Treatment of orbital blowout fracture using a customized rigid carrier

Presurgical Virtual Planning and Intraoperative Navigation with 3D-Preformed Mesh: A New Protocol for Primary Orbital Fracture Reconstruction

PURPOSE

This pilot study aims to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of computer-assisted surgery protocol with 3D-preformed orbital titanium mesh (3D-POTM), using presurgical virtual planning and intraoperative navigation in primary inferomedial orbital fracture reconstruction.

METHODS

Between March 2021 and March 2023, perioperative data of patients undergoing surgery for unilateral inferomedial orbital fracture treated with 3D-POTM were analyzed. Presurgical virtual planning with a Standard Triangle Language file of preformed mesh was conducted using the mirrored unaffected contralateral side as a reference, and intraoperative navigation was used. The reconstruction accuracy was determined by: correspondence between postoperative reconstruction mesh position with presurgical virtual planning and difference among the reconstructed and the unaffected orbital volume. Pre- and postoperative diplopia and enophthalmos were assessed.

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients were included. Isolated orbital floor fracture was reported in 14 (53.8%) patients, meanwhile medial wall and floor one in 12 (46.1%) cases. The mean difference between final plate position and ideal digital plan was 0.692 mm (95% CI: 0.601-0.783). The mean volume difference between reconstructed and unaffected orbit was 1.02 mL (95% CI: 0.451-1.589). Preoperative diplopia was settled out in all cases and enophthalmos in 19 (76.2%) of 21 patients.

CONCLUSION

The proposed protocol is an adaptable and reliable workflow for the early treatment of inferomedial orbital fractures. It enables precise preoperative planning and intraoperative procedures, mitigating pitfalls and complications, and delivering excellent reconstruction, all while maintaining reasonable costs and commitment times.

Customized orbital implant versus 3D preformed titanium mesh for orbital fracture repair: A retrospective comparative analysis of orbital reconstruction accuracy

This study aimed to compare the accuracy of inferomedial orbital fracture restoration using customized orbital implant versus 3D preformed titanium mesh. Patients were divided into two groups. Group 1 underwent surgery with customized orbital implants and intraoperative navigation, while group 2 was treated using 3D preformed titanium meshes with preoperative virtual surgical planning (VSP) and intraoperative navigation. Reconstruction accuracy was assessed by: (1) comparing the postoperative reconstruction mesh position with the preoperative VSP; and (2) measuring the difference between the reconstructed and unaffected orbital volume. Pre- and postoperative diplopia and enophthalmos were also evaluated. Fifty-two patients were enrolled (25 in group 1 vs 27 in group 2). The mean difference between final plate position and ideal digital plan was 0.62 mm (SD = 0.235) in group 1 and 0.69 mm (SD = 0.246) in group 2, with no statistical difference between the groups (p = 0.282). The mean volume differences between the reconstructed and unaffected orbits were 0.95 ml and 1.02 ml in group 1 and group 2, respectively, with no significant difference between the groups (p = 0.860). Overall clinical improvements, as well as complications, were similar. 3D preformed titanium meshes can reconstruct inferomedial fractures with the same accuracy as customized implants. Therefore, in clinical practice, it is recommended to use 3D preformed meshes for this type of fracture due to their excellent results and the potential for reducing time and costs.

Evaluating the Accuracy and Reliability of Blowout Fracture Area Measurement Methods: A Review and the Potential Role of Artificial Intelligence

Blowout fractures are a common type of facial injury that requires accurate measurement of the fracture area for proper treatment planning. This systematic review aimed to summarize and evaluate the current methods for measuring blowout fracture areas and explore the potential role of artificial intelligence (AI) in enhancing accuracy and reliability. A comprehensive search of the PubMed database was conducted, focusing on studies published since 2000 that investigated methods for measuring blowout fracture area using computed tomography scans. The review included 20 studies, and the results showed that automatic methods, such as computer-aided measurements and computed tomography-based volumetric analysis, provide higher accuracy and reliability compared with manual and semiautomatic techniques. Standardizing the method for measuring blowout fracture areas can improve clinical decision-making and facilitate outcome comparison across studies. Future research should focus on developing AI models that can account for multiple factors, including fracture area and herniated tissue volume, to enhance their accuracy and reliability. Integration of AI models has the potential to improve clinical decision-making and patient outcomes in the assessment and management of blowout fractures.

Accuracy of intraoperative navigation for orbital fracture repair: A retrospective morphometric analysis

In this retrospective case series, patients undergoing surgery to treat isolated orbital floor fractures were morphometrically analyzed. Cloud Compare was used to compare mesh positioning with a virtual plan, using the distance-to-nearest-neighbor method. To assess the accuracy of mesh positioning, a mesh area percentage (MAP) parameter was introduced and three distance ranges were defined as the outcome measures: the 'high-accuracy range' included MAPs at a distance of 0-1 mm from the preoperative plan; the 'intermediate-accuracy range' included MAPs at a distance of 1.1-2 mm from the preoperative plan; the 'low-accuracy range' included MAPs at a distance of >2 mm from the preoperative plan. To complete the study, morphometric analysis of the results was combined with clinical judgment ('excellent', 'good', or 'poor') of mesh positioning by two independent blind observers. In total, 73 of 137 orbital fractures met the inclusion criteria. In the 'high-accuracy range' the mean, minimum, and maximum MAP values were 64%, 22%, and 90%, respectively. In the 'intermediate-accuracy range', the mean, minimum, and maximum values were 24%, 10%, and 42%, respectively. In the 'low-accuracy range', the values were 12%, 1%, and 48%, respectively. Both observers classified 24 cases of mesh positioning as 'excellent', 34 as 'good', and 12 as 'poor'. Within the limitations of the study, it seems that virtual surgical planning and intraoperative navigation has the potential to add quality to the repair of the orbital floor and, therefore, should be taken into consideration whenever appropriate.

Primary reconstruction of combined orbital and zygomatic complex fractures with patient-specific milled titanium implants - A retrospective study

The aim of this retrospective study was to compare mid-facial symmetry and clinical outcomes between patients treated with patient-specific and standard implants in primary fracture reconstructions of combined orbital and zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures. Patients who underwent primary reconstruction of orbital and zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures during the study period were identified and background and clinical variables and computed tomography images were collected from patient records. Zygomaticomaxillary complex dislocation and orbital volume were measured from pre- and postoperative images and compared between groups. Out of 165 primary orbital reconstructions, eight patients treated with patient-specific and 12 patients treated with standard implants were identified with mean follow-up time of was 110 days and 121 days, respectively. Postoperative orbital volume difference was similar between groups (0.2 ml for patient-specific vs 0.3 ml for standard implants, p = 0.942) despite larger preoperative difference in patient-specific implant group (2.1 ml vs 1,5 ml, p = 0.428), although no statistical differences were obtained in symmetricity or accuracy between the reconstruction groups. Within the limitations of the study it seems that patient-specific implants are a viable option for primary reconstructions of combined zygomaticomaxillary complex and orbital fractures, because with patient-specific implants at least as symmetrical results as with standard implants can be obtained in a single surgery.

Application of customized integration titanium mesh in the treatment of complicated zygomatic complex fractures: A prospective randomized clinical study

The present study aimed to quantitatively evaluate the outcomes of the application of customized integration titanium mesh (CITM) in treating unilateral complicated zygomatic complex fractures. A prospective, randomized, controlled clinical study was conducted. Patients were randomly divided into the experimental group who underwent treatment with CITM, and the control group who underwent treatment just with traditional titanium plates. The X² test and student t-test were used for statistical analyses. Twenty patients who required surgery for unilateral complicated zygomatic complex fracture were included in this study. The results showed that the mean of average distance (AD) between pre- and postoperative CT measurements was 0.487 mm in the experimental group and 1.173 mm in the control group (P < 0.001). Compared with the control group, the experimental group had superior zygomatico-facial symmetry (P＜0.05), a shorter average operation time (150 min versus 229 min; P < 0.001), and a higher rate of anatomic reduction (80.0% versus 30.0%; P＜0.05). In conclusion, CITM deserves to be promoted for the treatment of complicated zygomatic complex fractures. TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.chictr.org.cn (ChiCTR1800016818).