Severe Bradycardia and Asystole Following Regadenoson in Pharmacological Myocardial Perfusion Imaging: Cases and Treatment Recommendations

Advanced Heart Block and Asystole After Regadenoson Infusion: When Cautionary Tales Become Reality

Regadenoson (brand name Lexiscan) is a specific adenosine receptor agonist commonly used in pharmacologic stress testing due to its coronary vasodilatory effects. Despite it being generally well-tolerated, the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology established absolute and relative contraindications to the use of regadenoson in patients with certain co-morbidities such as uncontrolled hyper/hypotension, sinus node disease, and second-degree heart blocks. While cases of advanced heart block after the administration of regadenoson have been reported, they remain incidental. We report the case of an 84-year-old male sustaining second-degree type II heart block, followed by pulseless electrical activity and asystole after the administration of regadenoson.

Asystole following Regadenoson administration: Review of literature, risk factors and management

Regadenoson, a selective A2A receptor agonist, is widely used for vasodilator stress myocardial perfusion imaging and has a superior adverse effect profile when compared with other agents. However, with widespread use, there have been several reported cases of Regadenoson induced bradyarrhythmias and even asystole in patients with no known conduction system disease. In this article, we report a case of asystole following Regadenoson administration, evaluate mechanisms and risk factors for Regadenoson induced bradyarrhythmias to better identify patients at risk. We also review the available treatment options and propose recommendations for limiting its risk.

Safety and tolerability of regadenoson in comparison with adenosine stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance: Data from a multicentre prospective registry

To assess the feasibility and incidence of immediate complications of stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) with regadenoson in comparison with adenosine in a large referral population. This is a large, multicenter, prospective registry of vasodilator stress-CMR in a referral population. We recorded the clinical and demographic data, quality of test, CMR findings, hemodynamic data, and complications. Between January 2016 and July 2019, 2908 patients underwent stress-CMR, 2253 with regadenoson and 655 with adenosine. 25.1% of patients had previously known coronary artery disease (CAD). In 305 patients regadenoson was used due to presence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or asthma, while in 1948 subjects regadenoson was used as first-line vasodilator. Quality was optimal in 90.0%, suboptimal in 9.5%, and poor in 0.5%. Images were diagnostic in 98.9%. After stress with regadenoson, aminophylline 200 mg was administered intravenously in all patients. No patient died or had severe immediate complications with regadenoson as opposed to 2 severe bronchospasm with adenosine (p = 0.05). 11 patients (0.5%) had non-severe complications with regadenoson and five patients (0.8%) with adenosine (p = n.s.). Only two patients (0.088%) had non-severe bronchospasm after regadenoson administration. All complications were solved in the CMR unit, with no need for further specific care. Factors significantly associated with presence of complications were history of COPD or asthma and detection of inducible ischaemia. Patients had significantly more minor symptoms when adenosine was used (66.0% vs. 18.4%, p < 0.0001). Stress-CMR with regadenoson is feasible, providing diagnostic information in a referral population. Regadenoson had an excellent safety profile and better tolerability than adenosine, with no serious immediate complications and low incidence of non-severe complications. Only inducible ischaemia and previous history of COPD or asthma were associated with complications after regadenoson-CMR. The incidence of minor symptoms was low.