1
|
Raveendranath V, Dash PK, Nagarajan K, Kavitha T, Swathi S. Skull Base Angle Morphometry in South Indian Population with Review on Terminology. INDIAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY 2022. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1722824] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction Basal angle, Boogaard’s angle, and clival angle are frequently used in diagnosing the craniometric angle malformations either on radiography or now more on MRI. But anatomic and clinical studies have used varied terms for these parameters. We aimed to look for these parameters among a normal south Indian adult population to standardize the measurements and their terminology.
Materials and Methods One hundred MRI images (50 males and 50 female) were studied retrospectively. MRI images that were reported as normal by neuroradiologist were taken up for the study. Mean and the standard deviation of males and females were calculated for basal angle, Boogaard’s angle, and clival angle, separately. Unpaired t-test was used to analyze the significant difference (p < 0.05) between the genders. The intraclass coefficient correlation was used to analyze the interobserver variability.
Results The mean value of basal angle in males and females are 113°and 114°, respectively. The mean value of Boogaard’s angle in males and females are 120°and 121°, respectively. The mean value of clival angle in males and females are 157°and 155°, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference (p > 0.05) between males and females in all three angles.
Conclusion Knowledge about the normal angles will be an important tool in understanding the normal and abnormal skull base. Since the type of skull varies in accordance with race, the normal craniometric angle also varies in accordance with race. The present study tried to standardize the parameters of normal skull base angles for appropriate correction of the anomalies and uniform usage of terminology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Veeramani Raveendranath
- Department of Anatomy, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education & Research, Puducherry, India
| | - Prafulla Kumar Dash
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India
| | - Krishnan Nagarajan
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education & Research, Puducherry, India
| | - Thangaraj Kavitha
- Department of Anatomy, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education & Research, Puducherry, India
| | - Srinidhi Swathi
- Department of Anatomy, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education & Research, Puducherry, India
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Alam MK, Alfawzan AA, Srivastava KC, Shrivastava D, Ganji KK, Manay SM. Craniofacial morphology in Apert syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep 2022; 12:5708. [PMID: 35383244 PMCID: PMC8983770 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-09764-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2021] [Accepted: 03/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
This meta-analysis aims to compare Apert syndrome (AS) patients with non-AS populations (not clinically or genetically diagnosed) on craniofacial cephalometric characteristics (CCC) to combine publicly available scientific information while also improving the validity of primary study findings. A comprehensive search was performed in the following databases: PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, Medline, and Web of Science, an article published between 1st January 2000 to October 17th, 2021. PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines were followed to carry out this systematic review. We used the PECO system to classify people with AS based on whether or not they had distinctive CCC compared to the non-AS population. Following are some examples of how PECO has been used: People with AS are labeled P; clinical or genetic diagnosis of AS is labeled E; individuals without AS are labeled C; CCC of AS are labeled O. Using the Newcastle–Ottawa Quality-Assessment-Scale, independent reviewers assessed the articles' methodological quality and extracted data. 13 studies were included in the systematic review. 8 out of 13 studies were score 7–8 in NOS scale, which indicated that most of the studies were medium to high qualities. Six case–control studies were analyzed for meta-analysis. Due to the wide range of variability in CCC, we were only able to include data from at least three previous studies. There was a statistically significant difference in N-S-PP (I2: 76.56%; P = 0.014; CI 1.27 to − 0.28) and Greater wing angle (I2: 79.07%; P = 0.008; CI 3.07–1.17) between AS and control subjects. Cleft palate, anterior open bite, crowding in the upper jaw, and hypodontia occurred more frequently among AS patients. Significant shortening of the mandibular width, height and length is the most reported feature in AS patients. CT scans can help patients with AS decide whether to pursue orthodontic treatment alone or to have their mouth surgically expanded. The role of well-informed orthodontic and maxillofacial practitioners is critical in preventing and rehabilitating oral health issues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammad Khursheed Alam
- Orthodontics, Preventive Dentistry Department, College of Dentistry, Jouf University, Sakaka, Saudi Arabia.
| | - Ahmed Ali Alfawzan
- Department of Preventive Dentistry, College of Dentistry in Ar Rass, Qassim University, Ar Rass, Saudi Arabia
| | - Kumar Chandan Srivastava
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Dentistry, Jouf University, Sakaka, Saudi Arabia
| | - Deepti Shrivastava
- Preventive Dentistry Department, College of Dentistry, Jouf University, Sakaka, Saudi Arabia
| | - Kiran Kumar Ganji
- Preventive Dentistry Department, College of Dentistry, Jouf University, Sakaka, Saudi Arabia
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wang X, Wang H, You J, Zheng R, Xu Y, Fan F. Craniofacial development in patients of Tessier No.0 cleft with a bifid nose using 3D computed tomography. Front Pediatr 2022; 10:979345. [PMID: 36090555 PMCID: PMC9449123 DOI: 10.3389/fped.2022.979345] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2022] [Accepted: 08/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Considerable studies have focused mainly on the facial deformity of Tessier No.0 cleft with a bifid nose, but the deformity of the skull is not well understood. Therefore, our study aimed to explore the evolution of cranial dysmorphology and the chronology of Tessier No.0 cleft with a bifid nose, by three-dimensional measurements. METHODS Ninety-six non-surgical patients and computed tomographic scans were included (Tessier No.0 cleft with a bifid nose, n = 48; controls, n = 48) and divided into five age subgroups. Craniofacial cephalometric measurements were analyzed by Mimics software. RESULTS The widening of nasal bone was the most remarkable and persistent from 2 years old appropriately. The overall cranial base length in patients compared with controls increased 11.8% (p < 0.01) on average. The middle and posterior cranial fossa increasing accounted for most of this change. The cranial base angles also showed increased obviously. By analyzing the linear of the nasopharynx and respiratory tract, it was found that its development did not affect respiration. CONCLUSIONS The cranial base deformity of Tessier No.0 cleft with a bifid nose consists of the whole skull base and particularly the middle and posterior cranial base length increase. At the same time, there may be late closure of the spheno-occipital synchondrosis and sella displacement. We believe this study is unique in providing valuable data for elucidating the pathological and morphological abnormalities of skull base development in Tessier No.0 cleft with a bifid nose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xin Wang
- Department of Rhinoplasty, Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Huan Wang
- Department of Rhinoplasty, Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jianjun You
- Department of Rhinoplasty, Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Ruobing Zheng
- Department of Rhinoplasty, Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yihao Xu
- Department of Rhinoplasty, Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Fei Fan
- Department of Rhinoplasty, Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Respective Roles of Craniosynostosis and Syndromic Influences on Cranial Fossa Development. Plast Reconstr Surg 2021; 148:145-156. [PMID: 34181610 DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000008101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Little is known about the detailed growth of the cranial fossae, even though they provide an important structural connection between the cranial vault and the facial skeleton. This study details the morphologic development of isolated cranial vault synostosis and associated syndromes on cranial fossa development. METHODS A total of 125 computed tomographic scans were included (nonsyndromic bicoronal synostosis, n = 36; Apert syndrome associated with bicoronal synostosis, n = 24; Crouzon syndrome associated with bicoronal synostosis, n = 11; and controls, n = 54). Three-dimensional analyses were produced using Materialise software. RESULTS The regional anterior and middle cranial fossae volumes of nonsyndromic bicoronal synostosis are characterized by significant increases of 43 percent (p < 0.001) and 60 percent (p < 0.001), respectively, and normal posterior cranial fossa volume. The cranial fossae depths of nonsyndromic bicoronal synostosis were increased, by 37, 42, and 21 percent (all p < 0.001) for anterior, middle, and posterior cranial fossae, respectively, accompanying the shortened cranial fossae lengths. The volume and morphology of all cranial fossae in Apert syndrome nearly paralleled nonsyndromic bicoronal synostosis. However, Crouzon syndrome had reduced depths of cranial fossae, and more restricted fossa volumes than both Apert syndrome and nonsyndromic bicoronal synostosis. CONCLUSIONS Cranial vault suture synostosis is likely to be more influential on cranial fossae development than other associated influences (genetic, morphologic) in Apert and Crouzon syndromes. Isolated Apert syndrome pathogenesis is associated with an elongation of the anterior cranial fossa length in infants, whereas in Crouzon syndrome, there is a tendency to reduce cranial fossa depth, suggesting individual adaptability in cranial fossae development related to vault synostosis.
Collapse
|
5
|
Lu X, Forte AJ, Alperovich M, Alonso N, Persing JA. Does different cranial suture synostosis influence orbit volume and morphology in Apert syndrome? Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2021; 51:338-346. [PMID: 34400025 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2021.07.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2021] [Revised: 07/25/2021] [Accepted: 07/28/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
This study was performed to compare the orbital and peri-orbital morphological variations in Apert syndrome patients with different cranial vault suture synostosis, so as to provide an anatomic basis for individualized surgical planning. Computed tomography scans of 57 unoperated Apert syndrome patients and 59 controls were subgrouped as follows: type I, bilateral coronal synostosis; type II, pansynostosis; type III, perpendicular combinations of cranial vault suture synostoses. Orbit bony cavity volume was significantly reduced in type I and type II, by 19% (P < 0.001) and 24% (P < 0.001), respectively. However, the reduction of orbital cavity volume in type III did not reach statistical significance. Globe volume projection beyond the orbital rim, however, increased by 76% (P < 0.001) in type III, versus an increase of 54% (P < 0.001) in type I and 53% (P < 0.001) in type II, due to different ethmoid and sphenoid bone malformations. Maxillary bone volume was only significantly reduced in type I bicoronal synostosis (by 24%, P = 0.048). Both type I and type II developed relatively less zygoma and sphenoid bone volume. Different cranial vault suture synostoses have varied influence on peri-orbital development in Apert syndrome. Instead of mitigating the abnormalities resulting from bicoronal synostosis in type I, additional midline suture synostosis worsens the exorbitism due to a more misshaped ethmoid.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- X Lu
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
| | - A J Forte
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.
| | - M Alperovich
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
| | - N Alonso
- Department of Plastic Surgery, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
| | - J A Persing
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Cephalocranial Disproportionate Fossa Volume and Normal Skull Base Angle in Pfeiffer Syndrome. J Craniofac Surg 2021; 32:581-586. [PMID: 33704985 DOI: 10.1097/scs.0000000000007203] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pfeiffer syndrome is a rare syndromic craniosynostosis disorder, with a wide range of clinical manifestations. This study aims to investigate the structural abnormalities of cranial fossa and skull base development in Pfeiffer patients, to provide an anatomic basis for surgical interventions. METHOD Thirty preoperative CT scans of Pfeiffer syndrome patients were compared to 35 normal controls. Subgroup comparisons, related to differing suture synostosis, were performed. RESULTS Overall, the volume of anterior and middle cranial fossae in Pfeiffer patients were increased by 31% (P < 0.001) and 19% (P = 0.004), versus controls. Volume of the posterior fossa in Pfeiffer patients was reduced by 14% (P = 0.026). When only associated with bicoronal synostosis, Pfeiffer syndrome patients developed enlarged anterior (68%, P = 0.001) and middle (40%, P = 0.031) fossae. However, sagittal synostosis cases only developed an enlarged anterior fossa (47%, P < 0.001). The patients with solely bilateral squamosal synostosis, developed simultaneous reduced anterior, middle and posterior cranial fossae volume (all P ≤ 0.002). The overall skull base angulation, measured on both intracranial and subcranial surfaces, grew normally. CONCLUSION Enlarged anterior cranial fossae in Pfeiffer syndrome children is evident, except for the squamosal synostosis cases which developed reduced volume in all fossae. Volume of the middle cranial fossa is influenced by associated cranial vault suture synostosis, specifically, sagittal synostosis cases develop normal middle fossa volume, while the bicoronal cases develop increased middle fossa volume. Posterior cranial fossa development is restricted by shortened posterior cranial base length. Surgical intervention in Pfeiffer syndrome patients optimally should be indexed to different suture synostosis.
Collapse
|
7
|
What Is the Difference in Cranial Base Morphology in Isolated and Syndromic Bicoronal Synostosis? Plast Reconstr Surg 2020; 146:599-610. [DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000007068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
8
|
Lu X, Forte AJ, Park KE, Allam O, Mozaffari MA, Alperovich M, Steinbacher DM, Alonso N, Persing JA. Sphenoid Bone Structure and Its Influence on the Cranium in Syndromic Versus Nonsyndromic Craniosynostosis. J Craniofac Surg 2020; 32:67-72. [DOI: 10.1097/scs.0000000000006914] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
|
9
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Apert syndrome causes normal or enlarged intracranial volume overall as patients grow. This study aimed to trace the segmental anterior, middle, and posterior cranial fossae volume and structural morphology in these patients, to help discern a more focused and individualized surgical treatment plan for patients with Apert syndrome. METHODS This study included 82 preoperative computed tomographic scans (Apert, n = 32; control, n = 50) divided into five age-related subgroups. The scans were measured using image processing and three-dimensional modeling software. RESULTS The middle cranial fossa volume was increased and was the earliest change noted. It was increased by 45 percent (p = 0.023) compared with controls before 6 months of age and remained increased into adulthood (161 percent, p = 0.016), with gradually increasing severity. The anterior and posterior cranial fossae volumes also increased, by 35 percent (p = 0.032) and 39 percent (p = 0.007), respectively. Increased depth of cranial fossae contributed most to the increase in volumes of patients with Apert syndrome, with correlation coefficients of 0.799, 0.908, and 0.888 for anterior, middle, and posterior cranial fossa, respectively. The intracranial volume was increased 12 percent (p = 0.098) across the entire test age range (0 to 26 years old), but only had statistical significance during the age range of 6 to 18 years (22 percent, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Malformation of the middle cranial fossa is an early, perhaps the initial, pivotal cranial morphologic change in Apert syndrome. Increased cranial fossae depth is an inherent characteristic of the maldevelopment. Normalization of cranial volume and circumference overall may not achieve a normal skull structure, as it does not correct regional craniocerebral disproportion.
Collapse
|
10
|
|