Prospective biomechanical analysis of donor-site morbidity after fibula free flap

Comparative analysis of cell morphology in patient-paired primary human osteoblasts from the jaw and the fibula

Previous studies hint at possible differences in osteogenic, osteoimmunologic, and angiogenetic potential among primary human osteoblasts (HOBs) from different origins (iliac and alveolar bone) within the same patient. In this study, HOBs from the jaw and the fibula were investigated for the first time to gain further knowledge about the similarities and differences on the cellular morphological level. Patient-paired HOB cultures from the jaw and fibula of 14 patients (60.3 ± 11.1 years; male: 9; female: 5) were isolated and further processed. Cells were stained with Calcein and Hoechst 33342, and single-cell morphometric shape analysis was performed. For each osteoblast, the shape descriptors area, length, width, aspect ratio, circularity, roundness, and solidity were determined. A site-specific and a gender-specific comparison were conducted. None of the shape descriptors showed any significant differences between HOBs derived from the jaw and the fibula. The same applied to the gender-specific comparison between osteoblasts from female and male patients. Significant correlations between shape descriptors were found. HOBs from both bones possess a comparable cell shape, which might positively influence the ossification between the recipient and the donor bone. Since cell morphology often reflects cell function, both bones might exhibit comparable osteoblast behavior, adding to the favorable outcomes observed with free fibula flaps in reconstructive surgery.

Morbidity of the Free Fibular Flap in Reconstructive Surgery

BACKGROUND

Our study evaluated long-term morbidities in patients and compared subjective morbidities to those measurable objectively.

METHODS

Patients completed a questionnaire regarding long-term morbidity, filled out the Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire by Ruscheweyh et al. and were examined physically.

RESULTS

Eighty-two patients were included in the study, 31 patients returned to the clinic for further evaluation and testing. The most common morbidities were weakened dorsiflexion of the great toe (34 patients), reduced ambulatory status (33), and muscle weakness (31). A significant correlation (p < 0.01) was found between higher pain intensity and high pain sensitivity scores. However, donor-site morbidities were not significantly associated with pre-existing comorbidities like smoking, diabetes, or age over 70. Subjective morbidities were reported 2.3 times more frequently than objectively measured ones.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest a notable discrepancy between subjective and objective morbidities, highlighting the importance of considering patients' subjective experiences when assessing postoperative outcomes and rehabilitation progress.

Long-Term Postoperative Donor Site Musculoskeletal Morbidity after Osseous Free Flap Harvest

Objective

Complex ablative maxillary and mandibular defects often require osseous free flap reconstruction. Workhorse options include the fibula, scapula, and osteocutaneous radial forearm flap (OCRFF). The choice of donor site for harvest should be driven not only by reconstructive goals but also by donor site morbidity. The goal of this study is to evaluate the long-term postoperative musculoskeletal morbidity at the donor site after osseous free flap harvest.

Study Design

Cohort study and cross-sectional analysis.

Methods

A retrospective review of patients who underwent free flap harvest at 1 of the 3 donor sites from 2015 through 2021 was performed. An additional cross-sectional analysis at ≥1 year postoperatively was performed from 2021 to 2022 using validated patient-reported orthopedic surveys: Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand for scapula or OCRFF harvest, and Foot and Ankle Ability Measure for fibula harvest.

Setting

Single, high-volume tertiary care institution.

Results

Among 731 eligible patients, 162 (22.1%) answered the telephone surveys and were included. Functional differences between operated and nonoperated sides were 18.5% (scapula, n = 33), 13.5% (OCRFF, n = 29), and 10% (fibula, n = 98). Postoperative physical therapy (for all donor sites), ipsilateral neck dissection (for scapula and OCRFF), and extent of bony resection (for OCRFF) were not factors associated with long-term morbidity. Acute donor site complications were most common in fibula patients and were associated with worse long-term functional outcomes (7.5% difference; 95% confidence interval, -14.0 to -1; P = .03).

Conclusion

There is acceptable long-term musculoskeletal morbidity at the donor site after osseous free flap harvest, and patients should be counseled appropriately.

An objective analysis of composite free flap donor site morbidity in head and neck surgery: Prospective series

BACKGROUND

A poor evidence basis exists regarding the objective donor site morbidity associated with osseous free flap harvest. This study prospectively assessed the objective donor site morbidity associated with osseous free flap harvest for the fibula, scapula, and iliac crest (DCIA) donor sites.

METHODS

A single-site, prospective cohort clinical research study was conducted. Sixty-four patients were recruited between 2017 and 2021. Patients were assessed using a donor site specific assessment tool pre-operatively, and again >12 months post-operatively.

RESULTS

There was a significant reduction post-operatively in assessment tool scores compared to the pre-operative period for the fibula, scapula and DCIA. Females were more likely to report a greater reduction in Harris Hip Score post-operatively compared to males.

CONCLUSIONS

The fibula, scapula, and DCIA donor sites are associated with reduced objective function post-operatively compared to patient's pre-operative baseline. The implications are least pronounced for the fibula.

Donor-Site Morbidity after Osteocutaneous Free Fibula Transfer: Longitudinal Analysis of Stair Climbing Asymmetry and Functional Outcome

The autologous vascularised free fibula flap is currently considered the best option for facial reconstruction after oncological surgery, but its donor-site morbidity has not been fully examined. The purpose was to evaluate donor-site changes in temporal and spatial kinematic gait parameters during stair climbing, as well as the gait symmetry. Fourteen patients (48 ± 16 years) were evaluated before and six months after harvest of a vascularised free fibula flap. Temporal gait variables for both the ascent and descent phases did not change after surgery (2-way ANOVA, p > 0.05). During stair ascent, ankle flexion (healthy side, increased; donor side, reduced; low effect size) had a significant time × side interaction. During stair descent, hip flexion was significantly larger on the donor side (medium effect size). Significant time × side interactions were observed for ankle inversion (healthy side, reduced; donor side, increased; and low effect size) and knee flexion (healthy side, increased; donor side, unchanged; and low effect size). Medium effect sizes were found for hip flexion side differences (significant). No relevant spatio-temporal nor kinematic asymmetry emerged apart from ankle joint kinematics. Overall, only the side effect of hip flexion during descent was both statistically significant and practically meaningful. Considering the slight modifications of the gait variables, no major functional limitations were found following vascularised free fibula flap reconstruction during stair climbing and descent.

Patient-Reported Outcomes after Fibula Free Flap Harvest: A Pilot Study

SUMMARY

Patient-reported outcomes regarding donor-site morbidity and quality of life for the fibula free flap in head and neck reconstruction patients have not been studied. The authors reviewed and identified patients who had undergone head and neck reconstruction using a fibula free flap (2011 to 2016). Patients were assessed via physical examination and two patient-reported outcomes questionnaires: the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (score range, 0 to 100) and the Pain Disability Questionnaire (score range, 0 to 100). Quantitative data were analyzed with appropriate statistical tests. Semistructured interviews exploring donor-site challenges were performed and analyzed using thematic analysis. Seventeen patients agreed to participate. Their mean age was 62 years (range, 41 to 81 years). Mean follow-up was 38 months (range, 12 to 65 years). Mean perceived level of function compared to baseline was 67 percent. Mean scores for the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score subscales were 84.6 (pain), 80.5 (symptoms), 86.7 (activities of daily living), 67.7 (sport), and 65.6 (quality of life). The mean Pain Disability Questionnaire score was 26.3 (mild/moderate perceived disability). Higher perceived level of function was associated with higher Foot and Ankle Outcome Score values (pain, symptoms, and activities of daily living, p < 0.05). Donor limbs had decreased range of motion and manual muscle testing scores compared with their contralateral limbs (p < 0.05). Lack of ankle support and balance, resulting in limitations and aversions to daily and sporting activities, were the most common themes regarding donor-site challenges. In conclusion, patients who have undergone fibula free flap harvest struggle with ankle support and balance and face functional difficulties that have an impact on their quality of life. Multidisciplinary approaches for targeted rehabilitation after fibula free flap harvest should be explored to determine the impact on patients' quality of life.

Donor site morbidity of composite free flaps in head and neck surgery: a systematic review of the prospective literature

Composite free flaps represent the cornerstone for the repair of osseous defects in the head and neck. For many patients, there are often multiple defect-suitable donor sites that may be utilised as part of the reconstructive process. Therefore, to optimise patient outcomes, an evidence-based approach to donor site selection is required to maximise quality of life and long-term functionality. A systematic review of the literature was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines to evaluate the evidence for donor site selection based on minimising the associated donor site morbidity and optimising patient functionality postoperative. The fibula is associated with the greatest potential risk for wound healing complications. Fibula and scapula harvest has the potential to have a significant impact on physical performance. The iliac crest is most favourable in terms of aesthetic scar healing outcomes. Overall, however, the quality and quantity of evidence for all donor sites is limited. Each site is associated with specific complications and morbidity, of which the surgeon and patient must both be aware. Whilst a cross-sectional informed opinion of the likely advantages/disadvantages of one donor site over another can thus be made, there are few head-to-head studies available that directly compare donor sites.

Complication of osteo reconstruction by utilizing free vascularized fibular bone graft

The success of free vascularized fibular bone graft (FVFBG) has accelerated the osteo reconstruction which results from trauma, resection of a tumor or an infectious bone segment, or correction of congenital deformity. But the complication behind should not be overlooked. The failure could necessitate a second surgery, which prolong the rehabilitation period and produce further health cost. Worst, the patients may suffer a permanent impaired ankle function, or a sustained morpho-functional loss on reconstructive area which are hard to save. To provide an overview of the complication related to reconstruction by FVFBG, a narrative review is conducted to identify the complications including their types and rates, the contributing factors, the approaches to measure and the techniques to avoid. Methodologically, by quick research on Pubmed and abstract reading of reviews, we characterize five reconstructive areas where FVFBG were most frequently applied: extremities, mandible, spine, osteonecrosis of femoral head, and penile. Following, the complications on different reconstructive areas are retrieved, studied and presented in five (or more specifically, six) separate sections. By the way, meaningful difference between FVFBG and other bone flap was presented in a few words if necessary. Donor-site morbidities were studied and summarized as a whole. In these literatures, the evidences documented on limb and mandibular reconstruction have the fullest detail, followed by the spine and lastly the penile. In conclusion, FVFBG, though a mature technique, needs further deep and comprehensive study and maybe device-based assistance to achieve better reconstructive effect and minimize donor-site damage.

Donor-Site Morbidity after Fibula Transplantation in Head and Neck Tumor Patients: A Split-Leg Retrospective Study with Focus on Leg Stability and Quality of Life

The free fibula flap has been one of the most important microvascular grafts for orofacial reconstruction for more than 30 years. The complication rates at the donor-site reported in literature are considered to be low, but the published data vary greatly in some cases. In particular, restrictions in the stability and balance of the involved leg and their effects on the quality of life have been described very inconsistently to date. Therefore, this study mainly focuses on the stability and balance of the affected leg in a split-leg design. Between December 2014 and January 2018, out of 119 subjects who underwent mainly jaw ablative tumor surgery and reconstruction using a fibula flap, 68 subjects were examined for donor site morbidity. Besides reporting general types of complications, two specific test procedures were used. The Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT) as a practical test for ankle function and the Foot and Ankle Disability Index (FADI) as a questionnaire in order to assess quality of life, depending on the lower leg function. SEBT revealed an average of 55.3 cm with the operated leg as the supporting leg, which corresponds to 95.5% of 57.9 cm achieved with the healthy leg as the supporting leg. An average FADI score of 89.4% was recorded. SEBT and FADI seem to be suitable methods of examination for subjects post fibular transplantation and pointed out minimal limitations of the involved legs in comparison to the unaffected legs. These limitations were clinically not relevant and they had minor influence on the subjects' quality of life and their daily activities.

Replacing one evil with another: Is the fibula really a dispensable spare part available for transfer in patients with medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaws?

Because of the long-term and consecutive use of different causative agents, clinicians are increasingly encountering patients needing restoration of the stomatognathic system after surgical resection of highly advanced necroses of the jaw. For plastic restoration in these cases, microvascular reconstruction seems to represent the most viable option. According to the limited data available, the risks of this operation are considered comparable with those faced by other patient cohorts. We report here the case of a patient who suffered 2 successive pathologic fractures of the tibia after microsurgical reconstruction of the mandible with a free fibula flap. This exemplifies a general problem, especially because the patient also suffered from a treatment-refractory infection of the transplanted bone. Although the present literature indicates otherwise, fibula transplants might not be the gold standard in these cases. Therefore, alternatives to transplants from the weight-bearing parts of the body need to be considered until more data are available.

Assessment of fibula flap with flexor hallucis longus's effect on head & neck tumor patients' quality of life and function of donor site

OBJECTIVE

Free fibular flaps (FFFs) have been widely used in mandibular reconstruction. It is still unclear whether retaining flexor hallucis longus (FHL) is needed for flaps. This study introduces a comparison in quality of life and donor-site function between those who have and haven't harvested FHL with FFF.

METHODS

Patients with FFFs were single-blind-randomly assigned into the FHL group or nFHL group. Patients were followed up preoperatively and 1, 3 and 6 months postoperatively via subjective evaluations (SF-36/AOFAS) and objective evaluation s(muscle strength and range of motion). Patients' hospitalization and intraoperative information, donor site morbidity were recorded.

RESULTS

Each group had 15 patients. The flap harvesting time in FHL group was shorter significantly than nFHL group (125.9 ± 24.8 min vs 146.7 ± 29.9 min, P = 0.048). There were no significant differences in hospitalization information such as operation time, hospitalization days and cost. Donor site morbidities at 1, 3 and 6 months postoperatively showed no significant differences except for the presence of claw toes (nFHL group > FHL group, 40% vs 0, P = 0.017; 53.3% vs 6.7%, P = 0.014; 60.0% vs 13.3%, P = 0.021). There were no significant differences in SF-36 and AOFAS scores. There were no significant differences in muscle strength and range of motion.

CONCLUSION

Excision of the FHL lowered the flap harvesting time. It did not increase donor site morbidity. The impacts on patients' quality of life and foot function were the same. The surgeons can use the FHL without considering the influence on patients if not retaining the FHL.

Osteocutaneous flaps for head and neck reconstruction: A focused evaluation of donor site morbidity and patient reported outcome measures in different reconstruction options

With significant improvements in success rates for free flap reconstruction of the head and neck, attention has turned to donor site morbidity associated with osteocutaneous free flaps. In this review, we address the morbidity associated with harvest of the four most commonly used osteocutaneous flaps; the free fibula flap, the scapula flap, the iliac crest flap and the radial forearm flap. A comprehensive literature search was performed to identify articles relevant to donor site morbidity for these flaps. We assessed morbidity in terms of incidence of delayed healing, chronic pain, aesthetic outcomes, site specific complications and patient satisfaction/quality of life. Weighted means were calculated when sufficient studies were available for review. The radial forearm and free fibula flaps are associated with high rates of delayed healing of approximately 20% compared to the scapular (<10%) and iliac flaps (5%). The radial forearm flap has higher rates of chronic pain (16.7%) and dissatisfaction with scar appearance (33%). For the majority of these patients harvest of one of these four osteocutaneous does not limit daily function at long-term follow-up. The scapular osteocutaneous flap is associated with the lowest relative morbidity and should be strongly considered when the recipient defect allows. The radial forearm is associated with higher morbidity in terms of scarring, fractures, chronic pain and wrist function and should not be considered as first choice when other flap options are available.

Donor-Site Morbidity After Osteocutaneous Free Fibula Transfer: Longitudinal Analysis of Gait Performance

PURPOSE

The purpose was to evaluate donor-site clinical morbidity and changes in kinematic gait parameters after the harvest of a vascularized free fibula flap for facial reconstruction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We enrolled 14 patients (aged 50 ± 15 years) in a longitudinal study. Every patient underwent a double evaluation in which a presurgical assessment and 6-month postsurgical assessment were performed. Subjective donor-site evaluation was carried out through unstructured clinical questioning about pain, paresthesia, walking ability, and restrictions in activity. Further subjective evaluations were assessed through the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index and the Point Evaluation System for Lower Extremity Fibulectomy. A clinical evaluation of the donor site assessed muscular deficits, sensibility disturbance, and wound healing. Temporal and spatial kinematic parameters were measured through gait analysis during overground walking at a comfortable speed.

RESULTS

Postsurgical clinical examinations detected 1 patient affected by a neurologic disorder and 3 patients with donor-site pain, whereas 10 patients (71%) declared no residual alterations in the operated leg. On average, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index score was 367 of 2,400, and the Point Evaluation System for Lower Extremity Fibulectomy score was 19 of 24. Presurgical versus postsurgical gait analysis comparison showed no significant differences in gait parameters except for a 6% reduction in the double-support phase. Stance values were higher for the operated limb in both evaluations (+1.3% before surgery, +1.8% after surgery). No alterations were detected in the range of motion of the lower-limb joints.

CONCLUSIONS

Considering the slight modification of the gait pattern, which is not usually perceived by patients, vascularized free fibula flap harvest was generally associated with successful functional and subjective outcomes of the donor site.

The impact of harvest length and detachment of the interosseous membrane on donor-site morbidity following free fibula flap surgery-a biomechanical experimental study

PURPOSE

The fibula flap has been established for orofacial reconstruction following ablative surgery. Donor-site morbidity of the lower leg may be explained by the harvest technique and particularly by detachment of the M. extensor halluces longus (EHL) and M. extensor digitorum longus (EDL).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

On cadaveric lower leg specimens, the tendons of the EHL and EDL were dissected at the proximal phalanges and loaded with corresponding weights. The average displacement of the muscle was evaluated during the harvesting procedure.

RESULTS

Cumulative detachment of the interosseous membrane caused considerable displacement of the EHL but less impairment of the EDL. Segmental and cumulative osteotomy of the fibula implicated significant displacement of both EHL and EDL.

CONCLUSION

A recommendation can be given for cautious selection of osteotomy site of the fibula and for limited sacrifice of the fibula and adjacent attachments of the extensors to keep local-site morbidity at a minimum.

Donor site morbidity after vascularized fibula free flap: gait analysis during prolonged walk conditions

The aim of this study was to determine the effect of vascularized fibula free flap (VFFF) harvest on gait variables during the six-minute walk test (6MWT). Eleven patients who had undergone VFFF harvest and 11 healthy peers participated in this case-control study. The main evaluation consisted of the collection of gait variables using the GAITRite system during three periods of the 6MWT: beginning (0-1min), middle (2:30-3:30min), and end (5-6min). The 6MWT was significantly shorter in the VFFF group than in the reference group (-31%, P<0.001). Most gait variables differed significantly between the groups for each period (P-value range 0.04-0.0004), including toe in/out on the operated side (P-value range 0.005-0.01). The increase in toe in/out on the operated side suggests a functional modification caused by an imbalance of the agonist-antagonist muscles. On comparison of the different periods, gait velocity decreased between the beginning and middle periods and increased between the middle and end periods in both groups. However, a significantly lower velocity between the beginning and end periods was found only for the VFFF group (P=0.026), suggesting an alteration in physical management. In conclusion, these results suggest that VFFF harvesting could alter gait and joint integrity.

Free flap surgery in Europe: an interdisciplinary survey

Free flap surgery is essential for the aesthetic and functional reconstruction of various parts of the body. The aim of this study was to compare current concepts of perioperative flap management between ENT, craniomaxillofacial, and plastic surgeons. A European survey was conducted among 570 surgical departments, covering all aspects of free flap surgery. Focus was placed on antibiotic and antithrombotic drug use, aspects of osseous reconstruction, and flap monitoring strategies. One hundred and seventy-two medical units participated. A broad spectrum of anticoagulant regimens and a trend towards prolonged antibiotic prophylaxis were found. Fixation with (CAD/CAM) reconstruction plates was more popular than monocortical locking with miniplates in the mandible. Visual assessment and Doppler systems were reported to be the most common monitoring modalities. The flap loss rate was stated to be higher after osseous reconstruction. Only a few differences in perioperative flap management were identified between the different surgical fields, and osseous reconstruction appears to be the most challenging.

Functional donor site morbidity longer than one year after fibula free flap: A prospective biomechanical analysis

OBJECTIVES

The fibula free flap is the workhorse procedure for osseous reconstruction. The objective of this study was to investigate long-term functional outcomes of the harvesting site.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

About 19 patients (10 male, 9 female, mean age 58.1 years) were available for the long-term analysis 13-51 months after surgery. Jumping mechanography and balance testing on a ground force reaction plate (Leonardo Mechanograph GFRP) were performed before and surgery. The Esslinger Fitness Index (EFI, maximum peak power in W/kg normalized for age and gender) was considered as primary endpoint. Secondary outcomes were maximum force, range of motion in the ankle joint, sensory limitations, the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society Score (AOFAS-Score), and subjective perceptions.

RESULTS

We found no significant difference between pre- and postoperative EFI (70.4% versus 66.0%, P = 0.07) and body sway (1.72 cm² versus 2.60 cm² , P = 0.093). The AOFAS-Score was reduced by 8.8 points (99.1 points versus 90.3 points, P < 0.001). Dorsal extenstion (31.6° versus 24.1°, P < 0.001) and flexion (32.3 versus 25.6° flexion, P = 0.011) were significantly reduced and 6 patients had chronic pain.

CONCLUSIONS

Reduced peak power and balance ability seem to be reversible short-term effects after fibula harvesting. We recommend preoperative patient education and standardized protocols for physiotherapy.