Open versus closed treatment for unilateral mandibular extra-capsular condylar fractures: A meta-analysis

Clinical course of masticatory function recovery following endoscopic-assisted open reduction and internal fixation in patients with unilateral mandibular condyle fracture

The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical course of masticatory function recovery following an endoscopic-assisted open reduction and internal fixation (EAORIF) procedure. Patients with a unilateral mandibular condylar fracture who underwent EAORIF for therapeutic purposes were evaluated, with comparisons made between those who underwent the procedure for base or neck fractures. At each time point analyzed after treatment, the occlusal contact area and maximum bite force in patients with a base fracture were greater, although the differences between the groups were not significant. Moreover, at 12 months following EAORIF for a base fracture, occlusal contact area and maximum bite force on the fractured and non-fractured sides were nearly equal, whereas these were significantly reduced in the fractured as compared with the non-fractured side in patients who underwent that treatment for a neck fracture. Additionally, after 12 months in the neck fracture cases, both occlusal contact area and maximum bite force on the fractured side were lower as compared with those on the non-fractured side. These findings indicate that EAORIF is an optimal method for base fracture treatment with regard to masticatory function.

Biomechanical evaluation of various rigid internal fixation modalities for condylar-base-associated multiple mandibular fractures: A finite element analysis

Condylar-base-associated multiple mandibular fractures are more prevalent than single ones. Direct trauma to mandibular symphysis, body or angle are prone to induce indirect condylar fracture. However, little is known about the effects of various rigid internal fixation modalities in condylar base for relevant multiple mandibular fractures, especially when we are confused in the selection of operative approach. Within the finite element analysis, straight-titanium-plate implanting positions in condylar base contained posterolateral zone (I), anterolateral zone (II), and intermediate zone (III). Von Mises stress (SS) in devices and bone and mandibular displacement (DT) were solved, while maximum values (SSmax and DTmax) were documented. For rigid internal fixation in condylar-base-and-symphysis fractures, I + II modality exhibited least SSmax in screws and cortical bone and least DTmax, I + III modality exhibited least SSmax in plates. For rigid internal fixation in condylar-base-and-contralateral-body fractures, I + III modality exhibited least SSmax in screws and cortical bone, I + II modality exhibited least SSmax in plates and least DTmax. For rigid internal fixation in condylar-base-and-contralateral-angle fractures, I + III modality exhibited least DTmax. The findings suggest that either I + II or I + III modality is a valid guaranty for rigid internal fixation of condylar base fractures concomitant with symphysis, contralateral body or angle fractures.

Correlation of clinical manifestations and condylar morphology of patients with temporomandibular degenerative joint diseases

OBJECTIVE

To study the correlation between condylar morphology and clinical manifestations in patients with degenerative joint disease (DJD) of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ).

METHODS

A total of 175 joints of 131 patients with DJD were included. Data on patients' basic information and symptoms were collected and analyzed. Condylar morphology was evaluated using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). The correlation between the condylar morphology and clinical manifestations was analyzed.

RESULTS

The prevalence of joint noises, clicks, and crepitus was 93/175 (53%), 73/175 (42%), and 20/175 (11%), respectively. Condylar anteroposterior diameter and condylar height were correlated with pain. There was a correlation between the shape of the condyle in the sagittal plane and joint noise.

CONCLUSION

Condylar morphology and clinical features of DJD were correlated to some extent.

Anatomical position of the mandibular condyle after open versus closed treatment of unilateral fractures: A three-dimensional analysis

This study aimed to compare open and closed treatment for unilateral mandibular condyle neck and base fractures by final three-dimensional (3D) condylar position at 6 months follow-up. 3D position was associated with mandibular functioning and pain. A total of 21 patients received open (n = 11) or closed (n = 10) treatment. 3D positions were assessed on cone-beam computed tomography scans. Volume differences, root mean square, translations, and rotations were obtained related to the pursued anatomical position and compared between treatment groups by the Mann-Whitney U test. The 3D position parameters were associated with the maximum interincisal opening (MIO), mixing ability test (MAT), Mandibular Function Impairment Questionnaire (MFIQ), and pain based on Spearman correlation coefficients (rs). Translation in the medial-lateral direction was smaller after open treatment (P = 0.014). 3D position was not associated with the MAT; however, worse position was associated with a smaller MIO. A larger pitch rotation was associated with a worse MFIQ (rs = 0.499, P = 0.025). Volume reduction of the affected condyle was associated with more pain (rs = -0.503, P = 0.020). In conclusion, after unilateral condylar fractures, worse 3D position is associated with a smaller mouth opening and worse patient-reported outcomes. This is independent of the chosen treatment, despite a better anatomical reduction after open treatment.

Correlation of patients' demographics and clinical symptoms with temporomandibular disorders

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the correlation between basic characteristics and clinical features of patients with temporomandibular disorders (TMD).

METHODS

The R language statistical tool was used to analyze the clinical information of 500 TMD patients, i.e., age, sex, joint noises, mouth opening pattern, and pain symptoms, as well as the results of the mandibular push-back test. A pairwise correlation analysis of each clinical feature was carried out.

RESULTS

The highest incidence of TMD was observed in the age group of 20 to 30 years (240/500). Around 2/3 of the patients showed pain symptoms. Abnormal mouth opening patterns, joint noises, and temporomandibular joint synovitis (TMJS) were observed in 48.4, 65.4, and 34% of patients, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Joint click and the corrected deviation of the mouth opening pattern are signs of early-stage TMD, whereas limited mouth opening and TMJS are indicators of progressive stage and complicated TMD.

Comparative evaluation of post treatment CT scan and clinical parameters in open reduction and closed reduction treatment of condylar fractures

Background

Mandibular fracture is the second most common fracture of facial bone, next to nasal bone. Twenty-five to forty percent of mandibular fractures involve the condyle. In the literature, there exists no consensus "gold standard" treatment for mandibular condylar fractures, and there is a continuing debate on whether condylar fractures should undergo closed or open reduction.

Materials and Method

Twenty patients who had undergone open reduction and closed reduction treatment were included in the study. Clinically maximal interincisal opening, laterotrusive and protrusive movements, pain on mouth opening, malocclusion, chin deviation on mouth opening, facial nerve palsy, hematoma, infected implant, and bite force were evaluated after a minimum of 3 months postoperatively. Also, a postoperative CT is done to evaluate the anatomical position of fragment.

Results

On evaluation of clinical parameters, both groups had comparable results. However, none of the patients in open reduction group had deviation of mandible from midline on mouth opening. Also, better anatomical repositioning is obtained in open reduction group.

Conclusion

The results of this study suggest that the open reduction method is a better alternative to closed reduction in treatment of mandibular condylar fractures.

Evaluation of the Relationship of Screw Pullout and Plate Fracutre in Fixation of Mandible Condyle Fractures: A Mechanistic Study

BACKGROUND

The mandible is the most injured part of the facial skeleton, and 25-40% of mandibular fractures involve the condyle process. The aim of this study is to answer the question of the relationship between screw pullout and/or plate fracture during osteosynthesis.

METHODS

We tested polyurethane models of mandibles whose condylar process was cut (simulating a fracture) and fused using plates and screws.

RESULTS

A total of 672 plates were tested. A total of 25.6% of them were fractured during the test, with most being fractures of the base of the condyle. More screws (81.97%) are pulled out from the ramus than from the condyle-69.15%.

CONCLUSIONS

The gold standard in the osteosynthesis of condylar fractures is two straight plates. Other than these, there is no one-size-fits-all plate for every type of fracture. Plates fixed with fewer screws (smaller plates used in higher-lying fractures) are more likely to result in screw pullout. On the other hand, in plates fixed with more screws, plate fracture is more common.

Postoperative Complications following Open Reduction and Rigid Internal Fixation of Mandibular Condylar Fracture Using the High Perimandibular Approach

The high perimandibular approach is a feasible surgical technique for treating mandibular condylar fractures with open reduction and internal fixation, followed by fewer complications. Temporary trismus is the only postoperative complication that may occur. This study evaluated postoperative complications following open reduction and rigid internal fixation (OR-IF) of mandibular condylar fractures using the high perimandibular approach. Twenty consecutive patients undergoing OR-IF were included in this study. They included 11 male and 9 female patients, of an average age of 58.5 years, all of whom responded to a follow-up call at least 12 months after the surgery. All patients were evaluated for range of mouth opening, postoperative complications, and radiological findings. A statistical analysis of the relationship between range of mouth opening and related clinical parameters at 6 months postoperative evaluation was conducted. The fracture of the condylar neck was associated with a limited range of mouth opening and longer operation time. However, longer operation time was not associated with a limited range of mouth opening. The high perimandibular approach with OR-IF in mandibular condylar fractures is a feasible and safe technique; however, prolonged surgery and mandibular condylar neck fractures could affect the postoperative range of mouth opening.

Oral functioning after open versus closed treatment of unilateral condylar neck or base fractures: A two-centre controlled clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Oral functioning and rehabilitation in patients after condylar trauma can be measured by objective functional outcomes and patient-reported outcomes. The similarities or differences between these outcomes may contribute to the decision if open treatment (OT) or closed treatment (CT) will obtain the most advantageous results.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to compare OT versus CT for unilateral condylar mandibular neck or base fractures in a two-centre controlled clinical trial by objective functional outcomes and patient-reported outcomes measured at 6 weeks and 6 months follow-up. Additionally, these outcomes were compared within each group.

METHODS

Patients were enrolled between January 2017 and November 2019. In one centre, patients received OT by extra-oral open reduction and internal fixation. In another centre, patients received CT by maxillomandibular fixation. Objective measurements included the mixing ability test (MAT) and mandibular active range of motion (ROM). Patient-reported outcomes included the mandibular function impairment questionnaire (MFIQ) and visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain. Independent t-tests and Mann-Whitney U-tests were used to determine differences between the treatment groups at 6 weeks and 6 months follow-up. Paired t-tests and Wilcoxon signed rank tests were used to determine differences within each group.

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients were enrolled. No differences were found between the groups treated with OT or CT for MAT, ROM, MFIQ and VAS. Both groups showed functional improvement.

CONCLUSION

Good objective functional outcomes and patient-reported outcomes were achieved with both OT and CT in patients with unilateral condylar mandibular neck or base fractures.

How far we have come with the Management of Condylar Fractures? A Meta-Analysis of Closed Versus Open Versus Endoscopic Management

Background

The treatment approaches for condylar fractures of the mandible include functional, closed reduction and open reduction-internal fixation. Recently endoscopic management of condylar fractures has been emphasized in the literature. We systematically review the studies comparing closed versus open versus endoscopic-assisted condyle fracture management with regard to the indications, effectiveness and complications of each modality.

Methods

A total of 11 articles were selected based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria from PubMed, Cochrane and clinical trials.gov. Differences in means and risk ratios were used as principal summary measures with p value < 0.05 as significant. For detection of any possible biases in sample sizes, the OR and its 95% CI for each study were plotted against the number of participants. Chi-square test, I2 test and the Cochrane bias tool were used to assess the bias in and across studies.

Results

Except for deviation on opening there was no significant difference between open versus closed treatment of condylar fractures. Endoscopic approach and open surgical approaches differed only in terms of operating time and TMJ pain. There was no significant difference in facial nerve injury among the two groups.

Discussion

Closed reduction is particularly indicated for minimally displaced fractures; for moderate to severe displacement, open reduction is preferred. Open reduction can also be preferred over endoscopic approaches as there is no significant advantage of using latter. Limitations of the study included specific treatment according to the site of fracture not addressed, limited data regarding pediatric condylar fracture, lack of homogenous classification schemes, etc.

Analysis of factors that influence quality of life of individuals undergoing treatment for mandibular fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To address the factors that affect the quality of life (QoL) of individuals undergoing treatment for mandibular fractures.

STUDY DESIGN

This review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and the search strategy was constructed according to the Populations, Interventions, Comparison, Outcomes, and Study Design principle in the following databases: PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and EMBASE. Risk of bias assessment was performed with Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions and Cochrane Risk of Bias tool for randomized trials 2.

RESULTS

Nineteen studies were included: 15 observational and 4 clinical trials. Mean age ranged from 28 to 39 years, with a higher proportion of males. The condyle was the main fracture location and traffic accident was the fracture cause. Treatment approaches were mostly open reduction (89.4%) and maxillomandibular fixation (63%). QoL measurements varied considerably with the General Oral Health Assessment Index (31.5%) and Oral Health Impact Profile-14 (21%) as the main instruments. Meta-analysis showed that open reduction and maxillomandibular fixation did not present significant differences to QoL (P = .39), but significant differences were observed with time (P < .00001). Other factors affected QoL, such as mental health, pain, socializing, appearance, and eating difficulties.

CONCLUSIONS

Several factors, apart from the treatment approach, mentioned in this review seemed to affect the QoL of patients with mandibular trauma. Treatment choice should be based on well-stablished clinical criteria and on all other factors mentioned here.

A comparative evaluation of retromandibular versus Modified Risdon approach in surgical treatment of condylar fracture

The purpose of this study was aimed to compare the efficiency and safety of retromandibular versus modified Risdon approach using periangular incision for open reduction and internal fixation of low subcondylar mandibular fracture. Open reduction and internal fixation with different plating systems were utilized via retromandibular approach (group I) and via modified Risdon approach with periangular incision (group II). Twenty four (n= 24) condylar fractures in 21 adult patients were divided randomly into two equal groups (12 each) according to the cutaneous incision (approach) utilized. The evaluation score for scarring in group I it was excellent in 9 patients, good in 2 patients and acceptable in only one patient (Mean 2.4 ± SD 3.38). While in group II was excellent in 10 patients and good in 2 patients (Mean 2.4 ± SD 3.87) and the p value was 0.591. Symptoms of transient facial nerve weakness were noted in only 3 patients in group I with slight to moderate dysfunction (Mean 2 ± SD 3.21), while only one patient had facial nerve weakness in group II with House - Brackman score of 2 immediate postoperatively and this got resolved in 6 weeks (Mean 2 ± SD 4.04) and the p value was 0.00022. Within the limitations of the study it seems that a modified Risdon approach using periangular incision for reduction and fixation of low subcondylar fracture should be preferred whenever possible because it yields better outcomes.

Three-dimensional assessment of accuracy for open reduction and internal fixation of the subcondylar fracture and its implications on the TMJ function

This study used three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) to assist the accuracy of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for the unilateral subcondylar fracture and the long-term temporomandibular joint (TMJ) function impairment. Bilateral TMJs were analyzed postoperatively on CBCT images, involving the following three-dimensional (3D) parameters: condylar position and inclination; circumferential joint space, ramus, and mandible length; and the volumetric joint space. The inclusion criteria for adult patients included having a displaced fracture >5°, a shortening in ramus length >2 mm, and mouth opening limitation. The non-fracture side was used as the comparison group. The Helkimo index was employed for the clinical assessment of the outcomes, while the paired student t-test and Pearson coefficient test were used to compare both sides. The study included 60 joints in 30 consecutive patients. The condylar inclination to the horizontal plane on the fracture and non-fracture sides was 9.29 ± 3.9°, 12.46 ± 4.2°, (p < 0.001) and was positively related to the subjective (Helkimo Hi) and objective (Helkimo Di) clinical outcomes. In contrast, the condylar position to the midsagittal plane in the fracture and non-fracture sides was 51.95 ± 3.5 mm, 50.17 ± 3.6 mm (P = 0.038), and was positively related to the objective outcomes. Additionally, the objective outcome was negatively related to the change of the posterior joint space. CONCLUSION: The three-dimensional assessments seem to demonstrate that the ORIF is an accurate approach for obtaining a three-dimensional reduction to the displaced subcondylar fracture.

Association between shape of the mandibular condylar head and the occurrence of unilateral condylar fracture - A retrospective computed tomographic study

This retrospective study aims to evaluate the correlation between the shape of the mandibular condylar head and the incidence of unilateral condylar fracture using computed tomography. Medical records of patients diagnosed with unilateral condylar fractures from the year 2012-2019 were reviewed. The shape of the condylar head on the non - fractured side was analysed using a Radiant Dicom Viewer. The analysis was done using both visual and analytical methods. In the analytical method, a horizontal line was drawn at the base of the curvature of the condylar head. The highest peak point of the head was marked, and a perpendicular line was drawn connecting the highest point to the horizontal line. The shape was categorized into four types as convex, flat, angled, and round based on these lines. 201 CT scans were examined, of which 69 were excluded as they did not meet the inclusion criteria. The remaining 132 were included in our study. On examining the shape, flat-shaped condyle was seen in 57 scans (43.2%), followed by convex in 31 scans (23.4%), angled in 30 (22.7%) and round in 14 scans (10.6%). The relationship between the shape of the mandibular condylar head and the incidence of unilateral condylar fracture was analysed using a chi-square test, which showed high statistical significance (p value 0.0001). The flat-shaped condylar head was more prone to fracture, and the round-shaped condylar head was least prone to fracture. In conclusion, the shape of the mandibular condylar head had a statistically significant association with the incidence of unilateral condylar fracture. The assessment of the shape of the condylar head can be taken as a guide to suspect condylar fractures and other associated mandibular fractures.

Endoscopic surgery versus open reduction treatment of mandibular condyle fractures: A meta-analysis

The aim of the study was to compare open reduction with internal fixation (ORIF) and endoscopic open reduction with internal fixation (EORIF) of condylar fractures (CF) in adults in terms of reducing both needing of reoperation and/or facial nerve injury. An electronic search was undertaken (PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, SCOPUS, and The Cochrane Library). The inclusion criteria were full text, published from their inception to June 2020, clinical trials, randomized or not, and retrospective studies, that compared ORIF and EORIF. The estimates of an intervention were expressed as the risk ratio (RR). From the 1338 articles found, 5 publications were included. There was no statistically significant difference between ORIF and EORIF regarding needing of reoperation (RR = 2.46, p = 0.42) or facial nerve injury (RR = 0.45, p = 0.14). Meta-analysis suggests that there is no difference between open reduction with internal fixation (ORIF) and endoscopic open reduction with internal fixation (EORIF) of condylar fractures (CF) regarding facial nerve injury risk or need for reoperation.

Comparison between 3D delta plate and conventional miniplate in treatment of condylar fracture: A randomised clinical trial

The aim of the study was to conduct a randomized clinical trial comparing the efficacy of standard non-compression miniplate and 3-dimensional (3D) titanium plate in the open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) of the mandibular condylar fractures. Patients who underwent open reduction of mandibular condylar fracture were recruited for the study. The patients satisfying the inclusion criteria were randomly assigned to two groups in a 1:1 ratio. Group A comprised patients treated using conventional miniplates, and Group B comprised patients treated using 3D Delta Plate. Informed consent was provided. All the patients underwent ORIF under GA via retromandibular approach. The sample size was set at 20 participants, with 10 participants in each group who were randomly allocated. Our study showed that patients in Group A had a significant statistical difference operating time (141.20 ± 2.59 min) than that of Group B (117.2 ± 9.63 min). Mouth opening was significantly greater in the 3^rd-month follow-up in Group B (mean = 42.40 ± 1.82) compared to Group A (mean = 35.80 ± 1.30). Biting efficiency in Group B was observed to be clinically and statistically better compared to Group A (P = 0.012). Wound dehiscence was managed efficiently by judicious use of antibiotics and wounds were free of any signs of infections or discharge in the consecutive follow-ups. No plate removal was required in either group. Patients treated with 3D delta plates have superior outcomes with regard to operation time, mouth opening, and biting efficiency compared with miniplates. Hence, it can be concluded that the triangular shape of the 3D Delta plate allows the stress distribution to be superior and multidimensional, leading to better post-operative stability, faster healing, and reduced complications.

Change of body composition, physical strength, and nutritional status of patients with mandibular fractures

The aim was to determine changes in various parameters indicating physical conditions and nutritional status of patients during surgical and conservative treatment of mandibular fractures. A round by a nutrition support team was done once postoperatively for the surgical treatment group. For the conservative treatment group, three rounds were performed during the period of intermaxillary fixation. Data obtained from the rounds were compared between the groups. There were 29 patients surgically and 30 patients conservatively treated. A significant weight loss was observed in both groups postoperatively. The mean weight loss of the surgical treatment group measured at the postoperative round was 1.73 kg (SD ± 1.78) (P < 0.001) and that of the conservative treatment group at the third round was 2.74 kg (SD ± 2.35) (P < 0.001). During the entire treatment period, weight loss, body fat percentage, skeletal muscle percentage, grip strength and parameters indicating body composition and nutritional status of the conservative treatment group did not substantially differ from those of the surgical group. The influence of the conservative procedure on the nutritional condition of the patients seems to be limited and reversible at the end of the treatment. The weight loss observed here suggests that systematic nutrition support is necessary during both surgical and conservative treatment.

The Stability Evaluation of Two Internal Fixation Patterns of Extracapsular Condylar Fracture Based on One Novel Measuring Method

PURPOSE

The most stable internal fixation pattern for extracapsular condylar fracture (ECF) has been controversial. In this study we aimed to evaluate the stability of 2 common internal fixation patterns using 1 or 2 miniplates separately. One novel measuring method based on the angle of miniplates' localization was introduced.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-seven patients with 30 sides of extracapsular condylar fracture were enrolled in this retrospective study. All cases were performed open reduction and internal fixation using 1 or 2 titanium plates with both the postoperative immediate CT (T1) and the over 6 months' follow-up CT (T2). Mandibles and implants were segmented and reconstructed respectively using SIMPANT 14.04 software. For 1 miniplate group, the sagittal crossing angle (<1) between miniplate (P1) and posterior border of ipsilateral ramus was measured. For 2 miniplates group, the sagittal crossing angle (<2) between 2 miniplates (P2a, P2b) was measured. Both anteroposterior (∠AP) and mediolateral angle change (∠ML) of each miniplate between T1 and T2 was measured. The stability of 2 internal fixation patterns was measured and evaluated based on the angle change of miniplates. And also the stability of each internal fixation pattern could be investigated based on the relationship between the placement patterns of miniplates and the angle change.

RESULTS

Fifty-two miniplates were finally segmented and reconstructed successfully, including 8 of 1 miniplate group and 44 of 2 miniplate group. For 1 miniplate group, the average ∠AP and ∠ML were 6.10° and 8.54°, respectively. For 2 miniplate group, the average ∠AP and ∠ML of P2a were 3.02° and 2.56°, respectively, as well as 3.12° and 3.07° of P2b.

CONCLUSIONS

The novel measuring method based on the angle of miniplates' localization showed potential for the stability evaluation of internal fixation of condylar fracture. In summary, the internal fixation patterns using 2 miniplates shows better stability than that of 1 miniplate.

The Use of 3D Titanium Miniplates in Surgical Treatment of Patients with Condylar Fractures

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of open treatment of mandibular condyle fractures using 3D miniplates. A group of 113 patients has been chosen for evaluation, including 100 men and 13 women. After hospitalization, each patient underwent a 6-month postoperative follow-up. The material chosen for the analysis consisted of data collected during the patient’s stay in the hospital as well as the postoperative outpatient care. A single 4-hole Delta Condyle Compression Plate (4-DCCP) was used in 90 out of 113 (79.6%) cases. In 16 out of 113 (14.2%) patients, the Trapezoid Condyle Plate (4-TCP or 9-TCP) was used. The remaining cases required more than one miniplate. No 3D miniplate fractures were found in the study subjects during the analyzed observation period. Loosening of one or more osteosynthesis screws was observed in 4 out of 113 (3.5%) patients. Screw loosening was a complication that did not affect bone healing in any of the patient cases. The conducted research confirms that titanium 3D mini-plates are easy to adjust and take up little space, therefore they can easily be used in cases of mandibular condyle base and lower condyle neck fractures. The stability of the three-dimensional miniplates for osteosynthesis gives very good reliability for the rigid fixation of the fractured mandibular condyle.

Use of an occlusal splint and intraoperative imaging with an intraoral approach in the management of mandibular subcondylar fractures

INTRODUCTION

To evaluate the feasibility of safely managing subcondylar fractures using an original surgical procedure combining an intraoral approach, the use of a custom-made occlusal overlay splint, and intraoperative imaging.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Condylar fragment was freed from surrounding soft tissues, was laterally exposed to the ramus, and a miniplate was fixed in place for osteosynthesis. An overlay splint maintaining the dental occlusion was used to facilitate reduction and stabilization during fixation. Intraoperative monitoring by cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) was performed before completing the fixation.

RESULTS

Between November 2018 and June 2019, 10 patients were treated using this procedure. The median length of the proximal condylar fragment was 29 mm (range 24-39 min). Five patients had an associated mandibular fracture. The median duration of the condylar fracture surgery was 54.5 min (range 38-79 min). All patients had satisfactory reduction and osteosynthesis with no complications.

CONCLUSION

It is feasible to safely manage subcondylar fractures with this surgical procedure that could facilitate open reduction using intraoral approaches. Occlusal splints maintain downward pressure on the rami bilaterally and symmetrically, helping to anatomically reposition condylar process fractures. Intraoperative imaging is used to monitor this step.

Establishing a Protocol for Closed Treatment of Mandibular Condyle Fractures with Dynamic Elastic Therapy

Treatment of mandibular condyle fractures is controversial. Open treatment achieves anatomic reduction with occlusal stability and faster functional recovery but risks facial nerve injury and jeopardizes joint capsule circulation which can lead to bone resorption. Traditional closed treatment avoids these issues but requires prolonged fixation and risks subsequent facial asymmetry, occlusal disturbance, and ankylosis. Rather than wires, closed treatment with elastics allows for customizable management of a healing fracture with ability to alter vector and degree of traction to restore vertical height and occlusion with less discomfort and decreased risk for ankylosis. In this protocol, unilateral condylar fractures were treated with class II elastics ipsilateral to injury and class I contralaterally. Class III elastics were used contralaterally if additional traction was required and Class II elastics were placed bilaterally for bilateral fractures. Patients were sequentially advanced from fixating to guiding to supportive elastics by titrating elastic vector to any dental midline incongruency or chin deviation. Six patients were treated with this protocol with six-month follow-up. Fracture patterns included displaced and dislocated fractures as well as intracapsular and extracapsular condylar fractures. All patients at completion of the protocol had objective centric occlusion with no subjective malocclusion, chin deviation, facial asymmetry, or temporomandibular joint pain. These early data demonstrate a safe and efficacious innovative protocol for closed treatment of mandibular condylar fractures with dynamic elastic therapy.