Usefulness of platysma muscle flap following superficial parotidectomy

Evaluation of functional and aesthetic outcomes of free dermal fat graft versus superficial musculoaponeurotic system flap after superficial parotidectomy: randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Parotidectomy is the standard procedure for treatment of many parotid lesions; however, it has several drawbacks. Facial asymmetry and Frey's syndrome are the most annoying complications to patients. Insertion of interpositioning grafts into the parotidectomy bed can decrease these complications significantly. Free dermal fat graft (FDFG) and superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) flap have very promising results. This RCT aimed to compare these two techniques regarding functional and aesthetic outcomes.

METHODS

Between February 2016 and October 2021, adult patients undergoing superficial conservative parotidectomy in a single centre for a benign indication were randomized into two equal groups using a closed envelope method. In one group, FDFG was inserted at the parotidectomy bed, whereas, in the other group, SMAS flap was performed. Preoperative, operative, and postoperative data were recorded and analysed. The primary outcome was the development of Frey's syndrome.

RESULTS

Seventy-eight patients were randomized into two equal groups of 39 patients. There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding development of Frey's syndrome. There was no significant statistical difference between study groups regarding demographic data, co-morbidities, parotid pathologies, specimen volumes, total operating time, and postoperative complications. A tendency for over correction was observed in FDFG and under correction in SMAS flap. There was no statistically significant difference between the study groups regarding the patients' aesthetic satisfaction with the majority displaying excellent satisfaction with no poor results.

CONCLUSION

FDFG and SMAS flap are simple, rapid, and reliable procedures and are effective in improving both functional and aesthetic outcomes post-parotidectomy. They have comparable results; however, selection of either procedure can be determined according to patient and tumour characteristics. Registration number: NCT05452837 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).

[Complications in the surgery of the parotid salivary glands. Causes, mechanisms of development, methods of prevention]

Operations for neoplasms of the parotid salivary gland require from the surgeon a deep knowledge of the anatomical and topographic features of this area and technical skill, which puts it in a number of «jewelry» operations that require patience and concentration. The review is devoted to the topic of specific postoperative complications after parotidectomy or subtotal resection of the gland. These include relapses of tumors, paralysis or paresis of facial muscles, Frey syndrome, salivary fistulas or sialocele, violation of skin sensitivity, soft tissue deformity. The review presents the frequency and causes of complications, mechanisms of their development, methods of prevention and elimination.

Meta-Analysis to Evaluate the Efficacy of Sternocleidomastoid Muscle Flap as a Reconstruction Modality in Prevention of Frey's Syndrome Following Parotidectomy

BACKGROUND

One of the commonest complications following parotidectomy is Frey's syndrome (FS). The use of sternocleidomastoid muscle (SCM) flap to prevent FS is controversial. Hence, this study has been designed to compare the effect of SCM flap with no reconstruction in prevention of FS following parotidectomy.

METHODOLOGY

An exhaustive literature search was conducted in July 2019. Studies focusing on sternocleidomastoid flap following parotidectomy were included in the meta-analysis. A random effects model was used to generate pooled estimates. Odds ratio with a 95% confidence interval was calculated for subjective symptoms and objective test.

RESULTS

A total of 125 studies were identified, out of which 17 studies were recruited in the meta-analysis. Sixteen studies were analyzed for the subjective symptoms, and ten were analyzed for the objective signs. There was no statistically significant difference in the occurrence of FS with the use of SCM flap on objective analysis. However, the subjective analysis showed a statistically significant reduction in FS following reconstruction with SCM flap after parotidectomy.

CONCLUSION

The present meta-analysis suggests that the use of SCM flap following parotidectomy has no effect in reducing the incidence of Frey's syndrome.

Autologous Free Dermal-Fat-Fascial Graft for Parotidectomy Defects: A Case Series

Background:

Frey’s syndrome and facial asymmetry from loss of parotid tissue are long-term sequelae of parotid surgeries causing significant morbidity. Various techniques have been used to fill the parotidectomy defect, preserve facial contour symmetry, and prevent Frey’s syndrome. Free dermal-fat-fascial graft (DFFG) is one such technique; however, its use is largely undocumented in the literature. In this case series, we investigate the efficacy of free DFFG in reconstructing parotidectomy defects at 2 tertiary care centers.

Materials and methods:

Medical records of 54 patients who underwent primary parotidectomy and immediate reconstruction with autologous abdominal free DFFG by 2 surgeons in George Washington University Hospital and McGill University Health Centre between 2007 and 2019 were collected prospectively. Patients responded to 2 questionnaires addressing postoperative outcomes.

Results:

Fifty-four patients were included; 32 superficial parotidectomies and 22 total parotidectomies were performed for 39 benign and 15 malignant tumors. Thirty-seven patients could be reached. Out of 37 patients who responded to the first questionnaire, 59% (22) reported complete facial symmetry, 27% (10) reported mild hollowness, and 14% (5) reported mild fullness. None declared noticeable hollowness or fullness. While 81% (30) did not experience Frey’s syndrome, 5.4% (2) experienced mild symptoms without disability, and 13.5% (5) experienced debilitating symptoms. Out of 37 patients, 8 patients responded to a second questionnaire addressing the outcome of the abdominal graft donor site. In regard to the donor site, 87.5% (7) were satisfied or very satisfied from its cosmetic appearance, 75% (6) were not bothered by its cosmetic appearance, and 87.5% (7) had no discomfort at the graft donor site. Patients did not report any other symptom at the graft donor site.

Conclusion:

In this large series of total parotidectomies including malignant pathologies, autologous abdominal free DFFG effectively prevented Frey’s syndrome and preserved facial cosmesis in most patients.

Prevention of Frey's Syndrome with the Use of Porcine Dermal Collagen Graft: Retrospective Analysis of 76 "Formal" Parotidectomies for Benign Pathologies

BACKGROUND

Frey's syndrome is a well-known complication of parotid surgery; its prevention may be achieved by the use of an interpositional barrier between the overlying flaps and the exposed parenchymal bed of parotid gland. The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate clinical outcomes with and without the interpositional placement of a porcine dermal collagen graft (PDCG) for prevention of syndrome occurrence.

METHODS

We conducted a 20-year retrospective study including the patients who had undergone "formal" (superficial, total, or subtotal) parotidectomies for benign pathologies. The inclusion criteria also involved patients that were (i) regularly monitored about clinical symptoms related to syndrome, and (ii) examined with Minor starch-iodine test. The severity of the diagnosed syndrome was retrospectively evaluated according to the grading score system of Luna-Ortiz. To assess group differences in terms of the extent of dissection in operating sites, we estimated the tumor and histological specimen volumes using the available dimensions.

RESULTS

We included 73 patients who had undergone 76 formal parotid surgeries. The surgical sites were divided into 2 groups: (1) Group A consisted of 44 sites that were reconstructed with a SMAS flap, and (2) Group B, comprised 32 sites where a PDCG was additionally applied as an artificial preventive barrier. At a mean follow-up of 26.3 months, a significantly lower incidence of clinically diagnosed Frey's syndrome was found after the use of dermal collagen interpositional barrier (P = .031). Specifically, subjective symptoms were reported at an incidence of 31.8% in Group A and 6.7% in Group B. Minor's test was positive at an incidence of 59.09% in Group A and 21.87% in Group B (P = .004, 95% CI). Severe Frey's syndrome was observed in 31.82% of the patients of Group A and in 3.12% of the patients of Group B (P = .002, 95% CI). Since there were no statistical significant differences between the volumes of the removed tumors and the excised histological specimens, the extent of dissection was not proved to influence the occurrence of Frey's syndrome in the compared groups.

CONCLUSION

Porcine dermal collagen is a safe, practical, and useful means for parotid reconstruction, since it seems to contribute in prevention of Frey's syndrome when increased amount of glandular tissue has to be removed. Additional randomized controlled studies with bigger samples are required to better assess the PDCG use in parotid surgery.

Different Surgical Strategies in the Prevention of Frey Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS

To define the best surgical technique able to reduce Frey syndrome (FS) incidence after parotidectomy.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review and network meta-analysis.

METHODS

An arm-based network analysis was conducted using a Bayesian hierarchical model. The primary and secondary outcomes were the incidence of subjective (clinical) and objective (positive starch-iodine test result) FS, respectively.

RESULTS

A total of 3830 patients with a median age of 50.35 years (n = 2323; IQR 44.25-54.18) were included for six interventions [temporoparietal fascia (TPFF), free fat graft (FFG), acellular dermal matrix (ADM), sternocleidomastoid muscle (SCM) flap, and superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) flap]. If compared to no treatment, the greatest reduction of subjective (clinical) FS incidence was measured for the TPFF (OR: 0.07, CI: 0.004-0.57), the ADM (OR: 0.09, CI: 0.02-0.35), and the FFG (OR: 0.11, CI: 0.03-0.42) techniques. However, a significant difference was measured also for the SCM flap (OR: 0.38, CI: 0.18-0.73) and for the SMAS flap (OR: 0.42, CI: 0.19-0.97). All treatments showed a significant reduction of the objective FS incidence if compared to no treatment (FFG, OR: 0.06, CI: 0.002-0.62; TPFF, OR: 0.07, CI: 0.01-0.33; ADM, OR: 0.11, CI: 0.03-0.44; SMAS, OR: 0.36, CI: 0.17-0.71; SCM, OR: 0.40, CI: 0.19-0.74).

CONCLUSIONS

TPFF, ADM, and FFG seem to be the best treatment strategies to prevent FS after parotidectomy. Further randomized controlled trials comparing these techniques should be conducted to define specific indications. Laryngoscope, 131:1761-1768, 2021.

Prospective outcomes following drainless superficial parotidectomy with sternocleidomastoid flap reconstruction

Background

Patients undergoing superficial parotidectomy for benign parotid lesions are at risk of postoperative complications, most notably cosmetic complications such as facial paralysis and contour defects, and functional complications including Frey’s syndrome. Traditionally, surgical drains have been placed at the end of surgery to prevent hematoma and sialocele formation. However, this can increase the risk of postoperative complications and contribute to a prolonged course in hospital. To try and prevent these risks and complications, we introduced a novel technique of a drainless parotidectomy by reconstructing the resulting parotid bed defect with a superiorly based sternocleidomastoid (SCM) rotational flap and by placement of gelfoam into the wound bed and a facelift dressing postoperatively to provide additional hemostasis and avoid drain placement.

Methods

All patients with benign parotid disease undergoing a drainless superficial parotidectomy and reconstruction with a superiorly based SCM rotational flap at our center were identified within a prospective cohort database between July 2010–2018. Primary outcomes included postoperative cosmetic and functional outcomes, complications and length of hospital stay. A secondary cost analysis was done to compare this novel technique to traditional superficial parotidectomy with surgical drain placement.

Results

Fifty patients were identified within the database and were included in the final analysis. The average length of hospital stay was 1.02 days. All patients were satisfied with their aesthetic outcome at 1 year. During long term follow-up, 63% of patients reported normal appearance of the operated side. Seven patient’s (14%) developed temporary facial paresis following surgery. All patients had resultant normal facial function at follow-up in 1 year. No patients developed subjective Frey’s Syndrome. Two patients (4%) developed a postoperative sialocele requiring drainage and one patient (2%) developed a hematoma on extubation requiring evacuation and drain placement. Cost analysis demonstrated a cost savings of approximately $975 per person following surgery.

Conclusion

In the current study, we introduced a novel approach of a drainless superficial parotidectomy using a superiorly based SCM flap, gelfoam and placement of a post-operative facelift dressing. This drainless approach was associated with good long-term cosmetic and functional outcomes with few postoperative complications. This new technique may also offer the potential for long-term savings to the health care system.

Graft interposition for preventing Frey's syndrome in patients undergoing parotidectomy

BACKGROUND

Frey's syndrome is characterised by transient flushing and sometimes facial sweating in the area of the auriculotemporal nerve. It most commonly occurs after parotidectomy, but other causes may include submandibular gland surgery, mandibular condylar fracture, obstetric (forceps) trauma, sympathectomy and metabolic disease. Although the pathophysiology of Frey's syndrome remains controversial, the generally accepted hypothesis is that it occurs as the result of injury to the auriculotemporal nerve.There is currently no clear evidence to establish the efficacy and safety of the different methods used for the treatment of Frey's syndrome, therefore the prevention of this symptom during surgery is important. The main method used for prevention is the interposition of a graft between the skin flap and the parotid bed during surgery. Biomaterials, allograft or autograft can be used for this purpose.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effects and safety of biomaterial, allograft or autograft interposition for the prevention of Frey's syndrome in patients undergoing parotidectomy, and to identify its effect on prevention and delayed occurrence.

SEARCH METHODS

The Cochrane ENT Information Specialist searched the Cochrane ENT Trials Register; Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2019, Issue 2); Ovid MEDLINE; Ovid Embase; CINAHL; Web of Science; ClinicalTrials.gov; ICTRP and additional sources for published and unpublished trials. The date of the search was 5 February 2019.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in patients with parotid disease (including tumours, inflammation, trauma etc.) undergoing parotidectomy with a minimal follow-up period of six months. We planned to include trials with interventions including biomaterial, allograft or autograft interposition alone or in combination with other surgical techniques. We included trials that compared any graft interposition and no graft interposition, or different graft interpositions.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used the standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. Our primary outcome measures were incidence rate of Frey's syndrome assessed clinically (Minor's starch-iodine test) and other complications (postoperative infection, subjective painful or restricted cervical movement, scar spread, rejection of the graft, complications related to the donor site such as accessory nerve injury and haematoma). Our secondary outcome measures were incidence rate of Frey's syndrome assessed by participants (by questionnaire) and sweating area assessed by Minor's starch-iodine test. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of the evidence for each outcome.

MAIN RESULTS

We included three RCTs (124 participants), two of which we assessed as at high risk of bias and one at unclear risk of bias. All studies were hospital-based and recruited participants undergoing superficial parotidectomy. Most participants were diagnosed with benign lesions of the parotid gland. Participants were followed up for more than six months. The studies evaluated the two comparisons shown below:Sternocleidomastoid muscle flap versus no flapTwo studies assessed this comparison. Both assessed the effects of the sternocleidomastoid muscle flap procedure on the incidence rate of Frey's syndrome assessed clinically but neither showed a significant difference between groups (risk ratio (RR) 0.08, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.00 to 1.23; 24 participants and RR 1.23, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.73; 36 participants; very low-certainty evidence). We did not pool the data due to the high heterogeneity (I² = 87%).One study found that the sternocleidomastoid muscle flap may result in little or no difference in other complications including haematoma (RR 2.18, 95% CI 0.09 to 50.16; 36 participants; low-certainty evidence), subjective painful or restricted cervical movement (RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.14 to 2.05; 36 participants; low-certainty evidence) and scar spread in the cervical region (RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.05 to 10.54; 36 participants; low-certainty evidence). Both studies reported the incidence rate of Frey's syndrome assessed by participants, with one reporting no events in either group and the other finding no evidence of a difference (RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.32 to 1.26; 36 participants; low-certainty evidence).Acellular dermal matrix versus no graftOnly one study assessed this comparison. Use of an acellular dermal matrix graft may result in little or no difference to the incidence rate of Frey's syndrome (assessed clinically) in comparison with the no graft group, but the evidence is very uncertain (RR 0.08, 95% CI 0.00 to 1.25; 30 participants; very low-certainty evidence).Acellular dermal matrix may slightly increase the wound infection rate compared with control (RR 17.00, 95% CI 1.02 to 282.67; 64 participants; low-certainty evidence). Acellular dermal matrix may result in little or no difference to the incidence of seromas or sialoceles (RR 2.33, 95% CI 0.66 to 8.23; 64 participants; low-certainty evidence). Acellular dermal matrix may result in little or no difference to the incidence rate of Frey's syndrome (assessed by participants) in comparison with the no graft group (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.04 to 3.04; 64 participants; low-certainty evidence).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The evidence for the effectiveness of graft interposition in preventing Frey's syndrome is of low or very low certainty. The use of acellular dermal matrix may be associated with an increase in the wound infection rate, and little or no difference in the incidence of seromas or sialoceles. Further studies are needed to draw reliable conclusions.

Effectiveness of platysma muscle flap in preventing Frey syndrome and depressive deformities after parotidectomy

BACKGROUND

Frey syndrome (FS) or depressive deformity (DD) occurring after parotidectomy significantly reduces a patient's quality of life. However, there seems to be no effective treatment strategy against these complications. In this study, we report our experience of using platysma muscle flap (PMF) to prevent the development of FS and DD after parotidectomy, and evaluate its effect subjectively and objectively.

METHODS

Superficial parotidectomy was performed for eight cases of parotid gland tumor, and a PMF was transferred to cover the site. The incidence of FS and DD were evaluated subjectively, using a questionnaire to the patients and board-certified reconstructive surgeons, and objectively, using Minor's starch-iodine test.

RESULTS

In seven patients, the defect could be completely covered with PMF, and none of them developed FS or obvious DD. However, in one patient, the defect could be only partially covered, and the patient developed complications in the exact site that the flap did not cover. Overall scores from the questionnaire were high in relation to both cosmetic and functional perspectives from most of the patients and all the surgeons. No patients had major postoperative complications requiring revision.

CONCLUSIONS

PMF can be useful to cover the defect and prevent complications after parotidectomy. PMF is relatively easy to perform with fewer complications; however, a complete coverage of the defect should be ensured to obtain optimal results.