Should Every Patient With MINOCA Have Cardiac Magnetic Resonance?

Early versus late cardiac magnetic resonance in the diagnosis of myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) is responsible for about 10% of all acute myocardial infarctions (AMI). Therapeutic strategies and prognosis depend on the underlying etiology, and a multimodal approach is essential. The objectives of this study were to characterize the group of patients diagnosed with MINOCA and to valuate the diagnostic yield of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR).

METHODS

This was a retrospective, observational, and analytical study, including 516 patients admitted for a non-ST-elevation MI and with no significant coronary disease on coronary angiography between January 2016 and September 2021.

RESULTS

After the inclusion criteria, 163 patients remained of the 516 admitted to the study. They were divided into four groups based on the CMR results: MINOCA (n=51), Takotsubo syndrome (n=37), myocarditis (n=33), and without diagnosis (n=42). Most patients diagnosed with MINOCA were female with a mean age of 61.06±13.83 years. CMR identified the diagnosis in 74.2% of patients admitted for suspected acute MI, in which coronary angiography showed the absence of significant obstructions. The median time between hospital admission and CMR was significantly shorter in the groups that had a diagnosis compared with the group with no diagnosis (p=0.038), with a significant increase in diagnostic profitability if CMR was performed up to 14 days after admission (p=0.022). There were no deaths of cardiovascular etiology during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

CMR was fundamental as it identified the diagnosis in three out of four patients; it should be performed in the first 14 days.

Nonobstructive epicardial coronary artery disease: an evolving concept in need of diagnostic and therapeutic guidance

For decades, we have been treating patients presenting with angina and concerning electrocardiographic changes indicative of ischemia or injury, in whom no culprit epicardial coronary stenosis was found during diagnostic coronary angiography. Unfortunately, the clinical outcomes of these patients were not better than those with recognized obstructive coronary disease. Improvements in technology have allowed us to better characterize these patients. Consequently, an increasing number of patients with ischemia and no obstructive coronary artery disease (INOCA) or myocardial infarction in the absence of coronary artery disease (MINOCA) have now gained formal recognition and are more commonly encountered in clinical practice. Although both entities might share functional similarities at their core, they pose significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. Unless we become more proficient in identifying these patients, particularly those at higher risk, morbidity and mortality outcomes will not improve. Though this field remains in constant flux, data continue to become available. Therefore, we thought it would be useful to highlight important milestones that have been recognized so we can all learn about these clinical entities. Despite all the progress made regarding INOCA and MINOCA, many important knowledge gaps continue to exist. For the time being, prompt identification and early diagnosis remain crucial in managing these patients. Even though we are still not clear whether intensive medical therapy alters clinical outcomes, we remain vigilant and wait for more data.

Reduced stress perfusion in myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries

Myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) has several possible underlying causes, including coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD). Early cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) is recommended, however cannot provide a diagnosis in 25% of cases. Quantitative stress CMR perfusion mapping can identify CMD, however it is unknown if CMD is present during long-term follow-up of MINOCA patients. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate presence of CMD during long-term follow-up in MINOCA patients with an initial normal CMR scan. MINOCA patients from the second Stockholm myocardial infarction with normal coronaries study (SMINC-2), with a normal CMR scan at median 3 days after hospitalization were investigated with comprehensive CMR including stress perfusion mapping a median of 5 years after the index event, together with age- and sex-matched volunteers without symptomatic ischemic heart disease. Cardiovascular risk factors, medication and symptoms of myocardial ischemia measured by the Seattle Angina Questionnaire 7 (SAQ-7), were registered. In total, 15 patients with MINOCA and an initial normal CMR scan (59 ± 7 years old, 60% female), and 15 age- and sex-matched volunteers, underwent CMR. Patients with MINOCA and an initial normal CMR scan had lower global stress perfusion compared to volunteers (2.83 ± 1.8 vs 3.53 ± 0.7 ml/min/g, p = 0.02). There were no differences in other CMR parameters, hemodynamic parameters, or cardiovascular risk factors, except for more frequent use of statins in the MINOCA patient group compared to volunteers. In conclusion, global stress perfusion is lower in MINOCA patients during follow-up, compared to age- and sex-matched volunteers, suggesting that CMD may be a possible pathophysiological mechanism in MINOCA.Clinical Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT02318498. Registered 2014-12-17.