Assessing the frequency of deep lingual concavities in 826 posterior mandible sockets

Feasibility of implant placement in healed mandibular molar sites: A retrospective cone beam computed tomography study

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

Implant placement in the mandibular molar sites plays a crucial role in the restoration of edentulous mandibles. However, the evaluation of bone quantity before implant surgery using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) is lacking.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this clinical study was to evaluate CBCT images of edentulous patients to analyze the feasibility of implant placement in healed mandibular molar sites.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The CBCT data of 138 patients were analyzed in the sagittal plane for measurements of mandibular bone height (MBH), superior bone height (SBH), inferior bone height (IBH), buccal bone width (BBW), lingual bone width (LBW), and alveolar bone widths (ABWs). The edentulous sites were categorized according to the bone quantity and complexity of the implant surgery. Multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) was used to analyze the site, sex, and age-related variations. An independent t test was used to compare the difference of bone dimension in different sites and between sexes. One-way ANOVA followed by post hoc tests were used to analyze the difference between different age groups. Categorical variables were presented as number of events and percentages. The chi-squared test was used to compare categorical variables (α=.05).

RESULTS

A total of 534 sites of interest were recorded, including 274 hemimandibles. A significant difference in BBW was found between the first and second molar sites. Men had higher MBH, SBH, IBH, and BBW than women. The distribution of implant surgical complexity in the conventional group was 63.5%, while the buccolingual tilted implant group accounted for 17.0%, and the complicated group accounted for 19.5%. Of the 274 hemimandibles, an implant could be placed directly at molar sites in 88% of situations.

CONCLUSIONS

The BBW at the mandibular second molar site was greater than that at the first molar site. The amount of available bone in the SBH and BBW was greater in men than in women at the healed molar sites. Age did not significantly affect the complexity of the implant surgery. Implants can be placed directly in healed mandibular molar sites in most patients who require a complete arch mandibular implant-supported restoration.

Quantitative and qualitative 3D analysis of mandibular lingual concavities: Implications for dental implant planning in the posterior mandible

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to investigate the type of ridge (degree of angulation of the lingual concavity) and the buccolingual dimensions in the area of the first and second molars in both genders of different ages and how this will affect implant placement in the posterior mandible.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective cross-sectional study comprised cone beam computed tomography images of 150 dental patients (75 males and 71 aged ≥30). The following were measured/reported: type (morphology) of the ridge (convex [C], parallel [P], or undercut [U]), buccolingual width at the base and the crest of the ridge, and ridge height. The concavity angle, depth, and length of the U-shaped ridge were measured too.

RESULTS

The prevalence of type U ridge ranged from 32.7% in the first molar region to 62.7% in the second molar region. Almost all measurements and ridge type distributions were comparable amongst the age groups (p > .05). Very few significant differences were found when comparing #36 versus #37 and #46 versus #47 teeth, with no differences in the distribution of the ridge types (p > .05). Quite the inverse, all measurements were statistically different when comparing #36 versus #37 and #46 versus #47 teeth, and type U ridge was more frequent in second molar compared to the first molar regions, respectively (p < .05). Many measurements were statistically higher in females; the inverse was true for a few measurements (p < .05). Type U ridge in #36 and #37 was found more frequently among males (p < .001). In contrast, the ridge types in #37 and #47 were not statistically different gender-wise.

CONCLUSIONS

The U type of ridge was more prevalent in the investigated population, encountered more frequently in the second molars generally and in the first molars of males than females. Most posterior mandibular measurements are similar age- and side-wise but seem different gender- and tooth-wise.

Relevant factors of posterior mandible lingual plate perforation during immediate implant placement: a virtual implant placement study using CBCT

BACKGROUND

To explore the influence of cross-sectional type and morphological parameters at the mandibular molar sites on lingual plate perforation (LPP) during the immediate implant placement (IIP).

METHODS

181 implants were virtually placed in the mandibular molar sites on the cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Each cross-section of the implantation site was divided into the Undercut (U)/Parallel (P)/Convex (C) types. Morphologically relevant parameters were measured on the cross-sections, including width of the upper end (Wb), width of the lower end (Wc), vertical height (V), angle between the natural crown axis and the alveolar bone axis (∠β), LC depth (LCD), LC height, and angle between the horizontal line and the line connecting the most prominent point and the most concave point of lingual plate (∠α). Besides, the distance from the end of the virtual implant and the lingual bone plate of the cross-section (D_IL) was calculated. Relationships between all the morphologically relevant parameters and the D_IL were further analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 77 (42.5%) cross-sections were classified as U-type, which was the most common one, accounting for 63% of the second molar regions. All LPP cases and most of the nearly LPP (87.9%) cases occurred at the U-type cross-sections, and the relationship between the D_IL and the morphological parameters can be expressed by a multivariate linear equation.

CONCLUSIONS

The occurrence rate of U-type cross-sections in the second molar region was very high, and the risk of LPP should be considered during IIP. Except for the U-type, significant large LCD, small Wc, and large ∠β were the important relevant factors. CBCT and multivariate linear equations could help to assess the LPP risk and provide a reference for implant placement design pre-surgery.

Effects of Crest Morphology on Lingual Concavity in Mandibular Molar Region: an Observational Study

Objectives

The aim of this radiological study is to evaluate the lingual concavity dimensions and possible implant length in each posterior tooth region according to posterior crest type classification by using cone-beam computed tomography.

Material and Methods

According to inclusion criteria, 836 molar teeth regions from 209 cone-beam computed tomography images were evaluated. Posterior crest type (concave, parallel, or convex), possible implant length, lingual concavity angle, width, and depth were recorded.

Results

In each posterior tooth region, concave (U-type) crest was detected most frequently while convex (C-type) was the lowest. Possible implant length values were higher in second molar regions than first molars. Lingual concavity width and depth were decreasing from second molars to first molars for both sides. Additionally, lingual concavity angle showed higher values in second molar sites than first molars. In all molar teeth regions, lingual concavity width values were the highest in concave (U-type) crest type while they were the lowest in convex (C-type) crest type (P < 0.05). Lingual concavity angle values were recorded as the highest in concave (U-type) and the lowest in convex (C-type) crest type at the left first molar and right molars (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

The lingual concavity dimensions and possible implant length may vary according to crest type and edentulous tooth region. Due to this effect, the surgeons should examine crest type clinically and radiologically. All parameters in the present study are decreasing while moving from anterior to posterior as well as from concave (U-type) to convex (C-type) morphologies.