Orthognathic surgery in “older” adults with Hemi-Mandibular Elongation: Long-term occlusion outcomes

Surgery-first orthognathic approach for the correction of facial asymmetry

We aimed to compare the reliability of the surgery-first approach and the traditional orthodontic-first approach for the correction of facial asymmetry based on the new classification of facial asymmetry. Patients with facial asymmetry who underwent orthognathic surgery between January 2016 and January 2019 were included. Cephalometric changes and relapse ratios were analyzed 12 months before and after surgery. Patients were divided into horizontal and vertical asymmetry groups based on the asymmetry vector, and subgroup analysis was conducted. The surgery-first approach without presurgical orthodontic treatment and the orthodontic-first approach showed a similar degree of asymmetry correction and skeletal stability. The relapse ratios of the maxilla height in the surgery-first and orthodontic-first groups were 0.25 ± 0.21 and 0.27 ± 0.25, respectively (p = 0.63), the relapse ratios of the maxilla width were 0.31 ± 0.32 and 0.21 ± 0.2, respectively (p = 0.14), the mandibular height relapse ratios were 0.34 ± 0.58 and 0.29 ± 0.36, respectively (p = 0.69), and the mandibular width relapse ratios were 0.12 ± 0.22 and 0.26 ± 0.31, respectively (p = 0.058). The treatment period of the surgery-first group (18.5 ± 5.3 months) was significantly shorter than that of the orthodontic-first group (22.9 ± 7.5 months, p = 0.024). Among the surgery-first group, patients with vertical asymmetry (15.0 ± 3.2 months) had a shorter treatment than those with horizontal asymmetry (21.6 ± 6.8 months, p = 0.006). Although contesting traditional standards is always challenging, the surgery-first orthognathic approach may lead to a new era in traditional orthognathic approaches. This new classification of facial asymmetry could be useful and practical when treating patients with facial asymmetry regardless of the etiology.

A conceptual framework for treating jaw deformities in patients with abnormal condyles: preservation versus replacement of the glenoid fossa-disc-condyle-ramus

This article outlines a conceptual approach to the reconstruction of jaw deformities associated with abnormalities in the mandibular condyle. The authors describe a hierarchy of reconstruction, emphasizing use of the least invasive and progressing to the most complex and invasive techniques, depending on the nature and severity of the underlying deformity, prior operations, patient age, and stage of growth. Consider joint preservation orthognathic surgical correction, followed by biological techniques for replacement of the condyle, and avoid replacing a functional temporomandibular joint based only on radiographic remodeling and concerns about potential future flare-ups of disease based on anecdotal data.

Common Patterns of Developmental Dentofacial Deformities: A Biologic Classification System

Jaw disharmonies that are recognized after birth and that present in association with the pre-pubertal growth spurt are called developmental dentofacial deformities. These deformities occur during the normal growth phase of the face with degrees of either excess or deficiency in one or more vectors of the jaws. Clinical observation combined with radiographic analysis confirms that developmental dentofacial deformities tend to occur in 6 distinct and repetitive biologic patterns. Once the individual’s jaw growth pattern is known, the natural progression of their deformity, the functional consequences on speech articulation, chewing ability, swallowing mechanism, and breathing, and the locations of skeletal dysmorphology that require surgical intervention fall into place. The purpose of the manuscript is to review the 6 common patterns.