Is there an ideal implant for orbital reconstructions? Prospective 64-case study

Customised products for orbital wall reconstruction: a systematic review

The purpose of this systematic review was to critically analyse the recent literature and present the state of the art in customised reconstruction of orbital fractures. Three electronic databases and manual search approaches were used to identify relevant articles. Only controlled clinical studies were included. Primary outcome was defined as the status of recovery (complete/partial functional, and aesthetic disturbances). The benefit of intrasurgical navigation should be described. The secondary outcome was defined as the time of surgery, post-surgical events, and hospitalisation. Of the 552 records identified, eight met the inclusion criteria. Post-surgical results regarding recovery were superior in the customised group, and were comparable to the control group in five studies. The time of surgery was shorter in the customised groups, and liquid infusion and time of hospitalisation were reduced. Four studies documented more accurate reconstruction with the use of navigation. All the studies presented at least one bias, and considerable heterogeneity was evaluated. This review found that the use of customised meshes in combination with surgical navigation resulted in more accurate reconstruction. A significant reduction in surgical time was revealed.

Is Surgery Needed for Diplopia after Blowout Fractures? A Clarified Algorithm to Assist Decision-making

Diplopia is a common symptom after blowout fractures, with an incidence of 43.6%–83%. Although there is some consensus toward surgical correction, diplopia is not always resolved by surgery. Thus, there is a clinical dilemma for surgeons with regard to performing surgery at a specific time. This review aimed to create an algorithm to support accurate and effective decision-making.

Early Hypoglobus in Orbital Floor Reconstruction With Resorbable Implants

BACKGROUND

Among the variety of materials developed for facial bone surgery, resorbable implants are widely used in orbital wall reconstruction. There are many advantages in selecting resorbable implants, such as minimal foreign body reaction and adjustability within the damaged orbital floor. Resorbable implants are supposed to remain in place over 1 to 2 years to hold the structure of immature healing tissue surrounding the bony defects. However, some patients who have undergone orbital wall reconstruction surgery with resorbable implants suffer from early hypoglobus.

METHODS

This retrospective study was performed from January 2014 to August 2019 and follows 39 patients with unilateral pure orbital floor fractures. All orbital floor reconstruction was performed using resorbable implants via the transconjunctival approach. Exophthalmometer measurements and CT scans showing the degree of implant sagging were used to provide an index of hypoglobus.

RESULTS

Most patients showed hypoglobus over 3 to 4 months follow-up. The size of bony defect in the orbital floor showed positive correlation with follow-up exophthalmometer measurement and degree of implant sagging.

CONCLUSION

Orbital floor reconstructed with resorbable implant tends to lose load-bearing strength gradually, especially in large bony defects. Therefore, surgeons should be cautious about using resorbable implants for the maintenance of reconstructed orbital floor, especially in large bony defects.

Repair of unilateral combined orbital floor and medial wall fracture using two titanium mesh plates: a modified technique

Background

Compared to isolated orbital wall fracture, combined orbital floor and medial wall fractures are more likely to be required surgical correction due to a higher possibility of complications. However, it remains a challenge to repair concomitant orbital fracture using a one-piece implant due to the complex anatomic structures of the orbit. Aiming to reduce surgical difficulties and enhance therapeutic effects, we repaired unilateral combined orbital floor and medial wall fractures using two separated modified titanium mesh plates in this study.

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted on 21 consecutive patients who presented with unilateral combined orbital floor and medial wall fractures in Tianjin Medical University General Hospital between November 2010 and January 2016. The orbital fractures were repaired with two separated titanium mesh plates. The corner at the transition zone area between the orbital floor and the medial wall was reconstructed simultaneously through a combined transcaruncular and inferior subciliary approach with lateral canthotomy. The pre- and post-operative functions and aesthetic results were evaluated.

Results

Preoperatively, all patients presented with 3.5-6.5 mm enophthalmos, five patients presented with diplopia with ocular motility limitation in injured eyes, and six patients presented with hypoglobus ranging from 1.5 to 3.5 mm. Orbital floor and medial wall fractures of all patients were successfully repaired with two separated titanium mesh plates. Postoperatively, enophthalmos was improved in all patients, which was less than 2 mm on the last follow-up day. Hypoglobus was disappeared in all six patients postoperatively. Diplopia was resolved in five patients within 3 months post operation, and was reduced in one patient.

Conclusions

In cases of unilateral concomitant orbital floor and medial wall fractures, two titanium mesh plates implantation is a safe and effective procedure. It is worthwhile to take the technique into account when the key points to consider when applying this method include reconstruction of the special orbital shape and the complete return reposition of prolapsed intraorbital soft tissues were intended.

Clinical evaluation of the efficacy of materials used for primary reconstruction of orbital floor defects: Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The aim of this network meta-analysis (NMA) was to compare the clinical results obtained after primary reconstruction of orbital floor fractures (OFF) using different materials.

METHODS

PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar databases were screened from 1989 to 2019. For a study to be eligible, it had to evaluate two or more materials and report the following clinical parameters: diplopia and/or enophthalmos and/or other complications.

RESULTS

Nine studies involving 946 patients presenting with an OFF were included. After the surgical procedure, 105 patients (11%) had diplopia, while 43 patients (4.5%) suffered from enophthalmos. The NMA revealed that less postoperative diplopia and enophthalmos were obtained either by using polydioxanone (PDS), or a polymer of l-lactic acid and dl-lactic acid (P[L/DL]LA), or porous polyethylene, or titanium mesh compared with the use of autologous bone grafts.

CONCLUSION

P(L/DL)LA and PDS seem to be the best options for small and intermediate defects, whereas the association of porous polyethylene and titanium should be preferred for larger defects.

Is specialized ophthalmologic evaluation necessary after orbital fractures? A prospective 64-case study

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to determine whether there is a need for ophthalmologists to perform a specialized assessment after the occurrence of orbital fractures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty-three patients (64 orbits) diagnosed with orbital fractures were evaluated preoperatively (up to 24 h after the trauma) and in 90-day postoperative period.

RESULTS

Eight injuries required either specialized clinical or surgical ophthalmologic intervention. Of these patients, four required emergency eye surgery: two patients with corneal lacerations had lesions larger than 2 mm. Two patients had extensive ocular lesions after multiple traumas with uveal exposure and without light perception. Another four patients (iridodialysis associated with lens subluxation, anterior uveitis, direct lesion on the optic nerve, and chorioretinitis sclopetaria) received conservative management.

CONCLUSION

This study concluded that a specialized ophthalmologic examination as soon as possible is important, particularly in cases in which the signs and symptoms of severity are associated. The non-ophthalmologist surgeon must have the basic medical knowledge required to provide basic primary ophthalmologic care and to discern the severity of the injury.

Autologous Fat Graft for the Treatment of Sighted Posttraumatic Enophthalmos and Sunken Upper Eyelid

PURPOSE

The treatment of enophthalmos and sunken upper eyelid is challenging. Although autologous fat graft has been widely used in breast augmentation, buttock contouring, and facial rejuvenation, its application in enophthalmos and sunken upper eyelid is not yet widely utilized. The clinical safety and value of autologous fat graft in sighted patients with enophthalmos and sunken upper eyelid are unclear. This study retrospectively analyzed the cosmetic results and safety of autologous fat graft in the correction of sighted traumatic enophthalmos and sunken upper eyelid.

METHODS

Autologous fat graft was performed in 9 patients with posttraumatic enophthalmos and sunken upper eyelid. The visual acuity, orbital swelling, eye movement, enophthalmos, and sunken upper eyelid were observed.

RESULTS

Eight to 24 months after autologous fat graft, enophthalmos and sunken upper eyelid in 9 patients improved significantly. Although orbital swelling occurred in the early postoperative period, no vision loss, eye movement limitation, or fat embolism had occurred.

CONCLUSION

Autologous fat graft is an effective, predictable, scarless, and minimally invasive surgery for the correction of the sighted posttraumatic enophthalmos and sunken upper eyelid. The possible risk of fat embolization and blindness from the compression of the optic nerve should not be neglected. Further studies and more cases must be performed.

Nanoscale Topographical Characterization of Orbital Implant Materials

The search for an ideal orbital implant is still ongoing in the field of ocular biomaterials. Major limitations of currently-available porous implants include the high cost along with a non-negligible risk of exposure and postoperative infection due to conjunctival abrasion. In the effort to develop better alternatives to the existing devices, two types of new glass-ceramic porous implants were fabricated by sponge replication, which is a relatively inexpensive method. Then, they were characterized by direct three-dimensional (3D) contact probe mapping in real space by means of atomic force microscopy in order to assess their surface micro- and nano-features, which were quantitatively compared to those of the most commonly-used orbital implants. These silicate glass-ceramic materials exhibit a surface roughness in the range of a few hundred nanometers (S_q within 500–700 nm) and topographical features comparable to those of clinically-used “gold-standard” alumina and polyethylene porous orbital implants. However, it was noted that both experimental and commercial non-porous implants were significantly smoother than all the porous ones. The results achieved in this work reveal that these porous glass-ceramic materials show promise for the intended application and encourage further investigation of their clinical suitability.