Sialendoscopy-assisted transfacial surgical removal of parotid stones

Image-guided and sialendoscopy-assisted transoral approach for parotid duct stenosis and megaduct

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this communication was to introduce a novel combined image (magnetic resonance and computed tomography-guided and sialendoscopy-assisted transoral approach for the treatment of a parotid duct stenosis with megaduct.

METHODS

A 46-year-old woman was referred to our department for recurrent infections of the right parotid gland following unsuccessful multiple transoral surgical approaches for a Stensen's duct stricture with megaduct. An image (magnetic resonance and computed tomography)-guided and sialendoscopy-assisted transoral sialodochoplasty was planned and performed.

RESULTS

No complications occurred. The patient was discharged 2 days after surgery. No more swelling or infections occurred. The patient is currently symptom-free after a follow up of 11 months.

CONCLUSION

Although imaging navigation means more technical effort and costs, this novel approach can be considered a viable surgical opportunity for distal and mid-third parotid duct stenosis with concomitant megaduct, particularly in cases of persistent inflammation or iatrogenic scars due to previous surgery.

A Rare Case of Parotid Stone Adherence to the Facial Nerve

This case report details a complex case of parotid gland sialolithiasis with stones adherent to the facial nerve, a scenario that presents a significant surgical challenge. Traditional sialendoscopy failed to address the condition in a 23-year-old female patient, leading to the adoption of a combined endoscopic transcutaneous approach. This method successfully resolved the condition without intraoperative complications, maintaining intact facial nerve function postoperatively. The case emphasizes the importance of individualized surgical strategy and expert technique in advanced parotid surgery, advocating this approach for similarly complex sialolithiasis cases.

Comparison of two transcutaneous approaches for the removal of impacted parotid stones

The aim of this study was to comparatively evaluate the indications and treatment outcomes of two transcutaneous approaches for the removal of impacted parotid stones. Sixty-eight consecutive patients with impacted parotid stones underwent endoscopy-assisted lithotomy via a direct mini-incision or a peri-auricular flap. Clinical safety and outcomes were evaluated. Complete stone extraction was achieved in all patients. In the mini-incision group (52 patients), the stones were in the middle third of the main duct in 31 patients, at the hilum in 16, and in the intraglandular duct in five. In the flap group (16 patients), they were in the middle third of the main duct in one patient, at the hilum in seven, and in the intraglandular duct in eight. Salivary fistula occurred in five mini-incision group patients (9.6%) and four flap group patients (25%). The clinical outcome in the mini-incision group (47 patients, median 25 months of follow-up) was good in 28 patients, fair in 13, and poor in six (12.8%). The clinical outcome in the flap group (16 patients, median 84 months of follow-up) was good in nine patients, fair in five, and poor in two (12.5%). The direct mini-incision approach was found to be safe and effective for impacted stones in the middle third, hilum, and proximal third of the main duct, while the peri-auricular approach would be best reserved for deeper intraglandular stones.

Treatment of Sialolithiasis: What Has Changed? An Update of the Treatment Algorithms and a Review of the Literature

Treatment for sialolithiasis has undergone significant changes since the 1990s. Following the development of new minimally invasive and gland-preserving treatment modalities, a 40–50% rate of gland resection was reduced to less than 5%. Extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL), refinement and extension of methods of transoral duct surgery (TDS), and in particular diagnostic and interventional sialendoscopy (intSE) are substantial parts of the new treatment regimen. It has also become evident that combining the different treatment modalities further increases the effectiveness of therapy, as has been especially evident with the combined endoscopic–transcutaneous approach. In the wake of these remarkable developments, a treatment algorithm was published in 2009 including all the known relevant therapeutic tools. However, new developments have also taken place during the last 10 years. Intraductal shock-wave lithotripsy (ISWL) has led to remarkable improvements thanks to the introduction of new devices, instruments, materials, and techniques, after earlier applications had not been sufficiently effective. Techniques involving combined approaches have been refined and modified. TDS methods have been modified through the introduction of sialendoscopy-assisted TDS in submandibular stones and a retropapillary approach for distal parotid sialolithiasis. Recent trends have revealed a potential for significant changes in therapeutic strategies for both major salivary glands. For the submandibular gland, ISWL has replaced ESWL and TDS to some extent. For parotid stones, ISWL and modifications of TDS have led to reduced use of ESWL and the combined transcutaneous–sialendoscopic approach. To illustrate these changes, we are here providing an updated treatment algorithm, including tried and tested techniques as well as promising new treatment modalities. Prognostic factors (e.g., the size or location of the stones), which are well recognized as having a strong impact on the prognosis, are taken into account and supplemented by additional factors associated with the new applications (e.g., the visibility or accessibility of the stones relative to the anatomy of the duct system).

Sialendoscopy-assisted combined approach for parotid sialolithotomy: Our long-term experience

OBJECTIVES

To assess the long-term outcome of sialendoscopy-assisted combined approach for parotid sialolithotomy with gland preservation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective study of patients treated with a combined sialendoscopic and open approach was conducted between 2011 and 2020. Demographic data of patients such as operative technique, stone size, stone location, complications, and symptom relief were collected. Patients were followed up via clinical examination and questionnaires.

RESULTS

Seventy-four patients were included and underwent endoscopy-assisted combined operations for the removal of 98 parotid stones. Of the 98 stones, 92(94%) stones were completely removed and 6(6%) were partially removed. At a mean follow-up of 47.1 ± 35 months, 65 of 74 patients (88%) achieved long-term success. Patients with stone incomplete removal were significantly more often to develop the recurrence of obstructive symptoms (p = 0.000) There were no cases of facial nerve injury or fistula formation. Gland function was preserved in 73 of 74 patients (99%).

CONCLUSIONS

The combined approach for parotid stones is a safe and gland-preserving alternative to parotidectomy. The techniques described here show high success rates and good long-term results, and they avoided the need for gland resection in >95% of cases.

Combined sialendoscopic/mini-preauricular microscopic approach for large proximal parotid sialolithiasis

OBJECTIVE

To describe and evaluate a combined approach for sialendoscopic stone localization with microscopic mini-preauricular incision external stone extraction as a gland-sparing minimally invasive surgical management in cases of large proximal duct or intraparenchymal parotid gland sialolithiasis.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of a single primary surgeon's patient series of 21 cases operated in a 5-year period in a tertiary care university and private practice hospitals.

RESULTS

Study included 16 males and five females, with age range 12-68 years (mean 40.9 ± 14.5). Nineteen out of the 21 patients had their stones completely removed (90.5%), with two not completing the procedure due to inability of intraoperative endoscopic stone visualization. In total 25 stones were extracted with six patients having two stones. Longest diameter of single (or first) stone was 5-16 mm (mean 9.1 ± 2.9) and second was 3-5 mm (mean, 3.9 ± 0.6). Endoscopic findings showed 14/25 stones in the proximal main parotid duct and 11/25 in one of its secondary parenchymal branches. Stents were used in 4/19 cases (21.1%). No major complications occurred. Minor complications included two postoperative conservatively managed seromas. All 19 cases had completely intact facial nerve function, good parotid salivary flow and acceptable esthetic result after median follow-up period of 26 months (range 6-62).

CONCLUSION

The combined sialendoscopic/microscopic mini-preauricular approach is a highly effective and safe gland-preserving method for large proximal parotid sialolithiasis management with a main limitation being inability to visualize the stone endoscopically.

Sialendoscopy-assisted transoral approach for parotid gland lithiasis

INTRODUCTION

Although lithiasis represents more than 60% of all cases of salivary gland obstruction, only 20% occurs in the Stensen´s duct. Nonetheless, the potential complications related to parotid gland surgery due to facial nerve injury, makes the development of minimally invasive techniques highly relevant.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A pilot study was conducted to assess results of patients treated by sialendoscopy-assisted trans-oral approach to treat Stensen´s duct lithiasis.

RESULTS

Eight patients were included; all of them operated satisfactorily. Six of them were male, and 2 were female. The mean size of the stones was 9.6 mm (Min: 6 mm/Max: 16 mm). Regarding to lithiasis location: it was anterior to the masseter line in the distal third of the Stensen's duct in seven patients and in another patient was immediately below the buccinator muscle. During the follow-up, all patients presented a healthy functioning of the gland after the compressive massage. Regarding complications, one patient presented a Stensen's duct stenosis, which required reintervention.

CONCLUSION

The transoral Stensen´s duct approach represents a safe technique for lithiasis bigger than 3 mm in the distal portion of the Stensen´s duct, anterior to the Masseter Muscle line and when other minimal invasive techniques fail.

A Pilot Study to Assess the Sialendoscopy-Assisted Transfacial Approach in Parotid Gland Sialolithiasis

INTRODUCTION

Twenty percent of the total lithiasis that affect a major salivary gland will be found in the parotid gland. An exclusive sialoendoscopic approach has achieved success rates close to 80%. In a significant percentage of these remaining cases, combined transfacial approaches assisted by sialendoscopy are presented as an option to be taken into account.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A prospective analysis of cases treated by combined transfacial approach assisted by sialendoscopy for lithiasis of the parotid gland and the impact of the facial nerve stimulator used during surgery.

RESULTS

Five patients were included; all of them operated satisfactorily. In 4 of them, the approach proposed by McGurk and modified by Capaccio was used, and in 1 of them, the approach proposed by Nahlieli was used. We suffered a complication in just case due to the appearance of postoperative sialocele.

CONCLUSION

According to our results and those previously published, the transfacial approach assisted by sialendoscopy can be considered a useful technique. Proper planning ensures an optimal result in the treatment of parotid gland lithiasis. The use of facial nerve stimulator guarantees extra security when working near to a branch of the facial nerve is suspected.

Long-Term Outcomes of Sialendoscopy in the Management of Sialolithiasis and Idiopathic Chronic Sialadenitis with Ductal Scars

Objective

We aimed to present the long-term outcomes and sialendoscopic findings in only patients with sialolithiasis and ductal scars in idiopathic chronic recurrent sialadenitis who experienced unsuccessful results with conservative treatment and were treated with sialendoscopy.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the patients with a diagnosis of only sialolithiasis and ductal scars in chronic recurrent sialadenitis who underwent sialendoscopy between January 2011 and June 2016. We collected clinical and intraoperative data including patient age, sex, date of the procedure, the involved gland, operative findings and complications. Follow-up data included whether the symptoms were resolved or recurred and whether any further procedures were performed.

Results

Of a total of 38 patients, 16 were excluded from the study due to missing clinical or follow-up data, and analysis was conducted on 22 patients. Twelve were diagnosed with sialolithiasis, while the remaining 10 were diagnosed with idiopathic chronic sialadenitis and had ductal scars. Stone sizes ranged from 2 mm to 10 mm. Mean follow-up time was 39.5 months. The final success rate was 100%. Of the 10 patients with ductal scarring, five had scar in the parotid gland duct, and five in the submandibular gland duct. The mean follow-up time of all ductal scar patients was 47.1 months. The final success rate was 70%.

Conclusion

Sialendoscopy is a minimally invasive method for the diagnosis and treatment of sialolithiasis and ductal scars of the salivary glands after failure of conservative treatments in adults.

Outcomes of interventional sialendoscopy for obstructive salivary gland disorders: an Italian multicentre study

Interventional sialendoscopy has become the predominant therapeutic procedure for the management of obstructive salivary disorders, but only a few multicentre studies of large series of patients with a long-term follow-up have been published. This Italian multicentre study involved 1152 patients (553 females; mean age 50 years) who, after at least a clinical and ultrasonographic evaluation, underwent a total of 1342 diagnostic and interventional sialendoscopies, 44.6% of which involved the parotid gland. 12% (n = 138) of patients underwent multiple treatments. The procedure was successful in 1309 cases. In 33 cases (2.4%) the procedure could not be concluded mainly because of complete duct stenosis (21 cases). Salivary stones were the main cause of obstruction (55%), followed by ductal stenosis and anomalies (16%), mucous plugs (14.5%) and sialodochitis (4.7%). Complete therapeutic success was obtained in 92.5% of patients after one or more procedures, and was ineffective in < 8%. Untoward effects (peri and postoperative complications) were observed in 5.4% of cases. Sialendoscopy proved to be an effective, valid and safe procedure in the diagnostic and therapeutic management of non-neoplastic obstructive salivary gland diseases.

Sialendoscopy-assisted transfacial removal of parotid calculi

Superficial parotidectomy has significant morbidity, and minimally invasive techniques have therefore been developed, including those involving sialendoscopy, to remove sialoliths and preserve the gland along with its function. The size, mobility and location of the sialolith, alongside the presence of strictures, all dictate management. We outline basic treatment paradigms and describe two sialoendoscopyassisted surgical procedures developed for treating stones, one intraoral and one extraoral.

Sialendoscopy-assisted transfacial removal of parotid sialoliths: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To review the literature and conduct a meta-analysis to determine the effectiveness and safety of the combined endoscopic-transfacial approach for parotid sialolith management.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed 1946-, Embase 1947-, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Database of Abstracts of Review Effects, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, clinicaltrials.gov, Proquest Dissertations and Theses, and FirstSearch Proceedings to March 2015.

REVIEW METHODS

Published prospective or retrospective English-language studies with reported outcomes of more than one patient undergoing the combined endoscopic-transfacial procedure for parotid sialolithiasis were included. Two independent authors screened all eligible studies and reviewed and extracted data from relevant publications. Weighted pooled proportions for stone removal, symptom improvement, gland preservation, and complications were calculated.

RESULTS

Ten studies, primarily retrospective single-institution studies, were included in the final analysis, with a total of 184 patients. Overall, the procedure was noted to be successful with low risk; the weighted pooled proportions were 0.99 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.97 to 1.00) for stone removal, 0.97 (95% CI: 0.93 to 0.99) for symptom improvement, 1 (95% CI: 0.99 to 1.00) for gland preservation, and 0.06 (95% CI: 0.01 to 0.15) for complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Although our analysis is primarily based on retrospective data, the evidence shown here suggests that the combined endoscopic-transfacial technique is an effective treatment for parotid gland sialolithiasis not amenable to intraoral or purely endoscopic removal. This approach results in high rates of symptom improvement and gland preservation. The complication rates are low, further supporting the use of this technique. Laryngoscope, 127:2510-2516, 2017.

Cost-effectiveness of transfacial gland-preserving removal of parotid sialoliths

OBJECTIVE

Examine outcomes of transfacial gland-preserving removal of difficult parotid stones and compare the cost and operative time to traditional parotidectomy.

STUDY DESIGN

Cost-effectiveness analysis and retrospective chart review.

METHODS

Patients who underwent transfacial removal of symptomatic parotid sialoliths at a tertiary medical center from June 2010 to July 2015 were evaluated. Outcomes included operative technique, stone size, stone location, complications, and symptom relief. In addition, patients who underwent traditional parotidectomy for chronic sialadenitis were identified. The charges and times for both procedures were reviewed and compared.

RESULTS

Forty-four patients underwent transfacial resection for symptomatic parotid sialolithiasis. Stones were most often located in the main duct and hilum (53.3%), with fewer intraglandular stones (46.7%). No facial nerve weakness was observed. Of those with follow-up, 33 (87%) patients reported at least partial resolution of symptoms. Overall transfacial technique charges were significantly less expensive (U.S.$) than parotidectomy (mean difference -8,064.09; 95% confidence interval [CI] -13,472.78 to -2,655.40; P = 0.033). Anesthesia charges (mean difference -2,997.85; 95% CI, -5,748.81 to -246.89; P = 0.035) and operating room charges (mean difference -4,793.91; 95% CI, -8,958.09 to -629.72; P = 0.028) were also less expensive for the transfacial technique. Finally, mean procedure time for transfacial removal of parotid stones was shorter than for parotidectomy (120.2 ± 49.9 vs. 178.4 ± 41.3 minutes, respectively; P = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

Transfacial gland-preserving removal of difficult parotid stones is a well tolerated and effective alternative to parotidectomy. Moreover, it is faster and less expensive than parotidectomy, maximizing both surgeon time and hospital resources.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4. Laryngoscope, 127:1080-1086, 2017.

Sialendoscopy-assisted transfacial surgery for the removal of an iatrogenic foreign body in Stensen's duct: a stone and broken wire basket

Background:

A foreign body is a rare cause of parotid gland obstructive sialadenitis; intra-oral penetration via Stensen's duct is unusual. The relatively recent introduction of interventional sialendoscopy to treat obstructive sialadenitis has allowed surgeons to adopt a gland-sparing approach by means of miniaturised endoscopes and instruments. However, unusual anatomy or pathological conditions can give rise to a risk of intraductal rupture that may lead to a subsequent iatrogenic foreign body.

Case report:

This paper describes the case of a patient with a 4 mm stone engaged by a broken wire basket stuck in a secondary branch of Stensen's duct.

Results:

The iatrogenic foreign body was successfully retrieved by means of sialendoscopy-assisted transfacial surgery.

Conclusion:

This is the first reported case of an intraductal rupture of a miniaturised device during interventional sialendoscopy successfully resolved by means of combined endoscopy and external surgery. This proved to be an effective method of rescuing a foreign body stuck in Stensen's duct.