1). Indications were cerebral hemorrhage (48%), gastro-intestinal bleeding (33.3%), and other bleeding (20.7%). No antithrombotic therapy was prescribed from the day of surgery to the latest follow up.

RESULTS

Procedural success was 98.7%. At a mean follow up of 38.2 ± 18.8 months, cardioembolic and bleeding events were 1.3% and 0.6%, respectively. Among patients with a history of blood transfusions (41.1%), none needed further transfusions or treatment post procedure.

CONCLUSION

Epicardial appendage occlusion without any antithrombotic therapy appears to be safe and effective. This strategy could be advised when minimization of bleeding risk concomitant to stroke prevention is needed.

Changes in left atrial appendage orifice following percutaneous left atrial appendage closure using three-dimensional echocardiography

Percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion is increasingly performed in patients with atrial fibrillation and long-term contraindications for anticoagulation. Our aim was to evaluate the effects of LAA occlusion with the Watchman device on the geometry of the LAA orifice and assess its impact on the adjacent left upper pulmonary vein (LUPV) hemodynamics. We included 50 patients who underwent percutaneous LAA occlusion with the Watchman device and had acceptable three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography images of LAA pre- and post-device placement. We measured offline the LAA orifice diameters in the long axis, and the minimum and maximum diameters, circumference, and area in the short axis view. Eccentricity index was calculated as maximum/minimum diameter ratio. The LUPV peak S and D velocities pre- and post-procedure were also measured. Patients were elderly (mean age 76 ± 8 years), 30 (60%) were men. There was a significant increase of all LAA orifice dimensions following LAA occlusion: diameter 1 (pre-device 18.1 ± 3.2 vs. post-device 21.5 ± 3.4 mm, p < 0.001), diameter 2 (20.6 ± 3.9 vs. 22.1 ± 3.6 mm, p < 0.001), minimum diameter (17.6 ± 3.1 vs. 21.3 ± 3.4 mm, p < 0.001), maximum diameter (21.5 ± 3.9 vs. 22.4 ± 3.6 mm, p = 0.022), circumference (63.6 ± 10.7 vs. 69.6 ± 10.5 mm, p < 0.001), and area (3.1 ± 1.1 vs. 3.9 ± 1.2 cm2, p < 0.001). Eccentricity index decreased after procedure (1.23 ± 0.16 vs. 1.06 ± 0.06, p < 0.001). LUPV peak S and D velocities did not show a significant difference (0.29 ± 0.15 vs. 0.30 ± 0.14 cm/s, p = 0.637; and 0.47 ± 0.19 vs. 0.48 ± 0.20 cm/s, p = 0.549; respectively). LAA orifice stretches significantly and it becomes more circular following LAA occlusion without causing a significant impact on the LUPV hemodynamics.

Computed tomography-based selection of transseptal puncture site for percutaneous left atrial appendage closure

BACKGROUND

An inferoposterior transseptal puncture (TSP) is generally recommended for percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure. However, the LAA is a highly variable anatomical structure. This may have an impact on the preferred TSP site.

AIMS

This study aimed to determine the optimal TSP site for percutaneous LAA closure in different LAA morphologies.

METHODS

In this prospective study, 182 patients undergoing percutaneous LAA closure were included. The spatial relationship of the LAA to the fossa ovalis and its consequence for TSP was assessed at preprocedural cardiac computed tomography (CCT).

RESULTS

Based on CCT analysis, it was predicted that coaxial alignment between the delivery sheath and the LAA would be obtained by an inferoposterior, inferocentral, or inferoanterior TSP in 75%, 16% and 8% of cases, respectively. This was also confirmed by procedural LAA angiogram in 175 cases (96%) with <30° angle between the delivery sheath and the LAA central axis. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified reverse chicken wing LAA (odds ratio [OR] 6.36 [1.85-29.3]; p=0.005) and posterior bending of the proximal LAA (OR 17.2 [3.3-96.2]; p<0.001) as independent predictors of a central or anterior TSP - this to increase the chance of obtaining coaxial alignment between the delivery sheath and the LAA.

CONCLUSIONS

An inferoposterior TSP is recommended in the majority of percutaneous LAA closure procedures in order to obtain coaxial alignment between the delivery sheath and the LAA. An inferior but more central/anterior TSP should be recommended in case of a reverse chicken wing LAA or posterior bending of the proximal LAA, which occurs in 20-25% of cases.

Clinical application of percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion guided only by transesophageal echocardiography without fluoroscopy and angiography in the patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The objective of this study was to understand the clinical efficacy and application of the percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (PLAAO) guided only by the transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), without using the fluoroscopy and angiography.

METHODS

During the time period of this study from June 2020 to June 2021, 32 patients underwent PLAAO and all underwent a TEE guided approach. The anatomical features of the left atrial appendage (LAA) were evaluated and observed by TEE before and during the procedure. LAA occluder device was selected for the appropriate size. Intraoperative TEE guided and monitored the process of PLAAO in real-time, and also evaluated the stability and tightness of the occluder device, following monitored postoperative complications.

RESULTS

The PLAAO procedure was successful in all the patients. No serious complications like dislocation of the occluder and embolism were seen. Postoperative TEE demonstrated that the PLAAO occluder devices were in a good position without residual shunting.

CONCLUSIONS

PLAAO only guided by TEE may become a safe and reliable surgical procedure, which can protect surgeons and patients from radiation, and can gradually become a novel surgical method of PLAAO with the practical application value.

Improving Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Device Size Determination by Three-Dimensional Printing-Based Preprocedural Simulation

Background

The two-dimensional (2D)-based left atrial appendage (LAA) occluder (LAAO) size determination by using transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is limited by the structural complexity and wide anatomical variation of the LAA.

Objective

This study aimed to assess the accuracy of the LAAO size determination by implantation simulation by using a three-dimensional (3D)-printed model compared with the conventional method based on TEE.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed patients with anatomically and physiologically properly implanted the Amplatzer Cardiac Plug and Amulet LAAO devices between January 2014 and December 2018 by using the final size of the implanted devices as a standard for size prediction accuracy. The use of 3D-printed model simulations in device sizing was compared with the conventional TEE-based method.

Results

A total of 28 cases with the percutaneous LAA occlusion were reviewed. There was a minimal difference [−0.11 mm; 95% CI (−0.93, 0.72 mm); P = 0.359] between CT-based reconstructed 3D images and 3D-printed left atrium (LA) models. Device size prediction based on TEE measurements showed poor agreement (32.1%), with a mean difference of 2.3 ± 3.2 mm [95% CI (−4.4, 9.0)]. The LAAO sizing by implantation simulation with 3D-printed models showed excellent correlation with the actually implanted LAAO size (r = 0.927; bias = 0.7 ± 2.5). The agreement between the 3D-printed and the implanted size was 67.9%, with a mean difference of 0.6 mm [95% CI (−1.9, 3.2)].

Conclusion

The use of 3D-printed LA models in the LAAO size determination showed improvement in comparison with conventional 2D TEE method.

Pre-procedural determination of device size in left atrial appendage occlusion using three-dimensional cardiac computed tomography

The complex structure of the left atrial appendage (LAA) brings limitations to the two-dimensional-based LAA occlusion (LAAO) size prediction system using transesophageal echocardiography. The LAA anatomy can be evaluated more precisely using three-dimensional images from cardiac computed tomography (CT); however, there is lack of data regarding which parameter to choose from CT-based images during pre-procedural planning of LAAO. We aimed to assess the accuracy of measurements derived from cardiac CT images for selecting LAAO devices. We retrospectively reviewed 62 patients with Amplatzer Cardiac Plug and Amulet LAAO devices who underwent implantation from 2017 to 2020. The minimal, maximal, average, area-derived, and perimeter-derived diameters of the LAA landing zone were measured using CT-based images. Predicted device sizes using sizing charts were compared with actual successfully implanted device sizes. The mean size of implanted devices was 27.1 ± 3.7 mm. The perimeter-derived diameter predicted device size most accurately (mean error = − 0.8 ± 2.4 mm). All other parameters showed significantly larger error (mean error; minimal diameter = − 4.9 ± 3.3 mm, maximal diameter = 1.0 ± 2.9 mm, average diameter = − 1.6 ± 2.6 mm, area-derived diameter = − 2.0 ± 2.6 mm) than the perimeter-derived diameter (all p for difference < 0.05). The error for other parameters were larger in cases with more eccentrically-shaped landing zones, while the perimeter-derived diameter had minor error regardless of eccentricity. When oversizing was used, all parameters showed significant disagreement. The perimeter-derived diameter on cardiac CT images provided the most accurate estimation of LAAO device size regardless of landing zone eccentricity. Oversizing was unnecessary when using cardiac CT to predict an accurate LAAO size.

Outcome of left atrial appendage closure using cerebral protection system for thrombosis: no patient left behind

BACKGROUND

Left atrial appendage (LAA) thrombosis increases the risk of stroke and its management has to be assessed. The aim of the present study is to evaluate short and long-term safety and efficacy of a standardized approach of percutaneous LAA closure (LAAC) routinely using a cerebral protection device (CPD) in patients with LAA thrombosis or sludge (LAAT).

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled 14 consecutive patients with atrial fibrillation complicated by LAAT presenting in a high-volume tertiary center. In seven patients (50%) LAAT was found after anticoagulant withdrawal for severe bleedings and in the remaining half LAAT was found despite appropriate anticoagulant therapy. All patients were treated with a standardized interventional approach of LAAC routinely using a CPD and guided by transoesophageal echocardiography.

RESULTS

Mean age was 68 ± 14 years and nine patients (64%) were male. Mean CHA₂ DS₂ -VASc and HAS-BLED scores were 3.3 ± 1.6 and 2.3 ± 1.1, respectively. Six patients (42.8%) presented organized thrombi while eight LAA sludge (57.1%). In 13 patients (92.8%) CPD was positioned through a right radial arterial access. Procedural success was achieved in all patients. In one patient we assisted to embolization of the thrombus during deployment of the device in the absence of neurological consequences. During a mean follow up of 426 ± 307 days, one patient died for non-cardiac cause while no embolic event or major bleeding were reported.

CONCLUSION

In an unselected cohort, LAAC with the systematic use of CPD was a feasible, safe and effective therapeutic option for LAAT both acutely and after long-term follow-up.

Manual zur Indikation und Durchführung spezieller echokardiographischer Anwendungen

Das zweite Manual zur Indikation und Durchführung der Echokardiographie bezieht sich auf spezifische Anwendungen der Echokardiographie und besondere Fragestellungen bei speziellen Patientengruppen. Dabei stehen v. a. praktische Aspekte im Vordergrund. Methodisch etabliert sind die transösophageale Echokardiographie, die Stressechokardiographie und die Kontrastechokardiographie. Bei nahezu allen echokardiographischen Untersuchungen spielen aktuell 3‑D-Echokardiographie und Deformationsbildgebung eine Rolle. Das gesamte Spektrum der echokardiographischen Möglichkeiten wird derzeit in Notfall- und Intensivmedizin, bei der Überwachung und Führung von Katheterinterventionen, bei strukturellen Herzerkrankungen, bei herzchirurgischen Operationen, bei der Nachsorge von kardialen Unterstützungssystemen, bei kongenitalen Vitien im Erwachsenenalter und bei der Versorgung von hochinfektiösen Patienten in Pandemiezeiten angewandt. Die diagnostischen Fortschritte der konventionellen und modernen echokardiographischen Anwendungen stehen im Fokus dieses Manuals. Die 3‑D-Echokardiographie zur Charakterisierung der kardialen Morphologie und die Deformationsbildgebung zur Objektivierung der kardialen Funktion sind bei vielen Indikationen im klinischen Alltag etabliert. Die Stressechokardiographie zur Ischämie‑, Vitalitäts- und Vitiendiagnostik, die Bestimmung der koronaren Flussreserve und die Kontrastechokardiographie bei der linksventrikulären Wandbewegungsanalyse und kardialen Tumordetektion finden zunehmend klinische Anwendung. Wie für die konventionelle Echokardiographie im ersten Manual der Echokardiographie 2009 beschrieben, erfordert der Einsatz moderner echokardiographischer Verfahren die standardisierte Dokumentation und Akquisition bestimmter Bildsequenzen bei optimierter Geräteeinstellung, da korrekte und reproduzierbare Auswertungen nur bei guter Bildqualität möglich sind.

Operative Workflow from CT to 3D Printing of the Heart: Opportunities and Challenges

Medical images do not provide a natural visualization of 3D anatomical structures, while 3D digital models are able to solve this problem. Interesting applications based on these models can be found in the cardiovascular field. The generation of a good-quality anatomical model of the heart is one of the most complex tasks in this context. Its 3D representation has the potential to provide detailed spatial information concerning the heart’s structure, also offering the opportunity for further investigations if combined with additive manufacturing. When investigated, the adaption of printed models turned out to be beneficial in complex surgical procedure planning, for training, education and medical communication. In this paper, we will illustrate the difficulties that may be encountered in the workflow from a stack of Computed Tomography (CT) to the hand-held printed heart model. An important goal will consist in the realization of a heart model that can take into account real wall thickness variability. Stereolithography printing technology will be exploited with a commercial rigid resin. A flexible material will be tested too, but results will not be so satisfactory. As a preliminary validation of this kind of approach, print accuracy will be evaluated by directly comparing 3D scanner acquisitions to the original Standard Tessellation Language (STL) files.

The prevalence and characteristics of candidates for percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion using a WATCHMAN device among patients who underwent atrial fibrillation ablation in a Japanese population

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) using a WATCHMAN device could be a treatment option for patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) with thromboembolic and bleeding risk. We sought to determine the prevalence and characteristics of patients with AF ablation who are potential candidates for WATCHMAN implantation in a Japanese population.

METHODS

We enrolled 2443 consecutive patients who had previously undergone AF ablation and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). We assessed their clinical characteristics and measured their LAA orifice diameter and depth retrospectively using the obtained TEE images. We defined patients who met both anatomical criteria (LAA orifice max diameter: 17-31 mm and LAA max depth > LAA orifice max diameter) and clinical criteria (CHA₂DS₂-VASc score ≥ 2 and HAS-BLED score ≥ 3) as LAAO candidates.

RESULTS

Among the 2443 enrolled patients, 361 (15%) met the clinical criteria, and 1928 (79%) met the anatomical criteria. Thus 12% (293/2443) of the total patient group met the criteria of LAAO candidates. LAAO candidates showed larger left atrial (LA) volume (77.6 ± 30.1 vs. 67.7 ± 29.1 mL, P < 0.001), larger LAA orifice diameter (22.5 ± 3.2 vs. 22.0 ± 4.3 mm, P = 0.026), and larger LAA depth (28.9 ± 4.6 vs. 27.0 ± 4.8 mm, P < 0.001). LAAO candidates made up only 23% of patients with CHA₂DS₂-VASc score ≥ 2 (N = 1295), whereas 78% of patients with a HAS-BLED score ≥ 3 (N = 378) were LAAO candidates.

CONCLUSION

Twelve percent of patients who underwent AF ablation were potential candidates for LAAO using a WATCHMAN device in this Japanese population. It is imperative to evaluate bleeding risk when considering the indications for LAAO.

Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion: An Emerging Option in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation at High Risk of Bleeding

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common cardiac arrhythmia with an estimated prevalence of 1% in the general population. It is associated with an increased risk of ischemic stroke, silent cerebral ischemia, and cognitive impairment. Due to the blood flow stasis and morphology, thrombus formation occurs mainly in the left atrial appendage (LAA), particularly in the setting of nonvalvular AF (NVAF). Previous studies have shown that >90% of emboli related to NVAF originate from the LAA, thus prevention of systemic cardioembolism is indicated. According to the current guidelines, anticoagulant therapy with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) or vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), represents the standard of care in AF patients, in order to prevent ischemic stroke and peripheral embolization. Although these drugs are widely used and DOACs have shown, compared to VKAs, non-inferiority for stroke prevention with significantly fewer bleeding complications, some issues remain a matter of debate, including contraindications, side effects, and adherence. An increasing number of patients, indeed, because of high bleeding risk or after experiencing life-threatening bleedings, must take anticoagulants with extreme caution if not contraindicated. While surgical closure or exclusion of LAA has been historically used in patients with AF with contradictory results, in the recent years, a novel procedure has emerged to prevent the cardioembolic stroke in these patients: The percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO). Different devices have been developed in recent years, though not all of them are approved in Europe and some are still under clinical investigation. Currently available devices have shown a significant decrease in bleeding risk while maintaining efficacy in preventing thromboembolism. The procedure can be performed percutaneously through the femoral vein access, under general anesthesia. A transseptal puncture is required to access left atrium and is guided by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). Evidence from the current literature indicates that percutaneous LAAO represents a safe alternative for those patients with contraindications for long-term oral anticoagulation. This review summarizes scientific evidences regarding LAAO for stroke prevention including clinical indications and an adequate patient selection.

Pre- and Postprocedural CT of Transcatheter Left Atrial Appendage Closure Devices

Transcatheter left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is an alternative to long-term anticoagulation therapy in selected patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation who have an increased risk for stroke. LAA closure devices can be implanted by means of either an endocardial or a combined endocardial and epicardial approach. Preprocedural imaging is key to identifying contraindications, accurately sizing the device, and minimizing complications. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) has been the reference standard imaging modality to assess the anatomy for LAA closure and to provide intraprocedural guidance. However, CT has emerged as a less-invasive alternative to TEE for pre- and postprocedural imaging. CT is comparable to TEE for exclusion of thrombus but is superior to TEE for the delineation of complex LAA anatomy, measurement for device sizing, and evaluation of pulmonary venous and extracardiac structures. CT provides accurate measurements of the LAA ostial diameter, landing zone diameter, and LAA length, which are vital for accurate sizing of the device. CT allows evaluation of the relationship with the pulmonary veins and other adjacent structures that can be injured during the procedure. CT also simulates procedural fluoroscopic angles and provides evaluation of the interatrial septum, which is punctured during LAA closure. CT also provides a more convenient method for the evaluation of postprocedural complications such as incomplete closure, peridevice leaking, device-related thrombus, and device dislodgement. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ^©RSNA, 2021.

Multimodality Approach for Endovascular Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Head-To-Head Comparison among 2D and 3D Echocardiography, Angiography, and Computer Tomography

Background: Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) requires accurate pre- and intraprocedural measurements, and multimodality imaging is an essential tool for guiding the procedure. Two-dimensional (2D TOE) and three-dimensional (3D TOE) transoesophageal echocardiography, cardiac computed tomography (CCT), and conventional cardiac angiography (CCA) are commonly used to evaluate left atrial appendage (LAA) size. However, standardized approaches in measurement methods by different imaging modalities are lacking. The aims of the study were to evaluate the LAA dimension and morphology in patients undergoing LAAC and to compare data obtained by different imaging modalities: 2D and 3D TOE, CCT, and CCA. Methods: A total of 200 patients (mean age 70 ± 8 years, 128 males) were examined by different imaging techniques (161 2D TOE, 103 3D TOE, 98 CCT, and 200 CCA). Patients underwent preoperative CCT and intraoperative 2D and 3D TOE and CCA. Results: A significant correlation was found among all measurements obtained by different modalities. In particular, 3D TOE and CCT measurements were highly correlated with an excellent agreement for the landing zone (LZ) dimensions (LZ diameter: r = 0.87; LAA depth: r = 0.91, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Head-to-head comparison among imaging techniques (2D and 3D TOE, CCT, and CCA) showed a good correlation among LZ diameter measurements obtained by different imaging modalities, which is a parameter of paramount importance for the choice of the LAAC device size. LZ diameters and area by 3D TOE had the best correlation with CCT.

Reference value of perimeter-derived diameter assessed by three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography in left atrial appendage occluder size selection

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to investigate the utility of perimeter-derived diameter (PDD) measured by three-dimensional (3D) transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in predicting the size of left atrial appendage (LAA) occluder.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Left atrial appendage landing zone diameter (LZD) was measured by two-dimensional (2D) TEE, 3DTEE, and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) as LZD-2Dmax, LZD-2Dmean, LZD-3Dmax, LZD-3Dmean, LZD-PDD, LZD-DSAmax, respectively, before and during transcatheter LAA closure with Watchman devices in 100 patients. A difference of one or more device size intervals between the predicted size and the size actually implanted was defined as mismatching. Seventy-eight patients were followed up by TEE to obtain occluder compression ratio. The correlation between LZD and the final implanted occluder size was 0.559, 0.641, 0.754, 0.760, 0.782, and 0.848 for LZD-2Dmax, LZD-2Dmean, LZD-3Dmax, LZD-3Dmean, LZD-PDD and LZD-DSAmax, respectively (P < .001). Matching ratio between the size predicted by retrospective measurements of LZD and the device size actually implanted was 65%, 57%, 66%, 63%, 70%, and 83% for LZD-2Dmax, LZD-2Dmean, LZD-3Dmax, LZD-3Dmean, LZD-PDD and LZD-DSAmax, respectively. There was no significant difference in LZD value, matching ratio, and compression ratio between the patients with eccentric and noneccentric LAA landing zone (P > .05). Compression ratio of the mismatching subjects was higher than that in the matching subjects when evaluated by LZD-2Dmean, LZD-3Dmean, and LZD-PDD (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Landing zone diameter derived from LAA perimeter measured by preprocedure 3DTEE showed reference value for LAA occluder size selection, providing superior correlation and matching ratio with the final implanted size and indicating the adjustment of oversizing.

Microtransesophageal Echocardiographic Guidance during Percutaneous Interatrial Septal Closure without General Anaesthesia

Objective

To study the safety and efficacy of microtransesophageal echocardiography (micro-TEE) and TEE during percutaneous atrial septal defect (ASD) and patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure.

Background

TEE has proven to be safe during ASD and PFO closure under general anaesthesia. Micro-TEE makes it possible to perform these procedures under local anaesthesia. We are the first to describe the safety and efficacy of micro-TEE for percutaneous closure.

Methods

All consecutive patients who underwent ASD and PFO closure between 2013 and 2018 were included. The periprocedural complications were registered. Residual shunts were diagnosed using transthoracic contrast echocardiography (TTCE). All data were compared between the use of TEE or micro-TEE within the ASD and PFO groups separately.

Results

In total, 82 patients underwent ASD closure, 46 patients (49.1 ± 15.0 years) with TEE and 36 patients (47.8 ± 12.1 years) using micro-TEE guidance. Median device diameter was, respectively, 26 mm (range 10–40 mm) and 27 mm (range 10–35 mm). PFO closure was performed in 120 patients, 55 patients (48.6 ± 9.2 years, median device diameter 25 mm, range 23–35 mm) with TEE and 65 patients (mean age 51.0 ± 11.8 years, median device diameter 27 mm, range 23–35 mm) using micro-TEE. There were no major periprocedural complications, especially no device embolizations within all groups. Six months after closure, there was no significant difference in left-to-right shunt after ASD closure and no significant difference in right-to-left shunt after PFO closure using TEE or micro-TEE.

Conclusion

Micro-TEE guidance without general anaesthesia during percutaneous ASD and PFO closure is as safe as TEE, without a significant difference in the residual shunt rate after closure.

Personalized Fluoroscopic Angles in Watchman™ Left Atrial Appendage Closure Landing Zone Assessment: A Three-Dimensional Printed Simulation Study

Background

Atrial fibrillation causes ischemic stroke when thrombi dislodge from a cardiac outpouching, the left atrial appendage (LAA), and embolize to the brain. LAA occlusion with the Watchman™ device (Boston Scientific Corporation, MA, USA), which prevents stroke, requires accurate LAA measurements for device sizing. We explore whether standard fluoroscopic LAA measurements improve when obtained at CT-derived viewing angles personalized to LAA anatomy while concurrently referring to three-dimensional (3D) CT.

Methods

Left atrial 3D reconstructions created from contrast CT (n=28) were analysed to identify personalized viewing angles wherein LAA dimensions (LAA maximum landing zone diameter and LAA length) were best observed. The 3D-CT reconstructions were then 3D printed with stands. Fluoroscopy of anatomically oriented models in the catheter lab simulated LAA angiography. Fluoroscopic images were acquired at standard (caudal 20˚/right anterior oblique 30˚) and personalized viewing angles. Repeated measurements of LAA dimensions were taken from CT (Control), fluoroscopy at standard angles (Standard), personalized angles (Blinded), and personalized angles while concurrently referring to 3D CT (Referred).

Results

Control measurements correlated and agreed better with Referred and Blinded measurements than with Standard measurements (diameter correlation and agreement: Control/Standard r=.554, limits of agreement [LOAs]=6.83/-5.91; Control/Blinded r=.641, LOA =5.67/-5.54; Control/Referred r=.741, LOA=4.69/-4.14; length correlation and agreement: Control/Standard r_s=.829, LOA=9.61/-3.02; Control/Blinded r_s=0.789, LOA=7.13/-4.94; Control/Referred r_s=.907, LOA=4.84/-4.13). Personalized angles resulted in hypothetical device size predictions more consistent with Control (device size correlation: Control/Standard r_s=.698, Control/Blinded r_s=.731, Control/Referred r_s=.893, P<0.001). False ineligibility rates were Standard=6/28, Blinded=6/28, and Referred=2/28.

Conclusion

This simulation suggests that personalized fluoroscopic viewing angles with in-procedural reference to 3D CT may improve the accuracy of LAA maximum landing zone diameter and length measurements at the Watchman landing zone. This improvement may result in more consistent device size selection and procedural eligibility assessment. Further clinical research on these interventions is merited.

Left Atrial Appendage Mechanical Exclusion: Procedural Planning Using Cardiovascular Computed Tomographic Angiography

Left atrial appendage (LAA) mechanical exclusion is being investigated for nonpharmacologic stroke risk reduction in selected patients with atrial fibrillation. There are multiple potential approaches in various stages of development and clinical application, each of which depends on specific cardiothoracic anatomic characteristics for optimal performance. Multiple imaging modalities can be utilized for application of this technology, with transesophageal echocardiography used for intraprocedural guidance. Cardiovascular computed tomographic angiography can act as a virtual patient avatar, allowing for the assessment of cardiac structures in the context of surrounding cardiac, coronary vascular, thoracic vascular, and visceral and skeletal anatomy, aiding preprocedural decision-making, planning, and follow-up. Although transesophageal echocardiography is used for intraprocedural guidance, computed tomographic angiography may be a useful adjunct for preprocedure assessment of LAA sizing and anatomic obstacles or contraindications to deployment, aiding in the assessment of optimal approaches. Potential approaches to LAA exclusion include endovascular occlusion, epicardial ligation, primary minimally invasive intercostal thoracotomy with thoracoscopic LAA ligation or appendectomy, and minimally invasive or open closure as part of cardiothoracic surgery for other indications. The goals of these procedures are complete isolation or exclusion of the entire appendage without leaving a residual appendage stump or residual flow with avoidance of acute or chronic damage to surrounding cardiovascular structures. The cardiovascular imager plays an important role in the preprocedural and postprocedural assessment of the patient undergoing LAA exclusion.

Anatomic Considerations for Epicardial and Endocardial Left Atrial Appendage Closure

Left atrial appendage closure is an increasingly used means of achieving thromboprophylaxis in atrial fibrillation, particularly in patients with contraindications to anticoagulation. Left atrial appendage anatomy is highly variable, and preprocedural imaging is critical to choosing the correct device and approach for left atrial appendage closure. This article reviews the common endocardial and epicardial closure systems, including anatomic considerations, advantages and disadvantages, as well as complications to be avoided.

Roles of Transesophageal Echocardiography and Cardiac Computed Tomography for Evaluation of Left Atrial Thrombus and Associated Pathology: A Review and Critical Analysis

Evaluation of the left atrium and left atrial appendage for the presence of thrombus prior to cardioversion and pulmonary vein isolation, and of the entire heart for embolic sources in the setting of cryptogenic stroke, has long been standard medical care. Guidelines have uniformly recommended transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) to accomplish these goals. In recent years, computed tomographic angiography has demonstrated diagnostic accuracy similar to that of TEE for the detection of thrombus. Analysis of the pertinent data and relative merits of the 2 technologies leads to the conclusions that: 1) both modalities have some unique, nonoverlapping capabilities that may dictate their use in specific situations; 2) computed tomographic angiography is a reasonable alternative to TEE when the primary aim is to exclude left atrial and left atrial appendage thrombus and in patients in whom the risks associated with TEE outweigh the benefits; and 3) both options should be discussed with the patient in the setting of shared decision making.

Three-dimensional printing in structural heart disease and intervention

Three-dimensional (3D) printing refers to the process by which physical objects are built by depositing materials in layers based on a specific digital design. It was initially used in manufacture industry. Inspired by the technology, clinicians have recently attempted to integrate 3D printing into medical applications. One of the medical specialties that has recently made such attempt is cardiology, especially in the field of structural heart disease (SHD). SHD refers to a group of non-coronary cardiovascular disorders and related interventions. Obvious examples are aortic stenosis, mitral regurgitation, atrial septal defect, and known or potential left atrial appendage (LAA) clots. In the last decade, cardiologists have witnessed a dramatic increase in the types and complexity of catheter-based interventions for SHD. Current imaging modalities have important limitations in accurate delineation of cardiac anatomies necessary for SHD interventions. Application of 3D printing in SHD interventional planning enables tangible appreciation of cardiac anatomy and allows in vitro interventional device testing. 3D printing is used in diagnostic workup, guidance of treatment strategies, and procedural simulation, facilitating hemodynamic research, enhancing interventional training, and promoting patient-clinician communication. In this review, we attempt to define the concept, technique, and work flow of 3D printing in SHD and its interventions, highlighting the reported clinical benefits and unsolved issues, as well as exploring future developments in this field.

ACC/AATS/AHA/ASE/ASNC/HRS/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR/STS 2019 Appropriate Use Criteria for Multimodality Imaging in the Assessment of Cardiac Structure and Function in Nonvalvular Heart Disease : A Report of the American College of Cardiology Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Heart Association, American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Rhythm Society, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons

This document is the second of 2 companion appropriate use criteria (AUC) documents developed by the American College of Cardiology, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Heart Association, American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Rhythm Society, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. The first document (J Am Coll Cardiol 2017;70:1647-1672) addresses the evaluation and use of multimodality imaging in the diagnosis and management of valvular heart disease, whereas this document addresses this topic with regard to structural (nonvalvular) heart disease. While dealing with different subjects, the 2 documents do share a common structure and feature some clinical overlap. The goal of the companion AUC documents is to provide a comprehensive resource for multimodality imaging in the context of structural and valvular heart disease, encompassing multiple imaging modalities.Using standardized methodology, the clinical scenarios (indications) were developed by a diverse writing group to represent patient presentations encountered in everyday practice and included common applications and anticipated uses. Where appropriate, the scenarios were developed on the basis of the most current American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Clinical Practice Guidelines.A separate, independent rating panel scored the 102 clinical scenarios in this document on a scale of 1 to 9. Scores of 7 to 9 indicate that a modality is considered appropriate for the clinical scenario presented. Midrange scores of 4 to 6 indicate that a modality may be appropriate for the clinical scenario, and scores of 1 to 3 indicate that a modality is considered rarely appropriate for the clinical scenario.The primary objective of the AUC is to provide a framework for the assessment of these scenarios by practices that will improve and standardize physician decision making. AUC publications reflect an ongoing effort by the American College of Cardiology to critically and systematically create, review, and categorize clinical situations in which diagnostic tests and procedures are utilized by physicians caring for patients with cardiovascular diseases. The process is based on the current understanding of the technical capabilities of the imaging modalities examined.

Thromboembolism in the Absence of Atrial Fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with thrombus formation in the left atrial appendage and systemic embolic events including ischemic stroke. Cardiogenic thromboembolism can also occur in the absence of clinical AF as a result of various pathological conditions affecting the endocardium. The inconsistent temporal relation between AF and ischemic events has stimulated exploration for factors other than clinical AF that contribute to thromboembolism. These include subclinical AF, a thrombogenic atrial cardiomyopathy, and left atrial appendage dysfunction and embolism from other sources. In conclusion, thromboembolism during normal sinus rhythm is likely multifactorial, involving intertwined pathologic processes. Patients at risk, if accurately identified, could theoretically benefit from anticoagulation.

Left Atrial Occlusion Device Implantation: the Role of the Echocardiographer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Atrial fibrillation is the most common arrhythmia worldwide and is a major risk factor for embolic stroke. For patients with atrial fibrillation who are unable to tolerate systemic anticoagulation, left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion has been shown to mitigate stroke risk. In this article, we describe the vital role of the echocardiographer in intraprocedural guidance of percutaneous LAA occlusion procedures as well as in the pre- and post-procedure assessment of these patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

A few percutaneously delivered devices for LAA exclusion from the systemic circulation are available in contemporary practice. These devices employ an either exclusive endocardial LAA occlusion approach, such as the Watchman (Boston Scientific, Maple Grove, MN) and Amulet (St. Jude Medical, Minneapolis, MN), or both an endocardial and pericardial (epicardial) approach such as the Lariat procedure (SentreHEART, Palo Alto, CA). Two- and three-dimension transesophageal echocardiography is critical for patient selection, procedure planning, procedural guidance, and ensuring satisfactory immediate as well as long-term LAA occlusion/exclusion efficacy. This review will provide an overview of the role of the echocardiographer in all aspects of LAA occlusion/exclusion procedures for the most commonly used commercially available devices in current practice.

The value of the left atrial appendage orifice perimeter of 3D model based on 3D TEE data in the choice of device size of LAmbre™ occluder

Preoperative optimal selection of the occluder size is crucial in percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion, and the maximal width of the LAA orifice is the main reference index, however it can not fully meet the practical operation requirements. We retrospectively analyzed three-dimensional (3D) transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and computed tomography (CT) imaging dataset of the 41 patients who underwent LAA occlusion with LAmbre™ system. The LAA orifice parameters were overall evaluated to determine their role in device size selection. Eight LAA 3D models of the four cases who had been replaced their device during the procedure based on TEE and CT were printed out to verify the optimal parameter decision strategy. There was a significant concordance of the results between 3D TEE and CT in the LAA orifice evaluation. The correlations between the perimeter and maximal width measurements by 3D TEE and the closure disk of the device were stronger than that between the area measurements and the closure disk (r = 0.93, 0.95, 0.86, respectively and p < 0.001 all), and the result was similar to that by CT (r = 0.92, 0.93, 0.84, respectively and p < 0.001 all). The ratios of the maximal width to the minimal width of the four cases were all > 1.4, however the rest 37 cases were all ≤ 1.4. Based on the comprehensive assessment of the LAA orifice perimeter and maximal width of the 3D printed models, the experiments were all succeed just for one try. The LAA orifice perimeter of 3D printed model based on 3D TEE may help in choosing the optimal device size of LAmbre™, especially for the LAA with flater ostial shape.

Semiautomatic Estimation of Device Size for Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion in 3-D TEE Images

Left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion is used to reduce the risk of thromboembolism in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation by obstructing the LAA through a percutaneously delivered device. Nonetheless, correct device sizing is complex, requiring the manual estimation of different measurements in preprocedural/periprocedural images, which is tedious and time-consuming and with high interobserver and intraobserver variability. In this paper, a semiautomatic solution to estimate the required relevant clinical measurements is described. This solution starts with the 3-D segmentation of the LAA in 3-D transesophageal echocardiographic images, using a constant blind-ended model initialized through a manually defined spline. Then, the segmented LAA surface is aligned with a set of templates, i.e., 3-D surfaces plus relevant measurement planes (manually defined by one observer), transferring the latter to the unknown situation. Specifically, the alignment is performed in three consecutive steps, namely: 1) rigid alignment using the LAA clipping plane position; 2) orientation compensation using the circumflex artery location; and 3) anatomical refinement through a weighted iterative closest point algorithm. The novel solution was evaluated in a clinical database with 20 volumetric TEE images. Two experiments were set up to assess: 1) the sensitivity of the model's parameters and 2) the accuracy of the proposed solution for the estimation of the clinical measurements. Measurement levels manually identified by two observers were used as ground truth. The proposed solution obtained results comparable to the interobserver variability, presenting narrower limits of agreement for all measurements. Moreover, this solution proved to be fast, taking nearly 40 s (manual analysis took 3 min) to estimate the relevant measurements while being robust to the variation of the model's parameters. Overall, the proposed solution showed its potential for fast and robust estimation of the clinical measurements for occluding device selection, proving its added value for clinical practice.

Device Sizing Guided by Echocardiography-Based Three-Dimensional Printing Is Associated with Superior Outcome after Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion

BACKGROUND

Left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion is an alternative to anticoagulation for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation. Accurate device sizing is crucial for optimal outcome. Patient-specific LAA models can be created using three-dimensional (3D) printing from 3D transesophageal echocardiographic (TEE) images, allowing in vitro model testing for device selection. The aims of this study were to assess the association of model-based device selection with procedural safety and efficacy and to determine if preprocedural model testing leads to superior outcomes.

METHODS

In 72 patients who underwent imaging-guided LAA occlusion, 3D models of the LAA were created from 3D TEE data sets retrospectively (retrospective cohort). The optimal device determined by in vitro model testing was compared with the actual device used. Associations of model-match and model-mismatch device sizing with outcomes were analyzed. In another 32 patients, device selection was prospectively guided by 3D models in adjunct to imaging (prospective cohort). The impact of model-based sizing on outcomes was assessed by comparing the two cohorts.

RESULTS

Patients in the retrospective cohort with model-mismatch sizing had longer procedure times, more implantation failures, more devices used per procedure, more procedural complications, more peridevice leak, more device thrombus, and higher cumulative incidence rates of ischemic stroke and cardiovascular or unexplained death (P < .05 for all) over 3.0 ± 2.3 years after LAA occlusion. Compared with the retrospective imaging-guided cohort, the prospective model-guided patients achieved higher implantation success and shorter procedural times (P < .05) without complications. Clinical device compression (r = 0.92) and protrusion (r = 0.95) agreed highly with model testing (P < .0001). Predictors for sizing mismatch were nonwindsock morphology (odds ratio, 4.7) and prominent LAA trabeculations (odds ratio, 7.1).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients undergoing LAA occlusion, device size selection in agreement with 3D-printed model-based sizing is associated with improved safety and efficacy. Preprocedural device sizing with 3D models in adjunct to imaging guidance may lead to superior outcomes.

Left atrial appendage occlusion using a Watchman device in a transplanted heart with biatrial anastomosis

A percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion using a Watchman device was performed in a patient with prior biatrial anastomosis orthotopic heart transplant (OHT). Due to the anatomical changes following biatrial anastomosis, transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) imaging and transseptal puncture become technically challenging. We describe how the standard LAA views on TEE were obtained for device sizing, and how the transseptal puncture was modified to cross the scarred septum. This case demonstrates that LAA occlusion using a Watchman device in biatrial anastomosis OHT is safe and can successfully be done.

Percutaneous devices for left atrial appendage occlusion: A contemporary review

Patient with atrial fibrillation (AF) are at risk of developing stroke with the left atrial appendage (LAA) being the most common site for thrombus formation. If left untreated, AF is associated with 4 to 5 folds increase in the risk of ischemic stroke in all age groups. About 5% to 15% of AF patients have atrial thrombi on transesophageal echocardiography, and 91% of those thrombi are located in the LAA in patient with nonrheumatic AF. Although oral anticoagulants are the gold-standard treatment for stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular AF, some patients are at high risk of bleeding and deemed not candidates for anticoagulation. Therefore, LAA occlusion (LAAO) has emerged as alternative approach for stroke prevention in those patients. Surgical LAAO is associated with high rate of unsuccessful closure and recommended only in patients with AF and undergoing cardiac surgery. Percutaneous LAAO uses transvenous access with trans-septal puncture and was first tested using the PLAATO device. Watchman is the most common and only Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved device for LAAO. LAAO using Watchman device is non-inferior to warfarin therapy in preventing ischemic stroke/systemic thromboembolism. However, it is associated with lower rates of hemorrhagic stroke, bleeding and death. Amplatzer is another successful LAAO device that has CE mark and is waiting for FDA approval. Optimal antithrombotic therapy post LAAO is still under debate and highly patient-specific. The aim of this paper is to systematically review the current literature to evaluate the efficacy and safety of different LAAO devices.

Transnasal Transesophageal Echocardiography Guidance for Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure

In the local anesthesia state, left atrial appendage closure cannot be accomplished under the real-time guidance of conventional transesophageal echocardiography because it induces significant discomfort for the patient. Transnasal transesophageal echocardiography can be well-tolerated by patients without general anesthesia for a prolonged examination time and can acquire excellent images. This case report describes the initially successful percutaneous left atrial appendage closure under the real-time guidance of transnasal transesophageal echocardiography without general anesthesia in a nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patient. The device covered the ostium of the left atrial appendage properly and stably, and there was no significant residual peridevice leak or device-associated thrombus postoperatively.

Percutaneous closure of the left atrial appendage: The value of real time 3D transesophageal echocardiography and the intraoperative change in the size of the left atrial appendage

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the value of real time three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography (RT3DTEE) in percutaneous closure of the left atrial appendage (LAAC). In addition, this study also explored the change in the size of the left atrial appendage (LAA) from 24 hours before the operation to just before implantation during the operation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In a retrospective study, 32 patients underwent two-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography (2DTEE) and RT3DTEE 24 hours prior to operation and during operation. The maximal LAA orifice diameter (by 2DTEE, 22.7 ± 2.7 vs 24.6 ± 2.2 mm, P < 0.01; by RT3DTEE, 24.2 ± 2.9 vs 25.8 ± 2.7 mm, P < 0.01), the maximal landing zone diameter (by 2DTEE, 19.0 ± 2.8 vs 20.4 ± 2.8 mm, P < 0.01; by RT3DTEE, 20.4 ± 2.7 vs 22.6 ± 3.0 mm, P < 0.01), and the maximal depth diameter (by 2DTEE, 25.2 ± 3.2 vs 26.5 ± 3.0 mm, P < 0.01; by RT3DTEE, 26.4 ± 3.2 vs 27.5 ± 3.7 mm, P < 0.01) all increased significantly during the operation. The highest correlation (R) between the maximal landing zone diameter and the compressed occluder diameter was determined for RT3DTEE measurements during the operation (R = 0.90), whereas the landing zone diameter (R = 0.80) measured by 2DTEE was less correlated. In addition, our study showed that RT3DTEE was of great value in discriminating the LAA orifice shape, allowing differentiation of the LAA morphology and identification of the number of LAA lobes.

CONCLUSIONS

A certain amount of intravenous rehydration just before and during operation increased the LAA size significantly. The measurements by RT3DTEE showed a closer correlation to LAA occluder size than those by 2DTEE. The LAA displayed by RT3DTEE was more visible than that by 2DTEE.

ACC/AATS/AHA/ASE/ASNC/HRS/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR/STS 2019 Appropriate Use Criteria for Multimodality Imaging in the Assessment of Cardiac Structure and Function in Nonvalvular Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Heart Association, American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Rhythm Society, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons

This document is the second of 2 companion appropriate use criteria (AUC) documents developed by the American College of Cardiology, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Heart Association, American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Rhythm Society, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. The first document¹ addresses the evaluation and use of multimodality imaging in the diagnosis and management of valvular heart disease, whereas this document addresses this topic with regard to structural (nonvalvular) heart disease. While dealing with different subjects, the 2 documents do share a common structure and feature some clinical overlap. The goal of the companion AUC documents is to provide a comprehensive resource for multimodality imaging in the context of structural and valvular heart disease, encompassing multiple imaging modalities. Using standardized methodology, the clinical scenarios (indications) were developed by a diverse writing group to represent patient presentations encountered in everyday practice and included common applications and anticipated uses. Where appropriate, the scenarios were developed on the basis of the most current American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Clinical Practice Guidelines. A separate, independent rating panel scored the 102 clinical scenarios in this document on a scale of 1 to 9. Scores of 7 to 9 indicate that a modality is considered appropriate for the clinical scenario presented. Midrange scores of 4 to 6 indicate that a modality may be appropriate for the clinical scenario, and scores of 1 to 3 indicate that a modality is considered rarely appropriate for the clinical scenario. The primary objective of the AUC is to provide a framework for the assessment of these scenarios by practices that will improve and standardize physician decision making. AUC publications reflect an ongoing effort by the American College of Cardiology to critically and systematically create, review, and categorize clinical situations in which diagnostic tests and procedures are utilized by physicians caring for patients with cardiovascular diseases. The process is based on the current understanding of the technical capabilities of the imaging modalities examined.