Evaluation of surgical outcome and influencing risk factors in patients with medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaws

What Affects Healing Rates in Patients Treated for Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw? The Role of Operative Therapy and Other Clinical Factors

BACKGROUND

In the therapy of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ), the healing rate, effectiveness of operative therapy, and factors associated with healing remain unclear.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to estimate MRONJ therapy healing rates and identify associated prognostic factors.

STUDY DESIGN, SETTING, SAMPLE

A 25-center prospective cohort study was conducted on 291 patients with MRONJ treated with a common therapeutic protocol during 2013-2016. Patients unable to continue examinations or treatment were excluded.

PREDICTOR VARIABLE

The primary predictor variable was MRONJ therapy grouped into two categories: operative and nonoperative. Secondarily, the prognostic factors categorized as demographic, medical, clinical, and perioperative were evaluated.

MAIN OUTCOME VARIABLES

The primary outcome variable was treatment duration, defined as the time (in months) between the initiation of therapy and when the site was healed or the date of the final visit or loss to follow-up.

COVARIATES

Not applicable.

ANALYSES

Descriptive statistics and 3-year cumulative healing rates were calculated. The association between clinical factors and time to healing was analyzed using bivariate and multivariate analyses and propensity score analysis. P < .05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

We analyzed data from 291 subjects with 76 (26.1%) and 215 (73.9%) subjects in the operative and nonoperative therapy groups, respectively. The healing rates for operative and nonoperative therapies were 95.8 and 70.7%, respectively (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.1-2.2, P value [P] < .01). The healing rates in patients for whom anti-resorptive agent (ARA) treatment was discontinued and continued were 87.2 and 37.4%, respectively (HR = 1.8, 95% CI = 1.1-3.0, P = .02). In a multiple regression analysis using ARA indication, the therapy method showed a significant association in the MRONJ malignancy group (HR = 2.75, 95% CI = 1.46-5.17, P < .01).

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

Operative therapy and ARA discontinuation were associated with better healing rates in MRONJ therapy. However, the choice of therapy for MRONJ should be based on a comprehensive consideration of the patient's condition. ARA discontinuation should be considered an adjunctive measure because of the possibility of adverse events such as fragility fractures and skeletal related events.

How does the clinical and tomographic appearance of MRONJ influences its treatment prognosis?

OBJECTIVES

To identify clinical and tomographic prognostic factors for conservative and surgical treatment of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaws (MRONJ).

METHODS

A retrospective search identified patients treated with antiresorptive drugs (ARDs), diagnosed with Stage 1, 2 or 3 MRONJ, and having CBCT scans previous to conservative or surgical treatment. Following data collection, imaging assessment of the following parameters on each MRONJ site was performed: involvement of teeth and/or implants, presence of osteosclerosis, osteolysis, sequestrum formation, periosteal reaction, and pathological fractures. For statistical analysis, patients and lesions were divided into conservative and surgical treatment. Comparisons were made between successful and unsuccessful outcomes. Significance was set at p ≤ 0.05.

RESULTS

115 ARD-treated patients who developed 143 osteonecrosis lesions were selected. 40 patients and 58 lesions received conservative treatment, of which 14 patients (35%) and 25 lesions (43%) healed. Additionally, 75 patients and 85 lesions underwent surgery, with 48 patients (64%) and 55 lesions (65%) that healed. Clinical and tomographic risk factors for conservative treatment were MRONJ staging, tooth involvement, extensive osteosclerosis, and deep sequestrum formation (p < 0.05). Complementarily, poor prognostic indicators for surgical therapy were a short bisphosphonate (BP) holiday, MRONJ staging, absence of sequestrum formation, and presence of periosteal reaction (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Lesions at Stage 3 MRONJ, with tooth involvement, or sequestrum formation showed poor outcomes when conservative treatment is chosen. Alternatively, surgical treatment is most effective when BPs are discontinued, in Stage 1 lesions, in the presence of sequestrum formation, and absence of periosteal reaction.

Alloplastic reconstruction of the mandible after subtotal mandibulectomy for medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw: An update of the method

BACKGROUND

Reconstruction of continuity defects following osteonecrosis in multimorbid patients is challenging. In all cases of the predescribed palliative treatment method for alloplastic mandible reconstruction, plate fractures were detected in follow-up. We hypothesized that a modification could avoid these fractures, leading to stable long-term results.

METHODS

This retrospective study compares the original method with a modification using single, laser-sintered CAD-CAM plates instead of manually bent miniplates. The predescribed shuttering technique was used to reconstruct the mandible in its original shape with bone cement.

RESULTS

Uneventful wound healing was observed in 86% of the cases after modification of the method. No implant or plate fracture occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

The presented method should be considered as a treatment option for mandible reconstruction in elderly, multimorbid patients in palliative situations. The results of this study suggest that the modification of the method leads to significantly improved long-term stability. Donor site morbidity is avoided with this method of palliative surgery.

Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw: A disease of significant importance for older patients

BACKGROUND

Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is clinically defined as a non-healing jawbone ulcerative-necrotic lesion appearing after dental therapy or minor trauma in patients treated previously with anti-resorptive, anti-angiogenic or immunomodulators. Older patients with osteoporosis and cancer receive these pharmacological agents regularly. As these patients are long-term survivors, efficient treatment is of paramount importance for their quality of life.

METHODS

Literature searches via PubMed were conducted to identify relevant MRONJ studies. Basic information on MRONJ classification, clinical features, and pathosphysiology is presented herein as well as various clinical studies dealing with MRONJ in patients with osteoporosis and cancer. Lastly, we discuss current managment of patients and new trends in treatment of MRONJ.

RESULTS

Although close follow-up and local hygiene have been advocated by some authors, severe forms of MRONJ are not responsive to conservative therapy. At present, there is no "gold standard" therapy for this condition. However, as the physiopathological basis of MRONJ is represented by the anti-angiogenic action of various pharmacological agents, new methods to increase and promote local angiogenesis and vascularization have recently been successfully tested in vitro, limited preclinical studies, and in a pilot clinical study.

CONCLUSIONS

It appears that the best method implies application on the lesion of endothelial progenitor cells as well as pro-angiogenic factors such as Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) and other related molecules. More recently, scaffolds in which these factors have been incorporated have shown positive results in limited trials. However, these studies must be replicated to include a large number of cases before any official therapeutic protocol is adopted.

Reporting Criteria for Clinical Trials on Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw (MRONJ): A Review and Recommendations

Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is a complication caused by anti-resorptive agents and anti-angiogenesis drugs. Since we wanted to write a protocol for a randomized clinical trial (RCT), we reviewed the literature for the essential information needed to estimate the size of the active patient population and measure the effects of therapeutics. At the same time, we designed a questionnaire intended for clinicians to collect detailed information about their practices. Twelve essential criteria and seven additional items were identified and compiled from 43 selected articles. Some of these criteria were incorporated in the questionnaire coupled with data on clinical practices. Our review found extensive missing data and a lack of consensus. For example, the success rate often combined MRONJ stages, diseases, and drug treatments. The occurrence date and evaluation methods were not harmonized or quantitative enough. The primary and secondary endpoints, failure definition, and date coupled to bone measurements were not well established. This information is critical for writing a RCT protocol. With this review article, we aim to encourage authors to contribute all their findings in the field to bridge the current knowledge gap and provide a stronger database for the coming years.

A comparative study of the clinical characteristics of patients with medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw and osteoporosis or malignancy

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare the clinical characteristics of patients with medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) and osteoporosis vs malignancy.

STUDY DESIGN

The study included patients hospitalized with MRONJ between July 2013 and April 2021. These patients were assigned to the osteoporosis or malignancy groups according to their primary disease. Characteristics and clinical variables were recorded and compared.

RESULTS

Nighty-one patients (107 MRONJ lesions) were included, with 12 (14 lesions) in the osteoporosis group and 79 (93 lesions) in the malignancy group. The osteoporosis and malignancy groups differed in their respective incubation periods (57.0 ± 42.8 vs 29.3 ± 19.8 months, respectively; P = .048), bisphosphonates cumulative dose (16,487.4 ± 14,268.8 mg alendronate vs 104.0 ± 79.9 mg zoledronic; P = .014), and rate of patients receiving antiangiogenic agents (0/12, 0.0% vs 48/79, 60.8%; P = .001). The groups were similar in their treatment outcomes, measured as successful surgeries (11/12, 91.7% vs 59/79, 74.7%; P = .351).

CONCLUSIONS

For stage 2 or 3 MRONJ, patients with osteoporosis (exposed to oral bisphosphonates) developed MRONJ over a longer incubation period than patients with malignancy. The groups had similar responses to surgery.

American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons' Position Paper on Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaws-2022 Update

Strategies for management of patients with, or at risk for, medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaws (MRONJ) - formerly referred to as bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaws (BRONJ)-were set forth in the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons (AAOMS) position papers in 2007, 2009 and 2014. The position papers were developed by a committee appointed by the AAOMS Board of Trustees and comprising clinicians with extensive experience in caring for these patients, as well as clinical and basic science researchers. The knowledge base and experience in addressing MRONJ continues to evolve and expand, necessitating modifications and refinements to the previous position papers. Three members of the AAOMS Committee on Oral, Head, and Neck Oncologic and Reconstructive Surgery (COHNORS) and three authors of the 2014 position paper were appointed to serve as a working group to analyze the current literature and revise the guidance as indicated to reflect current knowledge in this field. This update contains revisions to diagnosis and management strategies and highlights the current research status. AAOMS maintains that it is vitally important for this information to be disseminated to other relevant healthcare professionals and organizations.

Systematic review of medication related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) in patients undergoing only antiangiogenic drug therapy: surgery or conservative therapy?

Osteonecrosis of the jaw is a severe adverse condition affecting patients exposed to specific types of medications. Previous studies have highlighted that osteonecrosis of the jaw is triggered by invasive dental procedures and can be very challenging to manage, especially in patients with cancer. The primary aim of this review was to analyse all available evidence on the management (surgical and/or conservative) of medication related osteonecrosis of the jaws (MRONJ) in patients with a history of antiangiogenic drugs therapy and who had not been previously exposed to any antiresorptive drug treatments. A multi-database search (PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL) was performed to identify related multi-language papers published from January 2003 until November 2020. Data were extracted from relevant papers and analysed according to the outcomes selected in this review. The search generated 28 studies eligible for the analysis. The total number of patients included in the analysis was 36. Sixteen patients were treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor drugs (anti-VEGF) while the remaining patients were administered a combination of antiangiogenic drugs. The most common MRONJ site was the mandible in 29 patients. MRONJ recurrence after treatment was only reported in six patients, the majority of which were treated conservatively. The data reviewed confirmed that an invasive procedure was the most common trigger of MRONJ with relatively high frequency of postoperative recurrence following treatment. However, due to the low quality of available research in the literature, it is difficult to draw a definitive conclusion on the validity of the presented treatment to manage patients affected by MRONJ associated with angiogenic therapy.

Non-Interventional Prospective Observational Study of Platelet Rich Fibrin as a Therapy Adjunctive in Patients with Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw

BACKGROUND

Medication-related osteonecrosis (MRONJ) of the jaw is a severe and feared side effect of antiresorptive therapy in the oncological setting. With growing evidence that impaired angiogenesis may represent a key factor in pathogenesis, the aim of this study was to evaluate an autologous platelet concentrate as a possible additive in surgical therapy to optimize vascularization and, subsequently, resolution rates.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A non-interventional, prospective, multicenter study was conducted, and all patients with stage I-III MRONJ, undergoing antiresorptive therapy for an oncological indication, were included. The necrosis was treated surgically without (study arm A) or with (arm B) the addition of an autologous platelet concentrate (platelet-rich fibrin, PRF).

RESULTS

After 5, 14, and 42 days postoperative, wound healing (primary outcome: mucosal integrity) as well as downstaging, pain perception, and oral health-related quality of life (secondary outcome) were assessed via clinical evaluation. Among the 52 patients included, primarily with MRONJ stage I and II, the use of PRF as an additive in surgical therapy did not display a significant advantage for wound healing (p = 0.302), downstaging (p = 0.9), pain reduction (p = 0.169), or quality of life (p = 0.9).

SUMMARY

In conclusion, PRF as an adjunct did not significantly optimize wound healing. Further, no significant changes in terms of downstaging, pain sensation, and oral health-related quality of life were found.

[Management of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw-a review of recent study results in comparison to established strategies]

Hintergrund

Antiresorptiva gehören weltweit zu den am häufigsten applizierten Arzneimitteln. Ihr Haupteinsatzbereich liegt in der Osteologie und Onkologie. Trotz allgemein guter Verträglichkeit treten bei Patienten unter Therapie unerwünschte Arzneimittelwirkungen (UAW) auf. Eine spezifische UAW im Bereich der Kiefer ist die sog. medikamentenassoziierte Osteonekrose („medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw“, MRONJ) der Kiefer.

Ziel der Arbeit

Diese Arbeit stellt neuesten Entwicklungen in Ätiologie, Diagnostik und Therapie der MRONJ im Vergleich zu bereits bestehenden Erkenntnissen zusammen.

Methodik

Es wurde eine systematische Literaturübersicht der Jahre 2016–2021 zu diesem Thema durchgeführt. Prospektive Therapiestudien, Diagnostikstudien mit Vergleichsgruppe und innovative Studien zur Pathogenese der MRONJ wurden eingeschlossen und nach den MINORS-Kriterien („methodological index for non-randomized studies“) bewertet.

Ergebnisse und Diskussion

Die MRONJ tritt bei ca. 2–12 % der Patienten, die aus onkologischer Indikation mit Antiresorptiva behandelt werden, auf (osteologische Indikation ca. 0,1–1 %). Die Therapie der MRONJ sollte frühzeitig und operativ erfolgen. Die Heilungsrate ist bei einem operativen Therapieansatz mit über 85 % sehr gut.

CD34 and CD105 Microvessels in Resected Bone Specimen May Implicate Wound Healing in MRONJ

Clinical treatment outcome of MRONJ (medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw) surgery despite radical osseous removal and primary closure healing still shows differences in terms of outcome and disease recurrence. The study aims to assess the rate of angiogenesis of MRONJ lesions in order to understand the impact of angiogenesis and neoangiogenesis status on MRONJ surgical treatment outcome. This is the first study correlating microvessel density with prognosis in MRONJ surgically-treated patients. The immunohistochemical expression of CD34 and CD105 in MRONJ specimens obtained from surgically-treated patients was evaluated. The most vascularized areas detected by CD34 and CD105 were selected and the microvessel density value of the samples was registered. Samples were retrospectively divided according to the clinical outcome of MRONJ surgical treatment, dividing patients into two groups, “healed” and “not healed”. Statistical analysis was performed to assess if neovessels could influence treatment outcome in patients undergoing radical surgery. In the examined cohort, this value was highly predictive of better treatment outcome after radical surgery of MRONJ. Understanding of angiogenesis-dependent factors deserves further attention as a future target for MRONJ prevention and therapies.

Different Presentation and Outcomes in the Surgical Treatment of Advanced MRONJ in Oncological and Nononcological Patients Taking or Not Corticosteroid Therapy

Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is a severe side effect caused by antiangiogenic antiresorptive drugs used to treat various oncological and non oncological diseases. The clinical and radiological characteristics of MRONJ depend on the type of causative drug, the time of administration, and its dosage. Proven systemic risk factors like anemia, uncontrolled diabetes, corticosteroid therapy, and chemotherapy in neoplastic diseases (e.g., high doses of methotrexate up to 30 mg daily) significantly increase the chances of acquiring MRONJ. The risk factors themselves can affect treatment outcomes. Although the main scientific societies have recently disseminated good practice rules on the patient's prevention, diagnosis, and management, there are still no guidelines on shared therapeutic strategies. In general, if conservative treatment fails, surgical treatment is considered, including local debridement, osteoplasty, and marginal or segmental osteotomy. In literature, cohorts of heterogeneous patients with MRONJ have been analyzed for a long time, resulting in a lack of uniformity of information and difficulties interpreting the data. According to the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons criteria, this retrospective study evaluates the surgical treatment outcomes of 64 patients with stage II-III MRONJ, evaluated at the Department of Maxillofacial Surgery of the University of Turin (Italy). The first objective of this retrospective study is to evaluate treatment results for stages II-III in all cases; the second objective is to evaluate the same results by dividing the sample into different cohorts of patients: first, based on the underlying pathology, i.e., oncological and non oncological, and secondly, based on the drug or combination of drugs they took.

Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw—A Continuing Issue

Introduction: Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is a condition that is becoming more common in the everyday practice of both dental and maxillofacial surgeons. Materials and methods: This paper aims to provide a comprehensive and easy to read by clinicians presentation of comprehensive, accessible, and up-to-date data on MRONJ. The individual chapters focus on the etiology, epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention, treatment, and recurrence of MRONJ. Results and discussion: It has been observed over the years that among drugs that increase the risk of the disease, apart from bisphosphonates, angiogenesis inhibitors and anti-RANKL monoclonal antibodies should also be included. A thorough physical and subjective examination, periodic correction of dental prostheses, and an adequate preparation for even the simplest of procedures in the oral cavity area can prevent or minimize the risk of MRONJ. Conclusions: It is extremely difficult to treat once it occurs and oftentimes is a recurring problem that leads to a multitude of symptoms that gradually decrease the quality of a patient’s life.

Recurrence-Related Factors of Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw: A Five-Year Experience

PURPOSE

The treatment of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is greatly challenging for surgeons. In this study, we reviewed patients with MRONJ treated in our hospital in the past 5 years and explored the risk factors of recurrence.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted to review the patients with MRONJ from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2020. All patients received a monthly intravenous application of zoledronic acid. The primary outcome variable was the treatment outcome during follow-up. The predictor variables were local and systemic factors related to the treatment outcome. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the risk factors of recurrence after MRONJ treatment.

RESULTS

A total of 58 patients (62 sites) were included in this study. In multivariate regression analysis, the risk factor associated with recurrence after MRONJ treatment was the duration of medication of more than 18 months (odds ratio = 7.346; 95% confidence interval: 1.461-36.946; P = .016).

CONCLUSIONS

Using zoledronic acid over 18 months may increase the risk of recurrence in MRONJ patients.

Bisphosphonate-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw

OBJECTIVES

Antiresorptive agents for bone pain were widely used to treat patients with advanced osteoporosis, multiple myeloma, and bone metastatic cancer. In recent years, however, bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (BRONJ) has been a rare but major complication of this therapy. Most patients with BRONJ undergo dental procedures during treatment with antiresorptive agents. However, BRONJ may also occur spontaneously. This study reports 13 BRONJ patient cases at Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan, and their related treatments. We also compare patients with cancer with patients with osteoporosis in treatment outcomes.

METHODS

Thirteen symptomatic patients with BRONJ were reviewed between 1985 and 2018 at Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital. We included patients at advanced stage who were hospitalized for infection control of osteonecrosis of the jaw and excluded asymptomatic patients at stage 0 and stage 1. Four multiple myeloma, 3 patients with bone metastatic breast cancer and 6 patients with advanced osteoporosis (average ages, 63.57 ± 14.54 years in cancer patients and 79.5 ± 9.31 years in osteoporosis patients; average drug durations, 25.86 ± 27.23 months in cancer patients and 58.33 ± 23.87 months in osteoporosis patients; average follow-up times, 22.71 ± 14.46 months in cancer patients and 28.08 ± 36.35 months in osteoporosis patients) were included.

RESULTS

Seven patients were defined as having stage 3 (53.8%) and 6 as having stage 2 (46.2%) medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw, according to the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons classification. The complete response rate with totally healed mucosa was 61.5%. Four cancer patients received free fibular flap (FFF) reconstruction with a high complete response rate (100%). All of them had a relatively better performance status, and the average age was also younger than osteoporosis patients.

CONCLUSION

Free fibular flap with a high complete response rate may improve pain relief and infection control for patients with BRONJ. Younger age is seemed to be a great indicator for FFF, but poor self-care ability (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status >3) is not suitable for these surgical treatments.

Factors Influencing Severity of Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw: A Retrospective Study

PURPOSE

The progression of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is influenced by many factors. This study aimed to identify the clinical risk factors associated with severe MRONJ (stage 3).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The data of patients with MRONJ who were hospitalized between July 2013 and December 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Demographic and clinical factors were the independent variables, and the clinical stage of MRONJ lesions was the dependent variable. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the risk factors for advanced stage disease (MRONJ stage 3).

RESULTS

A total of 79 patients (with 93 MRONJ lesions) were included. In multivariate regression analysis, the risk factors associated with stage 3 MRONJ were age ≤65 years (odds ratio [OR] = 3.968, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.280-12.301; P = .017); chemotherapy (OR = 3.687, 95% CI: 1.048-12.972; P = .042); preoperative MRONJ duration ≥12 months (OR = 7.616, 95% CI: 1.865-31.110; P = .005); lesion location in maxilla (OR = 1.150, 95% CI: 1.006-1.315; P = .041); lesion location in posterior jaw, that is, in molar area (OR = 1.384, 95% CI; 1.118-1.715; P = .003); and serum albumin <40 g/L (OR = 6.257, 95% CI: 1.313-29.815; P = .021).

CONCLUSIONS

Age ≤65 years, chemotherapy, preoperative MRONJ duration ≥12 months, lesion location in maxilla, lesion location in the molar area, and serum albumin <40 g/L may increase the risk for severe MRONJ.

Evaluation of segmental mandibular resection without microvascular reconstruction in patients affected by medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw: a systematic review

Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is a severe condition that affects the jaw in patients exposed to specific drugs. More often it has been described in association with bisphosphonates (BP), but nowadays it has been observed with the use of other medications, such as denosumab (a RANK ligand inhibitor and monoclonal antibody agent) and antiangiogenic drugs. Managing the condition has unfortunately proven difficult and still remains a major challenge for clinicians and surgeons. The aim of this systematic review was to identify and analyse the evidence on mandibular segmental resection in patients with advanced MRONJ. A multi-database (PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) systematic search was performed. Any type of study on human patients treated with antiresorptive and antiangiogenic drugs was considered. The primary aim was to understand the success of mandibular segmental resection in the short, medium, and long term, and to understand its effects before, during, and after the operation. The search yielded 11 studies that were eligible for analysis with a total of 67 patients. Of the 11 studies, seven reported no complications, and overall, postoperative complications were seen in 16 cases. Recurrence of osteonecrosis was reported in one study. The most common postoperative complication was removal of hardware (n = 11). The mean (SD) follow-up time for eight studies was 35.57 (17.73) months. According to the limited data available in the literature, mandibular segmental resection is a viable treatment that has been used successfully in patients with various stages of MRONJ. The data show a relatively high percentage of recurrence. Additional data based on a larger cohort of patients or case-control studies are necessary to justify routine use of this type of intervention in patients affected by the condition.

The first quantitative histomorphological analyses of bone vitality and inflammation in surgical specimens of patients with medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw

BACKGROUND

The purpose of the study was to categorize the vitality and inflammation of resected bone of patients with medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) and to correlate the grade of inflammation with the surgical success.

METHODS

This prospective study includes 44 patients with stage III MRONJ. Necrotic bone was resected in a block fashioned way. After demineralization and staining, histological analyses were performed by measuring the areas of necrotic, vital, and regenerative bone. Areas of chronic and acute inflammation were categorized as non, mild, moderate, and severe and were correlated with surgical success and parameters of inflammation in blood plasma (C-reactive protein and leukocytes).

RESULTS

An average area of 59.0% was necrotic in the examined specimen. Vital bone was measured with an average area of 40.9%. The stage of chronic inflammation correlated with the amount of vital bone (P < .001) and the success of surgery (P = .002). If acute inflammation was dominant, chronic inflammation areas were found less while necrotic areas were observed more (P < .001). Also, the risk of relapses, wound healing disorders, and the level of C-reactive protein were elevated if acute inflammation was severe or moderate (P = .031). Areas of bone regeneration were seen only in 11.3% of vital bone areas and occurred independently of infection stages.

CONCLUSION

If possible, surgery should be delayed in patients with signs of severe acute inflammation. Patients may profit from prolonged pre-operative antibiotic therapy to reduce the level of acute inflammation.

Surgical treatment of advanced medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaws: Comparison of soft tissue closure techniques and evaluation of side effects

The aim of the study was to evaluate the surgical outcome of patients with advanced medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) treated with different flaps for soft tissue closure. Only MRONJ stage III patients with a minimum follow-up of 6 months were included in our prospective study. The soft tissue closure techniques were: Mylohyoid Muscle Flap, Buccal Fat Flap and mucoperiosteal flap alone. Potential risk factors and surgical side effects were analyzed. Relapses occurred in 12 of 44 included cases and 38 reached mucosal integrity within the follow-up. Cases treated with the muscle or fat flap showed better results regarding the recurrence rate (p < 0.001) and soft tissue healing (p = 0.002): only 3 of 33 developed a relapse, and 31 of 33 reached mucosal integrity. The outcome was worse if MRONJ occurred at the front areas of the jaw (p = 0.025). Postoperative, the pain level was reduced significantly (p < 0.001). Partial hypoesthesia of the lip arose in 18 cases. An impairment of the long-term prosthetic rehabilitation has not been seen.Patients with MRONJ stage III undergoing surgery benefit from extensive soft tissue closure.

Can Surgical Management Improve Resolution of Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw at Early Stages? A Prospective Cohort Study

PURPOSE

There is no clarity on which protocol is proper to use in the management of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) at early stages (ie, stages 1 and 2) to halt disease progression. The aim of this study was to evaluate the success of surgical treatment in terms of time to mucosal integrity and downstaging in patients with MRONJ at early stages.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was implemented as a prospective, single-center cohort study. The sample included patients who presented at Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro with a clinical diagnosis of MRONJ and underwent surgical treatment. The primary predictor variables were gender, age, medical history, drug administration, MRONJ localization, trigger factors, and stage. The outcome variables were 1) time to mucosal integrity after surgery with time-to-event analysis and 2) time to downstaging of MRONJ lesions. Descriptive, bivariate, and regression statistics were performed.

RESULTS

The study sample included 129 MRONJ patients (90 women and 39 men; mean age, 71.2 ± 12.7 years), of whom 57 had stage 1 and 72 had stage 2. The mean time to achieve mucosal integrity was 71.6 ± 67.7 days, considering the survival probability always to be 93% or greater. The mean time to achieve downstaging of the lesion was 43.6 ± 38.4 days. Patients older than 70 years, those affected by osteometabolic disorders, and those treated with oral antiresorptive therapy showed a significantly shorter time to mucosal healing and downstaging (P < .05). In patients with stage 2 MRONJ, we recorded a significantly longer time to mucosal integrity (56.4 ± 54.5 days) but shorter time to lesion downstaging (33.6 ± 9.9 days) than in patients with stage 1 MRONJ (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical treatment of patients in the early stages of MRONJ guarantees benefits in outcomes such as mucosal integrity and lesion downstaging, improvement in quality of life, and faster reuptake of medication therapy, especially for oncologic patients.

[Progress on medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw]

Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is a severe complication of bisphosphonates (BPs) or other targeted agent therapies. MRONJ appears as exposed bone, pus, and swelling in the oral and maxillofacial regions. However, neither surgery nor conservative therapy can eliminate symptoms thoroughly. In addition to BPs, several antiresorptive and antiangiogenic agents, such as denosumab and bevacizumab, as well as targeted agents, such as sunitinib and temsirolimus, can cause osteonecrosis of  the  jaw according to the literature. This review aims to summarize the research progress on these new drugs.

Is the conservative non-surgical management of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw an appropriate treatment option for early stages? A long-term single-center cohort study

PURPOSE

No consensus has been reached regarding the best treatment option for early-stage lesions in medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ). The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the long-time outcomes of conservative non-surgical management in stage I patients with underlying malignant disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We designed and implemented a retrospective cohort study and enrolled, between 2008 and 2018, a sample of patients with the indication for non-surgical conservative treatment stage I lesions. The primary outcome variable was treatment success defined as mucosal integrity without signs of infection. Secondary outcomes were: (i) worsening stage, (ii) necessity for surgical intervention over time, and (iii) discontinuation of antiresorptive therapy.

RESULTS

The sample included 75 patients with 92 lesions. Eight lesions showed full mucosal coverage, whereas 84 continued with exposed jaw bone (91.3%). Of the treatment-resistent 84 lesions, 67 presented a worsening stage shift over time. Indication for surgical intervention was set in 57 lesions. Of all lesions, 28 developed highly advanced necrotic bone destruction. Antiresorptive medication was paused in all evaluated patients after the first diagnosis of MRONJ.

CONCLUSION

Conservative non-surgical therapy in MRONJ stage I leads to a healing in rare cases. Conservative management might be a good option to preserve symptoms in patients either unwilling to undergo surgery or in those whose reduced general condition does not allow surgery. Early and consequent surgical advances should be performed throughout all stages of the disease to prevent the possibility of silent disease progression with the risk of large-scale bone loss.

Surgical treatment of medication-related osteonecrosis of the upper jaw: Case series

PURPOSE

The management of maxillary medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is challenging. Therefore, identifying the proper treatment is important. This study aimed to evaluate the surgical treatment of maxillary MRONJ using single-layer closure with mucoperiosteal flap and double-layer closure with buccal fat pad flap (BFPF) and mucoperiosteal flap and to find the outcomes after rehabilitation with obturators.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted and included all surgically treated and followed-up maxillary MRONJ cases in a single center. Demographics and clinical data, stage of MRONJ, surgical treatment, and treatment outcome were collected.

RESULTS

Seventy-nine lesions were included. Removal of necrotic bone was followed by coverage with mucoperiosteal flap in 60 lesions and BFPF in 14 lesions. Seven lesions (five primarily and two following unsuccessful treatment with BFPF) underwent necrectomy and were reconstructed with obturators. Complete mucosal healing was achieved in 76.7% of the lesions covered with mucoperiosteal flap. BFPF led to complete mucosal healing in 85.7% of the lesions. No complications were observed in the defects rehabilitated with obturators.

CONCLUSION

Removal of necrotic bone followed by closure with mucoperiosteal flap is reliable for MRONJ treatment. BFPF is effective for closure of MRONJ-related oroantral communications (OACs).

Treatment outcomes and prognostic factors of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw: a case- and literature-based review

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to investigate the treatment outcomes and prognostic factors of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) in Japanese patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Among 409 cases, treatment outcomes and prognostic factors were investigated in 275 patients. In statistical analyses, the 1-year cumulative curative rate was calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method, and significance was examined with the Wilcoxon test. Cox's proportional hazards regression analysis was used for the multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Resolution of the disease was achieved in 137 out of 275 MRONJ patients (49.8%). One-year cumulative curative rates were 39.8% in stage 1 patients, 26.3% in stage 2, and 19.0% in stage 3. The 1-year cumulative curative rates of treatment interventions were 17.2% for conservative treatment, 34.5% for sequestrectomy, and 40.7% for extended surgery including bone resection and segmental resection. As the prognostic factors of treatment outcomes, the type of medication, stage of MRONJ, and type of surgical intervention were identified as independent factors in a multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that surgical interventions may lead to a good prognosis in MRONJ patients.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This study indicated that surgical intervention for MRONJ might lead to improvement of prognosis and quality of life in MRONJ patients.

Nonsurgical Management of Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaws Using Local Wound Care

PURPOSE

Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaws (MRONJ) is a known complication of antiresorptive medications with surgical and nonsurgical treatment options. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of nonsurgical therapy using local wound care on management of MRONJ lesions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The authors conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients who presented to the University of California-Los Angeles School of Dentistry Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Clinic for evaluation and treatment of MRONJ. The primary predictor variable was wound care score; secondary predictors were demographics (age, gender), anatomic location, primary condition, and type and time of antiresorptive treatment. Outcomes assessed were disease resolution and time to disease resolution. Statistical analysis was carried out using the Spearman correlation for continuous and ordinal variables or the χ2 test for categorical variables. Time-to-event statistics and Cox proportional hazards models were calculated; a Kaplan-Meier plot was generated to assess time to healing.

RESULTS

One hundred six patients with 117 MRONJ lesions were treated using local wound care; complete disease resolution was observed 71% of lesions, with an additional 22% of lesions undergoing disease improvement. Wound care score was statistically associated with disease resolution and time to resolution, whereas demographics, anatomic site, condition, and type and time of antiresorptive treatment had no effect on resolution.

CONCLUSION

Local wound care increased the likelihood of MRONJ resolution and decreased the time to disease resolution. This strategy can be used in patients who cannot undergo surgery and should be implemented in all patients with MRONJ lesions who are managed nonsurgically.

A literature review of perioperative antibiotic administration in surgery for medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw

PURPOSE

Few studies exist that focus on the details of perioperative antibiotic administration for surgery to treat medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ). The regime and duration of perioperative antibiotics applied in published studies were reviewed to clarify appropriate perioperative antibiotic use in MRONJ surgery.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted using the MEDLINE database via PubMed.

RESULTS

The search resulted in 453 hits on PubMed. After reading the downloaded full-text articles, 17 articles met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The most common perioperative antibiotic used for MRONJ surgery was a combination of penicillin-based antibiotics and β-lactamase inhibitor (52.9%), and the second most common regime was penicillin-based antibiotics with metronidazole (17.6%). The duration of administration was 2 weeks postoperatively in nine studies, whereas four studies applied long-term administration (2-6 weeks postoperatively).

CONCLUSIONS

Oral and maxillofacial surgeons mostly prefer penicillin-based antibiotics plus β-lactamase inhibitor or metronidazole for MRONJ surgery. The duration of administration of these medications may be based on empirical experience.

Microbial diversity in infections of patients with medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw

OBJECTIVES

A central role of infections in the treatment of MRONJ patients is widely accepted. An investigation of the MRONJ lesions' biofilms as potential pathogens seems logical.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We investigated the clinical data of our MRONJ patients who received surgery in advanced stage of the disease. Special attention was granted to the local colonizers harvested from osseous MRONJ specimens and submucosal putrid infections.

RESULTS

Eleven out of 71 patients presented a spontaneous onset of the disease and for 60 out of 71 patients a trigger was detected. Breast cancer (29.6%) and prostate cancer (22.5%) were the most frequent underlying disease for prescription of an antiresorptive therapy, mostly zoledronate. Submucosal soft tissue biofilms significantly differed from biofilms harvested from the MRONJ lesions bottom, yet the most frequent bacteria were equally present in both groups: Streptococcus species (spp.), Prevotella spp., Actinomyces spp., Veillonella spp., and Parvimonas micra. The cephalosporins, cefuroxime and cefotaxime, and ß-lactam antibiotics with ß-lactamase inhibitor revealed the greatest susceptibility for the detected bacteria.

CONCLUSION

The bacteria from the submucosal areas and the bottom of the infected bone presented comparable susceptibility to the common antibiotics regimes. Streptococcus spp., Prevotella spp., and Veillonella spp. present a high abundance in MRONJ lesions beside Actinomyces spp. The MRONJ lesions bottom is in many cases not infected by Actinomyces spp.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The removal of the necrotic bone reduces the variety of bacteria found in MRONJ lesions, in particular at the bottom of the lesion.

Clinical characteristics and recurrence-related factors of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to investigate the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) and to elucidate factors affecting recurrence in surgical treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 51 patients who were diagnosed with MRONJ were analyzed according to demographic and clinical features and treatment results through a retrospective chart review from 2013 to 2017 in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul in Korea.

RESULTS

Alendronate composed the majority of medication doses (55.6%), followed by ibandronate (20.0%), risedronate (15.6%), and zoledronate (6.7%). Forty patients (88.9%) were given oral medication, and five patients (11.1%) were intravenously treated, and the mean duration of medication use was 61.1±42.9 months. A total of 10 patients (22.2%) had a drug holiday before MRONJ-induced dental treatment lasting an average of 6.8±7.0 months. MRONJ occurred 2.7 times more in the mandible, with 41 cases (73.2%) occurring in the mandible and 15 cases (26.8%) occurring in the maxilla, and the prevalence of affected posterior parts (premolar-molar) was six times greater than that of the anterior parts (incisor-canine) (48 cases vs 8 cases, 85.7% vs 14.3%). The most common dental cause of MRONJ was tooth extraction (69.6%). Regarding recurrence, there was no statistical difference in recurrence rate according to either site or stage. However, recurrence occurred in 4 out of 34 cases (11.8%) in the primary closure group and 9 out of 20 cases (45.0%) in the secondary healing group, and there was a statistical difference with respect to closure technique.

CONCLUSION

The identified risk factors in patients taking bone resorption inhibitors can aid dental clinicians in ensuring prevention and proper treatment of MRONJ.

Microsurgical Reconstruction of the Jaws Using Vascularised Free Flap Technique in Patients with Medication-Related Osteonecrosis: A Systematic Review

Background

Osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) has been reported to be associated with patients receiving primarily bisphosphonate (BP) therapies. However, lately it has been documented that other medications, such as RANK ligand inhibitor (denosumab) and antiangiogenic drug, can cause ONJ. Micro-osseous-vascular reconstruction of the jaws in patients affected by medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw represents a viable option of treatment for patients affected by stage III of the disease. However, there are still considerable doubts about the success of this procedure in the short, medium, and long term.

Material and Methods

A multidatabase (PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL) systematic search was performed. Any type of studies considering human patients treated with antiresorptive and antiangiogenic drugs was considered. The aim of the research is to primarily understand the success rate of micro-osseous-vascular reconstruction in the short, medium, and long period of time. This review has also the goal of better understanding any perioperative and postoperative complications resulting from the use of the reconstruction techniques.

Results

Eighteen studies resulted eligible for the study. Fibula free flap is the most commonly utilised vascularised free flap reconstruction technique (80.76%). Ten out of eighteen studies reported no complications. Recurrence of osteonecrosis was registered in five cases (6.41%) after free flap reconstruction. The overall free flap success rate was 96.16%.

Conclusions

Based on the limited data available in literature (Level 4 of the Oxford Evidence-based medicine scale), micro-osseous-vascular reconstruction of the jaws represents a valid treatment in patients with bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis at stage III of the disease. However, additional data based on a larger cohort of patients are necessary to justify this type of intervention in patient affected by MRONJ.

Antiresorptive treatment-associated ONJ

Osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) is a severe complication of therapy with antiresorptive agents (e.g. bisphosphonates and denosumab), which are used to manage bone metastases from cancer, to reduce the incidence of skeletal-related events. Available data indicate that 0-27, 5% of patients exposed to antiresorptive agents may develop ONJ, depending on the number of infusions and the duration of therapy. Besides antiresorptive therapy, a number of risk factors for osteonecrosis have been identified. Oral surgical procedures, tooth extractions and infection to the jawbones are considered the main risk factors for developing ONJ, when receiving antiresorptive therapy. However, a growing number of patients develop ONJ without apparent risk factors, raising concern for other predisposing factors. Jaw bone necrosis may be irreversible, resulting in a chronic disease with negative impact on the quality of patients' lives. The role of risk reduction strategies like meticulous dental screening and optimal oral hygiene is fundamental for preventing development of ONJ. ONJ is usually treated conservatively to relieve the symptoms and manage jaw bone necrosis. In certain cases, surgical intervention is required. Future research should emphasize individual predisposition to ONJ, more effective preventive measures and more efficient therapeutic procedures.

Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw in oncological patients with skeletal metastases: conservative treatment is effective up to stage 2

There is currently no widespread strategy for treating medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ), so our aim was to evaluate retrospectively the outcome of a minimally invasive treatment protocol for patients with both MRONJ and cancer. We designed a retrospective cohort study of patients with cancer who had been diagnosed with MRONJ after treatment with denosumab or bisphosphonates given intravenously. Primary outcome measures were improvement in the clinical stage of MRONJ and the time course to its resolution. Secondary outcome measures included the incidence of risk factors and patterns of treatment. Seventy-nine patients with 109 lesions were enrolled, and their characteristics, presentation of the lesions, complications, and relations to previous oral interventions were recorded. Treatment depended on the stage of disease, and included conservative medical, and minimally-invasive surgical, procedures. There was complete healing and resolution of disease in 38/57 stage 1 lesions, 30/47 stage 2 lesions, and 3/5 stage 3 lesions. The symptoms improved in 16/47 stage 2 lesions, and 2/5 stage 3 lesions. Fifteen of the stage 1 lesions, and one of the stage 2 lesions, failed to respond. Despite the possibility of an aggressive approach to the treatment of MRONJ, conservative treatment remains the first line of defence as regression is obvious, with evidence of no evolution to a higher stage. In our experience surgical intervention is recommended in persistent stage 3 MRONJ that has failed to respond to conservative treatment.

Osteonecrosis of the jaws: a review and update in etiology and treatment

INTRODUCTION

Osteonecrosis of the jaws can result either from radiation, used in radiotherapy for treatment of malignant tumors, or medications used for bone remodeling and anti-angiogenesis such as bisphosphonates. These conditions can be associated with triggering factors such as infection, trauma and decreased vascularity. The management of patients with osteonecrosis of the jaws requires caution since there is no specific treatment that acts isolated and decidedly. However, different treatment modalities can be employed in an associated manner to control and stabilize lesions.

OBJECTIVE

To review the current knowledge on etiology and management of osteonecrosis of the jaws, both radio-induced and medication-related, aiming to improve knowledge of professionals seeking to improve the quality of life of their patients.

METHODS

Literature review in PubMed as well as manual search for relevant publications in reference list of selected articles. Articles in English ranging from 1983 to 2017, which assessed osteonecrosis of the jaws as main objective, were selected and analyzed.

RESULTS

Infections, traumas and decreased vascularity have a triggering role for osteonecrosis of the jaws. Prophylactic and/or stabilizing measures can be employed in association with therapeutic modalities to properly manage osteonecrosis of the jaws patients.

CONCLUSION

Selecting an appropriate therapy for osteonecrosis of the jaws management based on current literature is a rational decision that can help lead to a proper treatment plan.