Selective neck dissection for neck residue of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A prospective study

Short-term efficacy and long-term survival of nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients with radiographically visible residual disease following observation or additional intervention: A real-world study in China

Background

To explore the short- and long-term outcomes in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-detected residual disease at 3 months post-treatment who received intervention either promptly (0 month) or following observation (after an additional 3 months).

Methods

A total of 272 patients with residual disease at 3 months post-treatment (observation [observation for additional 3 months]: 122, intervention [prompt intervention]: 150) were analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to examine the survival. Adverse events were analyzed in all patients.

Results

Patients in the observation group had a lower 3-year overall survival (77.1% vs. 85.2%), progression-free survival (10.2% vs. 18.1%), and locoregional relapse-free survival (10.2% vs. 20.6%) (all p < .05), but not distant metastasis-free survival (83.8% vs. 78.4%, p = .189), whereas patients in the intervention group achieved higher complete remission (CR) rates (43.3% vs. 21.2%, p = .003). Patients who achieved CR after prompt intervention had a better survival rate than those who achieved observation-CR or non-CR (p < .001). Multivariate analyses revealed that a wait-and-see policy was an independent prognostic factor for impaired survival (p < .001). No significant differences of acute or late toxicities were observed between the two groups.

Conclusions

Patients with NPC with MRI-detected residual disease 3 months post-radiotherapy should be encouraged to undergo prompt intervention rather than adopting a passive wait-and-see policy.

Specific Selective Neck Dissection for Isolated Regional Failure in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma after Radiation

BACKGROUND

To assess whether specific selective neck dissection (SND) with involved levels is a feasible treatment for isolated regional failure in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) after radiation.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Between January 2011 and December 2019, a total of 46 patients were assigned to undergo SND in the Department of Head and Neck Surgery at our center. The dissection extent of specific SND usually only involved levels of lymph node sites for isolated regional failure; in addition, lesions of level II or III involved removing both level II and III lymph nodes. The patients' clinical, MRI and pathological characteristics, overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and regional-free survival (RFS) were evaluated and analyzed.

RESULTS

Level II was the most commonly involved cervical nodal region in 28 neck dissection specimens (54.9%), followed by level III with positive nodes in 11 specimens (21.6%). Eleven patients (34.8%) had post-SND locoregional recurrence without distant metastasis. Of the patients, 7 patients (30.4%) had regional recurrence, and only one patient (2.8%) had lymph node recurrence on the side of SND. In addition, 8 patients (17.4%) had post-SND distant metastasis. The OS, DFS, and RFS of the patients were 76.1%, 58.7%, and 69.6%, respectively, at 3 years. The OS, DFS, and RFS values of patients who underwent SND were similar to those of patients who underwent comprehensive neck dissection (CND) and/or SND in published articles.

CONCLUSION

Specific SND was shown to be an effective and feasible treatment for isolated regional failure in NPC.

Identifying optimal candidates for postoperative adjuvant therapy among regional persistent/recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients after neck dissection

Purpose

To analyze the clinical outcomes of patients with regional persistent/recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) who received neck dissection, and to evaluate the clinical benefit of postoperative adjuvant therapy (PAT) based on patients’ positive lymph node counts (PLNs), extracapsular spread (ECS) and preoperative plasma EBV DNA levels.

Methods

From 2003 to 2017, 342 patients with regional persistent/recurrent NPC were included in this study. All patients were treated with neck dissection and 76 patients received PAT. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and locoregional relapse-free survival (LRFS) were compared between groups using propensity score matching (PSM).

Results

152 patients without PAT treatment and 76 patients with PAT treatment were selected by the PSM. There was no significant difference in 2-year PFS (52.4% vs. 61.3%, P = 0.371), 2-year OS (91.9% vs. 90.5%, P = 0.097) or 2-year LRFS (66.3% vs. 67.9%, P = 0.872) between the two groups. However, the application of PAT brought survival benefits to patients in terms of 2-year DMFS (76.5% vs. 84.7%, P = 0.020). PLN, ECS and preoperative EBV DNA level remained independent risk factors for poorer PFS. Accordingly, patients were divided into low-risk and high-risk groups using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve; the 2-year PFS rates for two risk groups were 73.4% and 59.1% (P < 0.0001) respectively. The results showed that low-risk patients didn’t benefit from the addition of PAT. However, the 2-year DMFS rate was significantly improved in high-risk PAT-treated patients than those treated by neck dissection alone (83.7% vs. 71.7%, P = 0.023).

Conclusions

PLNs, ECS and preoperative EBV DNA level are associated with the prognosis of patients with regional persistent/recurrent NPC. High-risk patients identified by PLNs, ECS and preoperative EBV DNA level may benefit from the addition of PAT after neck dissection.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-10150-0.

Contemporary management of the neck in nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Up to 85% of the patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma present with regional nodal metastasis. Although excellent nodal control is achieved with radiotherapy, a thorough understanding of the current TNM staging criteria and pattern of nodal spread is essential to optimize target delineation and minimize unnecessary irradiation to adjacent normal tissue. Selective nodal irradiation with sparing of the lower neck and submandibular region according to individual nodal risk is now emerging as the preferred treatment option. There has also been continual refinement in staging classification by incorporating relevant adverse nodal features. As for the uncommon occurrence of recurrent nodal metastasis after radiotherapy, surgery remains the standard of care.

Treatment of persistent/recurrent nodal disease in nasopharyngeal cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Persistent or recurrent disease in the neck lymphatics is an unusual pattern of failure in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) after definitive radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy. The purpose of this review is to critically synthesize the current knowledge regarding salvage treatment of this unique form of failure in NPC.

RECENT FINDINGS

Surgery in the form of radical neck dissection has been established as the standard salvage treatment with 5-year regional control of 60--86%. Recent shift in paradigm has resulted in the use of modified or selective neck dissection as salvage surgery in some centers. Risk factors for poor survival outcome include recurrent nodal disease, number of involved lymph nodes, extracapsular extension, high lymph node ratio, and positive resection margin. There are no well controlled studies on the role of additional radiotherapy or chemotherapy to improve local control or survival after salvage neck dissection in this group of patients with regional failure.

SUMMARY

There is limited literature regarding the extent of surgical dissection in treating nodal persistent or recurrent disease. Prospective studies are also needed to determine whether adjuvant therapy improves treatment outcomes.

Recurrent Nasopharyngeal Cancer: Critical Review of Local Treatment Options Including Recommendations during the COVID-19 Pandemic

Simple Summary

Options for the curative treatment of locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma include surgery or re-irradiation. Both approaches have been scientifically explored, yet there is no consensus on the indication or definitive preference of the above two salvage treatments. The aim of this review is to summarize the current evidence on the local treatment of recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma. The feasibility, safety, and efficacy of salvage surgery and radical re-irradiation are discussed. Recommendations on treatment modifications during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic are included as well.

Abstract

Recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma represents an extremely challenging therapeutic situation. Given the vulnerability of the already pretreated neurological structures surrounding the nasopharynx, any potential salvage retreatment option bears a significant risk of severe complications that result in high treatment-related morbidity, quality of life deterioration, and even mortality. Yet, with careful patient selection, long-term survival may be achieved after local retreatment in a subgroup of patients with local or regional relapse of nasopharyngeal cancer. Early detection of the recurrence represents the key to therapeutic success, and in the case of early stage disease, several curative treatment options can be offered to the patient, albeit with minimal support in prospective clinical data. In this article, an up-to-date review of published evidence on modern surgical and radiation therapy treatment options is summarized, including currently recommended treatment modifications of both therapeutic approaches during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.

Prevalence, incidence, and risk factors for shoulder and neck dysfunction after neck dissection: A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Shoulder pain and dysfunction may occur following neck dissection among people being treated for head and neck cancer. This systematic review aims to examine the prevalence and incidence of shoulder and neck dysfunction after neck dissection and identify risk factors for these post-operative complications.

METHODS

Electronic databases (Pubmed, CINAHL, EMBASE, Cochrane) were searched for articles including adults undergoing neck dissection for head and neck cancer. Studies that reported prevalence, incidence or risk factors for an outcome of the shoulder or neck were eligible and assessed using the Critical Review Form - Quantitative Studies.

RESULTS

Seventy-five articles were included in the final review. Prevalence rates for shoulder pain were slightly higher after RND (range, 10-100%) compared with MRND (range, 0-100%) and SND (range, 9-25%). The incidence of reduced shoulder active range of motion depended on surgery type (range, 5-20%). The prevalence of reduced neck active range of motion after neck dissection was 1-13%. Type of neck dissection was a risk factor for shoulder pain, reduced function and health-related quality of life.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence and incidence of shoulder and neck dysfunction after neck dissection varies by type of surgery performed and measure of dysfunction used. Pre-operative education for patients undergoing neck dissection should acknowledge the potential for post-operative shoulder and neck problems to occur and inform patients that accessory nerve preservation lowers, but does not eliminate, the risk of developing musculoskeletal complications.