Evaluation of a novel algorithm for automating virtual surgical planning in mandibular reconstruction using fibula flaps

Automated calculation of ontology-based planning proposals: An application in reconstructive oral and maxillofacial surgery

BACKGROUND

Structured modelling of surgical knowledge and its automated processing is still challenging. The aim of this work is to introduce a novel approach for automated calculation of ontology-based planning proposals in mandibular reconstruction and conduct a feasibility study.

METHODS

The presented approach is composed of an RDF(S) ontology, a 3D mandible template and a calculator-optimiser algorithm to automatically calculate reconstruction proposals with fibula grafts. To validate the viability of the approach, a feasibility study was conducted on 164 simulated mandibular reconstructions.

RESULTS

The ontology defines 244 different reconstruction variants and 80 analyses for optimization. In 146 simulated cases, a proposal could be automatically calculated (average time 8.79 ± 4.03 s). The assessments of the proposals by three clinical experts indicate the viability of the approach.

CONCLUSIONS

Due to the modular separation between computational logic and domain knowledge, the developed concepts can be easily maintained, reused and adapted for other applications.

From bench to bedside - current clinical and translational challenges in fibula free flap reconstruction

Fibula free flaps (FFF) represent a working horse for different reconstructive scenarios in facial surgery. While FFF were initially established for mandible reconstruction, advancements in planning for microsurgical techniques have paved the way toward a broader spectrum of indications, including maxillary defects. Essential factors to improve patient outcomes following FFF include minimal donor site morbidity, adequate bone length, and dual blood supply. Yet, persisting clinical and translational challenges hamper the effectiveness of FFF. In the preoperative phase, virtual surgical planning and artificial intelligence tools carry untapped potential, while the intraoperative role of individualized surgical templates and bioprinted prostheses remains to be summarized. Further, the integration of novel flap monitoring technologies into postoperative patient management has been subject to translational and clinical research efforts. Overall, there is a paucity of studies condensing the body of knowledge on emerging technologies and techniques in FFF surgery. Herein, we aim to review current challenges and solution possibilities in FFF. This line of research may serve as a pocket guide on cutting-edge developments and facilitate future targeted research in FFF.

New Technologies for Personalized Medicine in Head and Neck Oncologic and Reconstructive Surgery

The search for standardized protocols has been a constant concern in Head and Neck Reconstructive Surgery [...]

Mandible reconstruction with free fibula flaps: Accuracy of a cost-effective modified semicomputer-assisted surgery compared with computer-assisted surgery - A retrospective study

A new individualized, cost-effective, modified semi-computer-assisted surgery (MSCAS) concept for free fibular flap mandibular reconstruction is reported and compared with the computer-assisted surgery (CAS) concept. Patients were divided into two groups and retrospectively reviewed. In the MSCAS and CAS groups, intraoperative guides were created using computer-aided design with manual fabrication and computer-aided design and manufacturing, respectively. Differences in specific linear and angular parameters on pre- and postoperative computed tomography scans were calculated for morphometric comparison, and clinical parameters and efficiency were analysed. RESULTS: Eighteen patients (CAS, 7; MSCAS, 11), were included. The morphometric comparison showed no significant differences between the groups. The mean deviation of the mandibular ramus length, body length, width 1 and width 2 was 0.82 ± 0.29 mm, 1.84 ± 0.43 mm, 1.89 ± 0.61 mm and 1.45 ± 0.61 mm in the CAS group versus 1.56 ± 0.54 mm, 1.72 ± 0.33 mm, 2.24 ± 0.55 mm and 2.36 ± 0.50 mm in the MSCAS group (p = 0.7804, p = 0.9997, p = 0.9814 and p = 0.6334). The mean deviation of the sagittal, axial and coronal mandibular angles was 1.56 ± 0.48°, 1.93 ± 0.50° and 2.15 ± 0.72° in the CAS group versus 2.19 ± 0.35°, 1.86 ± 0.35° and 1.94 ± 0.55° in the MSCAS group (p = 0.7594, p = 0.9996 and p = 0.9871). There were no significant differences in clinical parameters, efficiency or postoperative complications between the groups. CONCLUSION: The accuracy and operative efficiency of the MSCAS concept are comparable to those of the more expensive CAS concept. Therefore, in times of increasing clinical costs, this concept might be an adequate and inexpensive alternative to preoperative CAS.

Institutional-based and commercial virtual surgical planning in maxillomandibular reconstruction - Comparing the digital plan and postoperative scan

BACKGROUND

Virtual surgical planning (VSP) is increasingly used in maxillomandibular osseous free flap reconstruction. Non-commercial ('in-house') VSP may offer the same level of accuracy and other benefits, without the inflated costs and time delays inherent in using commercial providers. Comparisons between commercial and in-house methods are lacking. This study aims to determine the accuracy of VSP, compare in-house and commercially planned cases, and explore predictors of the reconstruction error.

METHODS

Seventy-six patients who had a virtually planned maxillomandibular reconstruction between January 2012 and July 2020 were retrospectively identified. The preoperative digital plan was compared to the postoperative CT scan in terms of length of bone segments, angle between adjacent segments and intercondylar, and intergonial angle distances (mandibular reconstructions only).

RESULTS

Forty-four patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The mean intergonial and intercondylar distances error was 1.7 ± 1.01 mm, mean segment length error was 1.3 ± 1.40 mm, and mean angles error was 1.9 ± 2.32°. The difference in error of in-house VSP compared to commercial VSP was not statistically significant for intercondylar and intergonial distance (p = 0.76), segment length (p = 0.15), or angle between segments (p = 0.92). The increased error was associated with osteoradionecrosis as the indication for surgery, greater number of segments, and secondary reconstructions.

CONCLUSION

VSP is an accurate method of maxillary and mandibular reconstruction. In-house VSP may be similar in accuracy to commercial VSP options. Higher levels of inaccuracy are likely to occur in more complex reconstructions, particularly secondary reconstructions, and in the setting of osteoradionecrosis.

Vertical mandibular bone augmentation by the osteodistraction of the transplanted fibula free flap: A case series with long-term follow-up

Vertical augmentation of the mandible to prepare dental implant therapy is still a challenge, especially with large mandible defects. Reconstruction with fibula free flap is a regularly applied approach in such cases, but it does not always yield optimal results: the resulting crestal height might differ significantly from the crestal height of the patient's intact bone, which makes esthetic and functional rehabilitation difficult. Osteodistraction of the integrated flap is a known but rarely discussed approach where the already integrated flap undergoes additional distraction. Through the four cases reported here, we would like to demonstrate that the osteodistraction of the transplanted fibula free flap is a useful and efficient method of secondary augmentation for cases where the flap itself fails to produce the desired crestal height, and no other method is applicable. The cases show that the method allows outcomes that are highly satisfactory, both in the functional and esthetic sense.

Microvascular anastomosis techniques using the medical adhesive VIVO and expandable micro-stents in a rat carotid artery model

BACKGROUND

Sutured anastomosis remains the gold standard in microvascular surgery. The procedure is not free of complications and is a time-consuming operation requiring a high level of experience. The aim of this study was to develop new methods for a stable, faster, and safer anastomosis using a novel biodegradable adhesive, VIVO, and a custom-made microvascular stent.

METHODS

The VIVO medical adhesive was used for a total of 30 anastomoses in rats in the right carotid artery: 15 anastomoses were performed with a temporary intraluminal catheter, VIVO, and reduced sutures (VIVO + TC). A further 15 anastomoses were performed with nitinol stents, VIVO, and reduced sutures (VIVO + SM). Sutured anastomoses served as controls (C) and were performed on the left carotid arteries of the 30 rats. Operation and bleeding times were assessed, and patency was evaluated by Doppler flowmetry and indocyanine green (ICG) angiography. Subsequently, the anastomoses were evaluated histopathological.

RESULTS

The overall patency was recorded as 100% in all groups. No thrombosis or circulatory disturbance was found. Compared to C and VIVO + SM, VIVO + TC proved to be significantly less traumatic, less demanding, and time-saving. The sealing properties of VIVO lead to shorter bleeding times and less oozing. In contrast, VIVO + SM proved to be the most technically demanding and time-consuming procedure.

CONCLUSION

The success of a microvascular sutured anastomosis is determined by a short ischemic interval. Compared to sutured anastomosis, VIVO + TC showed ease of use as well as shorter time taken for anastomosis, less trauma, and lower blood loss. More long-term studies on the functions, biological interactions, and survival rates of glue-based anastomoses need to be initiated.

[Digitalization and use of artificial intelligence in microvascular reconstructive facial surgery]

BACKGROUND

When using digitalization and artificial intelligence (AI), large amounts of data (big data) are produced, which can be processed by computers and used in the field of microvascular-reconstructive craniomaxillofacial surgery (CMFS).

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this article is to summarize current applications of digitalized medicine and AI in microvascular reconstructive CMFS.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Review of frequent applications of digital medicine for microvascular CMFS reconstruction, focusing on digital planning, navigation, robotics and potential applications with AI.

RESULTS

The broadest utilization of medical digitalization is in the virtual planning of microvascular transplants, individualized implants and template-guided reconstruction. Navigation is commonly used for ablative tumor surgery but less frequently in reconstructions. Robotics are mainly employed in the transoral approach for tumor surgery of the hypopharynx, whereas the use of AI is still limited even if possible applications would be automated virtual planning and monitoring systems.

CONCLUSION

The use of digitalized methods and AI are adjuncts to microvascular reconstruction. Automatization approaches and simplification of technologies will provide such applications to a broader clientele in the future; however, in CMFS, robotic-assisted resections and automated flap monitoring are not yet the standard of care.