In vitro biomechanical evaluation of fixation methods of sagittal split ramus osteotomy in mandibular setback

Duplex Fluorinated and Atomic Layer Deposition-Derived ZrO2 Coatings Improve the Corrosion Resistance and Mechanical Properties of Mg-2Zn-0.46Y-0.5Nd (wt.%) Alloy Plates and Screws

This study investigated the corrosion resistance and mechanical properties of Mg-2Zn-0.46Y-0.5Nd (wt.%) alloy plates and screws with fluorinated coatings and atomic layer deposition (ALD)-derived zirconia (ZrO2) coatings in vitro under physiological stress conditions. Synthetic polyurethane hemimandible replicas were split and fixed as the following three groups of magnesium alloy plates and screws: no additional surface coating treatment (Group A), with fluorinated coatings (Group B), and with duplex fluorinated and ALD-derived 100 nm ZrO2 coatings (Group C). A circulating stress of 1-10 N was applied to the distal bone segment, and a 4-week simulated body fluid immersion test was employed to study the remaining material volume and the mechanical properties of the different groups. Compared with Group A and Group B, the degradation rate of magnesium alloy plates and screws' head regions was significantly slowed down under the protection of duplex MgF2/ZrO2 coatings (p < 0.01). There was no significant difference in the degradation rate of the screw shaft region between groups (p = 0.077). In contrast to fluoride coatings, duplex MgF2/ZrO2 coatings maintained the mechanical strength of magnesium alloy plates and screws after a 14 day in vitro SBF immersion test. We conclude that duplex MgF2/ZrO2 coatings exhibited a certain protective effect on the Mg alloy plates and screws under physiological stress conditions.

Penetration of inferior alveolar nerve canal increased by bicortical fixation after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy in mandibular prognathism

The purpose of this three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) study was to identify the difference between monocortical fixation (MCF) and bicortical fixation (BCF) in mandibular canal penetration after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) to correct mandibular prognathism, where interosseous fixation was done by BCF or MCF. CBCT was performed 1 week postoperatively and Dolphin 3D software was used to assess direct penetration of the mandibular canal by either type of screw. The primary outcome variable was the presence or absence of mandibular canal penetration and was categorized as a binary coded variable. The BCF and MCF groups were compared by χ² test, and the odds ratio for canal penetration was estimated. Multiple logistic regression was performed to identify factors related to canal penetration. A total of 118 patients were included. The MCF group had only 6% canal penetrations (3/50 patients) and the BCF group had 58.8% canal penetrations (40/68 patients). The regression model showed that BCF was the only factor causing mandibular canal penetration, with an adjusted odds ratio of 52.5. Awareness of the increased risk of canal penetration with BCF and potential nerve injury might influence case selection.

Revision of 116 orthognathic surgery patients operated on with the high-oblique sagittal osteotomy (HOSO): a retrospective case series (PROCESS-compliant article)

BACKGROUND

The high-oblique sagittal osteotomy (HOSO) is an alternative to a bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO). Due to its novelty, there are no long-term studies which have focused on describing the incidence and type of complications encountered in the post-operative follow-up. The aim of this retrospective study is to analyze patients operated on with this surgical technique and the post-operative complications encountered.

PATIENT AND METHODS

The electronic medical records of all patients treated with orthognathic surgery at the Department of Oral, Maxillofacial and Facial Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany, between the years 2009 and 2016 were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

A total of 116 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The cases operated on with the standard osteosynthesis (X, Y, and straight) showed a complication rate of 36.37% (n = 4/11). The cases operated on with the HOSO-dedicated plates (HOSO-DP) showed, in total, a complication rate of 6.67% (n = 7/105). The most common post-operative complication resulting from both fixation methods was a reduction in mouth opening and TMJ pain for 4.3%. During the first years of performing the surgery (2009-211), a variety of standard plates had material failure causing non-union or pseudarthrosis. No cases of material failure were observed in the cases operated on with the HOSO-DP. The statistical results showed a highly significant dependence of a reduction in OP-time over the years, when the HOSO was performed without additional procedures (R² > 0.83, P < 0.0015).

CONCLUSION

The rate of complications in the HOSO were shown to be comparable to the rate of complications from the BSSO reported in the literature. Moreover, the use of the ramus dedicated plate appears to provide enough stability to the bone segments, making the surgery safer.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The HOSO needs to be considered by surgeons as an alternative to BSSO. Once the use of the HOSO-DP was established, the rate of complications and the operation time reduced considerably.

Biomechanical evaluation of hybrid fixation method of sagittal split ramus osteotomy in mandibular advancement

PURPOSE

In this study, eight different fixation methods applied after sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) were compared experimentally.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

SSRO was performed to 48 sheep hemimandibles in eight groups of 6 each. Group A- a four hole standard miniplate; Group B- a four hole standard miniplate and one bicortical screw; Group C-a four hole locking plate; Group D-a four hole locking plate and one bicortical screw; Group E-a six hole straight miniplate; Group F-a six hole straight miniplate and one bicortical screw; Group G- a sliding plate, which was specifically designed for SSRO; Group H- sliding plate and one bicortical screw.

RESULTS

In terms of measured values of displacement, the highest degrees of displacement were observed in decreasing order in Groups G, C, A, and E. The least displacement values were detected in Groups H, F, D and B with values being very close to each other. For linear force applied up to 70N, 3 mm or higher displacement values were not seen in any fixation system.

CONCLUSION

According to the results of study, all systems are suitable for clinic usage. However, intermaxillary fixation or functional elastics may be needed for sliding plate systems during the healing period of hard tissue.

Comparative study of biomechanical stability of resorbable and titanium fixation systems after sagittal split ramus osteotomy with a novel designed in-vitro testing unit

INTRODUCTION

Sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) is one of the most popular surgical procedures for correction of mandibular deformities. Several clinical and biomechanical studies exist in the literature which, comparing the stability of different osteosynthesis materials and techniques, were performed using two or three-point biomechanical test models. The aim of this study was to compare the stability of biodegradable and titanium materials for SSRO on one-piece polyurethane mandible samples which were fixed in a novel designed 6-point testing unit.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

16 polyurethane one piece replicas of human mandibles were used and bilateral SSRO were performed by the manufacturer according to Dal Pont modification. Mandibles were fixed with titanium and PLLA/PGA fixation materials. Displacement amounts were measured under loading forces using a non-contact extensometer, and strain values at the screws were recorded by strain gauges.

RESULTS

Bicortical titanium screws (Group 2) showed significantly lower displacement values, while bicortical PLLA/PGA screws (group 4) showed significantly higher displacement values at 40-360 N forces. (p < 0.05). The highest strain value was measured on screws that were inserted upright in a proximal segment near the osteotomy line.

CONCLUSION

To achieve more realistic results in biomechanical studies, test models should imitate jaw movements and test environments should be as similar as possible to physiological conditions. Newly designed six-point testing units will contribute to future biomechanical studies.

Moving the mandible in orthognathic surgery - A multicenter analysis

Orthognathic surgery has always been a classical focus of maxillofacial surgery. Since more than 100 years, various surgical techniques for mandibular repositioning have been developed and clinically tested. Since the establishment of plate and screw osteosynthesis, orthognathic surgery became more stable and safe. Nowadays, different surgical methods for mobilising the mandible are existing. This international multicenter analysis (n = 51 hospitals) is providing first evidence based data for the current use of different surgical methods. The dominating techniques were Obwegeser/dal Pont (61%) followed by Hunsuck/Epker (37%) and Perthes/Schlössmann (29%). The main osteosynthesis materials were plates (82%), bicortical screws (23.5%), or a combination of both (5.9%). 47% of all centers reported to use several surgical methods at the same time, depending on the anatomical problem and the surgeon's preference. This shows that different surgical methods seem to work as comparable, safe, and reliable procedures in everydays clinical practise. On this basis, further prospective studies could evaluate possible advantages for our patients.

The amount of mandibular setback influence on occlusal force following sagittal split ramus osteotomy

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to examine the influence between the magnitude of setback in sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) and occlusal contact area and bite force without relapse after surgery.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Sixty female patients with a diagnosis of mandibular prognathism were divided into 3 groups according to the magnitude of setback: group 1 (≤5 mm), group 2 (>5 mm but <10 mm), and group 3 (≥10 mm). All patients underwent skeletal analysis by lateral and frontal cephalogrammetry and measured the occlusal contact area and bite force by the pressure-sensitive system (Dental Prescale, Dental Occlusion Pressuregraph FDP-705; Fuji Photo Film Co., Tokyo, Japan) preoperatively and postoperatively at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in occlusal contact area and bite force between the 3 groups. Only group 3 showed a significant difference in occlusal contact area and bite force between the preoperative and 1-year measurements.

CONCLUSION

The results indicate that the magnitude of setback did not influence the bite force or occlusal contact area in SSRO.