Predictors of speech outcomes in children with Pierre Robin sequence

Management of cleft palate among patients with Pierre Robin sequence

Pierre Robin Sequence (PRS) is a congenital craniofacial anomaly distinguished by the presence of micrognathia, glossoptosis, and upper airway obstruction. Cleft palate occurs in over 3/4 of patients with PRS. The wide U-shape cleft and airway dysfunction create challenges in clinical management. Currently, disputes exist on the treatment protocol and prognosis of cleft palate management among patients with PRS. This review is focused on the deformity features, intervention timing, technique selection, airway support, and outcome evaluation of cleft palate among patients with PRS, aiming to provide reference to further evolution in the management of PRS-related cleft palate.

Pharyngeal flap in velopharyngeal insufficiency: Proposal of an algorithm in a series of 31 patients

This study evaluated the results of a reproductible protocol indicating the need for a pharyngeal flap in children with cleft palate and velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI). A retrospective review of all patients operated for a pharyngeal flap between 2010 and 2019 in our center was conducted. After exclusion of patients with primary VPI or residual fistulas, 31 patients' data were analyzed. Our main outcome measure was the improvement of the Borel Maisonny Classification (BMC) by at least 1 rank. Further analysis was made to evaluate the impact of age, type of cleft, and BMC before surgery on the gain in the velopharyngeal function. Of the 31 patients, success was achieved in 29 (93.5%, p<0.005). There was no significant correlation between age and gain in the velopharyngeal function (p = 0.137). There was no significant correlation between type of cleft and gain in the velopharyngeal function (p = 0.148). There was a significant correlation observed between the starting classification and gain in velopharyngeal function. The gain observed was greater as the initial velopharyngeal function was worse (p = 0.035). The use of an algorithm combining clinical assessment with a standardized classification of the velopharyngeal function proved to be a reliable tool for the indication of surgery in patients with VPI. A close follow up is essential in a multidisciplinary team.

Impacts of anterior-posterior jaw disproportions on speech of dentofacial disharmony patients

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Articulation problems impact communication, development, and quality of life, and are diagnosed in 73-87% of patients with Class II Dentofacial Disharmony (DFD). We evaluated whether differences exist in stop (/t/ or/k/), fricative (/s/ or/ʃ/), and affricate (/tʃ/) consonant sounds of Class II DFD subjects, and whether extent of malocclusion correlates with severity of speech distortion. We hypothesized that Class II patients display milder distortions than Class III and anterior open bite (AOB), as Class II patients can posture into a Class I occlusion.

MATERIALS/METHODS

Audio and orthodontic records were collected from DFD patients (N = 53-Class II, 102-Class III, 72-Controls) who were pursuing orthodontics and orthognathic surgery. A speech pathologist perceptually scored speech. Acoustic differences in recordings were measured using Spectral Moment Analysis.

RESULTS

When Class II subjects were compared to controls, significant differences were found for the centroid frequency (M1) of the /s/ sound and the spectral spread (M2) of /t/, /tʃ/, and /s/ sounds, with pairwise significance for controls relative to Class II AOB and all Class II subjects. Class II AOB subjects had higher M1 and M2 values than patients with Class II closed bites and Class I controls for most sounds. When comparing across anterior-posterior (AP) groups, differences exist between controls, Class II and III DFD subjects for M1 of /t/, /tʃ/, and/ʃ/ and M2 for /t/, /tʃ/, /s/, and /ʃ/ sounds. Using linear regression, correlations between Class II and III severity and spectral measures were found for /t/ and /tʃ/ sounds.

CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS

Class II and III patients have a higher prevalence of qualitative distortions and spectral changes in consonants compared to controls, but Class II spectral shifts are smaller and affect fewer sounds than in Class III and AOB cohorts. Linear correlations between AP discrepancy and spectral change suggest causation and that treatment may improve articulation problems.

Long-term speech outcome in patients with Robin sequence after cleft palate repair and tongue-lip adhesion: A 21-year retrospective analysis

The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of tongue-lip adhesion (TLA) on the long-term speech and articulation outcomes of patients with Robin sequence (RS) after cleft palate repair. Outcomes were compared to those in patients with RS who required positioning alone and to patients with isolated cleft palate (ICP). All consecutive patients with RS (with or without TLA) versus isolated cleft palate (ICP) who underwent cleft palate repair were retrospectively reviewed. Speech and articulation included all assessments between the age of 3-6 years. Secondary speech operations, velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI), hypernasality, and articulation errors by cleft-type characteristics (CTC), including 4 categories (passive), non-oral, anterior-oral, and posterior-oral. A total of 41 RS patients and 61 ICP patients underwent repair with sufficient follow-up. Of them, 23 patients underwent a TLA at median age of 12 days. Rates of hypernasality (p = 0.004), secondary speech operations (p = 0.004), and posterior oral CTC (p = 0.042) were higher in RS compared to ICP. Isolated RS had speech outcomes similar to those of ICP; however, syndromic RS patients needed more secondary speech operations compared to isolated RS (p = 0.043). TLA-RS patients did not demonstrate differences in speech outcomes or any CTCs (all p > 0.05) compared to non-TLA-RS patients, except for the anterior oral CTC (74% TLA-RS vs 28% non-TLA-RS, p = 0.005). Within the limitations of the study, it seem that TLA does not affect long-term velopharyngeal function in patients with RS. However, TLA-RS patients demonstrated higher rates of anterior-oral CTC, which might be related to a different positioning of the tongue after TLA. Every effort should be taken to treat patients with RS conservatively instead of with TLA because of this demonstrated a negative effect on one type of articulation error. However, if conservative therapy fails, a TLA is still a valuable adjunct in the treatment of RS, and cleft speech pathologists who treat such patients should be more aware of this phenomenon in order to improve long-term articulation outcomes.

Speech assessment following microsurgical soft palate repair

The aim of this study was to analyze speech intelligibility of children, who had undergone microsurgical soft palate repair according to Sommerlad. Cleft palate patients were treated by closure of the soft palate according to Sommerlad at about 6 months of age. At the age of 11, their speech was evaluated through automatic speech recognition. Word recognition rate (WR) was used as the outcome parameter of automatic speech recognition. To validate automatic speech results, an institute for speech therapy evaluated the speech samples for perceptual intelligibility. The results of this study group were compared to an age-matched control group. A total of 61 children were evaluated in this study, 29 in the study group and 32 in the control group. Study group patients had a lower word recognition rate (mean 43.03, SD 12.31) compared to the control group (mean 49.98, SD 12.54, p = 0.033). The magnitude of the difference was considered small (95% CI of the difference 0.6-13.3). The study group patients received significantly lower scores in the perceptual evaluation (mean 1.82, SD 0.58) compared to the control group mean (mean 1.51, SD 0.48, p = 0.028). Again, the magnitude of the difference was small (95% CI of the difference 0.03-0.57). Within the limitations of the study it seems that microsurgical soft palate repair according to Sommerlad at the age of 6 months might be a relevant alternative to other well established surgical techniques.

Speech Development in Cleft Palate with and without Robin Sequence

BACKGROUND

Robin sequence is defined as the triad of micrognathia, glossoptosis, and upper airway obstruction. In up to 85 percent, it is associated with cleft palate. Many studies have reported worse speech development in Robin sequence children after cleft palate repair. The authors investigated speech development in isolated Robin sequence with cleft palate versus children with cleft palate only at the age of 5 to 6 years.

METHODS

All Robin sequence children were treated with the Tübingen palatal plate after birth. Data were collected using the German version of the Great Ormond Street Speech Assessment. Audio and video recordings were reviewed and analyzed separately by two blinded senior phoniatricians based on the German version of the Universal Reporting Parameters for Cleft Palate Speech, and scored to enable comparability of speech outcomes.

RESULTS

Forty-four children (Robin sequence, n = 22; cleft palate only, n = 22) were included. Robin sequence children were significantly older at surgery (11.8 months versus 7.1 months; p < 0.001) but younger at study (70.5 months versus 75.2 months; p = 0.035). They also had more severe cleft of the palate (p = 0.006). All children studied showed good to very good speech development without serious impairment. None of the reported parameters on the German version of the Universal Reporting Parameters for Cleft Palate Speech showed significant group differences; the median total score in the Robin sequence group was 23 (interquartile range, 16.5 to 27.5) versus 19 (interquartile range, 17 to 23) in the cleft palate-only group. Statistical analysis revealed no significant effect of group (Z = -1.47; p = 0.14).

CONCLUSIONS

No group differences in speech development were found at age 5 to 6 years. Isolated Robin sequence does not necessarily represent a risk for impaired speech development.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Risk, III.

Developmental outcome of children with Robin sequence: How does the question arise?

Robin sequence (RS) is a heterogeneous congenital condition characterized by retrognathia, glossoptosis, upper airway obstruction, and very often, posterior U-shape cleft palate. Half the children with RS have an underlying syndrome, either identified (syndromic RS) or not (RS+). Long-term intellectual developmental outcome first depends on the underlying diagnosis and is often poor in syndromic cases. On the contrary, the rare studies that analysed the long-term developmental outcome of children with isolated RS who received effective treatment of their respiratory and feeding difficulties early in life, showed intellectual and academic results close to or within the normal range. Speech outcome in RS is often delayed with phonation disorders. Speech difficulties depend on intellectual level, hearing and velar function after palate repair. It affects most children with RS and deserves active monitoring and care.

Quality of life and phonatory and morphological outcomes in cognitively unimpaired adolescents with Pierre Robin sequence: a cross-sectional study of 72 patients

Background

Pierre Robin sequence (PRS) is a heterogeneous condition involving retro(micro)gnathia, glossoptosis and upper airway obstruction, very often with posterior cleft palate. Patients with PRS, either isolated or associated with Stickler syndrome have good intellectual prognosis. Nevertheless, the quality of life in adolescence and the phonatory and morphological outcomes are rarely analysed. We assessed the phonatory and morphological outcomes of 72 cognitively unimpaired adolescents with PRS, studied their oral (COHIP-SF19), vocal (VHI-9i) and generic quality of life (QoL; KIDSCREEN-52), and searched for determinants of these outcomes.

Results

Two-thirds of our adolescents retained low or moderate phonation difficulties, but risk factors were not identified. For 14%, morphological results were considered disharmonious, with no link to neonatal retrognathia severity. Only one vs two-stage surgery seemed to affect final aesthetic results. The oral QoL of these adolescents was comparable to that of control patients and was significantly better than that of children with other craniofacial malformations (COHIP-SF19 = 17.5, 15.4 and 25.7, respectively). The oral QoL of the adolescents with non-isolated PRS was significantly worse (COHIP-SF19 = 24.2) than that of control patients and close to that of children with other craniofacial malformations. The vocal QoL of the adolescents (mean [SD] VHI-9i = 7.5 [5.4]) was better than that of patients with other voice pathologies and better when phonation was good. The generic QoL of the adolescents was satisfactory but slightly lower than that of controls, especially in dimensions concerning physical well-being, relationships and autonomy. QoL results were lower for adolescents with non-isolated than isolated PRS. Only non-isolated PRS and low oral QoL affected generic QoL.

Conclusion

Morphological or phonatory impairments remain non-rare in adolescents with PRS but do not seem to be directly responsible for altered QoL. These adolescents, especially those with non-isolated PRS, show self-confidence and social-relation fragility. We must focus on long-term functional and psychological results for PRS patients and improve therapy protocols and follow-up, notably those affecting the oral aspects of the disease.

Long Term Speech and Feeding Outcomes in Patients With Pierre Robin Sequence

OBJECTIVE

Airway obstruction in newborns with Pierre Robin sequence (PRS) may be managed with tongue-lip adhesion (TLA), mandibular distraction osteogenesis (MDO), or tracheostomy to prevent airway compromise when conservative airway interventions fail or are contraindicated based on the type of obstruction present. Unfortunately, some of these procedures have the potential to affect a child's speech and feeding development.

METHOD

The authors retrospectively reviewed the records of all children with PRS treated at our institution in the last 25 years. Our primary outcomes of interests were: (1) consonant production errors; (2) achievement of full oral feeds; (3) need for prolonged gastrostomy tube feeds; and (4) avoidance of tracheostomy.

RESULTS

Seven (7/73, 10%) children required intubation at birth for respiratory failure. Forty-two children were treated with TLA (42/73, 58%), 2 with MDO (2/73, 3%), and 1 (1/73, 1%) with tracheostomy. Twenty-one (21/73, 29%) were treated with conservative airway interventions. Of the 7 children requiring intubation, 1 required tracheostomy, and 6 required TLA. Five children who received TLA initially proceeded to tracheostomy. Of the 3 children who underwent MDO, 2 required tracheostomy. Of the 2 patients who underwent MDO, 2 failed, requiring tracheostomy. One child required tracheostomy as the first airway intervention. Among all children with PRS, /s,z/ speech errors were the most common. Children treated with conservative airway interventions had significantly fewer /sh/ errors at age 3 (X = 6.604, P < 0.05) relative to those treated with TLA, MDO, and/or tracheostomy. Consonant production errors extinguished over time, with significantly less /s,z/ errors produced at age 8 compared to at ages 3 (Z = -2.263, P < 0.01), 4 (Z = -2.449, P < 0.05), 5 (Z = -2.775, P < 0.01), and 6 (Z = -2.049, P < 0.05). Among all children, 70% (51/70) were able to achieve full oral feeds.

CONCLUSIONS

This study describes speech-production and feeding outcomes in children with PRS. Tongue-tip sound errors, including /s,z/, are prominent early in speech development but later extinguish, a pattern of speech maturation that follows that of typically-developing children.Most children were able to achieve full oral feeds, with few requiring prolonged g-tube placement. We hope these results serve as a useful tool in managing speech and feeding in children with TLA, and when counselling patients with PRS requiring definitive airway surgery.

Cleft palate lateral synechia syndrome in two patients and literature review

Cleft palate lateral synechia (CPLS) syndrome is an extremely rare congenital malformation syndrome of unknown origin, characterized by the association of cleft palate and one or more intraoral lateral synechiae (OMIM # 119550). Fewer than 20 cases have been described to date. The clinical and histological findings and results of genetic investigations for two additional cases of CPLS are presented herein, in order to better delineate this syndrome, within the context of the relevant literature. The first case presented with a U-shaped cleft palate, bilateral synechiae, and Pierre Robin sequence, requiring early sectioning of the synechiae because of severe feeding problems. The second case presented with a V-shaped cleft palate and a single synechia, running from the left border of the cleft to the floor of the mouth, and was without feeding difficulties. In both cases, histopathological examination of the synechiae revealed an aspect of mucous membranes macroscopically, while staining of sections indicated lymphocyte infiltrates and parakeratosis with stratified squamous epithelium, associated with vessel and connective tissue abnormalities. Sequencing of candidate genes did not identify a genetic cause. Accurate clinical descriptions, histopathological diagnosis, and genetic investigations of patients with synechiae are lacking in the literature. Better characterization of future cases of CPLS will give new insights into its developmental causes.

Robin Sequence: 5-Year Speech Outcomes-A Case-Control Study

BACKGROUND

Pierre Robin sequence (Robin sequence) is defined as the triad of micrognathia, glossoptosis, and airway obstruction. It is frequently associated with palatal clefting. In recent years, increased interest in speech outcomes of cleft patients diagnosed with Robin sequence has been shown.

METHODS

Speech outcomes of cleft patients with Robin sequence were assessed at age 5 in comparison with a cleft palate-only cohort. Speech parameters were evaluated according to the Cleft Audit Protocol for Speech-Augmented and analyzed using the National Audit Standards for Speech (United Kingdom). All patients were treated in the same institution during the same period (2005 to 2012). Subjects who needed nasopharyngeal airway support and those whose airway was managed by positioning only were eligible.

RESULTS

Fifty-one cleft patients diagnosed with Robin sequence were included in this study. Outcomes were compared to those of 128 nonsyndromic cleft palate-only patients.Patients with Robin sequence were shown to present with a significantly higher rate of cleft speech characteristics in comparison to the reference cohort (p = 0.001). Furthermore, it was shown that Robin sequence is associated with a significantly higher rate of secondary speech surgery for velopharyngeal dysfunction before the age of 5 (p = 0.016). Robin sequence patients with a nasopharyngeal airway presented with a higher rate of cleft speech characteristics compared to Robin sequence patients managed with positioning only.

CONCLUSION

Cleft patients with Robin sequence are more likely to need further surgery to correct velopharyngeal dysfunction before the age of 5 and are more prone to present with cleft speech characteristics at the age of 5.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Risk, II.

Early Communication Behaviors in Infants With Cleft Palate With and Without Robin Sequence: A Preliminary Study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the early communication behaviors in infants with nonsyndromic isolated cleft palate (iCP) and Robin sequence (RS).

DESIGN

Group comparison using parent report.

PARTICIPANTS

There were 106 participants included in this study. Two groups were selected from the UK Cleft Collective resource. Parents had completed the Language ENvironment Analysis Developmental Snapshot questionnaire when their child turned 13 months. There were 78 participants in the iCP group and 28 in the RS group.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Total number of communication behaviors reported on the questionnaire. Subdomains for expressive and receptive language and social communication behaviors were also analyzed.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant group differences. Parents of infants with RS reported fewer later communication behaviors compared to the iCP group. Infants in both groups had fewer communication behaviors compared to the normative sample. Across the whole sample, post hoc analysis revealed a significant correlation between severity of the cleft and social communication behaviors and expressive but not receptive language. Infants with a cleft of the hard and soft palate were more likely to be in the RS group (odds ratio: 7.04 [95% CI: 1.55-32.04]; P = .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Both groups reported similar levels of early communication. Some divergence of more complex language skills was seen, although there were no significant group differences. A relationship with the diagnosis of a cleft of the hard or soft palate with expressive language behaviors was found. Further study into the impact of cleft severity on early speech development and the relationship with later language skills is needed along with longitudinal follow-up of this population.

Palatal Re-Repair With Z-Plasty in Treatment of Velopharyngeal Insufficiency of Syndromic and Nonsyndromic Patients With Cleft Palate

BACKGROUND

Velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) often results from palatal shortening or insufficient levator function after cleft palate repair.

AIMS

To assess the efficacy of palatal re-repair with Z-plasty in treatment of VPI for patients with isolated cleft palate (ICP).

METHODS

This retrospective analysis comprised 130 consecutive patients who had ICP with VPI that required Z-plasty as secondary surgery between 2008 and 2017. Pre- and post-operative evaluation of velopharyngeal function was done perceptually and instrumentally by Nasometer.

RESULTS

Median patient age at Z-plasty was 6.8 years (range 3.0-20.1). Of the 130 patients, preoperatively VPI was severe in 73 (56%), mild-to-moderate in 55 (42%), and borderline in 2 (2%). Postoperatively, 105 (81%) of patients achieved adequate (normal or borderline) velopharyngeal competence and 16 (12%) required second operation for residual VPI. The success rate was 84% in nonsyndromic patients, 79% in nonsyndromic Pierre Robin sequence patients, and 58% in syndromic patients. In syndromic children, the speech outcome was significantly worse than in nonsyndromic children (P = 0.014). Complications included wound healing problems in 3 patients (2%), mild infection in 1 patient (1%), postoperative bleeding in 1 (1%), and postoperative fistula in 2 (2%).

CONCLUSION

Palatal re-repair with Z-plasty is a safe operation for VPI correction in patients with ICP with a success rate of 81%. In syndromic patients, the procedure did not seem to work as well as in nonsyndromic patients.

Long-term Speech Outcomes of Cleft Palate Repair in Robin Sequence versus Isolated Cleft Palate

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Whether treatment of cleft palate (CP) associated with Robin sequence (RS) should attain outcomes similar to those of isolated cleft palate (ICP) remains unknown. This study compares treatment and outcomes in both conditions and delineates predictors of long-term outcome.

Benchmarking Speech, Velopharyngeal Function Outcomes and Surgical Characteristics Following the Sommerlad Protocol and Palate Repair Technique

Objective:

To report speech and velopharyngeal function (VPF) outcomes, and surgical characteristics, at age 5 following early complete palate closure using the Sommerlad protocol.

Design:

A retrospective, descriptive, cross-sectional consecutive series.

Setting:

A regional twin site center; a district general hospital and tertiary children’s hospital.

Participants:

Between 1993 and 2006, 877 participants underwent surgery; 712 (81%) were eligible for inclusion; 391 (55%) were included, 321 (45%) excluded. Thirteen percent had bilateral cleft lip and palate (CLP), 40% unilateral CLP, and 47% isolated cleft palate.

Intervention:

Lip and vomerine flap repair at 3 months of age (BCLP, UCLP) with soft palate closure using radical muscle dissection and retropositioning at a mean age of 6.6 months, range 4 to 23 months, as described and undertaken by Sommerlad.

Outcome Measures:

Velopharyngeal Composite (VPC) CAPS-A and articulation summary scores derived from analysis using the Cleft Audit Protocol for Speech-Augmented.

Results:

A VPC-SUM CAPS-A score of “0” was found in 97% reflecting adequate VPF; 73% had no cleft articulation difficulties. The BCLP group had the poorest articulation. Secondary speech surgery rate was 2.6% and 10.7% had fistula repair. Levator muscle quality and degree of retropositioning was associated with speech outcomes related to VPF. 2.6% had current features of VPI.

Conclusions:

Complete palate closure by around 6 months of age by the surgeon who described the technique led to excellent perceived VPF and very good speech outcomes at age 5, with less speech therapy and secondary speech surgery than commonly reported. These findings serve as a benchmark for the Sommerlad protocol and technique.

Pierre Robin Sequence: Incidence of Speech-Correcting Surgeries and Fistula Formation

Objective:

Children with Pierre Robin sequence (PRS) and cleft palate have a high rate of velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) following primary palatoplasty. Our purpose was to determine the long-term incidence of speech-correcting surgeries (SCSs) and fistula rates in PRS after primary palatoplasty and the influence of possible causal factors.

Design:

A retrospective single-center, observational chart review study.

Participants:

After exclusion, the study cohort comprised 78 nonsyndromic PRS children (48 females) born between 1990 and 2009 and treated at the Cleft Palate and Craniofacial Center of Helsinki University Hospital, Finland. Causal factors included gender, surgeon, age at primary palatoplasty, surgical technique, airway obstruction in infancy, and cleft severity. We analyzed the outcome at age 8 years and at data retrieval, with a median follow-up of 14 years (range: 8-27 years).

Results:

Thirty-four (43.6%) children received SCS by age 8 years, and of the 19 (24.4%) postoperative fistulas, 6 (7.7%) underwent closure. At data retrieval, 37 (47.4%) children had undergone SCS and 8 (10.3%) had a fistula closure. Median age at SCS was 6 years. The results showed no significant association for gender, surgeon, age at primary palatoplasty, surgical technique, cleft severity, or airway obstruction in infancy regarding incidence of SCS, fistulas, or repaired fistulas.

Conclusion:

Pierre Robin sequence in children is associated with a high incidence of SCS and fistula formation, which necessitates accurate clinical follow-up and observation of speech development. The development of VPI in PRS is complex and most likely involving multiple factors.

The use of three-dimensional reconstructions of CT scans to evaluate anomalies of hyoid bone in Pierre Robin sequence: A retrospective study

AIM

The aim of the study was to investigate hyoid bone anomalies in patients with Pierre Robin sequence (PRS) compared to the control group, using computed tomography (CT) examination and three-dimensional reconstruction of the hyoid bone and mandible.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed of patients between birth and 12 months old with isolated PRS (i-PRS) and syndromic PRS (ni-PRS), who had undergone CT examination, and whose results were compared to the control group of the same age. DICOM data was processed to highlight bone tissue. The mandible and hyoid bones were the main targets of the three-dimensional reconstruction. The study outcomes were the analysis of hyoid bone ossification, volume, and position (distance between hyoid and mandibular symphysis). Univariate and multivariate statistical analyses were performed with α=0.05 as level of significance.

RESULTS

The study sample included 29 i-PRS and 21 ni-PRS patients, while 43 infants in the control group. Hyoid ossification was present in 26/50 (52%) PRS patients (14 i-PRS; 12 ni-PRS) but in 31/43 controls (72%). Statistical analysis showed that absence of hyoid ossification was significantly associated with the diagnosis of PRS (P<0.05). Only ni-PRS patients showed a significant reduction of the distance between hyoid and mandible compared to the control group (P<0.001). Hyoid volume was significantly lower only in the ni-PRS group than in controls (P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

I-PRS and ni-PRS patients differ both etiologically and clinically. Ni-PRS patients confirmed their worst clinical condition than i-PRS with severe anomalies of hyoid development, helping for their ontogeny classification.